We currently run postfix version 2.3.3 using hash files to store virtual
domain and virtual user information. We are trying to convert this system
to use a mysql database where the information is stored and getting a
strange error. It appears that the system is delivering the message to the
local r
On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 02:15:03 +0200, Simone Caruso
wrote:
> On 21/06/2011 00:50, l...@airstreamcomm.net wrote:
>> virtusertable.mappings.cf
>>
>> hosts = host
>> user = user
>> password = pass
>> dbname = virtusertable
>> query = SELECT address, destination FROM mappings WHERE address = '%s'
> Try
We are an ISP of about 60,000 customers, and in the past our systems were
setup to allow networks from mynetworks (a large number of IPs) as well as
a lookup table that allows users who have previously popped the server to
relay mail. We recently added SMTP Auth capability, and are seriously
consi
Is it possible to host multiple SSL certs for use with TLS? I am having
trouble finding documentation regarding this configuration, but we have
some customers who would like to implement their own SSL certs on our
outbound mail server for TLS.
We recently (within the last two weeks) started getting a very large
number of logs like this:
postfix/smtpd[29456]: lost connection after RCPT from
cel-broadband1-ws-72.dsl.airstreamcomm.net[64.33.198.73]
After doing packet traces it appears that the client is sending RST
packets to our server,
On Mon, 08 Aug 2011 16:41:59 -0500, Noel Jones
wrote:
> On 8/8/2011 4:15 PM, l...@airstreamcomm.net wrote:
>> We recently (within the last two weeks) started getting a very large
>> number of logs like this:
>>
>> postfix/smtpd[29456]: lost connection after RCPT from
>> cel-broadband1-ws-72.dsl.a
I was wondering if ODBC support was on the road map for Postfix, or if it
has ever been discussed?
Thanks.
We currently have a system setup to allow mass mailings sent via a single
one time address with an :include: statement that points to a list of local
users. We would like to simplify the process by having this done using the
existing mysql database of users based on their gid, but not sure how
ty
> strategies.
>
> Can anybody point me to examples, howtos, or what have you on building a
> high-availability mail cluster - I'm running Postfix, Amavisd,
> Spammassassin, ClamAV (plus Sympa for list management, and UW IMAP - but
> those aren't technically par
In mynetworks I have the following IP configured (among others):
204.9.157.0/24 OK
In main.cf mynetworks is listed in the recipient restrictions:
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
permit_mynetworks,
check_client_access hash:/etc/postfix/popimap_access,
permit_sasl_a
Kshitij,
To clarify we have three methods of relay. The first being the
mynetworks, the second a dynamically generated file (popimap_access) that
has remote ips for pop and imap clients added for relay, and the third is
smtp auth. We need to be able to do all three methods.
Thanks
On Thu, 3 No
permit_sasl_authenticated,
>> reject_unauth_destination
>>
>> However I am getting relay denied errors for clients using an IP in
that
>> range:
>
> CIDR notation is not supported in indexed files.
>
> If you want to use CIDR notation, you must either use
We currently run three load balanced outbound postfix servers and need to
integrate a policy service that can track messages per hour for SASL users.
We hope to have a service that can be cluster aware, or know how many
cumulative messages have been sent by all the servers in the cluster per
user p
We run a small cluster of postfix servers that are dedicated outbound
relayhosts for our customers. Beyond the outbound postfix cluster we have
another cluster of mail filtering appliances that have served their purpose
very well, but we are starting to get more compromised account due to
phishing
ther, and maybe
> temporarily disabled depending on site policy.
>
> I'm not quite sure how an RBL would be useful here.
>
>
> -- Noel Jones
What we were thinking was using RBLs to dynamically block known malicious
IPs before allowing SMTP Auth to occur, hopefully seeing a decrease in
spam. Not sure if this would have unintended consequences, which is why I
am consulting the list.
Wondering if anyone has made this leap recently, and what changes/gotchas
might be pertinent?
On Wed, 8 Feb 2012 15:32:55 +, Viktor Dukhovni
wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 04:25:04PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>> SIX major releases is a lot, even having the fact
>> that Wietse is very careful with changes in mind
>>
>> the problem is that even he can not say what exactly
>> has
On Wed, 8 Feb 2012 17:19:05 -0800, Ori Bani wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to know if anyone here has any thoughts or opinions about the
> best linux filesystem to use for an email system. There will be some
> small amount of website data on the system (including webmail to read
> the emails), althoug
On 2013-05-02 23:02, Nick Bright wrote:
On 5/2/2013 10:53 PM, Nick Bright wrote:
Greetings,
After having a problem with a lot of mail being queued by a
compromised end users mailbox, I was unable to find a script able to
remove messages from the queue based on the sasl_username.
