On Sun, Aug 06, 2017 at 11:57:37AM +0200, ftr public wrote:
The GRAPH procedure gives the annexed histogram dp-1.png.
The FREQUENCIES procedure gives the annexed histogram dp-1.png.
What is surprising is that the two procedures give different graphs, and
that in both
Dear Sir or Madam,
I've just read your message in the PSPP list. One problem is that your
data are discrete with a small number of categories, but histograms are
most useful for continuous data. For discrete data with a small number
of categories, a bar chart is more appropriate. I attached yo
Hi,
I want to graph a simple frequency distribution of ta variable called
soctrust from a national sample. I compare the histogram from a
FREQUENCIES command with a diagramme from a GRAPH command.
The variable can have integer values from 0 to 10.
FREQUENCIES
/VARIABLES= soctrust
/FO
Hi,
your data only has discrete values 1,2,3 … 10. Only the histogram bins which
range e.g. from [2.333, 3) (2. <= x < 3) are empty. This is correct as
there are really no
cases which have values in that range.
The histogram x-axis labeling is now a continuous range. For your specific
prob
Hi,
The attached pdf file shows the bizarre translation of DV var levels
into the histogram graph.
All the 10 continuous levels of the dependent variable soctrust are
occupied, but the histogram shows unoccupied classes. The diagram is
misleading to me.
I then repeated the example with three three
