building postfix 2.7 from source

Background, I am using Centos as a base distro, though I seem to be getting further and further away from the original install as its seems to be somewhat/very out of date. I am not very keen on debian/ubuntu for the server as the developers there make IMHO "odd" changes to other peoples softwar

building Postfix 2.7 from source Help!

i am attempting to build Postfix from the source rpms, I think I have worked out how to set the various parameters to get the options I want. except I don't see how to make this a x86_64 install. What am i missing? JLA

Re: building Postfix 2.7 from source Help!

On 12/04/2010 2:20 AM, ram wrote: On Sun, 2010-04-11 at 19:51 -0400, john wrote: i am attempting to build Postfix from the source rpms, I think I have worked out how to set the various parameters to get the options I want. except I don't see how to make this a x86_64 install. What am i mi

Connection Refused when sending on from local domain

on this and am now asking what am I missing or what do I have misconfigured in order to get this work correctly? Thanks for any help or pointing me in the right direction. John Here is the output of postconf -n # postconf -n alias_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/aliases broken_sasl_auth_clients = yes

Re: OT: How to resolve big ISP mail drop

If, and its a big if, they are respecting the various RFCs that cover email then email to postmaster or abuse should get through. But as it is a big IF> On 11/02/2011 12:15 PM, Gary Smith wrote: Anyway, the question is, how does the community as a whole deal with big ISP's losing email? It s

Multi-homed server & inet_interfaces or smtp-bind-address

eave the inet_interface at default and add the smtp_bind_address the master.cf. Help would be appreciated, also any suggestions on improving the setup. John A postconf ouput below== alias_database = $alias_maps alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases allow_untrusted_routing = no biff

Re: Multi-homed server & inet_interfaces or smtp-bind-address

On 2/15/2011 7:07 PM, Jeroen Geilman wrote: On 02/15/2011 08:21 PM, John wrote: First off I am still a bit green on this stuff. Both my servers are multi-homed, server A which runs Postfix is configured -> eth0 :n.n.n.186 and eth1:n.n.n.187. The host name for this server is mail.domain.

Re: Multi-homed server & inet_interfaces or smtp-bind-address - solved sort of.

t. Thanks for the input John A -- "All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." (Edmund Burke)

Re: How to configure postfix to reject every incoming mail with a temporary error?

On 2/20/2011 8:05 AM, Matthias Egger wrote: Background: After getting complaints about mails which could not be delieverd to us i checked the logfiles and found nothing. By nothing i really mean nothing. Postfix did not even log a "connect from". So i started to snoop on the network and foun

Re: How to configure postfix to reject every incoming mail with a temporary error?

On 2/21/2011 5:16 PM, Jeroen Geilman wrote: On 02/21/2011 11:09 PM, John wrote: On 2/20/2011 8:05 AM, Matthias Egger wrote: Background: After getting complaints about mails which could not be delieverd to us i checked the logfiles and found nothing. By nothing i really mean nothing. Postfix

Re: Starting postfix

2c worth John A [snip] Since Upstart is new to me I decided to read about it: "[The shortcomings of sysvinit] leaves it unable to handle various tasks on a moderndesktop computer <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Desktop_computer>elegantly, including: The addition or [snip] -- &

Re: Kernel Oops

What hardware are running openwrt on?

Re: Kernel Oops

On 04/03/2011 8:58 AM, Denis Shulyaka wrote: Hi John, It's D-Link DIR-825 router, CPU Atheros AR7161@680MHz (mips) 2011/3/4 john: What hardware are running openwrt on? I think that you are being a little ambitious, that box has 8M flash and 64M RAM. "All that is necessary for t

Re: Kernel Oops

I think you should listen to the advise you were given on the OpenWRT developers forum by Philip. "All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." (Edmund Burke)

OT: need some advice as to distro

ms to us "odd", overly complicated and arbitrary. openSUSE - not tied, but some concerns over the Novel /Microsoft deal. Thanks in advance John A

