On 2/25/2016 11:39 PM, John Darrington wrote: > On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 03:41:46PM -0600, Alan Mead wrote: > > This succeeded and in some quick testing psppire seems to work. > Thanks! Is there any hope for more recent versions? > > On CentOS 6 I'm afraid not. > > We could backport some bugs I suppose and maintain a separate branch, > if there was enough demand. > > Otherwise you should be looking to upgrade to CentOS 7.
I installed Fedora 23 on an older machine, so I'll be on the bleeding edge (or close to it). I haven't gotten around to trying to make the latest PSPP, but there's a package for 0.8.5. I use some Linux software that was distributed (by a developer who learned to code on Windows) as both source code and binaries where the binary was statically linked. Much like a Window executable, it still runs years after the author compiled it. (In fact, gcc and SWIG have moved on and the source no longer compiles.) Other than (a) "that's not the way we do it" and (b) the issues of trusting binaries, what's the downside of distributing a statically linked PSPP? Wouldn't that allow me to run the latest PSPP on my CentOS 6 machine? -Alan -- Alan D. Mead, Ph.D. President, Talent Algorithms Inc. science + technology = better workers +815.588.3846 (Office) +267.334.4143 (Mobile) http://www.alanmead.org I've... seen things you people wouldn't believe... functions on fire in a copy of Orion. I watched C-Sharp glitter in the dark near a programmable gate. All those moments will be lost in time, like Ruby... on... Rails... Time for Pi. --"The Register" user Alister, applying the famous "Blade Runner" speech to software development _______________________________________________ Pspp-users mailing list Pspp-users@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pspp-users
