Re: Arjanv man... no test kernel at your site

2002-12-22 Thread Riemer Palstra
2.2.i686.rpm http://people.redhat.com/arjanv/testkernels/athlon/kernel-2.4.20-2.2.athlon.rpm etc. -- Riemer Palstra // [EMAIL PROTECTED] // http://palstra.com/ A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad th

Re: Wanted: Rawhide kernel

2002-12-22 Thread Riemer Palstra
On Sat, 21 Dec 2002, M A Young wrote: > There isn't one at present. And the day after you write this, kernel-2.4.20-2.2 suddenly appears on all mirrors :) rsp., ... and what's that Phoebe thing? -- Riemer Palstra // [EMAIL PROTECTED] // http://palstra.com/ A: Because it

Re: console irc-client

2002-12-19 Thread Riemer Palstra
On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, David Sudjiman wrote: > I begin to move to something not BitchX as I read there are several URL > inform that BitchX is backdoored. Uhm, well, that was some months ago now... BitchX 1.0c19 still works fine for me. Or else you could take a look at irssi or ircii. --

Re: Pine and Eudora

2002-12-10 Thread Riemer Palstra
d over from out of your /var/spool/mail/what-ever to the mbox file. Removing the mbox file usually also stops this behaviour. If there are any mails you want to keep in there, then of course move them over to another folder or even back into your mailspool. -- Riemer Palstra // [EMAIL

Re: Dist. Suggestions

2002-11-23 Thread Riemer Palstra
me back in a few months... > For all that will bother to read this post, it has not always been RHs > policy to not distribute closed source software - Remember staroffice and > the cold fusion demo. So you didn't read Mike's posts then, did you? -- Riemer Palstra // [EMAIL PROTEC

Re: Sayonara (Was - Re: Dist. Suggestions)

2002-11-23 Thread Riemer Palstra
are not carefull. It's the kind of demanding, ranting, trolling people like you trying to achieve that, and failing btw. > Look I apologize for being a dick to Mike, but he should not have been > a dick first. The 'he started it' method. Oh grow up. -- Riemer Palstra // [

Re: ASSp

2002-11-09 Thread Riemer Palstra
On 8 Nov 2002, Dan Clowater wrote: > SO - none of my browsers support the evil asp!?! You mean Active Server Pages? As the name tells you, they run server-side, there's no need for plugins for your browser or anything... -- Riemer Palstra // [EMAIL PROTECTED] // http://palstra.co