Ronald W. Heiby wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I've noticed what may be a related problem. This has existed in the
7.x series, and I just replicated it under 8.0 (with all updates).
My linux box has ext2 filesystems and fat32 filesystems. I have some
of each shared via Samba.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I've noticed what may be a related problem. This has existed in the
7.x series, and I just replicated it under 8.0 (with all updates).
My linux box has ext2 filesystems and fat32 filesystems. I have some
of each shared via Samba. Within the linux box,
Nothing in the logs, when the machine is in "coma" it is completely dead,
nothing on screen, no response from keyboard, cant even ping it.
Haven't tried Memtest, and I just assumed that since everything else is
working without any flaws, well not wsftp
at the moment, it should be ok, no hangs in
James McArthur
> Skickat: den 28 mars 2003 01:57
> Till: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Ämne: Re: SV: RH hangs on large filetransfers Was[ Linux vs Windows]
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Ah Ha! When my RTL based card locks up, it brings the whole
> system down with it. The light on the switch star
from me are scanned with the latest updates of
> Norton Antivirus 2K2.
>
> > -Ursprungligt meddelande-
> > Från: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] För James McArthur
> > Skickat: den 28 mars 2003 01:08
> > Till: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Ämne
> -Ursprungligt meddelande-
> Från: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] För Jay Crews
> Skickat: den 28 mars 2003 01:37
> Till: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Ämne: Re: SV: RH hangs on large filetransfers Was[ Linux vs Windows]
>
>
> Tomas Larsson writes.
Tomas Larsson writes
>
>
>
> > Is there anything in the logs?? Can you ssh/telnet to it from
> > another machine?? Does the box pass memtest86?? This should
> > be fixable if you want to.
>
>
> Nothing in the logs, when the machine is in "coma" it is completely dead,
And when you say, "
rån: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] För James McArthur
> Skickat: den 28 mars 2003 01:08
> Till: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Ämne: Re: RH hangs on large filetransfers Was[ Linux vs Windows]
>
>
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 2003-03-28 at 07:36, Tomas Larsson wrote:
> &
> -Ursprungligt meddelande-
> Från: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] För Tom Diehl
> Skickat: den 28 mars 2003 00:52
> Till: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Ämne: Re: RH hangs on large filetransfers Was[ Linux vs Windows]
>
>
> On Thu, 27 Mar 2003, Tomas
Hi,
On Fri, 2003-03-28 at 07:36, Tomas Larsson wrote:
> Thing is that I've changed network cards cables etc. still the same problem.
> There is nothing in the logs. The RH box just goes into coma without any
> warning.
> It was a 400 MB website, about 1100 files and 60 directories, that I tried
>
On Thu, 27 Mar 2003, Tomas Larsson wrote:
> Thing is that I've changed network cards cables etc. still the same problem.
> There is nothing in the logs. The RH box just goes into coma without any
> warning.
> It was a 400 MB website, about 1100 files and 60 directories, that I tried
> to copy to t
s 2K2.
> -Ursprungligt meddelande-
> Från: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] För Dennis Gilmore
> Skickat: den 28 mars 2003 00:28
> Till: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Ämne: Re: RH hangs on large filetransfers Was[ Linux vs Windows]
>
>
> On Fri, 2003-03-28 at 08:06, T
ivirus 2K2.
>
> > -Ursprungligt meddelande-
> > Från: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] För Jay Crews
> > Skickat: den 27 mars 2003 22:53
> > Till: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Ämne: Re: SV: SV: Linux vs Windows
> >
> >
> > Tomas L
On Thu, 2003-03-27 at 16:06, Tomas Larsson wrote:
> Thing is that I've changed network cards cables etc. still the same problem.
> There is nothing in the logs. The RH box just goes into coma without any
> warning.
> It was a 400 MB website, about 1100 files and 60 directories, that I tried
> to co
gt; Från: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] För Jay Crews
> Skickat: den 27 mars 2003 22:53
> Till: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Ämne: Re: SV: SV: Linux vs Windows
>
>
> Tomas Larsson writes
> >
> > Well My encounter with RH8.
> >
> > PAN
Tomas Larsson writes
>
> Well My encounter with RH8.
>
> PANIC Kernel!!! Psyche has detected a big file-transfer from the network.
> Psyche needs to go into coma. Don't do it again because I cant handle it.
> You have to reboot to wake me up.
>
>
> Well,
ECTED] För Jay Crews
> Skickat: den 27 mars 2003 20:02
> Till: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Ämne: Re: SV: Linux vs Windows
>
>
> Taylor, ForrestX writes
> >
> > Tomas Larsson wrote:
> > > Using both RH8 an XP AND very happy with both, and yes XP is
> > >
Taylor, ForrestX writes
>
> Tomas Larsson wrote:
> > Using both RH8 an XP AND very happy with both, and yes XP is extremely
> > stable reboots only when someone manages to pull the plug.
>
> I must have a different version of XP, because mine reboots everytime
> that I install a Windows upda
Tomas Larsson wrote:
Using both RH8 an XP AND very happy with both, and yes XP is extremely
stable reboots only when someone manages to pull the plug.
I must have a different version of XP, because mine reboots everytime
that I install a Windows update ;o)
Forrest
--
--
Psyche-list mailing list
Ok I have to revise some of my articulations on this issue. My first
post was a bit rambelling, and was not as precise as it could be.