The pfdel s
We are currently using dovecot for smtp auth, and due to an increase in
spammers abusing smtp auth we setup dovecot to return an invalid login
for user's that have been set to "disabled" in our provisioning system.
This seemed to work for a while (preventing spammers that are using
auth), but
On 10/2/13 10:32 AM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 10:17:16AM -0500, List wrote:
We are currently using dovecot for smtp auth, and due to an increase
in spammers abusing smtp auth we setup dovecot to return an invalid
login for user's that have been set to "disabl
I wanted to confirm the behavior we are experiencing at the moment when
delivering messages to addresses aliased to thousands of local users.
For example we have the address distgr...@domain.tld which is an alias
to 3000 local users. When our inbound spam filter connects to the
Postfix server
On 10/19/13 3:24 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 10:56:59AM -0500, List wrote:
For example we have the address distgr...@domain.tld which
is an alias to 3000 local users.
What kind of "alias"? Are you using virtual(5) aliases via
virtual_alias_maps, and wi
I am building a script to handle some specific recipients so I will be
using transport to handle their domain. The script may run for a long
period of time (up to 30 seconds) and I am wondering if there is a way
for the script to let postfix know I have received the message and let
it continue
On 11/13/13, 11:52 AM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 11:18:32AM -0600, List wrote:
I am building a script to handle some specific recipients so I will
be using transport to handle their domain. The script may run for a
long period of time (up to 30 seconds) and I am wondering
So here's the problem:
An unusual server rejects mail on the basis that the domain portion
of the FROM address in the header does not match the IP address of
the server.
So I need to compose a message like this:
From: anything@
To: ...
Subject: ...
and I need postfix to replace the
> Yes. But, are you sure the problem is the mail header and not the
> MAIL FROM command?
No, I'm not sure. However, considering some servers will also reject
mail where the From: header domain is inconsistent with envelope
hostnames, I suppose it doesn't matter. Either way, I need postfix to
som
deed, this has nothing to do with your local resolver.
>
> > Hmmm... Hover.com is still not supporting DNSSEC, but I can still
> > validate my domains?
> >
> > That's not exactly what you said, is it?
>
> Does your domain registrar control (or even ask to contro
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 01:44:07AM -0500, Ron Scott-Adams wrote:
>
> I?ve updated a working user on this test server from r...@tohuw.net to
> r...@joab.tohuw.net. Under the previous address, I could successfully
> complete a telnet session and convey mail for r...@tohuw.net to the local MTA.
>
I am running postfix 2.6.6 and trying to setup check_client_access using
a mysql lookup under the smtpd_client_restrictions, which does not
appear to be rejecting clients when the query returns "REJECT" (which
has been confirmed to return "REJECT" using postmap -q xxx mysql:..).
When I change
On 4/15/14, 2:50 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
On 4/15/2014 2:27 PM, List wrote:
I am running postfix 2.6.6 and trying to setup check_client_access
using a mysql lookup under the smtpd_client_restrictions, which does
not appear to be rejecting clients when the query returns "REJECT"
(whic
On 4/15/14, 3:12 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
On 4/15/2014 3:02 PM, List wrote:
On 4/15/14, 2:50 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
On 4/15/2014 2:27 PM, List wrote:
I am running postfix 2.6.6 and trying to setup check_client_access
using a mysql lookup under the smtpd_client_restrictions, which does
not appear
On 4/15/14, 3:33 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
On 4/15/2014 3:25 PM, List wrote:
On 4/15/14, 3:12 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
On 4/15/2014 3:02 PM, List wrote:
On 4/15/14, 2:50 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
On 4/15/2014 2:27 PM, List wrote:
I am running postfix 2.6.6 and trying to setup check_client_access
using
Are there any plans or existing projects that support connecting Postfix
to a Cassandra cluster to execute CQL queries for table lookups? Or any
other NoSQL databases?
On 4/23/14, 3:24 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
List:
Are there any plans or existing projects that support connecting Postfix
to a Cassandra cluster to execute CQL queries for table lookups? Or any
other NoSQL databases?
If someone has a plan, then they are welcome to implement it!
For a simple
On 08/04/2014 01:58 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> However, this is generally a waste of
> time, nobody cares what the server's banner or EHLO name says.
I care that EHLO contains something reasonable, or I will reject the
connection. But that's me.
