eck=1
gpgkey=file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-gf.el7
failovermethod=priority
includepkgs=postfix*
[gf-testing]
name=GhettoForge packages that are currently untested.
mirrorlist=
http://mirrorlist.ghettoforge.org/el/7/testing/$basearch/mirrorlist
# This repo may contain packages that overwrite
I've run into a problem with one of the postfix tls scripts.
Attempting to deploy server certificates with
# postfix tls deploy-server-cert certificate.crt keyfile.key
Expected to deploy new certificates
What happened - command fails with
/usr/lib/postfix/sbin/postfix-tls-script
On 2020-05-30 09:42, Wietse Venema wrote:
postfix-us...@vintagesfinewine.com:
I've run into a problem with one of the postfix tls scripts.
Attempting to deploy server certificates with
# postfix tls deploy-server-cert certificate.crt keyfile.key
Expected to deploy new certificates
On Mo, Jun 08, 2020 at 07:52:34 +0200, Claus R. Wickinghoff wrote:
>What about redlist (stop) and greenlist (go)? Traffic lights are pretty
>international.
They arenât. As far as I know you have a blue light for go in Japan.
Stephan
--
|If your life was a horse, you'd have to shoot it.
On Mo, Jun 08, 2020 at 07:52:34 +0200, Claus R. Wickinghoff wrote:
>What about redlist (stop) and greenlist (go)? Traffic lights are pretty
>international.
They arenât. As far as I know you have a blue light for go in Japan.
Stephan
--
|If your life was a horse, you'd have to shoot it.
Hello (not helo :-)
I am working on a spam filter and so I find myself spending a lot more quality
time with mail logs than I used to. One of the things I have noticed is that I
will get a lot of connections that send a HELO command and then disconnect.
Sometimes I get this repeated sever
On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 19:01:48 +0200, Mark Martinec stated:
> Michael Ströder wrote:
> > Does anybody here have experience with current usage of SMTPUTF8?
> > I have a discussion whether that's already used in the wild or not.
>
> Google does support SMTPUTF8 :
>
>
> $ host -t mx gmail.com
> gmai
On Thu, 27 Aug 2015 07:39:48 +0200, Martin Skjöldebrand stated:
> After a lot of head scratching and despair, I *think* I got the
> problem down to sasl authentication didn't authenticate. I can now
> send from one account (this) but not my main address with the same
> settings (w/ change of
On Fri, 28 Aug 2015 12:30:48 +0200, dravion.sm...@gmx.net stated:
> really, idiot
> http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtp_bind_address
smtp_bind_address (default: empty) ≠ smtpd_bind_address
--
Jerry
I am using WinZip-19.5 on a Win 10 Pro machine. It has built in
configurations for different email site; Outlook, Gmail, Yahoo. You can also
configure your own server.
I configured it to use Postfix on my FreeBSD-10.1 machine. It fails. This is
from the Postfix logs:
Sep 13 11:22:41 scorpio
On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 15:54:45 +, Viktor Dukhovni stated:
> On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 11:37:07AM -0400, Postfix User wrote:
>
> > Sep 13 11:22:41 scorpio postfix/submission/smtpd[18955]: warning: TLS
> > library problem: error:1408A0C1:SSL routines:ssl3_get_client_h
On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 16:35:42 +, Viktor Dukhovni stated:
> > tls_medium_cipherlist = AES128+EECDH:AES128+EDH
>
> Never mind all the above, BINGO! Where did that come from? Certainly
> not anything I'd ever recommended to anyone. Remove that setting
> with prejudice.
I have no idea where t
Hello,
I have a lot of servers with postfix and a content filter. Last week end, I
noticed the following error "readdata: no buffer space" when the mail is sent
to the content filter (this is normal because the header size was not the same
on Postfix and on the content filter).
Bu
/09/15 15:16, wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema) a écrit :
>
> POSTFIX MAIL:
> > relay=127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]:10025, delay=0.38, delays=0.32/0.03/0/0.03,
> > dsn=4.4.2, status=deferred (lost connection with 127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1] while
> > sending end of data -- message ma
The only difference between the 2 tests is the debug_peer_list parameter
(postfix, content filter, filter, message are the same).