OT: need some advice as to distro

to us "odd", overly complicated and arbitrary. openSUSE - not tied, but some concerns over the Novel /Microsoft deal. Thanks in advance John A

Re: OT: need some advice as to distro

Terry L. Inzauro wrote: > John wrote: > >> Sorry to bring this here, but we are having trouble setting up a >> Postfix/dovecot mail system. >> >> Background: >> We are a bunch of retirees, so cost is a factor in any decision. We all >> have IT experienc

Re: OT: need some advice as to distro

"latest" packages and its fairly well documented. That said, I think I will setup an Ubuntu server as an experiment just to see how difficult/different it is in setup and operate. Once again thank you all John A

Re: OT: need some advice as to distro - Thank you all for the input.

We have decided to go with Centos as it is RedHat based and we hope similar to Fedora. At the same time I am going to start playing with a Ubuntu/Debian server just to see how easy it is to get the config and results we want. Once again thank you all for your input John A

OT: need some advice as to disto - supplementary

personal space, probably under /home (there would be no local login allowed. If we decide to go in this direction would it be a "good" idea to store the mail in a maildir under the individual user /home directory? TIA John A

smtp_sasl_auth_enable?

I understand that setting "smtp_sasl_auth_enable" to yes, enables sasl authentication in the SMTP client, but does it make it mandatory. If I do not have an entry in the sasl password list for a particular smarthost/relay will I have a problem. TIA JLA

Re: minor typo in Postfix's change log

On 3/28/2011 8:59 AM, Lima Union wrote: Hi, while looking in the change log for some info about an issue I'm having[1] I found a simple typo in the date specified as shown here: 20200102 Workaround: don't report bogus Berkeley DB close errors as fatal errors. All operations befo

Re: expensive checks first

Is there something that shows the "expense" associated with each check. I have looked through the documentation on the postfix site but could not find anything. John A -- "All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." (Edmund Burke)

postfix in a chroot jail

is there any good reason to run postfix chrooted? -- "All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." (Edmund Burke)

Where is postfix (qmgr) getting this wrong) transport from?

I missing? any other helpful suggestions. TIA John Allen === except from mail log === Aug 25 15:15:36 ls0 dovecot: imap-login: Login: user=, method=PLAIN, rip=74.82.82.252, lip=74.116.186.187, TLS Aug 25 15:15:39 ls0 dovecot: IMAP(henry@linderly.com): Disconnected: Logged out bytes=125/8979

Where is postfix (qmgr) getting this wrong) transport from?

I missing? any other helpful suggestions. TIA John Allen === except from mail log === Aug 25 15:15:36 ls0 dovecot: imap-login: Login: user=, method=PLAIN, rip=74.82.82.252, lip=74.116.186.187, TLS Aug 25 15:15:39 ls0 dovecot: IMAP(henry@linderly.com): Disconnected: Logged out bytes=125/8979

Re: Where is postfix (qmgr) getting this wrong) transport from?

Sorry, I screwed up some how when sending in my question. John A -- "All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." (Edmund Burke)

Re: Where is postfix (qmgr) getting this wrong) transport from?

That fixed the problem. Thank you! John A John: *Aug 25 15:16:44 ls0 postfix/qmgr[3704]: warning: connect to transport private/smtp-amavis: No such file or directory* This means that your configuration specified content filter of "smtp-amavis" at some earlier point in time.

Webmin as an admin tool?

