On Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 11:57:09AM -0600, Alan Mead wrote:
> On 2/25/2016 11:39 PM, John Darrington wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 03:41:46PM -0600, Alan Mead wrote:
> >
> > This succeeded and in some quick testing psppire seems to work.
> > Thanks! Is there any hope for more
On Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 11:57:09AM -0600, Alan Mead wrote:
I installed Fedora 23 on an older machine, so I'll be on the bleeding
edge (or close to it). I haven't gotten around to trying to make the
latest PSPP, but there's a package for 0.8.5.
I use some Linux softwa
On 2/25/2016 11:39 PM, John Darrington wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 03:41:46PM -0600, Alan Mead wrote:
>
> This succeeded and in some quick testing psppire seems to work.
> Thanks! Is there any hope for more recent versions?
>
> On CentOS 6 I'm afraid not.
>
> We could
On 2/26/2016 12:02 AM, John Darrington wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 11:48:56PM -0600, Alan Mead wrote:
>
> Or fedora, because (as you pointed out) there is a fedora pspp package.
> But EPEL 7 doesn't have one, so I'd have to compile it myself.
>
> Now that I can compi
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 11:48:56PM -0600, Alan Mead wrote:
Or fedora, because (as you pointed out) there is a fedora pspp package.
But EPEL 7 doesn't have one, so I'd have to compile it myself.
Now that I can compile the GUI, how do I go about modifying the dialog
fo
On 2/25/2016 11:39 PM, John Darrington wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 03:41:46PM -0600, Alan Mead wrote:
>
> This succeeded and in some quick testing psppire seems to work.
> Thanks! Is there any hope for more recent versions?
>
>
> On CentOS 6 I'm afraid not.
>
> We cou
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 03:41:46PM -0600, Alan Mead wrote:
This succeeded and in some quick testing psppire seems to work.
Thanks! Is there any hope for more recent versions?
On CentOS 6 I'm afraid not.
We could backport some bugs I suppose and maintain a separate branch
On 2/25/2016 3:23 PM, John Darrington wrote:
> It's segfaulting because the .ui files are not installed.
> make install seems to be failing because you seem to have a rather old
> version of xmllint. Fortunately we can live without it:
>
> In your makefile look for the four lines similar to:
>
>
It's segfaulting because the .ui files are not installed.
make install seems to be failing because you seem to have a rather old
version of xmllint. Fortunately we can live without it:
In your makefile look for the four lines similar to:
$(M_V_at)cat $(top_srcdir)/doc/help-pages-list | w
On 2/25/2016 2:50 PM, John Darrington wrote:
> Can you then try leaving configure.ac unchanged. That is to say,
> in the script, delete the lines
> diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
> .
> through to
> .
>PKG_CHECK_MODULES([GTKSOURCEVIEW], [gtksourceview-2.0 >= 2.2], [],
>
Ok, I did
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 02:46:07PM -0600, Alan Mead wrote:
On 2/25/2016 2:30 PM, John Darrington wrote:
> You should not need autoconf *at all*.
> I think you are probably running on a git checkout of something.
No, I'm using the official tarball (I just downloaded it, pat
On 2/25/2016 2:30 PM, John Darrington wrote:
> You should not need autoconf *at all*.
> I think you are probably running on a git checkout of something.
No, I'm using the official tarball (I just downloaded it, patched it,
and replicated the error again). The warning says:
'autohea
You should not need autoconf *at all*.
I think you are probably running on a git checkout of something.
Try downloading 0.8.5 from ftp.gnu.org , unzipping into a clean
directory and building there.
J'
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 02:22:09PM -0600, Alan Mead wrote:
On 2/25/2016 1:17 PM, John Dar
On 2/25/2016 2:22 PM, Alan Mead wrote:
> That does allow ./configure to run without error but when I make the
> software I get this:
PS - I have been able to make pspp (but not psppire) on this machine in
the past...
--
Alan D. Mead, Ph.D.
President, Talent Algorithms Inc.
science + technology
On 2/25/2016 1:17 PM, John Darrington wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 07:32:02AM -0600, Alan Mead wrote:
> CentOS /RHEL are based on a version of fedora. CentOS 6 is based on
> Fedora 13 or 14, so a package from Fedora 23 is no more use to me than
> an Ubuntu package.
>
> Tha
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 07:32:02AM -0600, Alan Mead wrote:
CentOS /RHEL are based on a version of fedora. CentOS 6 is based on
Fedora 13 or 14, so a package from Fedora 23 is no more use to me than
an Ubuntu package.
Thanks for the information.
Can you try running the attache
CentOS /RHEL are based on a version of fedora. CentOS 6 is based on
Fedora 13 or 14, so a package from Fedora 23 is no more use to me than
an Ubuntu package.
I'll have to continue using the Windows version of PSPP until I upgrade
to CentOS 7 someday.
-Alan
On 2/24/2016 11:30 PM, John Darrington
I may have understood this wrong, but I thought that CentOS was a "downstream"
of Redhat Fedora. I see that PSPP 0.8.5 (the latest release) is already
packaged
for Fedora - See https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/pspp
So presumably it ought to be in CentOS too. Or have I misunderstood somet
18 matches
Mail list logo
