I just downloaded 9.0 off mandrakes site and it looks ok. I'm
tempted
On Sat, 2002-10-12 at 18:16, Anthony Abby wrote:
> >Unfortunately, even Mandrake's starting to slack off a bit in the "customer
> >relations' department. Yeah, I see where you're coming from believe me, 8.0
> >is NOT all i
Am Son, 2002-10-13 um 05.24 schrieb Havoc Pennington:
>
> Peter Boy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > By the way: Are there plans to add to Metacity support for the third
> > mouse button as in sawfish, which opens a pop up applications menu (same
> > as the start button of the panel)?
> >
>
Peter Boy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> By the way: Are there plans to add to Metacity support for the third
> mouse button as in sawfish, which opens a pop up applications menu (same
> as the start button of the panel)?
>
As in Alt+F1?
That's not really a window manager feature; if you want
Am Sam, 2002-10-12 um 17.59 schrieb Havoc Pennington:
> There should not be a "break my UI"
> button.
That button worked very well in all prior versions of Gnome. It did not
"break" my UI, but I could intentionally try different UIs / WMs and
decide which one to use according to my working h
>Our intent is to appropriately compromise between different kinds of
>users.
>
>Havoc
But that's the rub of it isn't it. Many people question the appropriateness of
changing KDE, or Gnome for that matter. It's probably a philosophical debate, in
which case people have formulated opinions and
>Unfortunately, even Mandrake's starting to slack off a bit in the "customer
>relations' department. Yeah, I see where you're coming from believe me, 8.0
>is NOT all it's cracked up to be, hell, half the stuff that's supposed to go
>into menus doesn't any more, so I have to search where it was s
James Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:a
>
> Fair enough. Is there a date for when the facility will make it into
> an update?
It depends on how soon I can get it to work (I built new packages and
they don't work for some reason), and how many security errata are
clogging the QA pipeline.
> So
On Saturday 12 October 2002 07:55 am, Anthony Abby wrote:
> >Same for me. However you can't stay at 7.3 forever with all the changes
> >with gcc going on.
> >So a bit of enlightment from RH's side about where the distro is heading
> >would ease my
> >headache. I believe that RH should generate a ne
>Same for me. However you can't stay at 7.3 forever with all the changes
>with gcc going on.
>So a bit of enlightment from RH's side about where the distro is heading
>would ease my
>headache. I believe that RH should generate a new sub-Personal distro
>from the current
>8.0 tree and call it mig
Same for me. However you can't stay at 7.3 forever with all the changes
with gcc going on.
So a bit of enlightment from RH's side about where the distro is heading
would ease my
headache. I believe that RH should generate a new sub-Personal distro
from the current
8.0 tree and call it migration
On Sat, 12 Oct 102 07:15:09 EDT, Anthony Abby wrote:
[snip]
Date: Sat, 12 Oct 102 07:15:09 EDT
^^^
Not really, eh? ---|
msg02396/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
No, I think you're pretty much right on, but why
switch distros? Why not just retrograde back to
7.3, upgrade the kernel to the latest stable, and
run up2date?
I love KDE so I had a hige problem with what RH
did in 8 and thought it was going to be too much
work to restore a true KDE enviro
Havoc Pennington wrote:
>
Where "made more robust" means "made to work at all" ;-)
Fair enough. Is there a date for when the facility will make it into an
update? So far it seems that RedHat has tried to make 8.0 appeal to
Windows users by removing choices and flexibility (no gnorpm, no
kpac
Ajit George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Actually the menu editing feature is in GNOME2 and has been for some
> time. At the time RH was releasing it was being fixed up and made more
> robust. Which is why RH didn't package it. If you check the upstream
> versions of GNOME2 you'l
14 matches
Mail list logo
