gt; > > > > Any way to display MRSETS in the PSPP output would be very valuable
> > for a
> > > > > lot of people even if it would be a cross tabs extension allowing the
> > > > usage
> > > > > of mrsets in it or something like that. When people graduate from
ple graduate from
> > > > psychology, sociology, social science or pedagogics departments they
> have
> > > > knowledge how to build a surveys - there are a lot of tools that
> allow
> > > them
> > > > to collect data via online surveys,
se
> > > many non-profits and startups cannot afford SPSS + Custom Tables
> > licenses,
> > > and from my experience that is exactly the software they know how to use
> > > because of their Universities.
> > >
> > > That said, thanks again to Ben a
my experience that is exactly the software they know how to use
> > because of their Universities.
> >
> > That said, thanks again to Ben and all the developers and all other
> people
> > involved with PSPP project - you have done tremendous work so far.
> >
> >
ou have done tremendous work so far.
>
> Michał Dubrawski,
>
>
> > Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2018 08:48:33 -0700
> > From: Ben Pfaff
> > To: Alan Mead
> > Cc: "pspp-users@gnu.org"
> > Subject:
> >
> > Re: PSPP CTABLES
> > Mes
c: "pspp-users@gnu.org"
> Subject:
>
> Re: PSPP CTABLES
> Message-ID: <20180725154833.gf18...@sigabrt.benpfaff.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
>
> I think it's likely that I'll change PSPP to use the same output model.
> One reason th
TABLES
> >> with just the basics, without trying to emulate SPSS because they have
> >> stuffed up something that used to be quite good.
> >>
> >> From: Pspp-users
> >> [mailto:pspp-users-bounces+ronald.crichton=cit.edu...@gnu.org] On Behalf
> >&g
s own version of TABLES with
>> just the basics, without trying to emulate SPSS because they have stuffed up
>> something that used to be quite good.
>>
>> From: Pspp-users
>> [mailto:pspp-users-bounces+ronald.crichton=cit.edu...@gnu.org] On Behalf Of
>> Jakub Škrobá
Great News - I'd long to see CTABLES in PSPP. If there is anything we can
do to assist you with this project give us a note.
For me Ronald's suggestion to opt for TABLES instead would be also alright,
if this is easier to implement.
2018-07-24 23:30 GMT+02:00 Ben Pfaff :
> There might be some sm
f Of
> Jakub Škrobánek
> Sent: Tuesday, 24 July 2018 6:29 PM
> To: pspp-users@gnu.org
> Subject: PSPP CTABLES
>
> Hi, I would like to ask if there is any progression in CTABLES implementation
> to PSPP. I read some threads
> (http://pspp-users.gnu.narkive.com/r32JwdwI/wha
[mailto:pspp-users-bounces+ronald.crichton=cit.edu...@gnu.org]
On Behalf Of Jakub Škrobánek
Sent: Tuesday, 24 July 2018 6:29 PM
To: pspp-users@gnu.org
Subject: PSPP CTABLES
Hi, I would like to ask if there is any progression in CTABLES implementation
to PSPP. I read some threads
(http://pspp
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 10:29:21AM +0200, Jakub Škrobánek wrote:
> Hi, I would like to ask if there is any progression in CTABLES
> implementation to PSPP. I read some threads (http://pspp-users.gnu.narkive.
> com/r32JwdwI/what-features-of-custom-tables-ctables-are-most-important) but
> they seems
Hi, I would like to ask if there is any progression in CTABLES
implementation to PSPP. I read some threads (http://pspp-users.gnu.narkive.
com/r32JwdwI/what-features-of-custom-tables-ctables-are-most-important) but
they seems dead. Any suggestion?
Kind regards
Jacob
__
13 matches
Mail list logo
