Hi
Today uceprotect add class /24 to blaclist ... One user (dedicated
server) send probably spam but the user claims that he did not send spam
only 6 e-mails in 1h. And uceprotect was blocked by the whole class ...
other RBLs it was clean any IP with that class /24
Any idea ? I'm not going to
Hi
Mayby this help you:
/etc/postfix/sender_checks.pcre
/@scripkabox\.com/
/etc/postfix/recipient_checks.pcre
smtpd_sender_restrictions =
permit_mynetworks
check_sender_access pcre:/etc/postfix/sender_checks.pcre
reject_unknown_sender_domain
...
cat /etc/postfix/sender_checks.pc
Hi
Try postfwd for postfix
http://postfwd.org/ratelimits.html
W dniu 27.03.2023 o 13:21, Gino Ferguson via Postfix-users pisze:
Hi,
How can one set up outbound rate limiting for a certain mail service provider?
Can postfix 'recognise' that recipientdomainA, recipientdomainB and
recipientdom
/regexp but hash I use too
W dniu 27.03.2023 o 14:16, Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users pisze:
On 27.03.23 12:39, natan via Postfix-users wrote:
/etc/postfix/sender_checks.pcre
/@scripkabox\.com/
/etc/postfix/recipient_checks.pcre
smtpd_sender_restrictions
Hi
I have question about *_error_limit and postfix
I have separated services like
smtp incomming and smtp outgoing and webmail
I have roudcube which is used by several thousand users
On smtp outgoing in main.cf:
...
smtpd_client_connection_count_limit = 900
smtpd_hard_error_limit = 5
smtpd_soft
W dniu 19.04.2023 o 17:23, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users pisze:
natan via Postfix-users:
Hi
I have question about *_error_limit and postfix
I have separated services like
smtp incomming and smtp outgoing and webmail
I have roudcube which is used by several thousand users
On smtp outgoing
Hi
I use keepalived and easy check like:
vrrp_script chk_myscript {
script "/usr/bin/postfix-check.sh"
interval 4
fall 2
weight 10
user root
}
...
#!/bin/bash
echo "ehlo localhost" | /bin/nc -w 1 "127.0.0.1" 25 |grep -q "250"
...
It's not very pretty but d
Hi
In centos7
root@node2-klone:~# postconf mail_version
mail_version = 3.4.23
root@node2-klone:~# postconf -M bar/unix='foo unix - n n - - pipe
argv=/bin/false'
root@node2-klone:~# postconf -M bar/unix='foo unix - n n - - pipe
argv=/bin/false'
root@node2-klone:~# postconf -M bar/unix='foo unix
Hi
In old version 3.4.x problem not exists
W dniu 27.04.2023 o 14:50, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users pisze:
SATOH Fumiyasu (TSUCHIDA Fumiyasu) via Postfix-users:
I see the following problems.
1. `postconf -M bar/unix='foo unix ...'` will duplicates entries
in master.cf.
Nice find: postconf s
Hi
I have some problem with cert - user who connect via 465
postfix/smtps/smtpd[6901]: warning: TLS library problem:
error:14094418:SSL routines:ssl3_read_bytes:tlsv1 alert unknown
ca:../ssl/record/rec_layer_s3.c:1544:SSL alert number 48:
Debian10
Cert is new (renew) and openssl x509 -in ..
Hi
Problem is only via web aplications (php)
W dniu 8.05.2023 o 13:29, natan via Postfix-users pisze:
Hi
I have some problem with cert - user who connect via 465
postfix/smtps/smtpd[6901]: warning: TLS library problem:
error:14094418:SSL routines:ssl3_read_bytes:tlsv1 alert unknown
ca:../ssl
Hi
Exactly as you're saying - problem solved - CA cant load via aplications.
W dniu 8.05.2023 o 15:31, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users pisze:
On Mon, May 08, 2023 at 01:29:55PM +0200, natan via Postfix-users wrote:
I have some problem with cert - user who connect via 465
postfix/
Hi
I have a some problem with setup
opendkim+opendmarc+amavisd-milter
main.cf---
smtpd_milters =
inet:localhost:10028,inet:localhost:10027,inet:localhost:10029
When I try local telnet 25 i get many many logs like:
..