I do not want to start a flam war, but what are the thoughts on using webmin as a tool to administer postfix (+ dovecot, but that is outside this group). TIA John Allen -- "All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." (Edmund Burke)

Re: Webmin as an admin tool?

are not CLI literate and are not particularly keen on becoming so. TTYL John Allen John: I do not want to start a flam war, but what are the thoughts on using webmin as a tool to administer postfix (+ dovecot, but that is outside this group). The following is not specific to GUIs, but applies to

Header, body checks are they useful when using Amavis-new+Spamassassin?

so where might they be found? TIA John A -- First they came for the Communists, but I was not a Communist so I did not speak out. Then they came for the Socialists and the Trade Unionists, but I was neither, so I did not speak out. Then they came for the Jews, but I was not a Jew so I did not

postfix config exemplar

accommodate the differences in the distributions. Is there a postfix setup which I could use to check my config against in order to "tune" mine. TIA John A -- First they came for the Communists, but I was not a Communist so I did not speak out. Then they came for the Socialists and

Off Topic: Auto-whitelisting from sent mail?

there was something that might work with Spamassassin et al? TIA John A -- First they came for the Communists, but I was not a Communist so I did not speak out. Then they came for the Socialists and the Trade Unionists, but I was neither, so I did not speak out. Then they came for the Jews, but I

Re: Down To One Problem?

On 23/10/2011 2:33 PM, Simon Brereton wrote: On 23 October 2011 13:13, Jack Fredrikson wrote: I may be dreaming, but this could be my last problem with my installation. After following all your good advice, I still have this one problem and it is pervasive in all emails: Oct 23 09:50:58 myserve

Re: Down To One Problem?

Might I suggest you take a look here Dovecot 2.0 documentation - How to which has several extremely good Dovecot How-tos. Of particular interest to you might be Virtual User Flat Files Postfix which sh

Re: Plesk or equivalent to manage Postfix ?

On 04/11/2011 2:26 PM, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote: * Frank Bonnet: On 11/04/2011 03:48 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote: On Friday 04 November 2011 08:13:59 Frank Bonnet wrote: Does anyone has ever use Plesk or another graphical interface to manage Postfix ? I'm sure they have. If yes any infos/advices w

Email encryption check before accepting for transmission

the patient name showing up in plain text. I originally thought that the basic checking might be possible using header and/or body checks, but I am not sure if this will be reliable enough. Is any of this possible, if so suggestions as to where to look or solutions. John A

OT-follow up - postfix REGEX bug ???

Could somebody recommend a "good" tutorial on REGEX and/or PRCE? John A On 29/03/2012 11:35 AM, Женя wrote: That's it. Ashamed. Tricky REGEX. Thanks everyone. And thank you for great mail server. : /google\.com/ OK /mail\.ru/ OK You mean: /^google\.co

Re: Running on idle systems

I do not see where Stan was abusive. Abrasive maybe, but then sometimes bumps on logs need sanding down this would appear to be one of those occasions. On 03/05/2012 11:29 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote: On 5/3/2012 8:48 AM, Michael Tokarev wrote: On 03.05.2012 17:16, Stan Hoeppner wrote: [] To who

Re: separate log for amavisd-new

I am not sure that this is the right place to ask about NON-postfix problems. But, have you checked the log file permissions. JohnA On 04/05/2012 12:45 PM, Scott Brown wrote: Hello, Instead of including the amavisd activity in the maillog, I want to have a separate log file. I can't figure ou

Re: my server generates spam

environment. John A On 10/05/2012 8:42 AM, Robert Schetterer wrote: Am 10.05.2012 11:57, schrieb Giuseppe Perna: perhaps using the webmail with this ip 176.61.140.133 BE80AB81E65: message-id=<62105.176.61.140.133.1336457923.squirrel@176.61.140.133> your squirrelmail may get hacked

Re: my server generates spam

Sorry about the top post, but i wanted to give anybody who looked the earliest opportunity to skip as I was off topic. Perhaps I should have started a new thread. John A

mailbox_coomand

I recently "upgraded" my server to Debian 6. One of the things that seems to have been changed in the Postfix-Dovecot setup is the configuration of the "mailbox_command". In my old setup the command was mailbox_command = /usr/lib/dovecot/dovecot-lda -f ${sender} *-d ${recipient}* -m ${extensi

