On Mar 3, 2010, at 5:24 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
donovan jeffrey j:
Mar 3 09:49:59 mx1 postfix/smtp[1054]: name_mask: resource
Mar 3 09:49:59 mx1 postfix/smtp[1054]: name_mask: software
Mar 3 09:49:59 mx1 postfix/qmgr[603]: 0529299C4604: removed
Mar 3 09:49:59 mx1 postfix/smtp[1054
On Jan 15, 2009, at 11:25 AM, Gilles Albusac wrote:
Is it possible to set up Postfix to choose an SMTP relayhost when
routing
outbound mail based on the domain name of the sender ?
try using transport map
http://www.postfix.org/ADDRESS_REWRITING_README.html#transport
# TRANSPORT MAP
#
# S
On Jan 16, 2009, at 10:10 AM, Rob Horton wrote:
Hi,
I'm having some problems with setting a regexp transport map. What I
want is:
1) Mail for u...@domain.com is delivered locally via the Zimbra
system.
2) Mail for u...@machine.domain.com should be delivered directly to
that
machine.
3
Greetings,
not sure if what my problem is.
delivery times are way up and the queue is pretty high.
message come in, and take forever to deliver.
command_directory = /usr/sbin
config_directory = /etc/postfix
content_filter =
daemon_directory = /usr/libexec/postfix
debug_peer_level = 2
enable_serv
On Jan 21, 2009, at 12:13 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 10:41:00AM -0500, jeff donovan wrote:
I read the performance tuning http://www.postfix.org/TUNING_README.html
osx doesn't have qshape.
The "qshape" program is a small Perl script. Just download
On Jan 21, 2009, at 1:44 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 01:04:07PM -0500, jeff donovan wrote:
On Jan 21, 2009, at 12:13 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 10:41:00AM -0500, jeff donovan wrote:
I read the performance tuning http://www.postfix.org
On Jan 22, 2009, at 10:28 AM, bharathan kailath wrote:
hi
how can i take some measures to stop this so called Nigerian 419
spam ;i've got two postfix relays with amavisd; but still i get some
emails like Nigerian 419 spam
help appreciated
smtpd_client_restrictions = permit_mynetworks, c
Greetings
i have a user who is getting a ton of postmaster bounces. who or what
ever is spamming is using her address as the return reply, so all the
bounces and postmaster warnings are coming back to her and filling up
her account.
how can I alleviate this? I can't seem to get a handle o
On Feb 4, 2009, at 9:47 AM, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
jeff donovan wrote:
here is a sample of the bounce: I have modified the real users name.
Article rejected, un-authorized poster of realusern...@beth.k12.pa.us
Received: from XDYHONJUP [189.22.134.132] by john23.com with ESMTP
On Feb 4, 2009, at 8:59 AM, Matthias Andree wrote:
Am 04.02.2009, 14:42 Uhr, schrieb jeff donovan
:
Greetings
i have a user who is getting a ton of postmaster bounces. who or
what ever is spamming is using her address as the return reply, so
all the bounces and postmaster warnings are
Greetings
I have a user whos name is being spoofed by the spammers of the world.
and her mailbox is getting flooded by legitimate Mailer Delivery
notices.
Is there anything i can do for her besides change her account name ? I
was thinking about a temporary regex to discard those notices. (
On Feb 19, 2009, at 10:39 AM, Noel Jones wrote:
jeff donovan wrote:
Greetings
I have a user whos name is being spoofed by the spammers of the
world. and her mailbox is getting flooded by legitimate Mailer
Delivery notices.
Is there anything i can do for her besides change her account
On Feb 19, 2009, at 10:39 AM, Noel Jones wrote:
jeff donovan wrote:
Greetings
I have a user whos name is being spoofed by the spammers of the
world. and her mailbox is getting flooded by legitimate Mailer
Delivery notices.
