>From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
>
>Paolo Schiro:
>> Hallo everybody,
>>
>> I've wrote a postfix toolkit to report and act on the queue in a sharp way.
>> I would like to release it under GPL or some other free license.
>> To handle queue eff
Hallo everybody,
I've wrote a postfix toolkit to report and act on the queue in a sharp way.
I would like to release it under GPL or some other free license.
To handle queue efficently i rewrote the rec_get sub in perl (I discovered it
was already present in qshape too late)
In my understanding
I'm pretty shure you can group restrictions in classes for example:
restrictive2 = reject_unknown_sender_domain,reject_unknown_client_hostname
But I'm not shure they will be all applicable in the rcpt to stage.
Messaggio Originale
Da: post...@ptld.com
Inviato: Sat Jul 10 01:34:3
using an
header_checks rule resulting into a warning (or at least i recall something
similar).Anyway it's a journey i don't suggest because you will likely result
in an endless chasing of MUAs list their behaviors and obviously
exceptions. Paolo
Hi,
I'm writing to ask for help with the following problem. I cannot
use outlook365 as a relay host for Postfix.
I'm using postfix 2.6
I receive the following error:
Apr 1 17:12:19 elrng-backup postfix/smtp[10780]: warning: SASL
authentication failure: No worthy mechs found
Apr 1 17:12:1
Sorry, forget about this mail. I've solved it myself.
Thanks anyway.
On 04/01/2016 05:20 PM, Paolo Mioni wrote:
Hi,
I'm writing to ask for help with the following problem. I cannot
use outlook365 as a relay host for Postfix.
I'm using postfix 2.6
I receive the following er
t ldapsearch returns:
ldapsearch -v -LLL -h -b"dc=cgprouter" -x -s one 'mail=notexist@xx'
ldap_initialize( ldap://xxx)
filter: mail=notexist@xxx
requesting: All userApplication attributes
No such object (32)
Additional information: unknown user account
openldap]# postmap -q bar...@igi.cnr.it
ldap:/opt/trend/imss/OpenLDAP/etc/openldap/myBad.cf
postmap: warning: dict_ldap_lookup:
/opt/trend/imss/OpenLDAP/etc/openldap/myBad.cf: Search base 'dc=cgprouter' not
found: 32: No such object
Regards,
Paolo.
> On 4 Apr 2017, at 10:35, B
The latter broke postfix .
I’ve notified them about this, but I guess if can workaround it in postfix…. it
seems not.
Regards,
Paolo.
> On 4 Apr 2017, at 12:22, Michael Ströder wrote:
>
> Paolo Barbato wrote:
>> postmap: warning: dict_ldap_lookup:
>> /opt/trend/im
o grant interoperability with postfix, but I believe with other
MTA.
Regards,
Paolo.
> have you tried try omitting the base and simply searching base "" on the
> virtual ldap ? or adding a mapping option that allows a search at that
> virtual base to apparently succeed, so it
tml>
Regards,
Paolo.
> On 4 Apr 2017, at 16:53, Christian Rößner
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> Am 04.04.2017 um 08:48 schrieb Paolo Barbato :
>>
>> smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
> ...
>> ldap:ldaprfx,
> ...
>
> Maybe I am wrong, but aren't you mi
Hi Viktor,
Il giorno 04/apr/2017, alle ore 18.02, Viktor Dukhovni ha scritto:
> On Tue, Apr 04, 2017 at 08:48:33AM +0200, Paolo Barbato wrote:
>
>> I’m using following rules in main.cf
>>
>> smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
>> permit_mynetworks,
>>
nder the dc=cgprouter base now returns
> empty result rather than routing error.
>
> Th request with scope=base still returns error if the address can notbe
> routed.
Regards,
Paolo
Il giorno 04/apr/2017, alle ore 18.39, Viktor Dukhovni ha scritto:
>
>> On Apr
> On 5 Apr 2017, at 01:08, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>
>
>> On Apr 4, 2017, at 3:35 PM, Paolo Barbato wrote:
>>
>> here new ldaprfx.cf
>>
>> server_host = 150.178.3.89:389
>> bind=no
>> search_base = mail=%s,dc=cgprouter
>> scope =
> On 5 Apr 2017, at 01:21, Brett @Google wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 5:35 AM, Paolo Barbato <mailto:paolo.barb...@igi.cnr.it>> wrote:
>
> I've anyway just receive a feedback from CGPro developers that I share as
> promised:
>
>> For 6.2c3 (l
trend/imss/postfix/etc/postfix/ldaprfx.cf.
I noticed that this requires also to list explicitly proxy_read_maps:
proxy_read_maps = proxy:ldap:/opt/trend/imss/postfix/etc/postfix/ldaprfx.cf …..
Many thanks help me on focusing on a solution and for the very useful tips.
Regards,
Paolo.
> On 5
t most users have no reason to receive is a fine
> defensive
> strategy.
>
> --
> Viktor.
>
Paolo Barbato
Consorzio RFX
<https://www.igi.cnr.it/>corso Stati Uniti,4
35127 Padova - Italy
Network Administrator
phone: +39 049 8295097 fax: +39 049 8700718
Dear Enrico,
it seems that your domain hasn't any SPF entry in DNS.
dig txt cerm.unifi.it
Fighting spammers is hard, so at least SPF have to be used to legitimate your
IPs.
DKIM and DMARC are other ways...somewhat more complex to implement.
Regards,
Paolo.
> On 1 Feb 2019, at 15:41
Wed, 26 Nov 2014 14:32:34 +0100
From: Paolo De Michele
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/31.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Paolo De Michele
Subject: test
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
test
On 26/11/14 15:03, Cristiano Deana wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 2:42 PM, Paolo De Michele
> wrote:
>
>> Anyone can help me please?
> Not enough details (log, domains, anything), but this
>
> Received: from [172.16.2.153]
> (dynamic-adsl-78-15-215-90.client
20 matches
Mail list logo