If the filter is buggy, the result should be the same but this is not the case
here. So, I would like to understand why the behaviour is different once I
enable
On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 06:09:36 -0400, Ruben Safir stated:
> I have been running majordomo for a decade+ with postfix with no
> trouble but I resently turned over to mailman and it is taking
> 3 hours to turn over messages. And I don't have this problem
> with normal email, just w
Okay, I suppose I don't pay as close attention to release announcements as I
should. I noticed this is another post recently:
Postfix 3.0 also introduces inline: tables whose keys and values are stored
inside main.cf
I did not see any documentation on the Postfix site for that. Am I just
I apologize if this is not the correct place to ask this question.
I am using the "clamav milter" with Postfix. I assume it is checking
mail both coming and going. I want it to only filter mail I receive. Is
that possible in Postfix?
Thanks!
--
Jerry
I have a Postfix-relay with a bunch of domains.
Most oft them are relayed to an ms exchange-server behind.
Therefore I make a ldap-query against the ms ad-server (relay_recipient_maps =
ldap:/etc/postfix/ldap_relay_recipient_map.cf) which works perfect.
One domain is hosted on a Linux (Postfix
I have a question regarding “smtp_generic_maps” and
“smtp_sender_dependent_authentication” with
“sender_dependent_relayhost_maps”.
I have some users who have addresses in the form of:
“u...@localdomain.com” whose name should be rewritten to
u...@newdomain.com. The “new” name should then be looked
On Fri, 1 Jul 2016 11:01:00 +0200, Matthias Fechner stated:
>Am 30.06.2016 um 04:51 schrieb Noel Jones:
>> IIRC the FreeBSD ports postfix configuration SPF option will compile
>> postfix with a third-party SPF library patch, which is not
>> recommended.
>>
>&
Postfix-3.2-20160917 with FreeBSD-11.0 /64 bit
Lately, I have been finding the following entries in the maillog:
13643:Sep 30 02:00:40 scorpio postfix/smtpd[83056]: warning: hostname
ip-address-pool-xxx.fpt.vn does not resolve to address 118.71.251.67: hostname
nor servname provided, or not
On Fri, 30 Sep 2016 17:08:05 -0700, li...@lazygranch.com stated:
>This will pull these hackers off your maillog.
>bzgrep -e auth=0/1 maillog* | sed 's/.*\[\([^]]*\)\].*/\1/g' >iplist
>sort iplist | uniq
Great idea. I modified it slightly since the "sort" was not working
correctly here. I make a b
On Thu, 6 Oct 2016 22:33:11 +0200, Geert Stappers stated:
>On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 09:53:10PM +0200, Gary Luck wrote:
>> Wietse Venema schrieb:
>> >Gary Luck:
>> >[ Charset ISO-8859-15 converted... ]
>> >> Hello,
>> >>I made some changes
On Wed, 2 Nov 2016 03:17:14 -0600, @lbutlr stated:
>On Nov 1, 2016, at 5:20 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>> That's what books like 'the Postfix book' were been written for.
>
>The which what? The only postfix book I know about is the O’Reilly one
>that is more than
On the "http://www.postfix.org/docs.html"; page, the link to "Postfix
Howtos by Matthias Andree" <http://home.pages.de/~mandree/postfix/> is
apparently broken:
Not Found
The requested document was not found on this server.
Web Server at dt.e-technik.tu-dortmund.de
T
On Thu, 24 Nov 2016 22:04:41 +0100, Josh Good stated:
>Now, having said that, there is a gotcha: the URL for the hotfix offers
>a "Hotfix download available" button, which simply put does NOT work.
>Microsoft seems to have silently retired that hotfix from general
>availability. That is bad news f
On Fri, 25 Nov 2016 07:20:25 +0100, Josh Good stated:
>On 2016 Nov 24, 16:58, Postfix User wrote:
>> On Thu, 24 Nov 2016 22:04:41 +0100, Josh Good stated:
>>
>> >Now, having said that, there is a gotcha: the URL for the hotfix
>> >offers a "Hotfix downlo
On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 14:16:20 -0500 (EST), Wietse Venema stated:
>With 'no shared ciphers' happening frequently, do we want to set
>up a TLS troubleshooting document, or is the decision tree too
>complex for such a document to be useful?