Is there anything i can do for her besides change her account
On Feb 20, 2009, at 9:56 AM, J.P. Trosclair wrote:
jeff donovan wrote:
# reject_ndn
<> REJECT please don't send notices to forged sender
-- Noel Jones
Greetings,
I have added the data restrictions, the restrictions class, and
the sender restrictions. is there an erro
On Feb 20, 2009, at 9:56 AM, J.P. Trosclair wrote:
jeff donovan wrote:
# reject_ndn
<> REJECT please don't send notices to forged sender
-- Noel Jones
Greetings,
I have added the data restrictions, the restrictions class, and
the sender restrictions. is there an e
On Feb 20, 2009, at 9:56 AM, J.P. Trosclair wrote:
You should see the REJECT please... from Noel's example in the logs.
J.P.
got it working.
Feb 20 11:07:51 mail2 postfix/smtpd[28710]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
mailrelay1.msp.eschelon.com[209.150.200.11]: 557 <>: Sender address
reje
On Feb 20, 2009, at 11:51 AM, Noel Jones wrote:
jeff donovan wrote:
okay,..
no errors in logs
I beg to differ... Just not the errors you've looked for.
I am now the proud recipient of a million of these. all from
different domains.
Transcript of session follows.
Out: 220 mail2.bet
On Feb 20, 2009, at 12:18 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
jeff donovan wrote:
On Feb 20, 2009, at 9:56 AM, J.P. Trosclair wrote:
You should see the REJECT please... from Noel's example in the logs.
J.P.
got it working.
You can also
# grep 'reject: .*backscatterer' /var/log/maillog
http://postfix.state-of-mind.de/patrick.koetter/saslfinger/
this is the result from saslfinger
> smtp2:/usr/local/saslfinger-1.0.3 root# ./saslfinger -c
> saslfinger - postfix Cyrus sasl configuration Fri Jul 30 13:46:42 EDT 2010
> version: 1.0.2
> mode: client-side SMTP AUTH
>
> -- basics --
Jul 19 19:25:35 myserver postfix/error[14000]: D075AA21004: to=<
z...@comcast.net>, relay=none, delay=0.36, delays=0.36/0/0/0, dsn=4.0.0,
status=deferred (delivery temporarily suspended: host
mx2.comcast.net[76.96.30.116]
refused to talk to me: 554imta33.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net comcast
204.1
I've read the concurrency config and still not sure how to use it, or if
it's use can be applied to my problem.
http://www.postfix.org/SCHEDULER_README.html#concurrency_config
Can you configure the concurrency as .5 or must it be an integer 0 or 1?
I have several domains that I need to deliver f
:
default_destination_concurrency_negative_feedback = 3/1
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 8:50 AM, Donovan Bray wrote:
> How about using initial concurrency, negative and positive feedback so that
> dynamically it loses concurrency faster on failure than it gains on success?
>
> I've seen no examples of how to c
I set up Postfix based on http://www.postfix.org/SOHO_README.html
I've got sender_dependent_relay_maps working as expected for the users in the
map.
In main.cf, I have relayhost set to null, ie. relayhost=
My sender_relay map looks like this:
us...@myhost.mydomain.net [smtp.gmail.com]:587
bounced back to his local mailbox /var/spool/mail/user3
Regards,
Mike Donovan
On 12/14/2011 01:18 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Michael Donovan:
>
>What I want is for Postfix to NOT send the mail [when the sender
>>does not match sender_dependent_relayhost_maps] at all. Ins
to provide email for additional
domains that will be hosted locally on that server that are not the same
domain name as '$mydomain'... Well, I guess that is not a question, but
if any wants to offer any pointers for that "next step", I'd appreciate it.
TIA,
Donovan
--
D Brooke
/dev/rob0 wrote:
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 10:31:02PM -0600, Donovan Brooke wrote:
OSX Snow Leopard Server
I have managed to successfully setup a basic postfix server behind my
router, and I still have some hair left on my head.
I have a couple newb questions, if you don't mind (first time
I am seeing the following in the postfix logs, and we are having a delivery
problem to blarg.com. However the destination_concurrency_limit reported at
20 took my by surprise. I was under the impression we had already set it
higher.
Feb 11 12:36:08 email postfix/qmgr[23132]: warning: mail for blar
We override the syslog_name in the master.cf so that we can run pflogsumm
on the resulting log files (split out by rsyslog) and we began noticing
discrepancies.
