Thank you for the correction. I don't have a corpus of .spo or .spw
files. (If anyone has a collection of either kind of file and is
willing to give them to me, then I can make reading those formats a
later project. I would keep them confidential.)
GPL graphics are similar, except for syntax, t
Thank you Ben,
I remember the old output format from my first contact with SPSS as a
student - I found information that it was .spo file extension while .spw is
file extension for web reports:
https://stats.idre.ucla.edu/spss/seminars/introduction-to-spss-syntax-2/
" SPSS output files have the fil
There seem to be several SPSS output formats.
First, there's something really old (?) with an .spw extension. I
haven't looked at those at all and I don't have a corpus of them to
learn from, so PSPP won't support .spw files until those change.
Second, there are effectively two different subform
Thank you Ben. I understand the context now. Good to hear that spv format
will help. By the way does it mean that unlike SPSS which if I remember
well cannot open spv created in older versions of SPSS, PSPP would be able
to open any spv? Would it be only able to read spv with output from
procedure
MULT RESPONSE might also benefit from the work I'm doing. I've looked
at MULT RESPONSE before, and one of the things that kept me from
implementing it is the output complexity. CROSSTABS also has very
complex output routines, to the extent the complexity of the output
comes close to overshadowing
Hi Ben,
it is great to hear that you are working with spv output. I know that they
were changing it from version to version so it seem like quite a challenge,
but based on what challenges you have faced before when making PSPP
compatible to SPSS I'm sure you will handle it :)
CTABLES or Tables i