On 23/01/25 15:34, Christian Seberino via Postfix-users wrote:
Is there a "minimal" setting for these two variables that will
give *some* protection without blocking friendly sites by accident?
I don't know exactly what you mean by "minimal" here
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
Thanks Victor,
As I said, I didn't know if it was a Postfix, TLS Cert, or MariaDB
issue. I'll post over in the MariaDB lists.
On 24/1/25 18:24, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote:
On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 03:30:43PM +1100, duluxoz via Postfix-users wrote:
I'm using a Mar
ile = /etc/pki/tls/certs/mail_u...@exampl.com.crt
tls_key_file = /etc/pki/tls/certs/mail_u...@exampl.com.key
tls_CApath = /etc/pki/tls/certs/root_ca.crt
query = SELECT TRUE FROM virtual_domains WHERE domain_name='%s'
~~~
Could someone please point me in the right direction to get this sorte
On 2025-01-23 14:26, Tomasz Pala via Postfix-users wrote:
On 2025-01-23 12:59, MRob via Postfix-users wrote:
Is that correct? If yes, can we make Postscreen dnsbl_sites lookup
bind
IP for lookups?
I already have inet_interfaces and smtp_bind_address set so I guess
that's not used for
On 2025-01-23 20:25, Randy Bush via Postfix-users wrote:
I'm using zen.spamhaus.org for blocking and list.dnswl.org (with
filter)
for allowlisting.
zen.spamhaus.org*2 list.dnswl.org=127.0.[0..255].[1..3]*-2
Question occur to me, is there way to cease dnsrbl lookups once
thresho
Does that help explain things?
And thanks muchly for the help :-)
On 25/1/25 20:30, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote:
On Sat, Jan 25, 2025 at 10:06:36AM +0100, Tomasz Pala via Postfix-users wrote:
Emails are permitted to be sent between all three domains.
I would try:
master.cf:
smtpd [
nd
this is the part that I'm having trouble configuring.
Could someone please point me in the correct direction to accomplish
this - thanks
Cheers
Dulux-Oz
_______
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email
acklist" to be checked somewhere in
smtpd_relay_restrictions, but I didn't say anything because I didn't
want to "pollute" peoples mindsets if/when they replied...
And thanks very much for the help :-)
On 25/1/25 23:43, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote:
On Sa
On 29/01/25 12:56, E R via Postfix-users wrote:
Yes, I wholeheartedly agree. Even if I disagreed, it would not be one
of the rare Postfix bugs. 8-) As I wrote in another post, I do think
it might be helpful to mention the downside of not using the default
of syslog as I did.
While I don&#
On 30/01/25 15:11, Peter via Postfix-users wrote:
On 30/01/25 11:34, Josh Good via Postfix-users wrote:
Hello all.
Due to reasons which are best left untold, I am setting up a Red Hat 6.2
(classic edition) machine.
This system comes with Sendmail 8.9.3, and it mainly works just fine.
However
On 30/01/25 12:00, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
If you can get them to address the root cause problem: failing
syscalls without proper logging why) then people could fix these
problem themselves (as the saying goes, "teach a human to fish").
Except for the very rare case of
On 30/01/25 11:34, Josh Good via Postfix-users wrote:
Hello all.
Due to reasons which are best left untold, I am setting up a Red Hat 6.2
(classic edition) machine.
This system comes with Sendmail 8.9.3, and it mainly works just fine.
However, I was looking for some old Postfix RPM package
Thanks Victor (& everyone else who chimed in).
I'm going to sit down with management on Monday and see if I can explain
all this to them so as to get a consensus decision on what they'd like
to do.
Cheers
Dulux-Oz
On 26/1/25 12:50, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote:
verify return:1
depth=0 CN = mail.servicemouse.com
verify return:1
250 PIPELINING
DONE
CONNECTED(0003)
---
Certificate chain
0 s:CN = mail.servicemouse.com
i:CN = mail.servicemouse.com
---
On 13/01/25 11:45, Scott K via Postfix-users wrote
ot be accessible to the public.
_______
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
On 14/01/25 12:31, Scott K via Postfix-users wrote:
Yes, Dovecot should be listening on port 587 if using "submission"
service
Dovecot submission is just a proxy, it still has to pass the submitted
message to postfix so there is little reason to use dovecot submission
unless you
seful
and is relatively easy to implement with Postfix and milters or probbaly
others 3party software. I'm asking because I have OpenARC running on one
instance and I'm wondering what to do next.