Typical line in master.cf
smtp104_120_110_27 unix - - n - 150 smtp -o
smtp_bind_address=104.120.110.27 -o syslog_name=postfix-app1 -o
s
On Jan 13, 2010, at 10:23 PM, Jim Seymour wrote:
Hi All,
As many of you may be aware, about a year ago I emailed the list
asking if anybody would be interested in taking over maintenance
of Pflogsumm. Several people volunteered. In the mean-time,
after un-loading a bit (basically taking a hi
On Feb 16, 2010, at 8:09 AM, aa wrote:
Someone advised me to insert in the DNS zone a list of MX records
defined with the same level of priority so the DNS server will
choose one of them without invoking always the same mail server
It could be an idea, in my opinion, but I'd prefer a "le
On Feb 16, 2010, at 10:39 AM, Massimo Nuvoli wrote:
donovan jeffrey j ha scritto:
On Feb 16, 2010, at 8:09 AM, aa wrote:
Someone advised me to insert in the DNS zone a list of MX records
defined with the same level of priority so the DNS server will
choose
one of them without invoking
Greetings
I had several of these on my primary MX this weekend and one just
popped up. Can someone explain where this Insufficient system storage
is ?
both mail queues are empty, and DF shows < 20% on the reporting system.
Out: 220 mx2.beth.k12.pa.us ESMTP Postfix
In: EHLO mx1.beth.k12.pa.
On Mar 1, 2010, at 10:56 AM, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote:
Zitat von donovan jeffrey j :
Greetings
I had several of these on my primary MX this weekend and one just
popped up. Can someone explain where this Insufficient system
storage is ?
both mail queues are empty, and DF shows <
On Mar 2, 2010, at 7:31 PM, Daniel V. Reinhardt wrote:
this is default on all my systems.
MX1
/dev/disk1s3 77G51G26G66%/
MX2
/dev/disk0s3 234G46G 187G20%/
Can you show the partitioning of these systems?
Thanks
thats all i hav
On Mar 2, 2010, at 9:03 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
It may be worthwhile to run the Postfix fsspace test program.
- Download any Postfix source code that compiles on your system.
- cd into the source tree, then execute the following commands:
make makefiles
cd src/util
make fsspace
On Mar 3, 2010, at 12:09 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
donovan jeffrey j:
5468961666%
13235578 6836202 66% /
And that's 26 GBytes as well.
It would be interesting to see what Postfix smtpd logs. You can
turn it on selectively
postconf -e debug_peer_list=127.0.0.1
po
On Apr 8, 2010, at 9:57 PM, osmcr...@gmail.com wrote:
> I’m running Suse 10.3 Server and looking for a script like this that will
> backup all the system config files and any others that I would want, this is
> a db and mailbox users backup for my mail server ….. But I plan migrating to
> a n
On Apr 9, 2010, at 9:06 AM, Ansgar Wiechers wrote:
> On 2010-04-08 donovan jeffrey j wrote:
>> On Apr 8, 2010, at 9:57 PM, osmcr...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> I'm running Suse 10.3 Server and looking for a script like this that
DOH!
my bad,.. I saw 10.3 Server with one eye,
Greetings
i have been seeing tons of errors coming from spamhaus, it seems it's not
resolving. at least for me. is anyone else having any problems ?
Apr 19 08:21:48 mail2 postfix/smtpd[21485]: warning:
130.60.141.41.zen.spamhaus.org: RBL lookup error: Host or domain name not
found. Name servic
On Apr 19, 2010, at 8:41 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * donovan jeffrey j :
>> Greetings
>>
>> i have been seeing tons of errors coming from spamhaus, it seems it's not
>> resolving. at least for me. is anyone else having any problems ?
>
> You might
On Apr 19, 2010, at 8:54 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * donovan jeffrey j :
>
>> I certainly do not want to exceed any limits, how do i avoid that ?
>
> Well, how big is your server?
oh it's about this high " - - - "
j/k
this system in question picks up m
On Apr 19, 2010, at 8:58 AM, John Peach wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 08:53:03 -0400
> donovan jeffrey j wrote:
>
>>
>> On Apr 19, 2010, at 8:41 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
>>
>>> * donovan jeffrey j :
>>>> Greetings
>>>>
>>&
On Apr 19, 2010, at 9:03 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * donovan jeffrey j :
>
>> this system in question picks up mail ( primary MX ) for about 2000 users.