Re: mailbox_coomand

On 19/05/2012 8:46 AM, Jeroen Geilman wrote: On 05/19/2012 04:01 AM, john wrote: I recently "upgraded" my server to Debian 6. One of the things that seems to have been changed in the Postfix-Dovecot setup is the configuration of the "mailbox_command". In my old s

Re: mailbox_coomand

On 19/05/2012 9:21 AM, mouss wrote: Le 19/05/2012 04:01, john a écrit : I recently "upgraded" my server to Debian 6. One of the things that seems to have been changed in the Postfix-Dovecot setup is the configuration of the "mailbox_command". In my old setup the command

Re: mailbox_coomand

On 19/05/2012 2:45 PM, mouss wrote: Le 19/05/2012 16:50, john a écrit : {snip] Thanks for the pointer to pipe document, I had Googled, but I got a mass of not very useful hits. the official documentation of postfix can be found on http://www.postfix.org/documentation.html for the

Postfix configuration optimization?

Are there any tools that would help in optimizing/tweaking the Postfix configuration?

Re: virtual domains and aliases

Or, install postfixadmin and change the associated tables to SQL. Which makes life considerably simpler.

Re: OT: Large corporate email systems - Exchange vs open source *nix based

'You have been lucky where you work then:) The "political" nature comes in when some Executive @ the company gets it stuck in his head that we *HAVE* to switch to Exchange' Usually because some marketing shark from M$ has started the FUD campaign by whispered in his ear "do you want people to t

Re: OT - Dane, TLSA

On 14/12/2013 12:26 AM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 12:04:15AM -0500, John Allen wrote: The main difficulty with server-side DANE is that your zone must be DNSSEC signed. Deployment of DNSSEC is still fairly thin. With a bit of luck DANE might motivate folks

Re: OT - Dane, TLSA

On 14/12/2013 8:37 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: . Does this do anything to solve "Man in the middle" who presents an apparently valid cert (usually generated on the fly)? Because I thought the only way to detect this was to compare the finger print of the key presented with the know finger print.

Re: OT - Dane, TLSA

On 14/12/2013 1:30 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 12:44:49PM -0500, John Allen wrote: Just a thought, maybe there is a more appropriate forum/mail list to discuss this on, as this is not strictly Postfix related? It is fine to ask here, Postfix is the first real

Finding source of illegal address from localhost

I could understand >that pointed me to anywhere other than localhost (127.0.0.1) I can post the output of postconf -n. but I was thinking that maybe with the minimum information above someone may give me pointers as to where to look for this .-timeshare.escape.artist-. Kind regards, -- _ John Canberra Australia

Make error with 2.5.4

t_pgsql.c:857: error: ‘HOST’ has no member named ‘db’ dict_pgsql.c:858: error: ‘HOST’ has no member named ‘hostname’ dict_pgsql.c:859: error: ‘HOST’ has no member named ‘name’ make: *** [dict_pgsql.o] Error 1 make: *** [update] Error 1 What am I missing? Thanks, John

Re: Make error with 2.5.4

Wieste, Thanks for the question - it turned out that an update to the yum repository location for PostgreSQL had removed the development headers from my system. Fixing that corrected the problem and I got a successful compile and install. Thanks again for the assistance. John Wietse

Re: Altermime

own_sender_domain, reject_unknown_recipient_domain, check_recipient_access hash:/etc/postfix/access_recipient, check_client_access hash:/etc/postfix/access_outgoing_filter_check permit_mynetworks, reject_unauth_destination, your_other_smtpd_restrictions .. Hope this get you started. Regards, John The Netherlands

Re: Altermime

"John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schreef in bericht news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > "Paul Cocker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schreef in bericht > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Does anyone have any experience with Altermime? The official mailing > list page appears to be

Re: Mail server without MX record

Someone mentioned earlier that the OP (Jason Long) might be a bot. While I personally don't think this is the case, I do think we might be getting trolled... A quick Google search shows that this same username\email is on several different sites recently asking similar questions for a variety

