> On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, Kevin McConnell wrote:
>
>> --- "William F. Acker WB2FLW +1-303-777-8123"
>> > I haven't been bitten by that one yet, but you'd be
>> > surprised how many
>> > sites use Javascript. Lynx doesn't handle that at
>> > all. The Gnome
>> > Accessibility Project is coming along,
Ah yes, you are another friend restricted to lynx or flakey
screen readers. Important things should be accessible to the
greatest extent possible in text only modes as the most
universally accessible mode.
{^_^} (I'm vain enough I want EVERYONE to have access to
my genius. {O,o} Ack! Plb
On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, Kevin McConnell wrote:
> --- "William F. Acker WB2FLW +1-303-777-8123"
> > I haven't been bitten by that one yet, but you'd be
> > surprised how many
> > sites use Javascript. Lynx doesn't handle that at
> > all. The Gnome
> > Accessibility Project is coming along, so I s
From: "Jesse Keating" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Thursday 19 December 2002 07:35, Kevin McConnell uttered:
> > But my point being that, we all know you wouldn't be
> > very happy if you went and visited a site that you
> > couldn't know what was going on simply because
> > everything there was graph
From: "Kevin McConnell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> --- "William F. Acker WB2FLW +1-303-777-8123"
> > I haven't been bitten by that one yet, but you'd be
> > surprised how many
> > sites use Javascript. Lynx doesn't handle that at
> > all. The Gnome
> > Accessibility Project is coming along, so I sh
On Thursday 19 December 2002 07:35, Kevin McConnell uttered:
> But my point being that, we all know you wouldn't be
> very happy if you went and visited a site that you
> couldn't know what was going on simply because
> everything there was graphical. I'm an old schooler
> who believes that the int
--- "William F. Acker WB2FLW +1-303-777-8123"
> I haven't been bitten by that one yet, but you'd be
> surprised how many
> sites use Javascript. Lynx doesn't handle that at
> all. The Gnome
> Accessibility Project is coming along, so I should
> be OK with JS and
> possibly Flash, eventually.
On Mon, 16 Dec 2002, Kevin McConnell wrote:
>
> --- jdow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Just so long as your friends are nice enough people
> > to code the
> > sites so that the information content is available
> > to those who
> > do not have flash players. Like, I am sure my blind
> > friend Jo
On Tue, 2002-12-17 at 10:27, Scott Kindley wrote:
> They both work for me using flash6
>
Did you ever have flash 4 or 5 installed?
Tony
--
Anthony Joseph Seward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
On Tue, 2002-12-17 at 12:14, Anthony Joseph Seward wrote:
> I am getting crashes when I view either http://www.elpais.es/ or
> http://www.lemonde.fr/ with the pluggin from Warren installed. Could
> someone verify this please? I see the crashes with both
> mozilla-1.0.1-26 and galeon-1.2.6-0.8.0.
I am getting crashes when I view either http://www.elpais.es/ or
http://www.lemonde.fr/ with the pluggin from Warren installed. Could
someone verify this please? I see the crashes with both
mozilla-1.0.1-26 and galeon-1.2.6-0.8.0.
These were working OK with the old plugins that I had (4 and 5).
Thank you for taking your time to package flash. Works great on my systems.
Robert.
Warren Togami wrote:
http://macromedia.mplug.org
Thursday (12/12/2002) Macromedia released Flash 6 for Linux x86. I
have obtained permission from Macromedia to redistribute their plugin
in Linux friendly ways.
--- David Durst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All I have to say on that matter is from what I hear
> there has been
> alot of accesibility work being done, for specific I
> have not heard the
> products.
I would applaud their work if they had something for
those using text to speech converters to
--- jdow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just so long as your friends are nice enough people
> to code the
> sites so that the information content is available
> to those who
> do not have flash players. Like, I am sure my blind
> friend Joe
> Lazarro would REALLY enjoy a commerce or corporate
> site
> Just so long as your friends are nice enough people to code the
> sites so that the information content is available to those who
> do not have flash players. Like, I am sure my blind friend Joe
> Lazarro would REALLY enjoy a commerce or corporate site that
> bounces him if he doesn't have flash.
From: "David Durst" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Hey I don't like the crap anymore than you. What I am saying is that
> about 75% of my friends are web developers. Of as late most of the
> requests the
> have been getting are for full FLASH sites. :(
Just so long as your friends are nice enough people
David Durst wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 2002-12-15 at 04:25, David Durst wrote:
> >> > I guess flash can be useful for making kids web games, but I'd
> >> rather see java games. Anyway, flash is one of the things that
> >> annoys me most about the web.