>
> This should well be within the limits. We're execeeding the limit at
> about 30k users. Maybe you'r
On Apr 19, 2010, at 9:15 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * donovan jeffrey j :
>>
>> On Apr 19, 2010, at 9:03 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
>>
>>> * donovan jeffrey j :
>>>
>>>> this system in question picks up mail ( primary MX ) for about
On Apr 19, 2010, at 12:36 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 08:31:19AM -0400, donovan jeffrey j wrote:
>> abuseat.org is working fine. I'm only having trouble with zen.
>> Apr 19 08:29:12 mail2 postfix/smtpd[21642]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT
>> from unknown[11
On Apr 19, 2010, at 12:58 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> donovan jeffrey j:
>> by the time i typed this email. i got an authoritative answer;
>>
>> dns:~ root# nslookup 2.0.0.127.zen.spamhaus.org
>> Server: 209.96.96.2
>> Address:209.96.96.2#53
&
On Apr 19, 2010, at 3:07 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
>
> Rather test with:
> 2.0.0.127.zen.spamhaus.org
>
> which should return:
> 2.0.0.127.zen.spamhaus.org has address 127.0.0.2
> 2.0.0.127.zen.spamhaus.org has address 127.0.0.4
> 2.0.0.127.zen.spamhaus.org has address 127.0.0.10
yes this is
On Apr 19, 2010, at 9:22 PM, Steve wrote:
> You can run that caching DNS where ever you want as long as you secure that
> DNS. If you use BIND and are using forwarders to your ISP name servers then
> that caching will not necessarily help much if your ISP's NS are the problem.
>
thanks for the
Greetings
im working on a header check to filter out anything that says Viagra in the
From: line. My question,.. is how do I handle the quotes ?
here is a sample header
From: "Viagra US supplier"
From: "Viagra US dealer"
here is what i want to use , is this the correct syntax or do I need t
On May 4, 2010, at 3:23 AM, Ansgar Wiechers wrote:
> On 2010-05-03 donovan jeffrey j wrote:
>> im working on a header check to filter out anything that says Viagra
>> in the From: line. My question,.. is how do I handle the quotes ?
>>
>> here is a sample header
>&
version 2.5.5,
greetings
im upgrading a couple of xserves to 10.6 from 10.4. the main.cf used to be
pretty straight forward. The default main.cf on 10.6 snow leopard server has
overwhelmed my old eyeballs. may new lines most i understand but they pretty
much list every option known to man. anyh
On Jul 29, 2010, at 7:16 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> The simplest way to upgrade an existing configuration is:
>
> - Back up the new main.cf, master.cf, postfix-files, postfix-script
> and post-install files.
>
> - Install the old main.cf and old master.cf and any files that
> you have added to
On Jul 29, 2010, at 9:33 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> donovan jeffrey j:
>>
>> On Jul 29, 2010, at 7:16 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>>
>>> The simplest way to upgrade an existing configuration is:
>>>
>>> - Back up the new main.cf, master.cf, po
Greetings
I have an older relay system accept ssl on port 25, it seems to be working, but
when i test it, STARTTLS shows up but then the session stalls like it's waiting
for me to do something. -probably i do.
smtp2:/etc/postfix root# telnet 127.0.0.1 25
Trying 127.0.0.1...
Connected to localho
On Jul 30, 2010, at 11:50 AM, Magnus Bäck wrote:
> On Friday, July 30, 2010 at 17:33 CEST,
> donovan jeffrey j wrote:
>
>> I have an older relay system accept ssl on port 25, it seems to be
>> working, but when i test it, STARTTLS shows up but then the session
>&g
On Jul 31, 2010, at 11:11 AM, Magnus Bäck wrote:
> On Friday, July 30, 2010 at 19:47 CEST,
> donovan jeffrey j wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>> There is no smtpd.conf that defines what SASL should do for Postfix.
>> SMTP AUTH can't work!
>
> This is bad.