+1 for a "TLS Troubleshooting Document"
--
Jerry
cp_table is consulted with a full address, it can produce wrong
answers even if it is placed at the last position of transport_maps.
The first idea was to return 500 when queried for addresses whose domain is in
T.
In the next round, when Postfix queried for pure domains, it would find a hit
in HT an
Am 20.12.2014 um 20:44 schrieb nh:
I have a postfix/dovecot server, and I want to have one account per domain,
ie. :
*@Domain1.tld <-> User1 (+ sender only users (only "autop...@domain1.tld" in
example), like php mail function)
*@Domain2.tld <-> User2
*@Domain3.tld &
Am 20.12.2014 um 20:44 schrieb nh:
I have a postfix/dovecot server, and I want to have one account per domain,
ie. :
*@Domain1.tld <-> User1 (+ sender only users (only "[hidden email]
" in
example), like php mail function)
*@Domain2.tld <-> User2
*@Domain3.tld &
If you see the file main.cf I sent before, I already have this line :
virtual_alias_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/virtual
file /etc/postfix/virtual contains :
@domain2.tld user2
@domain1.tld user1
@domain4.tld user2
@domain3.tld user1
Users "user1" and "user2" are knew by my ser
Thanks for your help, I finally find my problem (after 3 hours of rereading and
grep configuration files in /etc), it's so simple ...
I have a line to declare myorigin in /etc/postfix/main.cf , after comment that
line, the configuration work fine.
#myorigin = /etc/mailname
On 21/12/20
On Sun, 25 Jan 2015 20:45:38 +0800, Roger Goh stated:
> Q4:
> Does Redhat support postfix (ie provide patches, troubleshooting of
> crashes, slowness)?
>
> Q5:
> We are on SendMail version 3.3.4 & I think it's a commercially-added
> tool Flow Control version 2.1.
On Sun, 1 Feb 2015 18:26:18 +0530, Vishal Agarwal stated:
> We are using zimbra 8.0. My postfix is allowing to send email without
> password authentication. Although this is for inter-domain but still it
> should ask for password.
1) Don't use HTML email. Gmail has an option fo
On Thu, 5 Feb 2015 09:57:00 -0500 (EST), Wietse Venema stated:
> We can adopt the current "pie=yes" support into Postfix 3.0 with a
> note that this was tested on a few recent BSD and Linux distributions
> (it solves 90% of the problem). We can use the Postfix 3.1 cycle
&
On Sat, 14 Feb 2015 01:50:09 +0100, Benny Pedersen stated:
> since no one have crystall
> balls here
Funny ... I think you meant, "Has a crystal ball here."
--
Jerry
On Tue, 24 Feb 2015 16:17:10 -0500, System Support stated:
> > $ pcregrep -v '^\s*#' /etc/postfix/master.cf
I believe that postconf -Mf would display what postfix sees in your master.cf
file. It would supply a cleaner output too.
--
Jerry
FreeBSD-10.1 amd64
I recently had a power outage that resulted in a system shutdown. When I
rebooted the system, postfix elicited this massage:
postfix/postfix-script: warning: damaged message: corrupt/3ktB2X6JxNz3DljZ
postfix/postfix-script: warning: damaged message: corrupt
On Thu, 26 Feb 2015 11:24:51 -0500 (EST), Wietse Venema stated:
> Postfix User:
> > FreeBSD-10.1 amd64
> >
> > I recently had a power outage that resulted in a system shutdown. When I
> > rebooted the system, postfix elicited this massage:
> >
> > p
On Thu, 26 Feb 2015 12:48:42 -0500 (EST), Wietse Venema stated:
> Postfix User:
> > Thank you. The files were 0 length, so I just deleted them.