Oct 17 13:59:01 mail2 postfix/10028/smtpd[6]: connect from
Hi
Thenx problem solved - problem was trivial (existing process with port
10028) W dniu 17.10.2023 o 17:37, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users pisze:
natan via Postfix-users:
Hi
I have a some problem with setup
opendkim+opendmarc+amavisd-milter
main.cf---
smtpd_milters =
inet:localhost
Hi
I found today
https://sec-consult.com/blog/detail/smtp-smuggling-spoofing-e-mails-worldwide/
--
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
Hi
Thenx for info Wietse
reject_unauth_pipelining in: smtpd_data_restrictions
or maybe only in smtpd_end_of_data_restrictions ?
W dniu 21.12.2023 o 19:11, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users pisze:
natan via Postfix-users:
Hi
I found today
https://sec-consult.com/blog/detail/smtp-smuggling
Hi
Why I asking beacuse I use
.
smtpd_end_of_data_restrictions =
check_policy_service { inet:127.0.0.1:10040 timeout=4s,
default_action=DUNNO }
permit_mynetworks,
lpolicyd
smtpd_data_restrictions = reject_unauth_pipelining
.
W dniu 21.12.2023 o 19:41, Wietse
Hi
In postfix-3.4.23 (debian) I set
(I use always)
smtpd_data_restrictions = reject_unauth_pipelining
And today I put
smtpd_discard_ehlo_keywords = chunking
And I get many many logs like:
...
Dec 29 10:10:13 msmtp postfix/submission/smtpd[11064]: discarding EHLO
keywords: CHUNKING
Dec 29 10:1
Hi
A good idea in my opinion, additionally add
reject_sender_login_mismatch with maps (u...@domain.ltd user@domainltd)
smtpd_sender_restrictions =
...
reject_sender_login_mismatch,
...
reject_unauth_pipelining,
Than only reject_unauth_pipelining
smtpd_data_restrictions = reje
Hi
I was in the same place some time ago and I use postwfd + others for
600K users and analize via sawmill (probably 6.x)
And conclusion for me
...
First rate is for 1 minut
id=sasl_msg_1min ; sasl_username=~$$sender ;
action=rate(sasl_username/40/60/421 4.7.1: $$sasl_username:
Sorry, send to
Hi
Sorry for stupid question but I dont realy undarstand
I create test VPS (outside my infrastructure) and install all for
python3 for testing
root@hanz:~# python3 smtp_smuggling_scanner.py --sender-domain gmail.com
piot...@mydomain.ltd
[*] Getting MX record for domain: xx
[*] Running SMTP
W dniu 8.01.2024 o 13:35, Damian via Postfix-users pisze:
I create test VPS (outside my infrastructure) and install all for
python3 for testing
root@hanz:~# python3 smtp_smuggling_scanner.py --sender-domain
gmail.com piot...@mydomain.ltd
Don't use a sender-domain you don't have control over. T
Hi
Yest this is e-mails body from test - only when sender domain have SPF
set ~all or SPF not exist
W dniu 8.01.2024 o 15:08, Damian via Postfix-users pisze:
SMUGGLING WORKS with '\r\n\x00.\r\n' as "fake" end-of-data sequence!
SMUGGLING WORKS with '\r.\r\n' as "fake" end-of-data sequence!
SMUG
Hi
I know it may seem quite strange, but I need it for my MX ...
I need a mapping every single email to the same one in pcre for
sender_login_maps.cf for
reject_sender_login_mismatch
...
smtpd_sender_login_maps = pcre:/etc/postfix/sender_login_maps.cf
...
Yes, I can use an existing map - I hav
Hi Wietse Have you thought about postfix repo for Debian, just like
dovecot has for his relase ?
