RE: Anti-spam

2003-01-27 Thread Pavel Rozenboim
> -Original Message- > From: Rob Unsworth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Mon, January 27, 2003 11:58 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Anti-spam > > > On Wed, 22 Jan 2003, Buck wrote: > > > Find the open relays and block the providing isp.

RE: Anti-spam

2003-01-26 Thread Rob Unsworth
On Wed, 22 Jan 2003, Buck wrote: > Find the open relays and block the providing isp. Inform the isp that > none of the users on your isp will have access to or from any of their > websites or customers and their ips won't be forwarded through your > system. Pressure the isps to police their syst

RE: Anti-spam

2003-01-22 Thread Lucas Albers
Wednesday, January 22, 2003 9:37 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Anti-spam   --> Find the open relays and block the providing isp.  Inform the isp that none of the users on your isp will have access to or from any of their websites or customers and their ips won’t be forwarded

RE: Anti-spam

2003-01-22 Thread Lucas Albers
for help')dnl FEATURE(enhdnsbl,`in.dnsbl.org', `t',`Spam blocked see: http://www.dnsbl.org Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems. Read http://www.cs.montana.edu/faq/spam.htm for help')dnl > --Luke > --Computer Science Sysadmin, MSU Bozeman > --admin(AT)cs.montana.edu

RE: Anti-spam

2003-01-22 Thread Lucas Albers
TED]] > On Behalf Of Steven W. Orr > Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 10:04 AM > To: Gregory L. Hering > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Anti-spam > > On Wed, 22 Jan 2003, Gregory L. Hering wrote: > > =>Dear Spam-haters (on Linux RH8), > [Lots of stu

Re: Anti-spam

2003-01-22 Thread Steven W. Orr
On Wed, 22 Jan 2003, Gregory L. Hering wrote: =>Dear Spam-haters (on Linux RH8), [Lots of stuff deleted...] =>I wanted a system that was low maintenance so I wanted some =>automated features. The (now optional) reply informed you that if you =>forwarded this to 'me@myserver' it would pass bec

Re: Anti-spam

2003-01-22 Thread Gregory L. Hering
...mmm sorry about the HTML...! Yes, blocking China would help. .cn, .ru, .cz, .br, ... how about everything? Better, why not make it like importing goods. Nobody gets in without a permit. Nobody gets to keep their permit if they are sending spam. The burden shifts to the ISPs, but it also pu

Re: Anti-spam

2003-01-22 Thread Jesse Keating
On Wednesday 22 January 2003 08:36, Buck uttered: > Find the open relays and block the providing isp. Inform the isp that > none of the users on your isp will have access to or from any of their > websites or customers and their ips won't be forwarded through your > system. Pressure the isps to p

RE: Anti-spam

2003-01-22 Thread Buck
.   Just my .02 worth   Buck   -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Gregory L. Hering Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 11:20 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Anti-spam   Dear Spam-haters (on Linux RH8),       At first I parsed

Anti-spam

2003-01-22 Thread Gregory L. Hering
Dear Spam-haters (on Linux RH8),       At first I parsed headers manually, e-mailing authorities as best I could.      Very time consuming and pointless.       I found an article on writing a 'custom action' for the rules in my M$ based client.  I wrote rules and put bad addresses on a list