On Jan 13, 2010, at 10:23 PM, Jim Seymour wrote:
Hi All,
As many of you may be aware, about a year ago I emailed the list
asking if anybody would be interested in taking over maintenance
of Pflogsumm. Several people volunteered. In the mean-time,
after un-loading a bit (basically taking a hi
On Feb 16, 2010, at 8:09 AM, aa wrote:
Someone advised me to insert in the DNS zone a list of MX records
defined with the same level of priority so the DNS server will
choose one of them without invoking always the same mail server
It could be an idea, in my opinion, but I'd prefer a "le
On Feb 16, 2010, at 10:39 AM, Massimo Nuvoli wrote:
donovan jeffrey j ha scritto:
On Feb 16, 2010, at 8:09 AM, aa wrote:
Someone advised me to insert in the DNS zone a list of MX records
defined with the same level of priority so the DNS server will
choose
one of them without invoking
Greetings
I had several of these on my primary MX this weekend and one just
popped up. Can someone explain where this Insufficient system storage
is ?
both mail queues are empty, and DF shows < 20% on the reporting system.
Out: 220 mx2.beth.k12.pa.us ESMTP Postfix
In: EHLO mx1.beth.k12.pa.
On Mar 1, 2010, at 10:56 AM, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote:
Zitat von donovan jeffrey j :
Greetings
I had several of these on my primary MX this weekend and one just
popped up. Can someone explain where this Insufficient system
storage is ?
both mail queues are empty, and DF shows <
On Mar 2, 2010, at 7:31 PM, Daniel V. Reinhardt wrote:
this is default on all my systems.
MX1
/dev/disk1s3 77G51G26G66%/
MX2
/dev/disk0s3 234G46G 187G20%/
Can you show the partitioning of these systems?
Thanks
thats all i hav
On Mar 2, 2010, at 9:03 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
It may be worthwhile to run the Postfix fsspace test program.
- Download any Postfix source code that compiles on your system.
- cd into the source tree, then execute the following commands:
make makefiles
cd src/util
make fsspace
On Mar 3, 2010, at 12:09 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
donovan jeffrey j:
5468961666%
13235578 6836202 66% /
And that's 26 GBytes as well.
It would be interesting to see what Postfix smtpd logs. You can
turn it on selectively
postconf -e debug_peer_list=127.0.0.1
po
On Apr 8, 2010, at 9:57 PM, osmcr...@gmail.com wrote:
> I’m running Suse 10.3 Server and looking for a script like this that will
> backup all the system config files and any others that I would want, this is
> a db and mailbox users backup for my mail server ….. But I plan migrating to
> a n
On Apr 9, 2010, at 9:06 AM, Ansgar Wiechers wrote:
> On 2010-04-08 donovan jeffrey j wrote:
>> On Apr 8, 2010, at 9:57 PM, osmcr...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> I'm running Suse 10.3 Server and looking for a script like this that
DOH!
my bad,.. I saw 10.3 Server with one eye,
Greetings
i have been seeing tons of errors coming from spamhaus, it seems it's not
resolving. at least for me. is anyone else having any problems ?
Apr 19 08:21:48 mail2 postfix/smtpd[21485]: warning:
130.60.141.41.zen.spamhaus.org: RBL lookup error: Host or domain name not
found. Name servic
On Apr 19, 2010, at 8:41 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * donovan jeffrey j :
>> Greetings
>>
>> i have been seeing tons of errors coming from spamhaus, it seems it's not
>> resolving. at least for me. is anyone else having any problems ?
>
> You might
On Apr 19, 2010, at 8:54 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * donovan jeffrey j :
>
>> I certainly do not want to exceed any limits, how do i avoid that ?
>
> Well, how big is your server?
oh it's about this high " - - - "
j/k
this system in question picks up m
On Apr 19, 2010, at 8:58 AM, John Peach wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 08:53:03 -0400
> donovan jeffrey j wrote:
>
>>
>> On Apr 19, 2010, at 8:41 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
>>
>>> * donovan jeffrey j :
>>>> Greetings
>>>>
>>&
On Apr 19, 2010, at 9:03 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * donovan jeffrey j :
>
>> this system in question picks up mail ( primary MX ) for about 2000 users.
