Hello everybody!
I have a little problem with local delivery performance. Due to specific mail
routes (it's complicated), on a couples of my SMTP gateways, I have to deliver
all local mail to another smtp:host:25. I do the following:
myhostname = external.mydomain.com
mydomain = mydomain.com
ma
18.03.09, 18:27, "Wietse Venema" :
> devel anaconda:
> > Hello everybody!
> >
> > I have a little problem with local delivery performance. Due to
> > specific mail routes (it's complicated), on a couples of my SMTP
> > gateways, I have to deliv
Hi everybody!
I have installed postfix-2.5.6 system on my server and I have a question. There
is one alias, that delivers messages to local bash script via pipe:
user: |/my/script.sh
And I want to have behaviour, when script fails (for some reasons) and such
messages should be deferred, not b
21.10.09, 19:30, "Wietse Venema" :
> devel anaconda:
> > Hi everybody!
> >
> > I have installed postfix-2.5.6 system on my server and I have a question.
> > There is one alias, that delivers messages to local bash script via pipe:
> >
> >
Hello everybody!
I have a high-performance server (dual quad-core Xeon 2.8Ghz + 16GB RAM + 2SCSI
disks 140Gb), RedHat Enterprise Linux 5.4, software RAID1 + Postfix 2.5.9.
This server serves only smtp traffic. The only thing postfix should do -
receive mails for one user and send it to local scr
05.11.09, 17:58, "Kenneth Marshall" :
> On Fri, Nov 06, 2009 at 02:19:34AM +0300, devel anaconda wrote:
> > Hello everybody!
> >
> > I have a high-performance server (dual quad-core Xeon 2.8Ghz + 16GB RAM +
> > 2SCSI disks 140Gb), RedHat Enterprise Linux 5.4
06.11.09, 00:02, "Stan Hoeppner" :
> devel anaconda put forth on 11/5/2009 5:19 PM:
> > Hello everybody!
> >
> > I have a high-performance server (dual quad-core Xeon 2.8Ghz + 16GB RAM +
> > 2SCSI disks 140Gb), RedHat Enterprise Linux 5.4, software RAID1
06.11.09, 01:58, "Victor Duchovni" :
> On Fri, Nov 06, 2009 at 12:02:45AM -0600, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> > If it's a 1U server, I can tell you already that you are screwed, and
> > that you need a bigger chassis with more SCSI/SAS disk bays, at least 8
> > disks given your load of 250-300 msgs/sec.
07.11.09, 13:41, "Stan Hoeppner" :
> > Have you tried a filesystem other than ext3 like Reiser or XFS? The
> > performance of ext3 really, really sucks if you have a lot of files in
> > one directory as a mail spool is bound to have.
> I'd stay away from Reiser, for multiple reasons, but XFS woul
06.11.09, 02:32, "Victor Duchovni" :
> > That's why I use postfix and that's why I can't use pre-queued
> > filter. I thought about different scheme, but postfix is the "easy way",
> > so I'm trying speedup things a bit :)
> You are not going to succeed without more spindles and likely more CPUs.
08.11.09, 12:28, "James MacLachlan" :
> Is your queue disk mounted aysnc? If so you are in ram for the most
> part anyway,
Well, actually - not.
Yes, it's mounted with async. I straced the cleanup daemon. Two things slows
down HDD's: write() and fsync() on each message. So, I disabled fsync(
11 matches
Mail list logo