> >
> > -rwx-- 1 postfix wheel 0B 2015-02-26 06:04:05 EST
> > 3ktB2X6JxNz3DljZ* -rwx-- 1 postfix wheel
On Wed, 18 Mar 2015 07:38:33 -0300, Fernando Maior stated:
> You also may try sendemail. Look
> at http://caspian.dotconf.net/menu/Software/SendEmail. I use it to send
> emails from scripts directly to gmail accounts I use for servers backup
> control.
I use to use it too, but I began getting al
I have a problem and I am not really sure what it is. I use the utility
program "sendEmail" to relay mail in several different scripts I created. When
I send to "Yahoo", everything goes fine. If I try and send through Postfix on
my server, with the same configuration exce
loyer (or my new one!).
>
> Needless to say, I will continue to support Postfix.
>
> Wietse
Best of luck to you Wietse. In your spare time, perhaps you can fix their
insane IMAP implementation.
--
Jerry
I was considering purchasing "The Book of Postfix" by Ralf Hildebrandt
and Patrick Koetter. The edition listed on Amazon is dated 2005. That is 10
years old which is ancient is software years. Is there a newer version
available?
Thanks
--
Jerry
On Wed, 06 May 2015 13:59:44 -0400, Scott Kitterman stated:
> Great. Feel free to throw RFC 7208 Section 3.4 (Record Size) at them. The
> SHOULD fit in a UDP packet is there for a reason.
SHOULD ≠ MUST
--
Jerry
On Tue, 19 May 2015 07:05:04 -0400 (EDT), Wietse Venema stated:
> The poster is a known querulant. In a post-mortem, I found that his
> choice of words is similar to that of a certain Richard who has
> pulled off similar stunts on this mailing list in the past. Note
> that this time, his submissio
On Sat, 23 May 2015 12:13:33 -0500, Noel Jones stated:
> # Avoid obsolete protocol versions
> #
> smtpd_tls_protocols = !SSLv2, !SSLv3
> smtp_tls_protocols = !SSLv2, !SSLv3
Wouldn't the following be more secure:
smtpd_tls_protocols=!SSLv2, !SSLv3, !TLSv1, !TLSv1.1
smtpd_t
On Mon, 25 May 2015 13:52:07 +, Viktor Dukhovni stated:
> -o smtpd_tls_dh1024_param_file=$msa_tls_dh1024_param_file
Is that correct? It doesn't look right.
--
Jerry
On Tue, 26 May 2015 08:14:43 +, Viktor Dukhovni stated:
> On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 03:49:09PM -0400, Postfix User wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 25 May 2015 13:52:07 +, Viktor Dukhovni stated:
> >
> > > -o smtpd_tls_dh1024_param_file=$msa_tls_dh1024_param_file
> >
I hope this isn't too stupid of a question. I have been finding this event
logged in maillog for the past several days:
Jul 16 08:50:38 scorpio postfix/smtpd[69563]: connect from localhost[127.0.0.1]
Jul 16 08:50:38 scorpio postfix/smtpd[69563]: warning: Illegal address syntax
from loca
On Mon, 03 Aug 2015 14:52:33 +0200, Istvan Prosinger stated:
> Yeah when I took the server for audit, Postfix was dead and couldn't
> start -the config file was (and stil is) in mess.
>
> Nevertheless, accepting SMTP is not the issue at this moment.
> The issue is
On Thu, 5 Jan 2017 17:11:15 -0500, Viktor Dukhovni stated:
>Perhaps we should add comments above internal core service entries in
>master.cf: "DO NOT REMOVE, DO NOT MODIFY, ..."
Personally, I believe it would be a waste of time Victor. Like the
saying, "Nothing is foolproof to the sufficiently mo
#recipient_bcc_maps = mysql:/etc/postfix/sqlconf/recipient_bcc_maps.cf
virtual_alias_maps = mysql:/etc/postfix/sqlconf/virtual_mailbox_maps.cf
virtual_mailbox_domains = mysql:/etc/postfix/sqlconf/mydestination.cf
virtual_transport = dovecot
smtpd_relay_restrictions =
permit_mynetworks
se_tls=yes
smtpd_tls_session_cache_database = btree:${data_directory}/smtpd_scache
smtp_tls_session_cache_database = btree:${data_directory}/smtp_scache
virtual_alias_maps = mysql:/etc/postfix/sqlconf/virtual_mailbox_maps.cf
virtual_mailbox_domains = mysql:/etc/postfix/sqlconf/mydestination.cf
virtual_alias_domai
My test procedure follows
telnet domain.com 25
ehlo me
mail from:
rcpt to:
At this point I get "Ok" message, and I can continue writing the body of the
e-mail. Because account doesn't exist, Postfix sends bounce notification
back to sender address.
