RE: Sendmail config

2003-02-04 Thread Christian Thibodeau
On Mon, 2003-01-27 at 17:20, Raul Acevedo wrote: > Ok, I managed to fix my other problems. However, I still get all mail > delivered locally (i.e. to the firewall box), whether it originates from > outside the firewall or from within the firewall box. It never gets > routed to my internal Linux b

RE: Sendmail config

2003-02-04 Thread Brian Johnson
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote*: > >> -Original Message- >> From: Brian Johnson >> Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:36 AM >> Subject: Re: Sendmail config >> >> >> I am now playing with DaemonPortOptions and Modifiers=b in >> sendmail to have computers use port 30

RE: Sendmail config

2003-01-31 Thread Cowles, Steve
> -Original Message- > From: Brian Johnson > Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:36 AM > Subject: Re: Sendmail config > > > I am now playing with DaemonPortOptions and Modifiers=b in > sendmail to have computers use port 30 (but still want local > connections th

Re: Sendmail config

2003-01-30 Thread Randy Kelsoe
Brian Johnson wrote: Maybe I need a simpler explanation: Computer A is main mail server Computer B is computer I want to forward from (to Computer A) - mainly system email Computer C is another computer on the LAN with computer A (behind the firewall) Computer D is totally unrelated to email scen

Re: Sendmail config

2003-01-30 Thread Brian Johnson
I am now playing with DaemonPortOptions and Modifiers=b in sendmail to have computers use port 30 (but still want local connections through port 25 so trying two ports on local machine) Can now telnet on port 30 from computer B to computer A Still not getting mail through ... but at least now sho

Re: Sendmail config

2003-01-30 Thread Brian Johnson
Maybe I need a simpler explanation: Computer A is main mail server Computer B is computer I want to forward from (to Computer A) - mainly system email Computer C is another computer on the LAN with computer A (behind the firewall) Computer D is totally unrelated to email scenario, just another node

Re: Sendmail config

2003-01-30 Thread Jay Crews
Brian Johnson writes > > I can telnet to port 25 of the local machine from a different remote machine (my > home machine through a different ISP) > > *snip snip* > > Could the ISP be blocking port 25? Why would they do that? Absolutely! They could. Because they don't want you running a

RE: Sendmail config

2003-01-29 Thread Brian Johnson
And the saga continues ... I adjusted my firewall at the local machine so I don't have to keep dropping it I can telnet to port 25 of the local machine from a different remote machine (my home machine through a different ISP) So we have confirmed that the local machine is accepting telnet reques

RE: Sendmail config

2003-01-29 Thread Cowles, Steve
> -Original Message- > From: Brian Johnson > Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 10:06 AM > Subject: RE: Sendmail config > > > Thanks for the help everyone - it isn't working yet but I > appreciate the suggestions > > I've been looking into tc

RE: Sendmail config

2003-01-29 Thread Brian Johnson
Thanks for the help everyone - it isn't working yet but I appreciate the suggestions I've been looking into tcpdump and tethereal (I don't have gui since I'm connecting to the remote machine via ssh) Anyway, when I drop my local firewall (I need to spend a little time and make a hole through port

RE: Sendmail config

2003-01-29 Thread Cowles, Steve
> -Original Message- > From: Brian Johnson > Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 8:50 AM > Subject: RE: Sendmail config > > > I removed iptables from the remote system a week ago ... just > to make sure that wasn't the problem (the remote system is > stoc

RE: Sendmail config

2003-01-29 Thread Jeremy Rodriguez
Ethereal or dsniff or snort -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Brian Johnson Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 9:42 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Sendmail config Do you have a recommended tool for sniffing LAN traffic

RE: Sendmail config

2003-01-29 Thread Brian Johnson
I removed iptables from the remote system a week ago ... just to make sure that wasn't the problem (the remote system is stock Redhat 8.0) > Are you sure you don't have a firewall script starting on your > other system? > The fact that you can telnet to this system (from another system) on your

RE: Sendmail config

2003-01-29 Thread Brian Johnson
Do you have a recommended tool for sniffing LAN traffic? > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of RayW > Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 08:15 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Sendmail config > > > The

Re: Sendmail config

2003-01-29 Thread RayW
The best way to find out whats going wrong would be to sniff the traffic on the LAN. Otherwise your just spining your wheels -- Psyche-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list