To address a few points...
>MS Windows is *perceived* as "more intuitive" is because there
>are so many people who were already in contact with it
I do actually a
On Wed, 2003-03-26 at 16:43, Tomas Larsson wrote:
> But what is "topical"
> Surely a discussion of pros and cons between MS 2K/XP and RH8/Linux is
> topical.
> Or maybe the topic should be RH8 vs Win XP/2K.
The list here is actually the RH 8 User Support list but it's
unmoderated so, whil
> -Ursprungligt meddelande-
> Från: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] För Joe Klemmer
> Skickat: den 26 mars 2003 21:50
> Till: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Ämne: Re: Linux vs Windows
>
/SNIP
> But this is the RH 8 list and none of this is really topic
On Wed, 2003-03-26 at 13:09, Michael Smith wrote:
> That's debatable. I'm in the middle of taking the MCSA, and let me tell
> you, you just have to know where to get to the complexities. Most people
> haven't even heard of Microsoft Management Console, the advanced
> Registry Editor, etc. Microsof
I am sysadmin for Linux, Windows, and Apple systems.
Its very wrong to say one is more or less complex.
Apple and MS hide most of the complexity from the user, but in reality
their codes are longer and more confusing/complex. Linux, in general,
is simpler. Examples in mind including deleting pr
hael Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@redhat.com con fecha 26/03/2003
> 07:09:16 p.m.
>
> Por favor, responda a [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Enviado por: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> Destinatarios: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> CC:
>
> Asunto: Re: Linux vs Windows
>
>
> > in windows, graphics and sound are supported right away.
> just install
> > the drivers if you need to and often you don't have to even
> do that...
> > and it all works. I have heard of very few problems with
> windows in the
> > same way as those with red hat on this issue.
>
> S
gards
Michael Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@redhat.com con fecha 26/03/2003
07:09:16 p.m.
Por favor, responda a [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviado por: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Destinatarios: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC:
Asunto: Re: Linux vs Windows
That's debatable. I'm in the middle of taking the
On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 02:01:10PM +1000, Mirabella, Mathew J wrote:
> I know that more immediate support with hardware is likely to be better
> for windows because most hardware like sound cards etc are comercial in
> nature, and thus usually come with windows drivers as a default. e.g.
> creativ
That's debatable. I'm in the middle of taking the MCSA, and let me tell
you, you just have to know where to get to the complexities. Most people
haven't even heard of Microsoft Management Console, the advanced
Registry Editor, etc. Microsoft just keeps those complexities away from
the general user.
On Wed, 26 Mar 2003, Mirabella, Mathew J wrote:
> and yes i agree that the linux net and web and ftp and networky stuff is far bettter
> than windows as i eluded to in my post.
Please wrap your lines.
> And although i do agree that linux and unix systems are a bit more complex than
>
On 25 Mar 2003, Michael Smith wrote:
> I think you made some very good points. I would only like to stress the
> fact that:
[...]
> 2) linux has, and probably (even though we don't like to admit it)
> always will be a more complex operating system.
I don't know why anyone would not admit
On Wed, 26 Mar 2003, Mirabella, Mathew J wrote:
> This may not be a very structured and organised piece of prose on this
> issue, but it includes all of what i essentially think on the topic.
> Please correct me if i am wrong on any particular technical issue.
This is a very interesting
** Reply to message from JD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 26 Mar 2003 05:55:54 -0800
> "Linux vs Windows" now is just about choosing between being a
> rouge-American or a normal member of the world citizen.
Ya know, I usually find Deb trolls in here amusing. But ones t
On Tuesday 25 March 2003 23:22, Mirabella, Mathew J uttered:
> Windows can learn from open source and linux / unix... but Unix and linux
> sure can learn from the user interface issues of windows... Linux is ahead
> on many important things... it just lacks the few things i mentioned in my
> last p
and so on, and so on.
"Linux vs Windows" now is just about choosing between being a
rouge-American or a normal member of the world citizen.
JD
--
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
Daniel T. Drea wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 26 Mar 2003, Keith Winston wrote:
Windows, and you will lose more control of both as time goes on. You
are also supporting a group of very unethical people, at least at the
highest management levels, who are not concerne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 26 Mar 2003, Keith Winston wrote:
> Windows, and you will lose more control of both as time goes on. You
> are also supporting a group of very unethical people, at least at the
> highest management levels, who are not concerned at all about y
Mirabella, Mathew J wrote:
What Windows lacks is the ability to configure everything... this is where linux and UNIX has it all over windows, but... you have to deal with it's complexities to do it.
Things average people want to do are:
editing and viewing documents of various types
web browsing
ngs... it just lacks the few things i mentioned in my last post.
Mat.
-Original Message-
From: Michael Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 26 March 2003 6:04 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Linux vs Windows
I think you made some very good points. I would only like
I think you made some very good points. I would only like to stress the
fact that:
1) a *nix environment is probably the _best_ web server out there...
(not to mention the cheapest)
2) linux has, and probably (even though we don't like to admit it)
always will be a more complex operating system.
This may not be a very structured and organised piece of prose on this issue, but it
includes all of what i essentially think on the topic. Please correct me if i am
wrong on any particular technical issue.
Windows and redhat might cost similar regarding the enterprise edition of redhat vs
win
41 matches
Mail list logo