(signed)
Bastard Mail Admin from Hell
I would like to transport messages for a specific address to a python
application to do a few things then push the message back to postfix for
delivery to their maildir. I am wondering what is the best way to put
that message back into postfix without it looping back through the
transport?
We would like to use the Cassandra database to persist the state of
abusive IPs which we would block from connecting in one of the
smtpd_xxx_restrictions clauses. We have systems that exist in multiple
data centers and Cassandra works really well for persisting data between
them, but Postfix d
- "mouss" schrieb:
> C. V. a écrit :
> > Hi,
> >
> > i've setup my mailsystem a while ago and query MySQL and LDAP vor
> address and domain mappings.
> >
> > Since both of them (database and directory) are more likely to be
> down of many reasons (network, connection overload etc.) i wan
- "Magnus Bäck" schrieb:
> On Saturday, March 14, 2009 at 17:08 CET,
> list-u...@backenhoernchen.de wrote:
>
> > - "mouss" schrieb:
> >
>
> Lookup tables are tried in the order specified in the configuration,
> but if any of t
The postconf(5) manage says: 'a result of "OK" is not allowed for safety
reasons.'
Is there a way to bypass this? I wish to make check_recipient_mx_access into a
whitelist instead of a blacklist.
Alternatively is there a way of REJECT-ing all mail that does not match the
desired entries (curre
In the smtpd_client_* section of postconf(5) the word "client" is
used frequently. What does a single "client" entail? If multiple
users are behind a NAT box do they all apear to be a single "client"?
Hi we have a virtual domain setup when sending emails from a virtual
somain dont want the local domain to appear in the headers.
For example as you can see bellow when sending emails from a virtual
email account (con...@vmail.eu) .
inside the header information the localhostt is sent(
lkjsdfgsa
5 14:29:31 VMailServerTest postfix/smtpd[16181]: fatal: no SASL
authentication mechanisms
I'm probably doing something very simple wrong, but I can't see it. I
was hoping some of the august lurkers on this list could take a look at my
settings and see where I'm going wrong.
Here are
On Sun, 5 Oct 2014 21:05:26 +0200, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
> * Mail List :
>> I am in the process of setting up postfix 2.9.6, postgrey, and dovecot
>> 2.1.7 on a clean install of Debian wheezy 7.6 AMD. I'm doing this very
>> systematically in a VirtualBox virt
Ok, this¹ has been raised over a few times in the past, but I'm not
satisfied with the answer (referral to man page of lmtp/smtp instead
of idiot-proof narrative version like other *_README howtos).
1. Do the cached file contents still apply to current release version
of postfix?
2. If yes, why is
update: interesting, header_check gives 5xx but user unknown gives
correct 4xx response:
Jul 30 01:49:01 mailhost postfix-in/smtpd[3685]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT
from relay3.isp.ro[IP_ADDR]: 450 4.1.1 :
Recipient address rejected: User unknown;
from=
to= proto=ESMTP helo=
Hi,
I asked this earlier but maybe skipped your attention.
In summary,
Why do body/header checks generate 5xx rejects even with soft_bounce=yes?
Thanks.
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 1:21 AM, mailing list subscriber
wrote:
> Hi,
> I have two issues.
> After hard reading of MULTI_INSTAN
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 4:19 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 8/8/2012 4:22 AM, mailing list subscriber wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I asked this earlier but maybe skipped your attention.
>>
>> In summary,
>>
>> Why do body/header checks generate 5xx rejects even with soft
Hello Folks,
I'm using postfix-2.9.20120102-sasl2 with cyrus-imapd-2.4.13p0 on OpenBSD v5.1.
There are unix-users and pure-cyrus-users on the system. Most of the unix-users
have mail delivered to an identical cyrus-user, but for a few "local" transport
should be used.
What is the best way to ar
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 12:42 AM, Jack S wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I have a problem that I am trying to resolve in emergency mode.
> I have a bunch of email in the derferred queue for a domain, their
> destination server will be down for a while so I need to create a way
> to get messages to them no
Hello Folks,
I'm running a postfix (postfix-2.9.20120102-sasl2) server on OpenBSD v5.1. We
have a number of anti-UCE postfix measures in place, including
"reject_unknown_client_hostname", which we quite like. It's hard to believe
there are so many spammers that can't overcome such a low obstacle.