I'm asking by the way
--
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
Hi
I have setup postfix+SPF+DKIM+DMARK and im confused
Sometimes I get in logs fail like:
Feb 2 09:02:31 mail134 opendmarc[29379]: 5AB633B005D: gmail.com none
Feb 2 09:02:39 mail134 opendmarc[29379]: D02333B005D: patronite.email pass
Feb 2 09:02:44 mail134 opendmarc[29379]: 363153B005D: indek
W dniu 9.02.2024 o 15:13, Juri Haberland via Postfix-users pisze:
On 09.02.24 14:58, natan via Postfix-users wrote:
Hi
I have setup postfix+SPF+DKIM+DMARK and im confused
Sometimes I get in logs fail like:
Feb 2 09:02:46 mail134 opendmarc[29379]: AE3D53B0062: allegromail.pl fail
Feb 2 09:02
Hi
I have questions about "high ability" in postfix
For example setup
1)postfix + external mysql (klaster) like
main.cf:
...
smtpd_sender_login_maps =
proxy:mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql_sender_login_maps.cf
smtpd_proxy_timeout=60s
...
For example I have a mysql maps - mysql_sender_login_maps.cf:
lived move IP)
All new connections work ok, but the old ones get an error connecting to
the database.
W dniu 27.02.2024 o 17:44, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users pisze:
natan via Postfix-users:
If i set smtpd_proxy_timeout=60s I "terminating" (timeout) all old
connections who get
&
W dniu 28.02.2024 o 16:14, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users pisze:
natan via Postfix-users:
for"us...@domain.ltd"
Feb 27 16:02:28 smtp1v postfix/cleanup[23476]: warning:
proxy:mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql_sender_bcc_maps_user.cf-new lookup error
for"us...@domain.ltd"
Feb 27 16:
Hi
I have one question regarding the RFC of the FROM field: in the message
header.
Is there any restriction that will force the FROM field to be correct
according to the RFC?
I'm asking because one client "parses e-mails strangely" and his
application hangs and instead of correcting it, he se
better to improve the
application than to play around with postfix because you can cause a big
problem
I don't want to kick with the horse...
W dniu 19.03.2024 o 11:43, Erwan David via Postfix-users pisze:
Le 19/03/2024 à 11:39, natan via Postfix-users a écrit :
Hi
I have one question regard
Hi
I try block all bc.googleusercontent.com but some adress allow
Is this make sense ?
cat /etc/postfix/header_checks.pcre
#allow
/^Received:.from.mg.gitlab.com.*bc.googleusercontent.com/ DUNNO
#reject
/^Received:.from.*bc.googleusercontent.com/ REJECT spam/scam/419
detected
I blocked b
Hi
I have a strange problem with SPF and I honestly don't know what to pay
attention to
What is a Permerror in SPF
In log i get:
Jun 27 15:09:11 MX policyd-spf[57158]: prepend Received-SPF: Permerror
(mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=84.205.190.72;
helo=h2.3hosting.pl; envelope-from=gp
W dniu 27.06.2024 o 15:39, Scott Kitterman via Postfix-users pisze:
On June 27, 2024 1:30:37 PM UTC, natan via
Postfix-users wrote:
Hi
I have a strange problem with SPF and I honestly don't know what to pay
attention to
What is a Permerror in SPF
In log i get:
Jun 27 15:09:11 MX po
W dniu 27.06.2024 o 15:48, natan via Postfix-users pisze:
W dniu 27.06.2024 o 15:39, Scott Kitterman via Postfix-users pisze:
On June 27, 2024 1:30:37 PM UTC, natan via
Postfix-users wrote:
Hi
I have a strange problem with SPF and I honestly don't know what to pay
attention to
What
Hi
What value do you use in postfix-policyd-spf in PermError_reject ?
HELO_reject = Fail
Mail_From_reject = Fail
#update 20240706
#PermError_reject = False
PermError_reject = True
TempError_Defer = False
I don't know if that's maybe too restrictive PermError_reject
But on the other hand, the se
Hi
What you propose use ?
Maybe instead of not accepting such mail will better is change score in SA ?
W dniu 8.07.2024 o 11:36, natan via Postfix-users pisze:
Hi
What value do you use in postfix-policyd-spf in PermError_reject ?