This i
Bastian Blank-3 wrote
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 02:01:27PM -0700, Postfix User wrote:
>> check_sender_access $virtual_alias_maps,
>
> You are creating an open relay, don't do that.
Actually I am not creating an open relay, $virtual_alias_maps contains only
internal a
Thanks for the tips Viktor,
For some reason the order of restrictions in smtpd_relay_restrictions
(Postfix 2.11.0) was wrong. Luckily expected check_sender_access values are
not valid email addresses. After I fix both problems I will post a new
postconf -n output.
Robin
Viktor Dukhovni wrote
You are right, there are no recipient restrictions, except
permit_sasl_authenticated restricting remote recipients for authenticated
clients only.
--
View this message in context:
http://postfix.1071664.n5.nabble.com/Prevent-Backscatter-tp88359p88385.html
Sent from the Postfix Users mailing
Postfix User wrote
> After I fix both problems I will post a new postconf -n output.
I removed completely check_sender_access, it is not required anymore.
Wietse Venema wrote
> Is your server MX host for domains that are delivered to a different
> mail server?
> If not:
> Se
Wietse Venema wrote
> This will be an open relay if all your SMTP mail is logged with the
> same client IP address, i.e. your SMTP mail comes from some box
> that is in mynetworks, and Postfix never sees the original SMTP
> client IP address.
I can remove permit_mynetworks, but
Wietse Venema wrote
> Wietse Venema:
>> Postfix User:
>> > smtpd_relay_restrictions = permit_mynetworks,
>> permit_sasl_authenticated,
>> > reject_unauth_destination
>>
>> This will be an open relay if all your SMTP mail is logged with the
>> sam
OMAINS in virtual_alias_DOMAINS.
I set a lookup table for virtual_alias_domains. Before it didn't work,
because I used $virtual_mailbox_domains, and it has different format
postconf -n | grep virtual_alias_domains
virtual_alias_domains =
mysql:/etc/postfix/sqlconf/virtual_al
This question has probably been answered somewhere before; however, I
cannot find it. I am going to rebuild my FreeBSD system from the ground
up. I was wondering if Postfix is compatible with the MySQL 8.0
verson release.
Thanks!
--
Postfix User
Postfix User wrote
> I am trying to reject instead of sending bounce message back when email
> arrives to non existing account at domains hosted by my server.
Anyone having similar problem, check_recipient_access map fixed my problem
postconf -n | grep smtpd_relay_restri
d you
feed him for a lifetime.
--
View this message in context:
http://postfix.1071664.n5.nabble.com/Prevent-Backscatter-tp88359p88413.html
Sent from the Postfix Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Tue, 7 Mar 2017 23:54:36 -0500, Robert Moskowitz stated:
>I am back to building a new mailserver. I am using Centos7 which has
>postfix 2.10.1
>
>Back some 4 years ago there was a thread here to add support to
>postconf to manage master.cf. From
>
>http://www.postfi
I am looking for a little guidance regarding deploying Diffie-Hellman
for TLS. According to this URL: https://www.weakdh.org/sysadmin.html,
the following are recommended settings for Postfix.
smtpd_tls_exclude_ciphers = aNULL, eNULL, EXPORT, DES, RC4, MD5, PSK,
aECDH, EDH-DSS-DES-CBC3-SHA, EDH
I am not really sure where the best place to report this is, so I will
just assume this will suffice.
On the http://www.postfix.org/docs.html page, the link
http://yocum.org/faqs/postfix-tls-sasl.html referring to Postfix SASL +
TLS + FreeBSD howto by Tim Yocum is broken.
