At 12:00 PM 2/14/2003 -0600, Dave Sherman wrote:
>According to the Linux-Tested website, the driver module to use is dmfc.
Yeah, I checked that. I notice that Redhat is the one that did the test, also.
>Run the command 'lsmod' to list the kernel modules currently loaded, and
confirm that thi
On Fri, 2003-02-14 at 11:08, John Nall wrote:
> OK, I guess it is time to get down to the specifics now, and ask for some
> specific advice. I am running RH8.0 on my 4300S and cannot activate
> eth0. It fails. Fails when it boots up, and then fails again if I try
> and acti
dated against Red Hat Linux
6.0 and a 2.2.5 kernel. I'd be surprised if it's no longer supported.
OK, I guess it is time to get down to the specifics now, and ask for some
specific advice. I am running RH8.0 on my 4300S and cannot activate
eth0. It fails. Fails when it boots up, and
On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 05:06:14PM -0500, John Nall wrote:
> I've Google-searched and searched the hardware compatibility list at Redhat
> and cannot find whether the Dell Dimension 4300S is, or is not, certified to
> run Linux on.
>
> Anyone know??? I'm trying to ins
On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 08:23:17PM -0500, John Nall wrote:
> OK. Did that, and one problem has to do with the modem, which I have now
> ascertained to be a WinModem (Conexant HCF) and I know those don't work on
> Linux, or at least not without some extra effort. So the modem is put
> aside f
On Thu, 13 Feb 2003, John Nall wrote:
> OK. Did that, and one problem has to do with the modem, which I have now
> ascertained to be a WinModem (Conexant HCF) and I know those don't work on
> Linux, or at least not without some extra effort. So the modem is put
> aside for now (may come bac
At 04:17 PM 2/13/2003 -0600, Dave Sherman wrote:
>In my experience, it isn't whole systems that are certified, but rather
subsystems (video card, sound card, network card, etc.). That being the
case, you can simply get a list of the hardware in your Dell, and
compare that against the various com
On Thu, 2003-02-13 at 16:06, John Nall wrote:
> I've Google-searched and searched the hardware compatibility list at Redhat
> and cannot find whether the Dell Dimension 4300S is, or is not, certified to
> run Linux on.
>
> Anyone know??? I'm trying to install RH8.
I've Google-searched and searched the hardware compatibility list at Redhat
and cannot find whether the Dell Dimension 4300S is, or is not, certified to
run Linux on.
Anyone know??? I'm trying to install RH8.0 on one, and it seems to install
OK but there are some problems. If the h
With Text mode goes Ok. Seems to be any type of bug in the GUI
isntallation.
HTH
Regards
--
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
Hi:
I'm trying to install RH8.0 on a Dell Latitude C600. At the begining
all seems go well, I can select language, keyboard and mouse. The problem
comes after the selection of the type of install. Even i try Desktop,
workstation, server or custom, the systems seems to freeze, and some
mi
--- Ed Wilts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 11:17:57AM -0700, Kevin
> McConnell wrote:
> >
> > Right now (not this machine) but one of my other
> > machines, I have RH 8.0 installed on a regular
> pentium
> > 200 MHz with 64MB RAM and a 4MB video card, and it
> > runs fairly
On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 11:17:57AM -0700, Kevin McConnell wrote:
>
> Right now (not this machine) but one of my other
> machines, I have RH 8.0 installed on a regular pentium
> 200 MHz with 64MB RAM and a 4MB video card, and it
> runs fairly fast until I fire up X-windows. I have
According to
--- Andrew Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Actually, this was from a very old thread discussing
> older hardware
> using Linux or Windows
I think RH has improved a little on older HW since
that thread started, which I believe was on the 7.2
list IIRC.
>
> You will find that WinXPHome even run
On Tue, 2002-10-22 at 08:54, Oisin C. Feeley wrote:
> >
> > I'm running RH 8.0 quite happily on my K6-2 400 at work, and I'll
> > hopefully be able to push to get everyone here switched over from
> > Windows. It's not as fast as on my Athlon XP 1800+ at home, but it's a
> > big improvement over Ma
On 22 Oct 2002, Michael Knepher wrote:
> On Mon, 2002-10-21 at 12:06, Thomas Dodd wrote:
> > Andrew Smith wrote:
> > > Yes there is no point running KDE/Gnome on anything much below a PIII 500
> > > (I know that as a fact in earlier releases - a PII 333 is too slow)
> > > but you do NOT need X to
On Mon, 2002-10-21 at 12:06, Thomas Dodd wrote:
> Andrew Smith wrote:
> > Yes there is no point running KDE/Gnome on anything much below a PIII 500
> > (I know that as a fact in earlier releases - a PII 333 is too slow)
> > but you do NOT need X to run a server - my DNS/mail server is only a
>
> G
17 matches
Mail list logo