On 11/14/2012 11:06 AM, Jamie Paul Griffin wrote:
> I've been getting client requests from this ip as well, i've put it into a
> permenant spamd(8) blacklist.
that's highly interesting, but:
1) the sender was legitimate
2) my problem is some sort of intermittent DNS lookup failure
3) that addre
2012 at 09:55:11PM +0100,
>IMAP List Administration wrote:
>> I'm running a postfix (postfix-2.9.20120102-sasl2) server on
> That's a pre-release snapshot. Postfix 2.9 is up to patchlevel 4.
so now I have a release version of postfix.
> That's very old. 9.4.3 was
Hello List,
a week or so ago I upgraded my OpenBSD mail server from OpenBSD 5.3 to 5.4, and
at the same time went from postfix-2.9.6 to postfix-2.11.20130710.
postfix-2.11.20130710 is the OpenBSD 5.4 default package, in case someone is
wondering "why that?".
I
[resending to list, where I meant to send it...]
Hi Wietse,
On 01/31/2014 04:46 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> IMAP List Administration:
>> Hello List,
>>
>> a week or so ago I upgraded my OpenBSD mail server from OpenBSD 5.3 to 5.4,
>> and
>> at the same time w
Hello Michael,
On 02/03/2014 02:41 PM, m...@tls.msk.ru wrote:
> 3 feb 2014 г. 17:08:31 GMT+04:00, IMAP List Administration
> wrote:
> >
> >Indeed, the problem was being caused by bug(s) in the OpenBSD
> >implementation of
> >gethostbyaddr().
>
> Care to gi
Hi:
I have a postfix running on opensuse LEAP42.1. This distro have journal as
default logging system, i really dislike this system and i want that postfix
create their own "/var/log/mail-postfix" file.
Is possible?
If yes, How i can do it?
If no, how i can change the logging system?
Best regar
El Miércoles 22 Junio 2016, Admin Beckspaced escribió:
> Am 22.06.2016 um 15:32 schrieb Christian Schmitz (list):
> > Hi:
> > I have a postfix running on opensuse LEAP42.1. This distro have journal
> > as default logging system, i really dislike this system and i want that
>
.99.11-9 without virtual domains, Mailscanner
> and Clamav on a CentOS 4.7 box.
>
> If you need more details, just let me know.
This sounds like a classic symptom of a Mailscanner mangle.
It is not supported on this list and may mangle or lose emails at random.
Brian
Victor Duchovni wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 03, 2009 at 01:32:39AM +0800, William Kisman wrote:
>
>
>> Thank you IBBoard, that is a nice idea, I am trying to understand it.
>>
>> Now I understand, thank you very much. This is the first time I make use of
>> my evolution mail menu to view the message he
ue, however the different SASL implementations can
be an interesting experiment to get working.
Dovecot SASL is easier, IMO, to setup and configure and you can disable
the IMAP services from starting simply enough.
>> Show the output of 'postconf -n' and relevant excerpts from
re
> using the server. I get error message : Relay access denied whenever
> sending email to anyone
>
> Here is my main.cf , I have left my master.cf file as it is.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Here is my main.cf and master.cf (just in case).
Welcome to the list.
It seems
secSwami wrote:
> Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
>
> Hi Brian,
>
> Sorry for newbie mistake. Here is dump of my config as produced by
> "postconf -n".
>
> [r...@wutang ~]# postconf -n
[...]
> smtp_sasl_auth_enable = yes
> smtp_sasl_passw
Tim Tyler wrote:
>
> Postfix users,
>
> I see a number of examples on how to configure Postfix as a gateway
> for multiple domains. However, I would like to configure Postfix for
> one domain that splits users to different smtp servers depending upon
> their ldap group. Does anyone have an exam
secSwami wrote:
> Hi,
>
> So after trying and trying other methods of making postfix send emails
> for the SASL authenticated users to work, I am trying to now use
> dovecot sasl config.
> My main purpose is that I should be able to SEND email from anywhere
> on the internet using my POSTFIX mail s
Rob Horton wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm having some problems with setting a regexp transport map. What I
> want is:
>
> 1) Mail for u...@domain.com is delivered locally via the Zimbra system.
>
> 2) Mail for u...@machine.domain.com should be delivered directly to that
> machine.
>
> 3) All other (i.e. exte
Thomas Ackermann wrote:
> Hello,
> i seem to be unable to set the "smtpd_client_restrictions" Variable!
>
> In master.cf, there is an option for smtps that sets this to
> "permit_sasl_authenticated,reject".
> In main.cf, i try to set this to "reject_invalid_hostname".