--
_______
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-us
On 22/12/24 23:22, Michael Tokarev via Postfix-users wrote:
Cyrus SASL is a separate thing in people minds because it is a
separate, independent library/subsystem. You can install a separate
package named this way. But in Dovecot it is an integral part of a
larger system, it is not viewed
to say hello.
So, "Hello".
There is another interesting behavior that if there is no Message-Id header,
cleanup(8) won't insert the Message-Id header and append all missing Resent-
headers.
_______
Postfix-users mailing l
On 2024/12/26 06:04, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
Cowbay via Postfix-users:
Hello,
My Postfix is 3.4.23-0+deb10u2. It's old.
I got a rare mail with the Resent-Sender header and no other Resent- headers.
Since I configured the local_header_rewrite_clients, cleanup(8) inser
On 21/12/24 12:37, E R via Postfix-users wrote:
Curious if there are others using the maillog_file setting who have
found that "out of the box" RHEL 8+ or 9+ will not allow Postfix to
start? I worked around the issue by creating a policy module for
testing purposes thanks to th
would have expected that postfix handles
this like a temp failure of a MX and therefore try the next one.
Kind regards
tobi
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
On Thu, 2025-01-16 at 08:33 -0500, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
wrote:
> Tobi via Postfix-users:
> > Hi list
> >
> > we have an issue with mail delivery. We use tlspol to tell postfix
> > if
> > mta-sts or DANE should be used for a recipient domain. Now we
On 16/03/25 17:48, Michael Tokarev via Postfix-users wrote:
16.03.2025 07:26, Peter via Postfix-users wrote:
You linked a debian bug, but I could not find a patch in there.
The patch was in the attachment in the same email:
https://marc.info/?l=postfix-users&m=174205748609705&w=2
I
On 25/03/25 07:43, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
Too late! I have already updated the documentation (on www.porcupine.org;
mirrrors will pick it up in the next hour or so).
I'm guessing that you added this to postscreen_dnsbl_sites and
reject_rbl_client rbl_domain:
"NO
hat break
before or after a TLS handshake
_______
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
Hi
In old server i have:
max_use=180
in new serwer I have:
max_use=150
I don't know if it's that important
I have no idea what could be wrong.
after restarting postfix everything seems to be back to normal so I
don't know
W dniu 3.04.2025 o 10:32, natan via Postfix-u
x 1406128 0.0 0.0 40076 5692 ? S 11:32 0:00 spawn
-n policy-spf -t unix user=nobody argv=/usr/bin/policyd-spf
Why process "still exist" after 1.5h - maby this is problem ?
W dniu 3.04.2025 o 11:09, natan via Postfix-users pisze:
Hi
In old server i have:
max_use=180
StartLimitIntervalUSec=10s
StartLimitBurst=5
StartLimitAction=none
W dniu 27.03.2025 o 12:52, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users pisze:
natan via Postfix-users:
Hi
I upgrade from debian10 to debian11 and init.d to systemd
In old debian I dont have any probles but in debian11 in systemd (after
4h) I get
On 26/03/25 05:02, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
"Reputation lists may have additional policies and restrictions that you
need to follow when using them, you should not configure a list in
Postfix until you are fully aware of its requirements."
...or something like that.
Ye
W dniu 27.03.2025 o 14:44, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users pisze:
natan via Postfix-users:
Hi
I dont have selinux
Hi
I dot have and use apparmor to
Then look for other 'security" addons such as AppArmor.
https://wiki.debian.org/AppArmor/HowToUse#Disable_AppArmor
On 1/04/25 12:23, Herb Weiner via Postfix-users wrote:
I am having problems comfiguring Postfix and Dovecot to communicate via
lmtp on Ubuntu.
The following is an excerpt of my Dovecot configuration:
protocols = imap lmtp
protocol lmtp {
postmaster_address = postmas
On 16/03/25 17:13, Michael Tokarev via Postfix-users wrote:
16.03.2025 06:18, Peter via Postfix-users wrote:
This is a relatively simple patch, for the sake of simplicity it
replaces the linefeed at read time, but a slightly more complicated
patch that does it when lines are output to dst
On 16/03/25 10:39, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
That said, it should not be difficult for Postfix code to always
strip line breaks on input and to always append line breaks on
output.
