tlsproxy: TLS handshake failed for service=smtp

2021-03-29 Thread Tomas Habarta
Hello, I would like to ask about the following encountered during selinux testing: * currently running 3.5.8 self-compiled (no vendor packaging), centos8 (selinux disabled) * target platform centos8 (same configuration but selinux enabled) With smtp_tls_connection_reuse = yes, all works ok on a

Re: tlsproxy: TLS handshake failed for service=smtp

2021-03-29 Thread Tomas Habarta
On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 01:22:38PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote: > Tomas Habarta: > > Hello, > > > > I would like to ask about the following encountered during selinux testing: > > * currently running 3.5.8 self-compiled (no vendor packaging), centos8 > > (selinu

Re: tlsproxy: TLS handshake failed for service=smtp

2021-03-29 Thread Tomas Habarta
On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 04:06:51PM -0400, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: > > On Mar 29, 2021, at 3:45 PM, Tomas Habarta wrote: > > > > 6663]: recvmsg(128, {msg_name=NULL, msg_namelen=0, msg_iov=[{iov_base="\0", > > iov_len=1}], msg_iovlen=1, msg_controllen=0, msg_f

Re: Empty sender question

2015-06-17 Thread Tomas Habarta
On 06/17/2015 09:00 AM, Michael Peter wrote: > Hi, > > I understand that postfix send bounces or failed delivered notifications > using empty sender. > > But does postfix accept empty sender emails during the MAIL FROM command > during the SMTP conversation? because i think that postfix needs a v

[pfx] Stray CR sent off

2024-08-22 Thread Tomas Habarta via Postfix-users
Hi, have got a Postfix (3.9) relay in between 2 Sendmails. Occasionaly I can see a marketing stuff (most likely somehow misformatted) from specific domain to come in but Sendmail down the stream refuses that with "Bare carriage return (CR) not allowed". I have cleanup_replace_stray_cr_lf on its

[pfx] Re: Stray CR sent off

2024-08-23 Thread Tomas Habarta via Postfix-users
;bare CR not allowed" response. Anyway, sorry for the noise and thank you for your help. Tomas On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 10:18:59PM +1000, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote: > On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 12:32:31PM +0200, Tomas Habarta via Postfix-users > wrote: > > > As th

[pfx] Re: Logging of the HOLD action (when used in a access(5) context)

2024-10-08 Thread Tomas Habarta via Postfix-users
Ralf, looking at the log on one of the servers (Postfix 3.9), I can see this: ... smtpd[435179]: NOQUEUE: hold: RCPT from xx[a.b.c.d]: : Sender address triggers HOLD action; from= to= proto=ESMTP helo= You do not have anything similar at all or you find that insufficient? -th On Tue, Oct 08