No, please do not ask for mosre posts from this guy. I have too little bandwidth as it
is.
Charles Johnson
Manager, IS Applications
Phone: 463-6527
Fax: 463-6503
Help Desk: 463-6516
Remember the heroes of UAL Flight 93
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sunday, November 24, 2002 12:08:11 AM >>>
On Sat, 2002
Which will be a shame, but in the end, that won't work and just strengthen Micro$oft's
hand in the OS market.
A part of the point of Open Source is that it is...well...open. An attempt to close it
to some binaries is counter productive and counter philosophical (to coin a phrase).
It will splin
Hello David,
> I didn't ask for a NVIDIA driver?
> I asked for a DRIVER that is under a OSS license, I believe the MPL. Hmmm
> wait sorry, that alone should make this a MUTE point in that RH can
> distribute MPL software w/ GPL. But somehow every moron w/ a bone to pick
> with MS decided to jump
>
>You remind me of that one random annoying person on our mailing
>lists each release, that makes me sick enough to not want to help
>people on our lists any more, as I'm not paid to do so, and I no
>longer enjoy the experience.
>
>So on that note, I bid the mailing list goodbye. I don't need to
David Durst wrote:
>
> > "Mike A. Harris" wrote:
> >>
> >
> >
> > . . . text whacked
> >
> >>
> >> Feel free to fight amongst yourselves.
> >>
> >
> >
> > Wish you could ignore the agitator & not leave the forum, Mike. I try to
> > read all the posts by RH employees. I never know what info I may f
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 23 Nov 2002 23:23:35 -0800 (PST), David Durst wrote:
> > Mike A. Harris wrote:
> >
> >>You remind me of that one random annoying person on our mailing
> >>lists each release, that makes me sick enough to not want to help
> >> people on our lis
On Sat, 23 Nov 2002, David Durst wrote:
> So I will just go and un-install all 1500 RH machines I have installed at
> small companies.
Hey, if you want support from Red Hat, you're free to buy it from them.
> This is the exact sorta talk that will destroy the community if you
> are not carefull.
> Don't mince words. Binary only modules are binary only modules. It is
> stupid to think that Red Hat would ship binary modules and
> not ship the source code, or that Red Hat would ship binary
> modules that someone else compiled if source was available.
>
> There was no lack of clarity in wha
> Mike A. Harris wrote:
>
>>You remind me of that one random annoying person on our mailing
>>lists each release, that makes me sick enough to not want to help
>> people on our lists any more, as I'm not paid to do so, and I no
>> longer enjoy the experience.
>>
>>So on that note, I bid the mailing
I know its pittifull compared to Mikes achievements and all, and I am sure
its lame in comparison to you and all also.
So I will just go and un-install all 1500 RH machines I have installed at
small companies.
Thanks for your great insight into the underlying problem
This is the exact sorta talk
Mike A. Harris wrote:
You remind me of that one random annoying person on our mailing
lists each release, that makes me sick enough to not want to help
people on our lists any more, as I'm not paid to do so, and I no
longer enjoy the experience.
So on that note, I bid the mailing list goodbye.
On Sat, 2002-11-23 at 22:41, David Durst wrote:
> Once again, someone that didn't read the ORIGINAL POST and still thinks
> the driver I asked for is a CLOSED SOURCE DRIVER.
>
You are a stupid moron, David Durst. Nobody on this list will miss you
if you decide to leave, but *A LOT* of people (in
> "Mike A. Harris" wrote:
>>
>
>
> . . . text whacked
>
>>
>> Feel free to fight amongst yourselves.
>>
>
>
> Wish you could ignore the agitator & not leave the forum, Mike. I try to
> read all the posts by RH employees. I never know what info I may find
> valuable in those posts.
It might have be
> On Saturday 23 November 2002 18:50, jdow uttered:
>> Indeed, he is in a position to REQUEST. He is not in a position to
>> demand. He is apparently too inexperienced with the world to have
>> learned the difference. Incidentally, Red Hat's attidude about modules
>> for which no source is availabl
> Amazing, someone got under Mike's collar. I wonder who could bozo
> well enough to manage that?
I didn't ask for a NVIDIA driver?
I asked for a DRIVER that is under a OSS license, I believe the MPL. Hmmm
wait sorry, that alone should make this a MUTE point in that RH can
distribute MPL software
On Saturday 23 November 2002 18:50, jdow uttered:
> Indeed, he is in a position to REQUEST. He is not in a position to
> demand. He is apparently too inexperienced with the world to have
> learned the difference. Incidentally, Red Hat's attidude about modules
> for which no source is available, suc
Amazing, someone got under Mike's collar. I wonder who could bozo
well enough to manage that?
{O.O}
From: "Mike A. Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Sat, 23 Nov 2002, David Durst wrote:
>
> >> A full install does not install every single RPM package. There
> >> is a reason for that.
> >
> >Sound
"Mike A. Harris" wrote:
>
. . . text whacked
>
> Feel free to fight amongst yourselves.
>
Wish you could ignore the agitator & not leave the forum, Mike. I try to
read all the posts by RH employees. I never know what info I may find
valuable in those posts.
-toby
--
Psyche-list mailin
On Sat, 23 Nov 2002, David Durst wrote:
>> A full install does not install every single RPM package. There
>> is a reason for that.
>
>Sounds like you are clueless for what I am asking.
>And you never stated Binary ONLY modules, I believe you said
>binary modules (Which really doesn't make sense
19 matches
Mail list logo