HELO_reject = Fail
Mail_From_reject = Fail
#update 20240706
: _spf.cyberfolks.pl:
include:_spf.cyberfolks.pl. Please see
http://www.openspf.net/Why?s=mfrom;id=x...@wrap-zone.pl;ip=193.17.184.42;r=;
from= to= proto=ESMTP
helo=
W dniu 27.06.2024 o 16:21, Carlos Velasco via Postfix-users pisze:
natan via Postfix-users escribió el 27/06/2024 a las 15:48:
W dniu
W dniu 15.07.2024 o 12:06, Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users pisze:
On 08.07.24 11:42, natan via Postfix-users wrote:
What you propose use ?
Maybe instead of not accepting such mail will better is change score
in SA ?
This is a policy issue. You can choose your policy to be
Hi
I have that scenario
My client have e-mail @domain.ltd and have correct SPF DKIM and DMARC
(politic reject)
When my klient set "vacations" in sieve filter all works fine but have
problem with gmail (I guess because of redirects)
The information flow looks like this:
---incomming-email>
Hi
Is avilable to run thats setup use postfix+milter ?
For test I run thats setup:
1)enable addheaders on dovecot
2)create special rules in sieve like:
if allof (header :contains "return-path" "@domain.ltd",
header :contains "Received" "domai",
header :contains "X-HEADERS" "do
Hi
Thenx for replay
Bill I have seperate setup like
1)one serve for outgoing
2)one server for incomming + dovecot cluster
W dniu 10.09.2024 o 18:07, Bill Cole via Postfix-users pisze:
On 2024-09-10 at 08:05:21 UTC-0400 (Tue, 10 Sep 2024 14:05:21 +0200)
natan via Postfix-users
is rumored to
W dniu 11.09.2024 o 11:34, Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users pisze:
On 11.09.24 09:11, natan via Postfix-users wrote:
Bill I have seperate setup like
1)one serve for outgoing
2)one server for incomming + dovecot cluster
I personally still don't knbow how your system works.
W
W dniu 11.09.2024 o 15:14, Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users pisze:
On 11.09.24 09:11, natan via Postfix-users wrote:
The problem is with DKIM signing when I try to reply to a message
and the external recipient has DMARC verification
If I have a p=none policy in DMARC it
Hi
I would be happy to privately send sample emails with someone between
domains that have a DMARC reject policy.
W dniu 11.09.2024 o 15:49, natan via Postfix-users pisze:
W dniu 11.09.2024 o 15:14, Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users
pisze:
On 11.09.24 09:11, natan via Postfix-users
Hi
I have working setup without greylisting
I try run greylisting (via mtpolicyd) but only in some domain
I thinking something concept like:
main.cf:
...
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
check_recipient_access hash:/etc/postfix/special_domains,
master.cf:
...
mtp
24 o 13:36, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users pisze:
On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 12:46:10PM +0100, natan via Postfix-users wrote:
main.cf:
...
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
check_recipient_access hash:/etc/postfix/special_domains,
Add:
smtpd_restricti
Hi
Thanx for reply problem solved :) This is exactly what I've come to
W dniu 13.11.2024 o 15:11, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users pisze:
natan via Postfix-users:
Hi
Thenx for replay but im doing something wrong
smtpd_restriction_classes=lpolicyd, greylist
lpolicyd=check_policy_se
Hi
The logs show that Postfix does not pass the from key because the From
header comes from the message body, and Postfix by default only supports
sender information from the Envelope From (sender). Right?
I'm trying to write something "like DMARC" in Python to reject if the
From and return-p
Hi
I have some problem with comunications postfix + python
in main.cf:
...
smtpd_restriction_classes=testowy
testowy=check_policy_service { unix:private/testowy, timeout=4s,
default_action=DUNNO }
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
check_recipient_access inline:{{testdomain.ltd=testowy}},
sys.stdout.write("action=DUNNO\n\n")
sys.stdout.flush()
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()
...
