RE: VFP7: Scan challenge

2007-11-19 Thread David Crooks
On Monday, November 19, 2007 9:00 PM Lew wrote: >Man! I was really hoping to win. When are you going to have another problem? Well, I got this 1 last app to move which is a web service app... 8-) If I didn't have problems...I would not have a job...And if it was easy, then anyone could do it..

RE: VFP7: Scan challenge

2007-11-19 Thread Lew
Man! I was really hoping to win. When are you going to have another problem? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Crooks Sent: Monday, November 19, 2007 12:48 PM To: ProFox Email List Subject: RE: VFP7: Scan challenge On Monday

RE: VFP7: Scan challenge

2007-11-19 Thread David Crooks
On Monday, November 19, 2007 12:39 PM Malcolm Greene wrote: >Sounds like your development environment has different config.fpw settings than your EXE has? Do >you compile your config.fpw in your EXE or depend on your EXE to find the first config.fpw it finds >(if any) in the path? The config.fpw

RE: VFP7: Scan challenge

2007-11-19 Thread Malcolm Greene
David, > I was able to get it work in the same way it worked on the old PC, by passing > the exe as a parameter to VFP7.exe. Sounds like your development environment has different config.fpw settings than your EXE has? Do you compile your config.fpw in your EXE or depend on your EXE to find the

RE: VFP7: Scan challenge

2007-11-19 Thread David Crooks
Thanks for all of the suggestions for this challenge. I was able to get it work in the same way it worked on the old PC, by passing the exe as a parameter to VFP7.exe. It makes no sense to me but as long as I do not have to think about it anymore and it works then it must be ok. Case closed. Thanks

RE: VFP7: Scan challenge

2007-11-19 Thread Lew
.. recompile everything before build? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Malcolm Greene Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2007 3:44 PM To: profox@leafe.com Subject: RE: VFP7: Scan challenge Dave, Some ideas: 1. Make sure SET DEVELOPMENT ON. 2

Re: VFP7: Scan challenge

2007-11-19 Thread Alan Bourke
Regarding last mail, I meant is NOT running an old app version :) ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Search

Re: VFP7: Scan challenge

2007-11-19 Thread Alan Bourke
Make sure your dev environment is running an old APP version of the built project. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo

Re: VFP7: Scan challenge

2007-11-18 Thread Mike yearwood
> 2. VFP7: Scan challenge (David Crooks) > Message: 2 > Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2007 10:03:53 -0500 > From: "David Crooks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: VFP7: Scan challenge > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Message-ID: ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > Another in

RE: VFP7: Scan challenge

2007-11-18 Thread Malcolm Greene
Dave, Some ideas: 1. Make sure SET DEVELOPMENT ON. 2. Make sure that your EXE and development environment have the same values for SET EXACT. 3. Double check your SET PATH setting to make sure your EXE is being built with the same files you are using in development. 4. Delete all your *.FXP fi

RE: VFP7: Scan challenge

2007-11-18 Thread David Crooks
Malcolm wrote: "Something in your code is moving the record pointer in the table being scanned. Sounds like a failed seek that leaves table in an eof() position." And Lew wrote: "Filtered index expression? (or other filter) Reindex everything on the new server." Thanks for the quick responses o

RE: VFP7: Scan challenge

2007-11-18 Thread Lew
Filtered index expression? (or other filter) Reindex everything on the new server. -Lew -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Crooks Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2007 10:04 AM To: ProFox Email List Subject: VFP7: Scan challenge Another in

Re: VFP7: Scan challenge

2007-11-18 Thread Malcolm Greene
David, > processes the first record and then gets out of the scan Something in your code is moving the record pointer in the table being scanned. Sounds like a failed seek that leaves table in an eof() position. Malcolm ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@l