Hi,
If the information here is up to date then we have MRSETS command
implemented in PSPP
http://www.gnu.org/software/pspp/manual/pspp.html#MRSETS
Is there any way to display these MRSETS in the PSPP output - frequences,
percentages or in corss tabs? I'm only using thses MRSETS in SPSS in
CTables
On 06/11/2015 11:24, Michał Dubrawski wrote:
Hi,
If the information here is up to date then we have MRSETS command
implemented in PSPP
http://www.gnu.org/software/pspp/manual/pspp.html#MRSETS
Is there any way to display these MRSETS in the PSPP output -
frequences, percentages or in corss
On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 11:24:18AM +0100, Michał Dubrawski wrote:
> If the information here is up to date then we have MRSETS command
> implemented in PSPP
> http://www.gnu.org/software/pspp/manual/pspp.html#MRSETS
>
> Is there any way to display these MRSETS in the PSPP output - frequences,
> per
Thanks a lot Ben for your quick answer!
Have you considered MULT RESPONSE command implementation?
Like I wrote before today it is has an option to display frequences,
percentages and even cross tabulation and I think that it would be very
useful to have it in PSPP, but I'm just asking.
kind rega
CTABLES is probably the most valuable feature of SPSS and is used by the vast
majority of people that buy the SPSS license. It is a real shame that PSPP
doesn't have CTABLES as this would be a major factor in more widespread use of
this open source solution.
- Original Message -
From:
I strongly support Robert's view. However, the maintainers seem to be more
interested in statistics than plain old tabulation. Has anyone an idea how
to implement even a stripped down version of CTABLES?
Matthias Fäth
Im Mediapark 12
50670 Köln
t: 0221-2907973
m: 0171-9832175
e: m.fa...@gmx.de
20
I agree with the suggestion. Baccalaureate courses, biostatistics and generally
in the early years of social sciences, these tools are very useful.
I hope the developers can add to your to-do list, considering that they use
their free time to this project.
CJT
---
There is no interest from the developers to do this. A while back someone even
offered to put down $500 of their own money and others volunteered a few
hundred each on top to bring this about but it was stated that there is no
interest from the developers to implement this functionality. Which
I recently added a small feature to PSPP, and I think if someone had
money and wanted to fund a feature, it might be possible to do so.
For my small feature, I had to complete some paperwork to assign my
copyright to FSF. Then I added the feature to the code and tested it.
Then I modified the docu
Hi all,
I am not one of the - bless them - developers. I am a old TABLES
user. Lately (20 years or so) the output is not considered "presentation
quality" anymore. So I find myself exporting the TABLES output in order
to get it into Microsoft Office stuff, where AGGREGATE + SAVE TRANSLATE
wo
The big reason is for output for complex subheadings and big banner reports.
This is what everyone in my industry uses SPSS for. Actually, it is the only
thing that they use it for. In terms of presentation I know it is ugly as all
hell but there really isn't a substitute for the CTABLES func
If developers are not interested in the task - we cannot complain about it.
I have great respect for them, and appreciate it that they have spent so
much of their time to make PSPP possible. I remember time when there was
not GUI, or when the output was in plain text - the project has gone a long
w
I see. In my industry, too, you defined a big banner, submitted to EDP
and waited at the continuous paper printer for the
everything-by-everything crosstabs. I bet the developers are excited.
On 06/11/2015 19:54, Robert Lutener wrote:
The big reason is for output for complex subheadings and bi
I do not think you have to use such harsh words. I insist that developers do
their best in their free time.
I think we can do other initiatives such as pay to companies to do the job or
make donations to commission new features to PSPP. Another great idea is to
include PSPP request as part of "
Funding the implementation of a fully blown CTABLES at commercial rates,
I think would cost well into 5 figures.
However, it is perhaps possible, that a smaller subset of CTABLES could
be undertaken by an altruistic programmer who has some time on his
hands and wishes to earn a bit of money for a
15 matches
Mail list logo