>
greetings
this weekend I have been hit with a ton of forged spam messages.
here is a sample header
From: realu...@beth.k12.pa.us
Subject:realu...@beth.k12.pa.us 62% OFF on Pfizer!
Date: August 8, 2010 9:41:57 AM EDT
To: realu...@beth.k12.pa.us
Return-Path:
Received: fro
On Aug 8, 2010, at 2:16 PM,
wrote:
> http://www.openspf.org/
>
thanks for the reply,
since this is not postfix related. I have to go off list. but before I go
i get a little confused when reading the SPF docs. It seems to easy.
from what i understand I can add a TXT line in my dns config,
@
greetings
all day long I see tons of reject warnings from different ips sample
reject_warning: RCPT from unknown[65.60.20.157]: 450 Client host rejected:
cannot find your hostname, [65.60.20.157];
when I do an nslookup or host that IP it returns a 157.20.60.65.in-addr.arpa
domain name pointer
On Aug 12, 2010, at 2:24 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 8/12/2010 1:07 PM, donovan jeffrey j wrote:
>> greetings
>>
>> all day long I see tons of reject warnings from different ips sample
>> reject_warning: RCPT from unknown[65.60.20.157]: 450 Client host rejected:
&
On Aug 12, 2010, at 2:55 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 8/12/2010 1:37 PM, donovan jeffrey j wrote:
>>
>> On Aug 12, 2010, at 2:24 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
>>
>>> On 8/12/2010 1:07 PM, donovan jeffrey j wrote:
>>>> greetings
>>>>
>>>&
On Aug 23, 2010, at 11:32 AM, LuKreme wrote:
> On 19-Aug-2010, at 13:08, D G Teed wrote:
>>
>> The only place I've seen which publicly talks about
>> the reverse DNS requirement is AOL.
>
> Craigslist requires that the reverse DNS match EXACTLY the mail server name.
> So, if your mailserver do
greetings
i just upgraded postfix to 2.7.1 on a OSX 10.6.4 machine. From what I have read
in the archives it may be an incorrect user or permission but it's not harmful.
How do i clear the warning ?
I used macports
Sep 10 22:00:22 mx1 postfix/master[191]: daemon started -- version 2.7.1,
con
On Sep 10, 2010, at 10:05 PM, donovan jeffrey j wrote:
> greetings
>
> i just upgraded postfix to 2.7.1 on a OSX 10.6.4 machine. From what I have
> read in the archives it may be an incorrect user or permission but it's not
> harmful. How do i clear the warning ?
On Sep 10, 2010, at 10:30 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> donovan jeffrey j:
>> greetings
>>
>> i just upgraded postfix to 2.7.1 on a OSX 10.6.4 machine. From what I have
>> read in the archives it may be an incorrect user or permission but it's not
>&g
On Sep 10, 2010, at 10:49 PM, donovan jeffrey j wrote:
>
> On Sep 10, 2010, at 10:30 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
>> donovan jeffrey j:
>>> greetings
>>>
>>> i just upgraded postfix to 2.7.1 on a OSX 10.6.4 machine. From what I have
>>>
On Sep 11, 2010, at 9:04 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> donovan jeffrey j:
>>
>> On Sep 10, 2010, at 10:49 PM, donovan jeffrey j wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Sep 10, 2010, at 10:30 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>>>
>>>> donovan jeffrey j:
>>&g
On Sep 27, 2010, at 6:57 PM, Troy Campbell wrote:
> Sorry, this is probably a newbie question but I’m having an issue where I see
> a bunch of emails with an “*” next to them when I run postqueue –p but not
> being delivered to the local machine. What does the “*” mean. I also
> noticed “!”
greetings
I was reading http://linux.die.net/man/5/ldap_table and was trying to get a
clear picture of what the config would look like, and is postmap required?