W dniu 28.11.2024 o 13:57, natan via Postfix-users pisze:
Hi
I have some problem with comunications postfix + python
in main.cf:
...
smtpd_restriction_classes=testowy
tes
Hi
I'm trying to write something like DMARC in Python to reject if the from
and return-path for the selected domain are different
Because these similar solutions like vrfydmn (in Perl) are not very
user-friendly
W dniu 28.11.2024 o 13:57, natan via Postfix-users pisze:
Hi
I have
Hi
I have a specific problem - yes, I can solve it with opendmarc and
opendkim, and score in spamassassin but that's out of the question - I
only need to domain in "return-patch" and "From" for one specific domain
and if it's different, then reject. I thought about doing something at
the milte
W dniu 20.11.2024 o 12:53, Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users pisze:
On 20.11.24 11:48, natan via Postfix-users wrote:
I have a specific problem - yes, I can solve it with opendmarc and
opendkim, and score in spamassassin but that's out of the question -
I only need to domain in &q
W dniu 20.11.2024 o 12:06, Ralph Seichter via Postfix-users pisze:
* natan via Postfix-users:
If @domain.ltd in return-path and from: is dfferend then Reject "non
allowed"
That kind of rejection can be realised easily using milter-regex [1].
Simply combine "envfrom" and
W dniu 5.12.2024 o 13:17, Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users pisze:
On 05.12.24 12:32, natan via Postfix-users wrote:
Maybe change
from:
cleanup unix n - y - 0 cleanup
to:
cleanup fifo n - y - 0 cleanup
But I don't
Hi
In process list I sow always milter
mailregx 42670 16.6 0.0 920172 6000 ? Ssl 11:19 2:54
/usr/bin/milter-regex -c /etc/postfix/milter-regex.conf -u mailregx -G
postfix -p /var/run/milter/milter-regex.sock
W dniu 5.12.2024 o 11:34, natan via Postfix-users pisze:
Hi
Today i run
Hi
Today i run setup postfix+milter-regex.sock
Some times in log I get:
tail -f /var/log/mail.log |grep milter
Dec 5 11:23:03 mx-node2 postfix/cleanup[45922]: warning: connect to
Milter service unix:/var/run/milter/milter-regex.sock: No such file or
directory
Dec 5 11:23:25 mx-node2 postfix/
Hi
I upgrade from postfix-3.7.x to postfix-3.9.x (Almalinux and repo
GT-plus) and i get problem
Dec 11 23:58:31 smtp2 postfix/postmap[24258]: warning: dict_mysql:
mysql_set_character_set 'utf8mb4' failed: Unknown character set: 'utf8mb4'
Dec 11 23:58:31 smtp2 postfix/postmap[24258]: fatal: tab
W dniu 12.12.2024 o 15:00, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users pisze:
On Thu, Dec 12, 2024 at 02:40:29AM +0100, natan via Postfix-users wrote:
I upgrade from postfix-3.7.x to postfix-3.9.x (Almalinux and repo GT-plus)
and i get problem
Dec 11 23:58:31 smtp2 postfix/postmap[24258]: warning
Hi
In the case you are talking about it would be every time and this
happens sporadically
W dniu 5.12.2024 o 11:50, Ralf Hildebrandt via Postfix-users pisze:
* natan via Postfix-users :
Hi
Today i run setup postfix+milter-regex.sock
Some times in log I get:
tail -f /var/log/mail.log |grep
t via Postfix-users pisze:
* natan via Postfix-users :
Hi
Today i run setup postfix+milter-regex.sock
Some times in log I get:
tail -f /var/log/mail.log |grep milter
Dec 5 11:23:03 mx-node2 postfix/cleanup[45922]: warning: connect to Milter
service unix:/var/run/milter/milter-regex.sock: No such fi
W dniu 5.12.2024 o 13:41, Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users pisze:
On 05.12.24 12:32, natan via Postfix-users wrote:
Maybe change
from:
cleanup unix n - y - 0 cleanup
to:
cleanup fifo n - y - 0 cleanup
But I don't know if it
Hi
What is currently happening with the OpenArc project? On GitHub, I see
the last modifications were made 7 years ago. Has the project completely
failed? I'm asking because I see that Gmail/G-Suite are using it, and,
after all, they are trendsetters. The OpenARC project seems quite useful
and
Hi
In old server i have:
max_use=180
in new serwer I have:
max_use=150
I don't know if it's that important
I have no idea what could be wrong.
after restarting postfix everything seems to be back to normal so I
don't know
W dniu 3.04.2025 o 10:32, natan via Postfix-u
x 1406128 0.0 0.0 40076 5692 ? S 11:32 0:00 spawn
-n policy-spf -t unix user=nobody argv=/usr/bin/policyd-spf
Why process "still exist" after 1.5h - maby this is problem ?