>
> This should well be within the limits. We're execeeding the limit at
> about 30k users. Maybe you'r
On Apr 19, 2010, at 9:15 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * donovan jeffrey j :
>>
>> On Apr 19, 2010, at 9:03 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
>>
>>> * donovan jeffrey j :
>>>
>>>> this system in question picks up mail ( primary MX ) for about
On Apr 19, 2010, at 12:36 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 08:31:19AM -0400, donovan jeffrey j wrote:
>> abuseat.org is working fine. I'm only having trouble with zen.
>> Apr 19 08:29:12 mail2 postfix/smtpd[21642]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT
>> from unknown[11
On Apr 19, 2010, at 12:58 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> donovan jeffrey j:
>> by the time i typed this email. i got an authoritative answer;
>>
>> dns:~ root# nslookup 2.0.0.127.zen.spamhaus.org
>> Server: 209.96.96.2
>> Address:209.96.96.2#53
&
On Apr 19, 2010, at 3:07 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
>
> Rather test with:
> 2.0.0.127.zen.spamhaus.org
>
> which should return:
> 2.0.0.127.zen.spamhaus.org has address 127.0.0.2
> 2.0.0.127.zen.spamhaus.org has address 127.0.0.4
> 2.0.0.127.zen.spamhaus.org has address 127.0.0.10
yes this is
On Apr 19, 2010, at 9:22 PM, Steve wrote:
> You can run that caching DNS where ever you want as long as you secure that
> DNS. If you use BIND and are using forwarders to your ISP name servers then
> that caching will not necessarily help much if your ISP's NS are the problem.
>
thanks for the
Greetings
im working on a header check to filter out anything that says Viagra in the
From: line. My question,.. is how do I handle the quotes ?
here is a sample header
From: "Viagra US supplier"
From: "Viagra US dealer"
here is what i want to use , is this the correct syntax or do I need t
On May 4, 2010, at 3:23 AM, Ansgar Wiechers wrote:
> On 2010-05-03 donovan jeffrey j wrote:
>> im working on a header check to filter out anything that says Viagra
>> in the From: line. My question,.. is how do I handle the quotes ?
>>
>> here is a sample header
>&
version 2.5.5,
greetings
im upgrading a couple of xserves to 10.6 from 10.4. the main.cf used to be
pretty straight forward. The default main.cf on 10.6 snow leopard server has
overwhelmed my old eyeballs. may new lines most i understand but they pretty
much list every option known to man. anyh
On Jul 29, 2010, at 7:16 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> The simplest way to upgrade an existing configuration is:
>
> - Back up the new main.cf, master.cf, postfix-files, postfix-script
> and post-install files.
>
> - Install the old main.cf and old master.cf and any files that
> you have added to
On Jul 29, 2010, at 9:33 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> donovan jeffrey j:
>>
>> On Jul 29, 2010, at 7:16 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>>
>>> The simplest way to upgrade an existing configuration is:
>>>
>>> - Back up the new main.cf, master.cf, po
Greetings
I have an older relay system accept ssl on port 25, it seems to be working, but
when i test it, STARTTLS shows up but then the session stalls like it's waiting
for me to do something. -probably i do.
smtp2:/etc/postfix root# telnet 127.0.0.1 25
Trying 127.0.0.1...
Connected to localho
On Jul 30, 2010, at 11:50 AM, Magnus Bäck wrote:
> On Friday, July 30, 2010 at 17:33 CEST,
> donovan jeffrey j wrote:
>
>> I have an older relay system accept ssl on port 25, it seems to be
>> working, but when i test it, STARTTLS shows up but then the session
>&g
On Jul 31, 2010, at 11:11 AM, Magnus Bäck wrote:
> On Friday, July 30, 2010 at 19:47 CEST,
> donovan jeffrey j wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>> There is no smtpd.conf that defines what SASL should do for Postfix.
