On Sun, 2003-03-30 at 16:47, Joe Klemmer wrote:
> On Sun, 2003-03-30 at 10:13, Pavel Rozenboim wrote:
>
> > > It's much more fun to read the FUD. After all, there is no
> > > 8.1 because Red Hat jumped the gun and went right to Red Hat
> > > Linux 9. That changes everything, Chicken Little. If th
On Sun, 2003-03-30 at 10:13, Pavel Rozenboim wrote:
> > It's much more fun to read the FUD. After all, there is no
> > 8.1 because Red Hat jumped the gun and went right to Red Hat
> > Linux 9. That changes everything, Chicken Little. If they had
> > just called it Red Hat Linux 8.1, it would have
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael Fratoni [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sun, March 30, 2003 4:48 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: About RH9 "usefulness"
>
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Sunday 30
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 30 March 2003 09:13 am, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 29, 2003 00:28:52 at 12:28:52AM -0800, Eric Burke wrote:
> > > The bottom line is for a corporate desktop, RH no
> > > longer serves the purpose. Once compatibility is broken by
On Sat, 2003-03-29 at 04:45, M. Fioretti wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 29, 2003 00:28:52 at 12:28:52AM -0800, Eric Burke ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> wrote:
> >
> > The bottom line is for a corporate desktop, RH no
> > longer serves the purpose. Once compatibility is broken by adding
> > something no one else is
On Sat, 2003-03-29 at 12:17, Jesse Keating wrote:
> Perhaps everybody just needs a big foam clue bat attack on the differences
> between "Free as in speech" and "Free as in beer".
Amen brother! In fact I would offer that some need a genuine
Louisville Slugger.
--
Farewell neighbor. T
On Sat, 29 Mar 2003 09:17:36 -0800, you wrote:
>Of course, I would note that "RH" is much more than the GPL Red Hat Linux
>product. I don't see NPTL going into RHEL, so that is still _very_ much
>viable for a corporate desktop. What I see is a lot of people that were
Ironically enough Red Ha
Hiya,
>
> Perhaps everybody just needs a big foam clue bat attack on the differences
> between "Free as in speech" and "Free as in beer".
I snipped most as i agree with most. I like the statement of the clue
bat as well, and will use it back ;)
I have paid for boxed sets since 5.2, as I do app
On Saturday 29 March 2003 01:45, M. Fioretti uttered:
> On Sat, Mar 29, 2003 00:28:52 at 12:28:52AM -0800, Eric Burke
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > The bottom line is for a corporate desktop, RH no
> > longer serves the purpose. Once compatibility is broken by adding
> > something no one else is