RE: Sendmail config

2003-01-28 Thread Cowles, Steve
> -Original Message- > From: Brian Johnson > Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 11:20 PM > Subject: RE: Sendmail config > > Haven't quite figured it out yet > > When I drop my local firewall (the machine I want to handle > all domain email), I can telnet to

RE: Sendmail config

2003-01-28 Thread Brian Johnson
Haven't quite figured it out yet When I drop my local firewall (the machine I want to handle all domain email), I can telnet to ports 110 and 143 but not port 25 from the remote machine (the one I want to forward email to the local machine. From another local machine, on my LAN, I CAN telnet to p

RE: Sendmail config

2003-01-28 Thread Bruce Douglas
Brian Johnson Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 7:20 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Sendmail config Sorry - no US - it's Canada I think I can get it - I got a machine inside the LAN to forward mail, I just can't seem to get it from outside the LAN Currently checking access permissio

RE: Sendmail config

2003-01-28 Thread Cowles, Steve
> -Original Message- > From: Brian Johnson > Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 7:53 AM > Subject: RE: Sendmail config > > > The 0 0.0.0.0:25 means it's listening on all ip addresses doesn't it? Yes. > > Other than firewall, what else could be inter

RE: Sendmail config

2003-01-28 Thread Brian Johnson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Raul Acevedo > Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 08:57 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Sendmail config > > > > My system looks like it's trying to connect to the main mail server > > but is timing out

Re: Sendmail config

2003-01-28 Thread Raul Acevedo
> My system looks like it's trying to connect to the main mail server > but is timing out (even when I drop the firewall) The problem I had with this turned out to be in /etc/resolv.conf: it had a line saying: search com which resulted in lines in /var/log/maillog saying stuff like "Connec

RE: Sendmail config

2003-01-28 Thread Brian Johnson
e- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Cowles, Steve > Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 23:44 > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: RE: Sendmail config > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Brian Johnson > > Sen

RE: Sendmail config

2003-01-27 Thread Cowles, Steve
> -Original Message- > From: Brian Johnson > Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 10:01 PM > Subject: RE: Sendmail config > > > My system looks like it's trying to connect to the main mail > server but is timing out (even when I drop the firewall) Just a gues

RE: Sendmail config

2003-01-27 Thread Brian Johnson
My system looks like it's trying to connect to the main mail server but is timing out (even when I drop the firewall) Raul Acevedo ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote*: > >Ok, I managed to fix my other problems. However, I still get all mail >delivered locally (i.e. to the firewall box), whether it origi

RE: Sendmail config

2003-01-27 Thread Brian Johnson
Sorry - no US - it's Canada I think I can get it - I got a machine inside the LAN to forward mail, I just can't seem to get it from outside the LAN Currently checking access permissions Bruce Douglas ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote*: > >Brian > >Regarding your sendmail.Given that I just

RE: Sendmail config

2003-01-27 Thread Raul Acevedo
Ok, I managed to fix my other problems. However, I still get all mail delivered locally (i.e. to the firewall box), whether it originates from outside the firewall or from within the firewall box. It never gets routed to my internal Linux box, and looking at its /var/log/maillog, it doesn't get e

RE: Sendmail config

2003-01-27 Thread Bruce Douglas
Brian Regarding your sendmail.Given that I just went through a situation where I finally got Sendmail to send email. Send me your contact information. If you're in the US, I might be able to help out... Regards, Bruce [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Sendmail config

2003-01-27 Thread Raul Acevedo
Cowles, Steve wrote: > Have you opened up the appropriate ports on your firewall to allow this > system to send outbound e-mail? What ports would those be? How would I do this? I tried your instructions for using mailertable, but I have the following problems: 1. All mail sent externally t

RE: Sendmail config

2003-01-27 Thread Cowles, Steve
> -Original Message- > From: Raul Acevedo > Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 4:46 PM > Subject: Sendmail config > > > Yes please! This is the most basic need for sendmail in a > simple home setup: firewall box which just forwards all mail > to my "real" Linux box behind the firewall. Use

Re: Sendmail config

2003-01-27 Thread Kevin Brouelette
Hello. You need have and setup Mailertable support. Here's a link or look at /usr/share/docs/sendmail documentation. http://freebsd.peon.net/tutorials/16/ Kevin B - Original Message - From: "Brian Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003

RE: Sendmail config

2003-01-27 Thread Cowles, Steve
> -Original Message- > From: Brian Johnson > Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 4:13 PM > Subject: Sendmail config > > > Could someone give me some pointers for getting sendmail to > forward all email (including internal email messages) to > another machine over the internet? > > I've playe