Re: Deprecated: white is better than black

I've purposefully held off on responding to any of this but if the devs\list-owners are fine with the community converting this into a forum about race + software & computer terms, albeit temporarily, then fine - let's "damn the torpedos & full steam ahead" this baby and get to work... We all

Re: Deprecated: white is better than black

"Let's not do that." I would wholeheartedly agree...and that was actually my point. I view this forum as being a place for all things Postfix but only Postfix - not the possible root-cause nor philosophies behind why nomenclature might be the way it is. None of us enjoys a universal right to

Re: Deprecated: white is better than black

e-of-color are not more or less oppressed due to the recent changes in PF. Notwithstanding the right of devs to use whatever nomenclature they desire, those choices should not be taken as any measure of social justice... On 2021-02-24 21:34, John Dale wrote: If we were to change the nomen

Re: Deprecated: white is better than black

believe that context truly matters which leads them to understand that white & black in a piece of software config or log file has nothing to do with past or present social abuses and the quest for justice... On 2021-02-24 21:53, John Dale wrote: "the right of devs to use whatever nomenc

Re: DKIM Signing (postfix + amavis-new)

t the attached main and master postconf outputs. My main concern is that I have left something important out, not that I will not appreciate suggestions for improvement. On 3 February, 2016 1:40:10 PM Noel Jones wrote: On 2/2/2016 5:53 PM, John A @ KLaM wrote: If I might ask another peripheraly re

How can/could I redirect based upon sender.

Is it possible to redirect mail based upon sender. I need to redirect email from j...@example.com which would normally be sent to some...@klam.com to legal@our_lawyers.com and/or ab...@klam.com. I would like to just block them but they may be needed! Thanks John A

Re: Postscreen setup

, 2016 at 01:32:02PM -0400, John Allen wrote: As I expect local user to use submission for sending (as a result mynetworks is 127.0.0.1 & ::1/128) do I need specify postscreen_access_list? I use that to whitelist one site (affiliated with us) and to block certain undesirable ESP services. As po

Re: WoSign/StartCom CA in the news

This may be way off topic, if I apologise. Looking a the available CAs many of them do not seem to pass the /s//niff test//./ WoSign/Startcom are not alone in being found to be either incompetent or dishonest. Which made me wonder if there might be an alternative to CA issued certs. Is there a

Re: Prevention of sending authentication via plaintext on port 25.

I have submission sasl set as Venema suggests, should/would it a good idea to add "smtp_sasl_auth_enable=no" to the smtp entry in master.cf, or is the default "good enough". On 03/12/16 10:10 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: rich.gre...@hushmail.com: There are ports that exist for encrypted transfe

Warning: group or other writeable:

.1 /usr/lib/postfix/sbin/./lmtp My problem is that I cannot find these files - where should I look and why are they group/other writeable? John A

Re: Warning: group or other writeable: - followup

Do these errors matter? On 10/12/16 01:15 AM, John wrote: I am seeing the above message associated with the following files - /usr/lib/postfix/./sbin/lmtp /usr/lib/postfix/./libpostfix-tls.so.1 /usr/lib/postfix/./libpostfix-util.so.1 /usr/lib/postfix/./libpostfix-dns.so.1 /usr/lib/postfix

Re: Warning: group or other writeable: - followup

s I cannot find these files - and why might they be group/other writeable? I am running Postfix 3.1.3 under Debian Stretch. John A On 10/12/16 09:04 AM, Bastian Blank wrote: On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 08:39:14AM -0500, John wrote: Do these errors matter? Where do you see errors? In the subject

Re: Warning: group or other writeable: - followup

I will sit on my hands for the moment and await the official fix. Thanks Scott On 10/12/16 01:37 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote: On December 10, 2016 9:48:38 AM EST, John wrote: In the mail log. I get the error message "Warning: group or other writeable:" followed by one of the foll