would this work
server_host = 127.0.0.1
server_host = 192.168.1.1
server_host = 192.168.1.2
search_base = dc=my,dc=example,dc=com
quer
On Sep 28, 2010, at 8:38 PM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
> On 09/29/2010 02:35 AM, donovan jeffrey j wrote:
>>
>> greetings
>>
>> I was reading http://linux.die.net/man/5/ldap_table and was trying to get a
>> clear picture of what the config would l
On Sep 28, 2010, at 9:42 PM, Troy Campbell wrote:
> The first two lines were commented out but when I looked at the server that
> used to host mail it was uncommented so I uncommented it on this new machine
> and recreated the hash i.e., postmap hash:/etc/postfix/transport
>
this did not look
On Sep 30, 2010, at 8:16 AM, Cimoni Enwis Ogwujiakwu wrote:
> Hello,
> I have setup a postfix server for scanning mails for spam relayed through it
> and I have redirected all port 25 traffic through it from my firewall but
> when I try sending mails through
> telnet for example smtp.gmail.com
On Oct 5, 2010, at 6:04 AM, Avinash Pawar // Viva wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please suggest me solution on following requirements :
>
> User will send emails on one postfix server then this server will route email
> traffic to multiple postfix servers.
>
> How we can implement this feature ?
>
> Shoul
On Oct 6, 2010, at 3:42 PM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
> On 10/05/2010 12:04 PM, Avinash Pawar // Viva wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Please suggest me solution on following requirements :
>>
>> User will send emails on one postfix server then this server will route
>> email traffic to multiple postfix server
On Oct 8, 2010, at 8:11 AM, Frank Bonnet wrote:
> Hello
>
> I would like to use LDAP ( OpenLDAP ) aliases from our MX server
> in order to forward emails to the internal mailhub.
>
> The MX use the transport utility to forward emails to the mailhub
> and does not perform local deliveries.
>
>
greetings
How can I test my local recipient map. Im looking for something similar to a "
postmap -q us...@example.com hash:/etc/postfix/myfile "
here is my map statement.
local_recipient_maps = proxy:unix:passwd.byname $alias_maps
this doesn't work
postmap -q dva...@example.com proxy:unix:pas
On Oct 26, 2010, at 8:47 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> jeffrey j donovan:
>> greetings
>>
>> How can I test my local recipient map. Im looking for something similar to a
>> " postmap -q us...@example.com hash:/etc/postfix/myfile "
>>
>>
On Nov 3, 2010, at 11:14 AM, Edward Carraro wrote:
> I would like to set up SMTP, allowing the user to authenticate as their main
> address, but still continue to send mail using their alias (without disabling
> reject_sender_login_mismatch, as discussed here
> http://serverfault.com/questions
On Dec 9, 2010, at 7:22 AM, Sufian Hameed wrote:
> Dec 9 14:18:18 esprimo postfix/qmgr[8828]: warning: transport smtp failure
> -- see a previous warning/fatal/panic logfile record for the problem
> description
what does this log entry say ?
greetings
how can i test submission to port 587 from command line ?
I am setting up a relay for my some users to use when they are off site. Those
that have verizon need to use 587
I want to watch each step through so that i can make sure I have a clean path.
-j
On Feb 27, 2011, at 4:37 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> jeffrey j donovan:
>> greetings
>> how can i test submission to port 587 from command line ?
>>
>> I am setting up a relay for my some users to use when they are off site.
>> Those that have verizon need t
On Feb 28, 2011, at 9:58 AM, Daniel Bromberg wrote:
> On 2/28/2011 9:13 AM, jeffrey j donovan wrote:
>> If the port requires TLS:
>>> $ openssl s_client -quiet -starttls smtp -connect host:587
>>> helo client.example.com
>>> mail from:
>>> etc.
&
greetings
Configuring Sender-Dependent SASL authentication
there is a a line in the docs thats says, " If you are creative, then you can
try to combine the two tables into one single MySQL database, and configure
different Postfix queries to extract the appropriate information."
I would like to
On Mar 2, 2011, at 10:22 PM, jeffrey j donovan wrote:
> snip
> also,.. the passwords listed in sasl_passwd, if i can't use ldap whats the
> best way to generate these. Im sketchy about plain text passwords sitting on
> a file; sshken openldap htpass hand written binary ?
n
On Jul 8, 2009, at 2:16 PM, New Old Stk wrote:
Looks like I spoke to early about tricky Cisco router. Just had our
modem/router equipment replaced, hoping it would fix the problem but
to no avail! I give up.
in the cisco box , did you remove any " fixup smtp "protocols / ports ?
