Since this discussion is happening in an open forum through this mailing
list, I thought I'd add my two cents.
First, I agree that the message in the title bar should go. Not because of
GNU or GPL guidelines (specifically), though.
Really, I think the question "what other [software] has a message
In reference to John's comments:
First, you seem to have ignored my point about the title bar being the
wrong place for this, so maybe in the same way that you're accusing people
of not reading instructions, it seems from my perspective like you're not
reading these emails carefully (though I'm su
I still think a lot of this can be avoided through better and clearer
messaging when downloading the software, but it is also a good idea to have
a message like this in the output, one time.
The suggested text had a few grammatical errors, though, so here are some
fixes:
This is a development
I agree that this sounds less scary (and even just making it not ALL CAPS
would go a long way).
However, I maintain that the title bar is not the right way to warn people
in an interface. Title bars are for application names and information like
filenames.
Currently, the titlebar looks as follows
I've attached a screenshot of what I think is a much better solution (to
change the website). I think this simple change would alleviate the need
for any messages in the application (though still wouldn't object to
"(unstable)" or "(development)" in the title bar, just not a long
instructional mess
I do have some understanding of the packager vs. developer situation, yes,
but didn't know there was a known bug in 0.8.5 that is so serious in
Windows, so the explanation is very appreciated.
Just to be clear, I'm not actually advocating recommending 0.8.5
specifically (I thought that's what the
n <
j...@darrington.wattle.id.au> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 01:43:31AM -0500, Mark Hancock wrote:
>
> I know this is a Linux-first community,
>
> I am disappointed that you think this. It is a common misconception which
> we have tried hard to dispell.
>
>
Hi Julia,
I also don't have a Mac to test things on, but it might help if you
provided some more information about the process you followed. If you
provide the info below, the list can probably better help you:
1. Did you already install MacPorts (instructions here:
https://www.macports.org/insta
I unfortunately don't know enough about PSPP syntax to suggest how to do
this, but a CI is *not* always associated with a hypothesis and can be
calculated from just a mean and SD (and a cumulative distribution function,
which is typically the normal one). Typically the formula is something like:
m
u0, X normally distributed with unknown
> population variance
>
> If mü0 is not contained in the confidence interval, the hypothesis test is
> significant.
>
> Dr. Oliver Walter
>
> Am 12.10.2018 um 15:01 schrieb Mark Hancock:
>
> I unfortunately don't know enough a
10 matches
Mail list logo