>> SMTP AUTH can't work!
>
> This is bad.
>
greetings
this weekend I have been hit with a ton of forged spam messages.
here is a sample header
From: realu...@beth.k12.pa.us
Subject:realu...@beth.k12.pa.us 62% OFF on Pfizer!
Date: August 8, 2010 9:41:57 AM EDT
To: realu...@beth.k12.pa.us
Return-Path:
Received: fro
On Aug 8, 2010, at 2:16 PM,
wrote:
> http://www.openspf.org/
>
thanks for the reply,
since this is not postfix related. I have to go off list. but before I go
i get a little confused when reading the SPF docs. It seems to easy.
from what i understand I can add a TXT line in my dns config,
@
greetings
all day long I see tons of reject warnings from different ips sample
reject_warning: RCPT from unknown[65.60.20.157]: 450 Client host rejected:
cannot find your hostname, [65.60.20.157];
when I do an nslookup or host that IP it returns a 157.20.60.65.in-addr.arpa
domain name pointer
On Aug 12, 2010, at 2:24 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 8/12/2010 1:07 PM, donovan jeffrey j wrote:
>> greetings
>>
>> all day long I see tons of reject warnings from different ips sample
>> reject_warning: RCPT from unknown[65.60.20.157]: 450 Client host rejected:
&
On Aug 12, 2010, at 2:55 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 8/12/2010 1:37 PM, donovan jeffrey j wrote:
>>
>> On Aug 12, 2010, at 2:24 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
>>
>>> On 8/12/2010 1:07 PM, donovan jeffrey j wrote:
>>>> greetings
>>>>
>>>&
On Aug 23, 2010, at 11:32 AM, LuKreme wrote:
> On 19-Aug-2010, at 13:08, D G Teed wrote:
>>
>> The only place I've seen which publicly talks about
>> the reverse DNS requirement is AOL.
>
> Craigslist requires that the reverse DNS match EXACTLY the mail server name.
> So, if your mailserver do
greetings
i just upgraded postfix to 2.7.1 on a OSX 10.6.4 machine. From what I have read
in the archives it may be an incorrect user or permission but it's not harmful.
How do i clear the warning ?
I used macports
Sep 10 22:00:22 mx1 postfix/master[191]: daemon started -- version 2.7.1,
con
On Sep 10, 2010, at 10:05 PM, donovan jeffrey j wrote:
> greetings
>
> i just upgraded postfix to 2.7.1 on a OSX 10.6.4 machine. From what I have
> read in the archives it may be an incorrect user or permission but it's not
> harmful. How do i clear the warning ?
On Sep 10, 2010, at 10:30 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> donovan jeffrey j:
>> greetings
>>
>> i just upgraded postfix to 2.7.1 on a OSX 10.6.4 machine. From what I have
>> read in the archives it may be an incorrect user or permission but it's not
>&g
On Sep 10, 2010, at 10:49 PM, donovan jeffrey j wrote:
>
> On Sep 10, 2010, at 10:30 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
>> donovan jeffrey j:
>>> greetings
>>>
>>> i just upgraded postfix to 2.7.1 on a OSX 10.6.4 machine. From what I have
>>>
On Sep 11, 2010, at 9:04 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> donovan jeffrey j:
>>
>> On Sep 10, 2010, at 10:49 PM, donovan jeffrey j wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Sep 10, 2010, at 10:30 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>>>
>>>> donovan jeffrey j:
>>&g
On Sep 27, 2010, at 6:57 PM, Troy Campbell wrote:
> Sorry, this is probably a newbie question but I’m having an issue where I see
> a bunch of emails with an “*” next to them when I run postqueue –p but not
> being delivered to the local machine. What does the “*” mean. I also
> noticed “!”
greetings
I was reading http://linux.die.net/man/5/ldap_table and was trying to get a
clear picture of what the config would look like, and is postmap required?