Also, the http
On Thu, 27 Jul 2017 22:20:36 +1200, Peter stated:
>On 27/07/17 21:54, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> We are moving to a new (virtual) server (from CentOS 5 with Postfix
>> 2.11.6 to CentOS 7 with Postfix 3.2.2).
>
>Where did you get Postfix 3.2 from?
On Tue, 22 Aug 2017 10:14:11 +, Alef Veld stated:
>Now which clarifies things a lot. I'll probably keep 465 with wrapper mode to
>support outlook expresss or other clients which want it and put 587 without.
MS Outlook Express was depreciated in Windows 7, way back on Oct 2009. It has
been yea
On Mon, 28 Aug 2017 08:06:39 -0500, Tom Browder stated:
>My remote postfix installation can send but not receive, and I'm sure
>I have a bad setting somewhere. When sending to the remote server,
>from my personal gmail account I finally get a response from gmail as
>shown in
=permit_mynetworks
But when I try to send a mail, I get an error:
[root@vps3 ~]# socat UNIX:/var/spool/postfix/public/lsmtp -
220 vps3.xyz.com ESMTP Postfix
EHLO test
250-vps3.xyz.com
250-PIPELINING
250-SIZE 10
250-ETRN
250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES
250-8BITMIME
250 DSN
MAIL FROM:
250 2.1.0 Ok
RCPT TO:
454
> I think this is not supported.
> Try using type 'inet', bound to 127.0.0.1.
Thank you.
I was able to run smtpd on a UNIX socket. The problem was in the
policies smtpd_relay_restrictions and smtpd_recipient_restrictions,
which can not be set as "permit".
On Thu, 26 Oct 2017 14:20:47 +0200, Poliman - Serwis stated:
>It's just unconditioned reaction. I also post this message to some forums,
>you know. I am affaird that hotmail.com / outlook.com and all microsoft
>email domains are configured to block emails from new/fresh domain and
>newly created e
On Fri, 5 Jan 2018 21:13:36 -0500, Phil Stracchino stated:
>On 01/05/18 20:55, @lbutlr wrote:
>> On 4 Jan 2018, at 14:40, Phil Stracchino ph...@caerllewys.net> wrote:
>>> The principal shortcoming of mysqldump is that it is a benightedly stupid
>>> tool that cannot walk and chew gum at the same
On Sun, 4 Mar 2018 19:06:52 +0100, no@s...@mgedv.net stated:
>hi wietse & postfix-folks, thanks for the best MX out there - still!
>feel free to apply this patch if reqd.
>
>--- ./src/util/sys_defs.h.orig 2017-02-02 02:31:15.0 +0100
>+++ ./src/util/sys_defs.h
ning an error.
>>
>> The signal is ignored the same way as if someone had called
>> | signal(SIGFOO, SIG_IGN)
>
>Postfix code is (while handling SIGTERM)
>
>sigemptyset(&action.sa_mask);
>action.sa_flags = 0;
>action.sa_handler = SI
On Thu, 17 May 2018 20:05:16 -0400, Viktor Dukhovni stated:
>> On May 17, 2018, at 7:53 PM, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
>>
>> Can you please elaborate on what are the "good security reasons" for
>> which that is a good idea and not simply a form of user tracking
On Sun, 20 May 2018 15:08:11 -0700 (MST), jmct stated:
>Hi there,
>
>I've set up a mail server that should be relaying messages to a different
>cluster of Postfix boxes. When I attempt to send a message to the first box,
>mail sits in the active queue for 5 minutes before
Hello,
I have a issue with a message-id automatically added when not present.
Postfix mail system:
postfix 25 (content-filter) --> AV 10026 --> postfix 10025
Summary of the problem:
When a message arrives to the postfix mail system, if it not present, a
message-id is added by the
On Thu, 16 Aug 2018 07:08:29 +0200, Poliman - Serwis stated:
>1. To be honest I don't know what is top-posting. Could you explain? I will
>avoid it then. ;)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
--
Jerry
ildir over
quota.)
us...@example.dm
ali...@example.dm
-- 1 Kbytes in 1 Request.
This results to user1 and user3 receiving the same queued message again and
again each time postfix tries to deliver the message out of
d
administration of the system would be more straightforward.