>
> In "postconf -n" the varia
Thomas Ackermann wrote:
> Wietse Venema schrieb:
>> That is a bug in your operating system.
>>
>
> That made me test all of them :)
> I used several runs of "ping" against the hostname after including it
> with two entries into /etc/hosts
> Cannot use "getaddrinfo" ...
getaddrinfo is a test pro
MountainX wrote:
> I am new to all this. I installed Postfix and it is mostly working as I want
> it to. However, I have a list of small issues that need to be resolved.
>
> Where is the best place to get help? Is this it? Would the Ubuntu forums be
> better? Somewhere else?
>
MountainX wrote:
> I only want my local machine to be able to send email out. I won't want to
> receive email.
>
> Today, I saw this info in my log. The "connect from" surprised me. How can I
> prevent anyone outside my local machine from connecting to postfix?
>
> Jan 26 09:26:48 ubuntu postfix/sm
advise how to configure perdition allowing roaming mail clients
> to send mails via their server. OR I have to use another solution?
> TIA
>
>
Welcome to the list.
First, please keep questions to Postfix and not (insert your favorite
IMAP/POP3 server here).
Second, plea
AILDROP_README.html#direct , it
seems as if you should have all domains listed in
virtual_mailbox_domains if all users are truly virtual.
Do not list a domain in more than one address class.
Suggest the following: (season to taste)
virtual_transport = maildrop
virtual_mailbox_domains = rpgnet.com, $myd
MountainX wrote:
> I was reading the SOHO doc and decied that setting "myorigin = $mydomain"
> might address my needs. (I was just guessing, because it isn't clear to me
> exactly what this setting does.) After making the change, I have the problem
> where my postfix logs show emails addressed like
MountainX wrote:
>
> Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
>
>> MountainX wrote:
>>
>>> I was reading the SOHO doc and decied that setting "myorigin = $mydomain"
>>> might address my needs. (I was just guessing, because it isn't clear to
&g
t;
> same question here:
> smtp_tls_session_cache_database = btree:/var/run/smtp_tls_session_cache
> smtp_tls_session_cache_database = btree:${data_directory}/smtp_scache
>
>
> If it makes a difference, I'm on Ubuntu 8.04. Thanks.
>
Please list Postfix version instead of distribution.
This is
Steve wrote:
> Hello list
>
> I just don't get it. I have created a smtpd restriction and would like to use
> that restriction from within master.cf. Something like that:
>
> main.cf:
>
> smtpd_restriction_classes =
> my_filter
>
> filter =
Jason Voorhees wrote:
> Hi there:
>
> I'm a little tired of making some tests with gnarwl and postfix, so I
> started to reduce directives. I have something like this in main.cf
> (postconf -n):
>
>
> virtual_alias_maps = ldap:/etc/postfix/phamm_alias.cf, $alias_maps
> virtual_mailbox_maps = ldap:/
jan gestre wrote:
> Can anyone tell me how to configure postfix to use mysql for smtp
> auth? My version of postfix was rebuilt with mysql support because the
> default postfix for CentOS does not come with mysql support by
> default.
>
Postfix does not query databases directly for SASL.
It is
gt; isn't working and I'm getting some strange errors. For starters, I
> don't have a relay_domain map (file) or any reference to it in my
> main.cf file and yet I'm getting this error in my system.log:
>
> /Feb 2 21:52:15 mailserver postfix/trivial
Doug Jaquays wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
>
> We recently moved our anti-virus server to Linux, eTrust ITM and
> SLES10sp1 with all available updates without going to sp2. When our
> clients have notifications that match our policy, they are forwarded
> to the server, which then sends the notification t
Doug Jaquays wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 12:33 PM, Brian Evans - Postfix List
>>>>
> wrote:
>
>> I hope you have more in your master.cf than listed in that pastebin.
>> It is severely lacking some entries.
>>
>> Logs for
Rocco Scappatura wrote:
> Hello,
>
> When I send a message to an inexistent email address and the receiving
> MTA is down, like the following example:
>
> av4 mail16:46:22postfix/smtppostfix/smtp[27440]:
> 11BD7750296: to=, relay=none, delay=10,
> delays=0.03/0/10/0, dsn=4.4.1, st
jeff donovan wrote:
> here is a sample of the bounce: I have modified the real users name.
