Re: correlations

2015-02-15 Thread Ben Pfaff
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 07:59:24PM +0100, John Darrington wrote: > If you look closely you will see that it is not quite identical. > > The SIG / NOSIG flag controls weather significant results should be > emphasised. > In the default output mode, PSPP does this by rendering in an italic font. >

Re: correlations

2015-01-23 Thread John Darrington
If you look closely you will see that it is not quite identical. The SIG / NOSIG flag controls weather significant results should be emphasised. In the default output mode, PSPP does this by rendering in an italic font. Unfortunately, it's rather hard to see italics from upright fonts when lookin

Re: correlations

2015-01-22 Thread news
An identical result ! In both cases I get the significance levels. On 22/01/2015 21:51, Alan Mead wrote: You're sure "nosig" means to suppress significance levels? Because I think in SPSS it's the opposite. Try: correlations var = v12 to v21/print sig. This, BTW, makes no sense to me either.

Re: correlations

2015-01-22 Thread Alan Mead
You're sure "nosig" means to suppress significance levels? Because I think in SPSS it's the opposite. Try: correlations var = v12 to v21/print sig. This, BTW, makes no sense to me either. -Alan On 1/22/2015 2:48 PM, F. Thomas wrote: > Hi, > I try to get a simple correlations matrix for some var