Thanks a lot again for your support.
Constantinos
Constantinos Kousouris
Network Operation Centre
Athens University of Economics and Business
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
[mailto:owner-postfi
It's all very clear to me now, after your reply Viktor ...
> ... If users read the
> documentation, we could perhaps find a few more places to encourage them
> to avoid aliases(5) and use virtual(5) for all rewriting that maps
addresses to
> other addresses.
> ...
That would be very useful
Tha
Is there any recommended schedule for regenerating DHparams for Postfix? I
could not find anything specific about it.
--
Jerry
On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 21:14:07 -0500, Richard Damon stated:
FreeBSD users already have a choice of either the latest postfix
version, Postfix 3.3 stable release or the latest beta
version,Postfix 3.4 experimental release. I don't know if
there is a good reason to modify the release date
til I could research
>> it.
>>
>> I attempted to remove the distro specific noise from the report.
>
>Sorry for making you the guinea pig.
>
>I am considering to withdraw Postfix 3.4 and do a proper Postfix
>3.5 release as planned later this year. We can't af
cided to forward it
>> > without evaluation rather than sit on it for a week until I could
>> > research it.
>> >
>> > I attempted to remove the distro specific noise from the report.
>>
>> Sorry for making you the guinea pig.
>>
>> I am cons
Hello,
I typed the address in a message wrong. Pine copied ot to the
sendmail folder anyway. But postfix saw the message that the
address was wrong and put it in the mailq. (Fair enough).
Question is: can I resnd the message with the correct address
and if yes, how?
Regards,
Hans
*** Antwoord op een bericht uit gebied LISTS.POSTFIX-USERS
(lists.postfix-users).
Hallo Ralf,
Op zondag 24 mei 2009 schreef Ralf Hildebrandt aan postfix-users@postfix.org:
>> Question is: can I resnd the message with the correct address
>> and if yes, how?
RH> I fail to se
*** Antwoord op een bericht uit gebied LISTS.POSTFIX-USERS
(lists.postfix-users).
Hallo Wietse,
Op zondag 24 mei 2009 schreef Wietse Venema aan Postfix users:
>> Question is: can I resnd the message with the correct address
>> and if yes, how?
WV> I assume that the message
okay i'm trying to configure postfix to use maildir instead of mbox. this
is in preparation to migrate to a new server.
i've got it configured so it will deliver the mail into the correct mail
directories for the users. i used mb2md version 2, which with a little
trial and error w
## >> ## >> > my problem is, when i log in, i can't see the mail.
## >> the new mail
## >> > files are being created in /home/username/Maildir/new
## >> but... mail
## >> > clients can't see it.
## >>
## >> This is a configuration issue with your pop3/imap
## >> service. You'll need to conf
## >> ## >> > my problem is, when i log in, i can't see the mail.
## >> the new mail
## >> > files are being created in /home/username/Maildir/new ## >> but...
mail ## >> > clients can't see it.
## >>
## >> This is a configuration issue with your pop3/imap ## >> service.
You'll need to configure
I'm currently running postgrey, but a recent thread here got me thinking
about postscreen, which I hadn't considered before.
What are the pros and cons of one versus the other? Are there advantages of
one over the other for a given application?
--Mac
Sorry about that.
Reading the postscreen readme is what spawned the question.
## >> -Original Message-
## >> From: Noel Jones [mailto:njo...@megan.vbhcs.org]
## >> Sent: Tuesday, 01 May, 2012 12:29
## >> To: postfix users; postfi...@triad.ath.cx
## >
Hallo postfix-users,
Occasionally external systems are tying to send mail with a
faked sender address via my system. So far no harm is done,
ad they have not been able to create a real user name. But
I would like to stop them before they use my mail system,
as soon as they make contact. How can I
Hallo Robert,
Op vrijdag 01 augustus 2008 schreef Robert Schetterer aan ram:
>>> Example:
>>> Jul 31 15:31:02 duinheks postfix/smtpd[29511]: NOQUEUE:
>>> reject: RCPT from unknown[218.20.152.23]: 550 5.1.0
>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Sender address reje
601 - 700 of 4850 matches
Mail list logo