That is fundmentally how all message content is handeld everywhere,
regardless off whether the line
On 16/03/25 16:18, Peter via Postfix-users wrote:
This is a relatively simple patch, for the sake of simplicity it
replaces the linefeed at read time, but a slightly more complicated
patch that does it when lines are output to dst might be more
appropriate. Note this is untested:
...and I
2
but I'm hoping someone here has any suggestions about controlling
(permitting?) programs called as a pipe service by postfix to set their
own signal handlers.
Thanks,
Mark
_______
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe s
r('From', 'Alex
')
syslog: mail-lf1-f42.google.com [209.85.167.42]: REJECT: bad address, HELO:
mail-lf1-f42.google.com, FROM: , RCPT: ,
From: Alex , To: , Subject:
alex
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
reading, it appears that the above is not the right approach. What
other methods exist to do this?
https://serverfault.com/questions/1052369/postfix-header-check-regex-with-if-conditional-not-matching-change-sender-addr
Thanks,
Alex
___
Postfix-users
Hi
Problem solved but thenx
W dniu 17.04.2025 o 15:40, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users pisze:
natan via Postfix-users:
Hi
I known that but I terminated tls via haproxy
Then this is better discussed on an HaProxy forum.
Wietse
___
Postfix
l and destroy all copies of the original
message.
Website: https://www.ursc.gov.in
--
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an ema
W dniu 17.04.2025 o 14:11, natan via Postfix-users pisze:
Hi
For test I use setup like haproxy + postfix - works fine via 587 /
587+tls and I have problem with 465
frontend ft_submission
bind 0.0.0.0:587
mode tcp
timeout client 1m
log global
default_backend bk_submission
check maxconn 2000
weight 2
W dniu 17.04.2025 o 14:40, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users pisze:
natan via Postfix-users:
Hi
For test I use setup like haproxy + postfix - works fine via 587 /
587+tls and I have problem with 465
The port 465 service MUST have "-o smtpd_tls_wrappermode=ye
--
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
many thanks, L._______
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
thanks,
Even had it my notes, I skipped two releases of OS and some
changes to binaries made me anxious a bit, unnecessarily.
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
regex.conf:
>> reject
>> header /From/ /^user@baddom\.tld$/i and envrcpt /@example\.com$/i
>>
>
It looks like this is the place to start?
https://github.com/milter-regex/milter-regex/tree/main
Can I ask usage questions about this plugin here?
Thanks,
Alex
__
inary-capable" from "not
BINARYMIME-capable".
Also note that although RFC1652 (8BITMIME) explicitly mentions the 1000
octet limit itself, it also mentions dot-stuffing, which Postfix
(rightfully) ignores when using BDAT.
___________
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
to be announced by a
specifically named EHLO keyword defined by a specifically numbered RFC.
In my opinion, BDAT itself could already be meant to signal support for
binary payload, as the name most probably stands for Binary DATa.
___
Postfix-users ma
ot by RFC2045. Or would you say that it is
impossible to design an SMTP-unrelated binary-capable protocol that can
transport RFC2045-compliant Binary Data?___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to po
On the download page the first GPG key links to
http://ftp.porcupine.org/mirrors/postfix-release/official/postfix-3.10.0.tar.gz.gpg0
which is a 404.
Peter
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
compliance from the presence or absence of SMTP
features.
_______
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
Disable clamav completely, restart your server and try it like that,
for a few days.
ClamAV is a RAM killer!
On Mon, Mar 3, 2025 at 5:34 PM Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming via
Postfix-users wrote:
>
> Dear Varadi Gabor,
>
> I have just asked ChatGPT Artificial Intelligence (AI) fo
_____
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
Il 07/03/2025 22:13, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users ha scritto:
By far the easiest is to stop using content_filter and to use an
rspamd milter or the like do the signing.
Thanks, but I don't want to "overturn" everything; yes I'm running
spamassassin.
ATM I just fo
t starting a new thread for that, though.
Peter
___________
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
riant 2 did not work. The generic rewrite does not take place.
So the verbatim.invalid
address is used for the final delivery.
Regards,
Ingo
Am 13.03.25 um 15:17 schrieb Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users:
On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 02:55:00PM +0100, rog7993--- via Postfix-users wrote:
In simple
d in the existing configuration with virtual_alias_maps?
Ingo
___________
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
the wheel?
--
_______
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
r it was a (health) `check` statement on the
offending port in the haproxy config. Removing that statement and the
error messages disappeared.