>
>
>
> Article rejected, un-authorized poster of realusern...@beth.k12.pa.us
> Received: from XDYHONJUP [189.22.134.132] by john23.com with ESMTP
> (SMTPD32-8.00) id A6C57D10052; Wed, 04 Feb 2009 08:23:17
Paul Gardiner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been running postfix under SuSE now for several years. I keep
> up to date with SuSE by every now and then moving everything across
> to a newly installed machine (git repository for config, and rsync
> for data). This time something has gone wrong which prevents
Paul Gardiner wrote:
> Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
>
>> You post a fetchmail log entry, but no Postfix ones.
>> A bit more clarification of what Postfix is doing may help us help you.
>
> Ah right. I have a simpler test without using fetchmail now (
> I've
Paul Gardiner wrote:
> Has postfix just recently been updated to use IPv6 when present?
>
>From http://www.postfix.org/IPV6_README.html:
The first new parameter is called inet_protocols. This specifies what
protocols Postfix will use when it makes or accepts network connections,
and also controls
go back to those admins and tell them their
> config is bad. I certainly don't know anything about exchange, let
> alone how to configure it properly... come to that, I'm sure my
> postfix config needs help too. I'm a jack of all trades type and
> don't have the dept
richard lucassen wrote:
> reject_rbl_client list.dsbl.org
Wietse answered the main question, however dsbl.org is gone.
Recommend to remove it from all configs to prevent breakage in the future.
Brian
post...@corwyn.net wrote:
> Well, I thought I had this working, but apparently not. Domain names
> have been changed. 2.example.com is the mail server in this example
>
> postfix-2.3.3-2.1.centos.mysql_pgsql
>
> /etc/postfix/access:
> t...@1.example.com REJECT
>
> postmap /etc/postfix/access
Vittorio Manfredini wrote:
> I have some problem with postfix and amavisd-new.
> Postfix is configured as a mx backup and use amavisd-new to check
> about spam.
>
> I setup amavisd-new to rejict messages that are disoverd as SPAM, but
> seem that postfix bounce this messages and sent a sender non-d
Carver Banks wrote:
> Hello Everyone,
> I am seeing weird bounces on my postfix server and can't quite figure out
> why...
> It looks like it is failing while passing the mail off to a spam appliance,
> but from the spam appliance side I see no record of the message. Also
>
> Any ideas, I have a
Rich wrote:
> Has any ever integrated Lotus Domino Ldap with postfix and used it for
> authentication?
Are you talking about SASL authentication?
If so, it is up to Dovecot SASL or Cyrus SASL to talk to a back end.
Robert A. Ober wrote:
> On 3/4/2009 9:56 AM, Scent-Sations Support wrote:
>> Robert A. Ober wrote:
>>
>>> On 3/4/2009 9:48 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
>>>
>>> No, postfix -n does not return anything except a posfix generated
>>> error. It does not like the -n .
>>>
>>>
>> Charles means
Robert A. Ober wrote:
> On 3/4/2009 10:19 AM, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
>> Robert A. Ober wrote
>>
> vi /etc/sysconfig/saslauthd :
>
>
FYI: saslauthd is Cyrus not Dovecot
>
> There is some issue with Mandriva 2009.0 that requires
> SASL_AUTHME
Robert A. Ober wrote:
> On 3/4/2009 12:32 PM, Robert A. Ober wrote:
>> On 3/4/2009 11:54 AM, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
>> FYI: saslauthd is Cyrus not Dovecot
>>>>
> Right and that means the type is Cyrus?
>
> Robert
You seem to have had Cyrus wor
Robert A. Ober wrote:
> On 3/4/2009 1:06 PM, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
>> Robert A. Ober wrote:
>>
>>> On 3/4/2009 12:32 PM, Robert A. Ober wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 3/4/2009 11:54 AM, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
>>>>
J.P. Trosclair wrote:
> I'm trying to implement a white list with check_sender_access in
> smtpd_recipient_restrictions. The problem I'm running into is that the
> submission port is requiring TLS even when I have set
> smtpd_enforce_tls=no and smtp_enfoce_tls=no in main.cf a
Jim McIver wrote:
> I have Postfix 2.1 on Freebsd 4.10 and am having trouble blocking
> email from a domain.
>
Postfix 2.1 is ancient. Recommend an upgrade as some things I mention
may require 2.2 or 2.3 or higher.
> Here is a snipet of the postqueue -p:
>
> DF6A927D 3512 Tue Mar 3 18:42:3
ort.example.com" ? A subdomain?
>
Yes. In addition, this list uses example.com as a basis quite frequently.
You didn't provide your own domain, so J.P. used this as an example.
> What is "my_custom_transport:"? The command to which the email is
>
my_custom_transport
1 - 100 of 590 matches
Mail list logo