Re: Thanks: Input requested: append_dot_mydomain default change

On 24/09/2014 10:29 AM, wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema) wrote: Thanks for the first-hand input, both on- and off-list. The responses show that there is a massive problem with what Rumsfeld called the "unknown unknowns". That is, except for those who have total control over their clients,

OT: can anybody tell me what is wrong here

courriel, ne se r??sout pas. (in reply to MAIL FROM command) However every test that I perform comes back normal. I have also used offsite services such as MXtools, dnsstuff; neither of them show any problems. What am I missing? John A

DROP not a Postfix problem!!: OT: can anybody tell me what is wrong here

On 14/10/2014 11:14 PM, Claus Assmann wrote: On Tue, Oct 14, 2014, John wrote: host MX.cogeco.ca[216.221.81.26] said: 451 Postmaster Code 5 - #4.1.8 Domain of sender address does not resolve. Try again, it's just a temporary error. BTW: cool error message with those 8 bit cha

Re: DROP not a Postfix problem!!: OT: can anybody tell me what is wrong here

*Thank you.* Yes that is/was the problem! An automatic update to my system broke DNSSEC tools, so it did not roll, no roll, no notice to update the DLV Temp solution, drop DNSSEC while I try to fix the DNSSEC tools. On 17/10/2014 6:55 AM, wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema) wrote: John

Re: google bouncing emails - ipv6 ptr problem?

On 11/22/2014 9:45 AM, Robert Schetterer wrote: Am 22.11.2014 um 14:50 schrieb A. Schulze: wietse: A. Schulze: So instead implementing strange workarounds, one should search, find, understand and fix the real problem. Google bounced my mail because of a temp error. I changed nothing in my DN

Re: google bouncing emails - ipv6 ptr problem?

I forgot to add that the PTR records for both 74.nnn.nnn.178 and 2001:470:dead:beef:nn::178 point to smtp.my.domain which matches the rest of my setup.

Re: google bouncing emails - ipv6 ptr problem?

On 11/23/2014 9:50 AM, wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema) wrote: John: however, I had a similar problem a while back, Google would randomly reject email for, to me, no good reason. It turned out that with IPv6 postfix was not consistent in binding an address for sending. Please do not

Maybe OT: SPF records

ecor..."! Not a life or death issue, just a confusing! John A

Closed: Maybe OT: SPF records

On 12/8/2014 1:30 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote: On December 7, 2014 12:28:12 PM EST, John wrote: Are SPF DNS records deprecated. i was checking my setup using MXTools and it comes back with a warning then SPF records are no longer "supported". When I look for docs on the internet,

Re: A highly goofed installation Postfix/Dovecot/Squirrelmail

OK. So these are a little dated. Any recommendations for HOWTOs that are a more up to date. On 12/13/2014 5:33 PM, Bill Cole wrote: On 12 Dec 2014, at 22:47, ghalvor...@hushmail.com wrote: Hello friends, I followed a HOWTO document and it wasn't an entire success. I do want to be more prof

DNSSEC - DANE

internal network. John Allen KLaM -- A day without sunshine is like, night? ; zone file for klam.ca $ORIGIN klam.ca. $TTL 1H @ IN SOA ns0.klam.ca. admin.klam.ca. 2014123005 4H 1H 2W 1H IN

Re: DNSSEC - DANE

On 12/30/2014 7:58 PM, wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema) wrote: Wietse Venema: John: *Dec 30 19:16:35 bilbo postfix/smtp[3376]: warning: [127.0.0.1]:10024: dane configured with dnssec lookups disabled* Have you noticed the "unused parameter" warning for smtp_dns_supporta_level

Re: DNSSEC - DANE

On 12/30/2014 11:19 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 07:47:24PM -0500, John wrote: I have setup my DNS server for DNSSEC + DANE. I am using inline signing on Bind9 and it appears to be working for HTTPS access. I have a minor problem with key rolling, it seems to be a rather

Re: DNSSEC - DANE

ully catch them next time they are available. -- John Allen KLaM -- OK, so what is the speed of dark?