W dniu 3.04.2025 o 11:09, natan via Postfix-users pisze:
Hi
In old server i have:
max_use=180
StartLimitIntervalUSec=10s
StartLimitBurst=5
StartLimitAction=none
W dniu 27.03.2025 o 12:52, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users pisze:
natan via Postfix-users:
Hi
I upgrade from debian10 to debian11 and init.d to systemd
In old debian I dont have any probles but in debian11 in systemd (after
4h) I get
W dniu 27.03.2025 o 14:44, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users pisze:
natan via Postfix-users:
Hi
I dont have selinux
Hi
I dot have and use apparmor to
Then look for other 'security" addons such as AppArmor.
https://wiki.debian.org/AppArmor/HowToUse#Disable_AppArmor
Hi
Problem solved but thenx
W dniu 17.04.2025 o 15:40, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users pisze:
natan via Postfix-users:
Hi
I known that but I terminated tls via haproxy
Then this is better discussed on an HaProxy forum.
Wietse
___
Postfix
W dniu 17.04.2025 o 14:11, natan via Postfix-users pisze:
Hi
For test I use setup like haproxy + postfix - works fine via 587 /
587+tls and I have problem with 465
frontend ft_submission
bind 0.0.0.0:587
mode tcp
timeout client 1m
log global
default_backend bk_submission
check maxconn 2000
weight 2
W dniu 17.04.2025 o 14:40, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users pisze:
natan via Postfix-users:
Hi
For test I use setup like haproxy + postfix - works fine via 587 /
587+tls and I have problem with 465
The port 465 service MUST have "-o smtpd_tls_wrappermode=ye
Hi
For test I use setup like haproxy + postfix - works fine via 587 /
587+tls and I have problem with 465
frontend ft_submission
bind 0.0.0.0:587
mode tcp
timeout client 1m
log global
default_backend bk_submission
backend bk_submission
mode tcp
timeout server 1m
Hi
For test i run setup with postgrey like:
...
smtpd_restriction_classes=greylist
greylist=check_policy_service { inet:127.0.0.1:12345, timeout=4s,
default_action=DUNNO }
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
check_recipient_access inline:{{foo.bar.ltd=greylist}},
...
It works ok - but for one/two
in/chronyd (1374)
/usr/sbin/chronyd (1389)
0 processes are unconfined but have a profile defined.
And Realy I dont have any problem whats going on
I must mention that my traffic is about 40 requests per second
W dniu 27.03.2025 o 20:32, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users pisze:
natan via Postfix
Hi
I upgrade from debian10 to debian11 and init.d to systemd
In old debian I dont have any probles but in debian11 in systemd (after
4h) I get many
ar 27 10:17:01 node2 postfix/smtpd[4005054]: warning: connect to
private/policy-spf: Resource temporarily unavailable
Mar 27 10:17:01 node2 post
Hi
I dont have selinux
W dniu 27.03.2025 o 12:52, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users pisze:
natan via Postfix-users:
Hi
I upgrade from debian10 to debian11 and init.d to systemd
In old debian I dont have any probles but in debian11 in systemd (after
4h) I get many
ar 27 10:17:01 node2 postfix
ody argv=/usr/local
/bin/policyd-lemat3
postfix 1406128 0.0 0.0 40076 5692 ? S 11:32 0:00
spawn -n policy-spf -t unix user=nobody argv=/usr/bin/policyd-spf
Why process "still exist" after 1.5h - maby this is problem ?
W dniu 3.04.2025 o 11:09, natan via Postfix-user
78 matches
Mail list logo