would this work
server_host = 127.0.0.1
server_host = 192.168.1.1
server_host = 192.168.1.2
search_base = dc=my,dc=example,dc=com
quer
On Sep 28, 2010, at 8:38 PM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
> On 09/29/2010 02:35 AM, donovan jeffrey j wrote:
>>
>> greetings
>>
>> I was reading http://linux.die.net/man/5/ldap_table and was trying to get a
>> clear picture of what the config would l
On Sep 28, 2010, at 9:42 PM, Troy Campbell wrote:
> The first two lines were commented out but when I looked at the server that
> used to host mail it was uncommented so I uncommented it on this new machine
> and recreated the hash i.e., postmap hash:/etc/postfix/transport
>
this did not look
On Sep 30, 2010, at 8:16 AM, Cimoni Enwis Ogwujiakwu wrote:
> Hello,
> I have setup a postfix server for scanning mails for spam relayed through it
> and I have redirected all port 25 traffic through it from my firewall but
> when I try sending mails through
> telnet for example smtp.gmail.com
On Oct 5, 2010, at 6:04 AM, Avinash Pawar // Viva wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please suggest me solution on following requirements :
>
> User will send emails on one postfix server then this server will route email
> traffic to multiple postfix servers.
>
> How we can implement this feature ?
>
> Shoul
On Oct 6, 2010, at 3:42 PM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
> On 10/05/2010 12:04 PM, Avinash Pawar // Viva wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Please suggest me solution on following requirements :
>>
>> User will send emails on one postfix server then this server will route
>> email traffic to multiple postfix server
On Oct 8, 2010, at 8:11 AM, Frank Bonnet wrote:
> Hello
>
> I would like to use LDAP ( OpenLDAP ) aliases from our MX server
> in order to forward emails to the internal mailhub.
>
> The MX use the transport utility to forward emails to the mailhub
> and does not perform local deliveries.
>
>
On Oct 26, 2010, at 8:47 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> jeffrey j donovan:
>> greetings
>>
>> How can I test my local recipient map. Im looking for something similar to a
>> " postmap -q us...@example.com hash:/etc/postfix/myfile "
>>
>> here is my map statement.
>> local_recipient_maps = proxy:u
On Nov 3, 2010, at 11:14 AM, Edward Carraro wrote:
> I would like to set up SMTP, allowing the user to authenticate as their main
> address, but still continue to send mail using their alias (without disabling
> reject_sender_login_mismatch, as discussed here
> http://serverfault.com/questions
On Dec 9, 2010, at 7:22 AM, Sufian Hameed wrote:
> Dec 9 14:18:18 esprimo postfix/qmgr[8828]: warning: transport smtp failure
> -- see a previous warning/fatal/panic logfile record for the problem
> description
what does this log entry say ?
On Jul 8, 2009, at 2:16 PM, New Old Stk wrote:
Looks like I spoke to early about tricky Cisco router. Just had our
modem/router equipment replaced, hoping it would fix the problem but
to no avail! I give up.
in the cisco box , did you remove any " fixup smtp "protocols / ports ?
On Wed
greetings,
how can I test local_recipient_maps ?
I am using an ldap local map, and I would like to insert a backup or
failover map. here is what I am using.
local_recipient_maps = ldap:/etc/postfix/ldaplocal $alias_maps
#ldaplocal
server_host = 10.10.1.12
search_base = dc=ldap,dc=mydomain,
On Oct 9, 2009, at 10:33 AM, Mark Johnson wrote:
All,
We have an application server to generate mail and use postfix as
relay mail server for outgoing mail. We ran the test and postfix did
catch the error. However, it didn't report back to application server.
We used sendmail as relay mail
On Oct 22, 2009, at 6:50 AM, ram wrote:
On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 09:07 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
ram:
A lotus notes server of our clients in hugely misconfigured to
send just
a empty HELO. And we are supposed to relay mails for this client.
I know getting the lotus admin to set his MTA is
54 matches
Mail list logo