Re: DNSSEC - DANE

/smtpd_tls_security_level = dane/. postconf does not show any error for the above, but postfix itself does "fatal: invalid TLS level "dane" - I have switched back to may -- John Allen KLaM -- You are off the edge of the map, mate. Here there be monsters!

New year

Here is wishing you all a very happy and prosperous new year. -- John Allen KLaM -- Support bacteria. There are the only culture some people have.

Re: DNSSEC - DANE

On December 31, 2014 12:37:52 PM Viktor Dukhovni wrote: On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 12:45:20AM -0500, John wrote: > https://tools.ietf.org/draft-ietf-dane-ops-07#section-8.1 > https://tools.ietf.org/draft-ietf-dane-ops-07#section-8.4 Sorry, Don't worry about it.

Postfix + Davical

telling me what I have screwed up. */SELECT CASE WHEN count(DISTINCT email) =1 then 'OK' ELSE 'DUNNO' END/**/ /**/FROM addressbook_address_email WHERE addressbook_address_email.email = '%s';/* -- John Allenpost KLaM -- OK, so what is the speed of dark?

Postfix + Davical RE-SENT

work. I am not a SQL of any sort expert, so would somebody mind taking a look and telling me what I have screwed up. */SELECT CASE WHEN count(DISTINCT email) =1 then 'OK' ELSE 'DUNNO' END/**/ /**/FROM addressbook_address_email WHERE addressbook_address_email.email = '%

Re: DANE and DLV

use somebody elses work! Victor - I have a question and a suggestion which I would like to explore offline. May I contact you at IETF, or at any other address you like, you may contact me a j...@klam.ca. -- John Allen KLaM -- You are off the edge of the map, mate. Here there be monsters!

Re: DANE and DLV

reading it. * Do understand how to coordinate DANE TLSA record updates with key rotation, and never forget to update DANE TLSA records as part of that process. -- John Allen KLaM -- A day without sunshine is like, night?

Re: hold trigger dmarc milter notify_classes

Dumb question. Are all holds to be found in the (debian case) in the /var/spool/postfix/hold space? If so the surely a simple script that sends a message to root (?) if the folder is not empty might be a stop gap solution.

DMARC

I am not sure about implementing DMARC on my servers. However, is it worth adding a DMARC record to the DNS? What, if anything, would it buy us. If we were to add such a record, what would be the "best" setup/set of parameters be? -- John

Re: DMARC

deliver quarantined messages to the Gmail users spam folder. User sending mail from a quarantined DMARC domain through a mailing list will likely have many of their messages disappear when sent to subscribers with Gmail accounts. Yep. That one found me fairly fast! -- John Allen KLaM

Re: DMARC

? -- John Allen KLaM -- I just go lost in thought. It was unfamiliar territory. smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Backscatter

Although I do not see any signs of backscatter in my mail logs. Is there a way of testing to ensure that I am not a potential source of backscatter?

Postfix configuration & postconf

ntries in the config files that are duplicating defaults. The obvious method would be to check each entry against the manual, however, probably over thinking this, I wondered if the manual and my distribution (Debian Jessie) my be different. -- John Allen KLaM -

Solved : Postfix configuration & postconf

On 2/8/2015 7:06 AM, Koko Wijatmoko wrote: On Sun, 8 Feb 2015 05:55:47 -0500 John wrote: Is there a way of checking for /unnecessary/ entries in the Postfix main or master config files. I was looking through the mailing list and noticed the point that Victor made about

Re: SOLVED: Postfix configuration & postconf

Surprisingly, I found that I had only six items that were duplicated. One, a file location which I left as is following Wietse's advice. The remainder I left in place as book marks for the future. Thanks to both Wietse and Ben for their input. -- John Allen

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >