Re: Access

2003-01-22 Thread kbb0927
Tried it. Liked it. It's great. I just dunno python at all and having a helluva time. It is just what I need, however, to access my mysql files on my linux server (a home net) using either winbloze or linux. I have a home based business that I track inventory as well as some other things. I have D

Re: Access

2003-01-22 Thread Keith Winston
Bill Reid wrote: On Tue, 2003-01-21 at 13:24, Vasyl wrote: > Hi! > Is there an alternative to MS Access under Linux? > Vasyl Kenyuk > As suggested by Michael Knepher OpenOffice is certainly an option. A good starting point is: OpenOffice.org 1.0, ODBC, and MySQL How-to ... The Kompany

Re: Access

2003-01-21 Thread Michael J. Denton
Please excuse the typos in my last post! :) Mike -- Psyche-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list

Re: Access

2003-01-21 Thread Michael J. Denton
> > Hi! > > Is there an alternative to MS Access under Linux? > > Vasyl Kenyuk There have been some good suggests for far regarding Access alternatives for Linux. This article has a really detailed list of SQL Databases for Linux. http://freshmeat.net/articles/view/305/ Hope that helps. Mik

Re: Access

2003-01-21 Thread Bill Reid
On Tue, 2003-01-21 at 13:24, Vasyl wrote: > Hi! > Is there an alternative to MS Access under Linux? > Vasyl Kenyuk > As suggested by Michael Knepher OpenOffice is certainly an option. A good starting point is: OpenOffice.org 1.0, ODBC, and MySQL How-to ... http://www.unixodbc.org/doc/OOoMyS

Re: Access

2003-01-21 Thread Michael Knepher
On Tue, 2003-01-21 at 13:24, Vasyl wrote: > Hi! > Is there an alternative to MS Access under Linux? > Vasyl Kenyuk > It depends on what you need to do. There are a number of powerful databases available - Red Hat 8.0 ships with PostgreSQL and MySQL. I've been learning MySQL for an intranet projec

Re: access time-outs with mozilla and Inbox Monitor

2003-01-14 Thread Michael Kuss
On Tue, 14 Jan 2003, Derek Martin wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 07:19:45PM +0100, Michael Kuss wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I assume both errors are related, that's why I post them together. > > Well, I've never seen any of the behavior you descr