Problem solved (or at least side-stepped)
Thank you again for all your help
Cheers
Dulux-Oz
On 25/2/25 06:36, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
Vikto
On 25/2/25 16:12, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote:
Well, it leaves us in a not entirely satisfactory situation,
because it is still unclear what the haproxy health check
sent to Postfix, and whether it should, or should not, have
been accepted.
Nor it is clear what inet_protocols your
e to ask if required :-)
Thanks in advance
Dulux-Oz
_______
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
in/chronyd (1374)
/usr/sbin/chronyd (1389)
0 processes are unconfined but have a profile defined.
And Realy I dont have any problem whats going on
I must mention that my traffic is about 40 requests per second
W dniu 27.03.2025 o 20:32, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users pisze:
natan via Postfix
persistently available?
To configure sasl, I used (among other things) this documentation:
https://www.postfix.org/SASL_README.html
Thanks in advance for your help!
OS : DEBIAN 12
Postfix version : 3.7.11
Best regards,
Wouldsmina
___
Postfix-users mailing
.
Some Debian-based Postfix distributions ignore the "cyrus_sasl_config_path"
parameter setting, and force Postfix to open the file
/etc/postfix/sasl/smtpd.conf.
Thank you for your help.
Le jeu. 3 avr. 2025 à 19:11, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users <
postfix-users@postfix
A tcpdump between smtp and smtpd shows a TCP handshake but no payload at
all.
On the tlsrpt socket, I would expect negative feedback signaling
"starttls-no-supported" and "dnssec-invalid" or "dane-required".
___________
Postfix-users m
= 6
I dont have any idea
--
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
Hi
I dont have selinux
W dniu 27.03.2025 o 12:52, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users pisze:
natan via Postfix-users:
Hi
I upgrade from debian10 to debian11 and init.d to systemd
In old debian I dont have any probles but in debian11 in systemd (after
4h) I get many
ar 27 10:17:01 node2 postfix
u 3.04.2025 o 12:56, natan via Postfix-users pisze:
Hi
maby this is problem:
root@node2:~# date
czw, 3 kwi 2025, 12:52:33 CEST
root@node2:~# ps -aux |egrep '(lemat3|spf)'|head -n2
postfix 1406118 0.0 0.0 40076 5668 ? S 11:32 0:00
spawn -n policyd-lemat3 -t unix user=nob
> On May 15, 2025, at 9:53 AM, vom513 wrote:
>
>
>
>> On May 14, 2025, at 11:24 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users
>> wrote:
>>
>> On 14.05.25 10:37, vom513 via Postfix-users wrote:
>>> I see docs on how to rate limit for certain netwo
Hello all,
I see docs on how to rate limit for certain networks / IPs - but can custom
rate limiting be applied to authenticated users ?
Thanks.
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users
e certainly not taxed.
and, i know i can filter log output with grep or rsyslog.
can pf's logging config itself, for these connections, be directly quieted --
or at least better aggregated?
if so, how?
if not, ndb -- just an inconvenience.
_______
Postfi
possible.
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
> On May 14, 2025, at 11:24 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
> On 14.05.25 10:37, vom513 via Postfix-users wrote:
>> I see docs on how to rate limit for certain networks / IPs - but can custom
>> rate limiting be applied to authenticated users
On 3/06/25 09:13, Luca vom Bruch via Postfix-users wrote:
I wanted to implement TLSRPT and added the Ghettoforge repo to Alma9 to
get the latest 3.10.x release of Postfix, but now I found out that
TLSRPT support is not compiled in the RPM
Will it ever find its way into a regular .rpm?
As
On 3/06/25 14:25, Peter via Postfix-users wrote:
On 3/06/25 09:13, Luca vom Bruch via Postfix-users wrote:
I wanted to implement TLSRPT and added the Ghettoforge repo to Alma9
to get the latest 3.10.x release of Postfix, but now I found out that
TLSRPT support is not compiled in the RPM
Will
fix_postdrop_t,cluster_t,fifo_file,write
___________
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
- n - - lmtp
anvil unix - - n - 1 anvil
scache unix - - n - 1 scache
postlog unix-dgram n - n - 1
postlogd
_______
Postfix-users mailing list
id_maps = static:2000
___________
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
-c /etc/postfix_relay/ | egrep -i fifo
(no results)
But as far as postifx's binaries go - there is only one install/package on each
box.
___________
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
r {
unix_listener login/director {
#mode = 0666
}
fifo_listener login/proxy-notify {
#mode = 0666
}
unix_listener director-userdb {
#mode = 0600
}
inet_listener {
#port =
}
}
...
