-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 25 Nov 2002, Ivaylo Toshev wrote:
> Why there is no option: REMOVE BLUCURVE !? If anyone wants to use
> it - OK, but if i dont - what ?
It was my understanding that Bluecurve is just a theme so you
should be able to get standard KDE
Tim Waugh wrote:
On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 08:58:54PM +0100, Jean Francois Martinez wrote:
2) Better printing management. For one thing when switching from LPRng
to CUPS and viceversa I really expect the tool to take care of
evrything: ie install the missing parts, stop and start daemons.
On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 08:58:54PM +0100, Jean Francois Martinez wrote:
> 2) Better printing management. For one thing when switching from LPRng
> to CUPS and viceversa I really expect the tool to take care of
> evrything: ie install the missing parts, stop and start daemons.
I agree, and I thin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 24 Nov 2002 15:16:35 +0100, Peter Boy wrote:
> e.g. Mandrake
> May be because of so many bugs they disabled the bug report facility
> for their users (you have not only to register as with Redhat or SuSE,
> but you have to apply and qualify as a bu
Mandrake 8.* and 9.0 never did work for me, I tried 3 different cd's for
MD 9.0, invariably the installer has troubles to open and install
packages, mostly the kernel and or xfree.
I gave up, no such problems with SuSE or Redhat 8.0
Herman
On Sunday 24 November 2002 5:34 am, Anthony Abby wrote:
>
On Fri, 22 Nov 2002, Rob Blomquist wrote:
>Let's see, I am stuck trying to install kdeadmin and koffice from source, and
>I am finding that RH has customized things so that we either have to use the
>RH version of KDE, or forget it.
What is wrong with the included kdeadmin and koffice that are
On Sat, 23 Nov 2002, Marco Fioretti wrote:
>> Plese. I do not want the problem solved for myself I want
>> solved for everyone and that means a native form.
>
>Why can't that "native form" be "completely intgrate apt-get for RPM
>and synaptic" in standard Red Hat?
If you wan't Debian,
On Sat, Nov 23, 2002 11:42:46 at 11:42:46AM +0100, Jean Francois Martinez
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >
>
> Plese. I do not want the problem solved for myself I want
> solved for everyone and that means a native form.
Why can't that "native form" be "completely intgrate apt-get for
On Sat, Nov 23, 2002 00:31:01 at 12:31:01AM -0800, David Durst ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
>
> I think to appease more users RH needs to come out w/ a TECHNICAL &
> NON-TECHNICAL distribution.
>
David,
I agree with you, but one can already have a "TECHNICAL" RH 8.0
distribution, as you call it. I
Great.
Not to be a dick but.
I think RH has done a great thing for the overall MARKET in 8.0.
But what RH needs to remember and I think what I see you are angry at
is that 8.0 is not for you and not for the typical LINUX user.
But by no means is 8.0 NOT Linux, in fact I think it is the embodiment
On Friday 22 November 2002 11:58 am, Jean Francois Martinez wrote:
Let's see, I am stuck trying to install kdeadmin and koffice from source, and
I am finding that RH has customized things so that we either have to use the
RH version of KDE, or forget it.
As far as I am concerned:
RH broke the
Jean Francois Martinez wrote:
1) Better package management: At last we got an RPM front end who
Use apt-get and Synaptic for better package management. Find this and
many other tips on my Red Hat 8.0 Tips & Tricks page.
http://www.mplug.org/phpwiki/index.php/RedHat8.0TipsTricks
--
Psyche
12 matches
Mail list logo