> >>
> >> So sorry to hear that you hate flash so m
> On Sun, 2002-12-15 at 04:25, David Durst wrote:
>> > I guess flash can be useful for making kids web games, but I'd
>> rather see java games. Anyway, flash is one of the things that
>> annoys me most about the web.
>>
>> So sorry to hear that you hate flash so much, but just to give you a
>> hea
On Sun, 2002-12-15 at 04:25, David Durst wrote:
> > I guess flash can be useful for making kids web games, but I'd rather
> > see java games. Anyway, flash is one of the things that annoys me most
> > about the web.
>
> So sorry to hear that you hate flash so much, but just to give you a heads
>
> On Sat, 2002-12-14 at 01:01, Warren Togami wrote:
>
>> The format is "open" only if you sign an NDA to receive the
>> specifications. If you read that page, you will see that they allow
>> you to only make apps that output SWF files, not play SWF.
>
> And this is a good reason to not use or sup
John Kodis wrote:
The format is "open" only if you sign an NDA to receive the
specifications. If you read that page, you will see that they allow you
to only make apps that output SWF files, not play SWF.
There seems to be some ambiguity in the license. While they
specifically allow you to
On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 08:01:50PM -1000, Warren Togami wrote:
> Gordon Messmer wrote:
>
> >Flash 6 is an open, documented file format:
> >http://www.macromedia.com/software/flash/open/licensing/fileformat/faq.html
> >
> >Macromedia even suggests on the above page that you search
> >sourceforge.ne
On Sat, 2002-12-14 at 01:01, Warren Togami wrote:
> The format is "open" only if you sign an NDA to receive the
> specifications. If you read that page, you will see that they allow you
> to only make apps that output SWF files, not play SWF.
And this is a good reason to not use or support it.
Viestissä Lauantai 14. Joulukuuta 2002 01:12, Warren Togami kirjoitti:
> Did you have CrossOver Plugin wine + Windows Flash plugin installed by
> chance?
No.
> Have you installed any Flash plugins into ~/.mozilla/plugins?
No.
I did have flash_linux-5.0-50.i386.rpm from the "Multimedia and Office
Gordon Messmer wrote:
No, Macromedia is still a proprietary company with plenty of
intellectual property to protect. There are likely several patents
including Sorenson video codec within the source code, making it
impossible to open source.
I've never heard that Sorenson or Quicktime were us
On Fri, 2002-12-13 at 01:42, Warren Togami wrote:
> David Durst wrote:
> > Hm, this is interesting.
> > I didn't hear that they had started work on the x86 plugin till last week.
> > Is the source available?
>
> No, Macromedia is still a proprietary company with plenty of
> intellectual p
Markku Kolkka wrote:
Viestissä Perjantai 13. Joulukuuta 2002 20:42, Warren Togami kirjoitti:
Try closing Mozilla completely (check ps aux to make sure all processes
are gone), run setup again then restart mozilla.
That help?
No.
However, I noticed that the plugin works if I run Mozilla as r
Viestissä Perjantai 13. Joulukuuta 2002 20:42, Warren Togami kirjoitti:
> Try closing Mozilla completely (check ps aux to make sure all processes
> are gone), run setup again then restart mozilla.
>
> That help?
No.
However, I noticed that the plugin works if I run Mozilla as root. It doesn't
wo
Markku Kolkka wrote:
I installed the plugin, but it doesn't appear in Mozilla's plugin list. I
tried running /usr/lib/flash-plugin/setup according to the FAQ, but it didn't
help. There were no error messages during installation or setup, rpm -V
flash-plugin doesn't report any errors, and there
I installed the plugin, but it doesn't appear in Mozilla's plugin list. I
tried running /usr/lib/flash-plugin/setup according to the FAQ, but it didn't
help. There were no error messages during installation or setup, rpm -V
flash-plugin doesn't report any errors, and there are symlinks in
/usr/
David Durst wrote:
Hm, this is interesting.
I didn't hear that they had started work on the x86 plugin till last week.
Is the source available?
No, Macromedia is still a proprietary company with plenty of
intellectual property to protect. There are likely several patents
including Sor
Hm, this is interesting.
I didn't hear that they had started work on the x86 plugin till last week.
Is the source available?
Do they have a posting the site about the release?
> http://macromedia.mplug.org
>
> Thursday (12/12/2002) Macromedia released Flash 6 for Linux x86. I have
> obtain
32 matches
Mail list logo