My postfix also uses amavisd & pyspf-milter.
many thanks, L._______
vent" mail delivery?
b) what to "fix" on "external" mail tools' end in order to
adhere to system's default mail delivery?
I think "a" is preferable.
many thanks, L.___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
Am 19.06.25 um 11:24 schrieb Michael Webb via Postfix-users:
In my master.cf I have defined a dedicated listener (port 10032) to receive TLS
reports from the tlsrpt-reporter package so they can be relayed without
generating another TLS report (to avoid a report loop).
I tried to use these
the From: header has no protection from
forged headers, but this is not what I am querying.
Is this a known issue or have I uncovered an interesting MAIL FROM
spoofing edge case?
Kind Regards,
Matthew
P.s. "Reporting problems to postfix-users@postfix.org" on
s,
Matthew
On 22/06/2025 12:57, Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users wrote:
On 22.06.25 12:44, Matthew via Postfix-users wrote:
I'm a new user and during my testing I noticed some potentially
unintended behaviour with "reject_sender_login_mismatch" when SASL is
disabled on
n and as my server is purely a personal server used solely by me
you would think I would notice if someone pretends to be me to me :).
Kind Regards,
Matthew
On 22/06/2025 13:50, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote:
On Sun, Jun 22, 2025 at 01:39:09PM +0100, Matthew via Postfix-users wrote:
Than
e new From: header address is postfix-mum...@postfix.org
for mumble in [announce, devel, users]. The original sender
address is added as a Reply-To address.
- There is a new DKIM signature from the domain postfix.org.
Wietse
_______
Postfix-users ma
ail-archive.com, ... ?
Best regards,
Gerald
_______
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
Gerald Galster via Postfix-users:
>
> >> Out of sheer curiosity ... Mailman 2 or 3?
> >
> > Mailman 3 with ARC support enabled. Additionally all listmail will be DKIM
> > signed.
>
> Do you plan to enable a public archive at
> https://list.sys4.de/hyper
//lists.mailman3.org/archives/list/mailman-us...@mailman3.org/thread/YWGG2KTDLRYL3DM4YCDYVD73TOXXLJSX/
There may be leftovers that hyperkitty finds.
Best regards
Gerald
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
Gerald Galster via Postfix-users:
> The tab "Archiving" under "List Settings" offers "Archive policy":
> "Public archives", "Private archives", "Do not archive this list".
These settings are mutually exclusive, i.e. the setting &qu
Patrick Ben Koetter via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-03-07 17:16:
I'll let Jörg at sys4 take a look at this.
+1
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0
tests=ARC_INVALID,ARC_SIGNED,AWL,
DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,DMARC_MISSING,
KAM_
On Tue, Mar 7, 2023, at 12:02, Benny Pedersen via Postfix-users wrote:
>
> why is arc invalid ?
My email provider is adding a little more detail:
Authentication-Results: pb-mx20.pobox.com;
arc=invalid
(as.1.list.sys4.de=invalid (public key: does not support hash algorithm
&
Hello.
Sadly, when viewing this list in Thunderbird, it only displays "Postfix
Users" as the From address, versus showing the posters name. I tend to
ignore posters I don't recognize, and now i need to open each post to
see who replied.
Any workarounds in Thunderbird t
Matthew McGehrin via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-03-07 18:31:
Any workarounds in Thunderbird to override this behavior?
imho if you show Reply-To in this list you will see original poster ?
i have not tryed it self yet, using roundcube mostly
toganm--- via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-03-07 18:32:
Abusix Mail Intelligence;
https://lookup.abusix.com/search?q=188.68.34.52
https://multirbl.valli.org/lookup/188.68.34.52.html
not even on dnswl.org :/
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix
On 3/7/2023 11:31 AM, Matthew McGehrin via Postfix-users wrote:
Hello.
Sadly, when viewing this list in Thunderbird, it only displays
"Postfix Users" as the From address, versus showing the posters
name. I tend to ignore posters I don't recognize, and now i need to
open each
Le 07/03/2023 à 18:42, Benny Pedersen via Postfix-users a écrit :
Matthew McGehrin via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-03-07 18:31:
Any workarounds in Thunderbird to override this behavior?
imho if you show Reply-To in this list you will see original poster ?
i have not tryed it self yet
1001 - 1100 of 8004 matches
Mail list logo