On Wed
greetings,
how can I test local_recipient_maps ?
I am using an ldap local map, and I would like to insert a backup or
failover map. here is what I am using.
local_recipient_maps = ldap:/etc/postfix/ldaplocal $alias_maps
#ldaplocal
server_host = 10.10.1.12
search_base = dc=ldap,dc=mydomain,
On Oct 9, 2009, at 10:33 AM, Mark Johnson wrote:
All,
We have an application server to generate mail and use postfix as
relay mail server for outgoing mail. We ran the test and postfix did
catch the error. However, it didn't report back to application server.
We used sendmail as relay mail
On Oct 22, 2009, at 6:50 AM, ram wrote:
On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 09:07 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
ram:
A lotus notes server of our clients in hugely misconfigured to
send just
a empty HELO. And we are supposed to relay mails for this client.
I know getting the lotus admin to set his MTA is
On Mar 7, 2011, at 5:47 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Hi Wietse
>
> I would like to say THANK YOU for postfix because i know
> developers are hearing this words not often enough as long
> their "baby" is running well and nobody takes notice about
>
> Especially for the great documentation and craz
On Apr 12, 2011, at 10:56 AM, James Seymour wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Apr 2011 17:06:22 +0300
> Tolga wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Is it possible to have pflogsumm detail the report by domain? eg.
>>
>> 291 messages received by example.com
>> 354 messages received by example.net
>> xxx messages receive
Greetings
I need some user opinions on obtaining certificates. Free or purchase ?
I have a bank of relays and imap servers running in my intranet. We have been
using self signed certs for ever, but I am thinking that a Free " comodo "
style cert may work in this case. But I know absolutely not
On Apr 19, 2011, at 11:00 AM, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote:
> Zitat von jeffrey j donovan :
>
>> Greetings
>>
>> I need some user opinions on obtaining certificates. Free or purchase ?
>>
>> I have a bank of relays and imap servers running in my intranet. We h
On Apr 20, 2011, at 3:47 AM, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote:
> Zitat von Noel Jones :
>
>> On 4/19/2011 6:31 PM, jeffrey j donovan wrote:
>>>
>>> On Apr 19, 2011, at 11:00 AM, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote:
>>>
>>>> Zitat von jeffrey j donovan:
On Apr 25, 2011, at 10:22 PM, William Ono wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Yes, this again. I promise it's slightly different this time.
>
> I have users in LDAP and they're brought in as local users by
> libnss-ldapd. With local_recipient_maps set to use a LDAP map instead of
> unix:passwd.byname, smtp
On May 9, 2011, at 7:32 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> I'm trying to use
>
> relay_recipient_maps =
> ldap:/etc/postfix/testlab01.intern.com.cf
>
> and /etc/postfix/testlab01.intern.com.cf is giving me:
>
> May 9 13:25:20 mail postfix/smtpd[3599]: warning: dict_ldap_lookup: Search
> error
On May 12, 2011, at 8:08 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Jason Voorhees:
>>> I suggest the documentation, instead:
>>>
>>> http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtpd_proxy_filter
>>>
>>
>> Thanks, I'm going to read it.
>>
>>> This can be anything that speaks SMTP.
>>>
>>> (Note that implementin
greetings
does anyone have a good current header check they would be willing to share,
specifically Im looking for correct fundamentals like date and time?
-j
On Jun 27, 2011, at 9:16 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 6/27/2011 6:54 PM, jeffrey j donovan wrote:
>> greetings
>> does anyone have a good current header check they would be willing to share,
>> specifically Im looking for correct fundamentals like date and time?
>>
>
On Aug 2, 2011, at 10:31 AM, Jason Gauthier wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> Due to a new business requirement, I need to make a change with postfix that
> I am not certain how to handle.
> First, I use postfix as a relay only system. It does not do local delivery.
> Once it does it's tasks it passes
On Sep 9, 2011, at 10:28 AM, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
> On 9/9/2011 3:14 μμ, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
>
>> Since this is just a relay, mail is not stored locally;
>> ...
>> So I was thinking I should configure postfix/spamassassin to keep local
>> copies of spam (to be also available for checking usi
1 - 100 of 150 matches
Mail list logo
