[pfx] Is it possible to add a dynamic value to a heder by header_checks?

Hi there I wonder if the following is possible: can postfix add a header with a dynamic value? My goal would be to add a header with the current unix timestamp on the edge system and then check that header against current time on last system in the delivery chain. Have a good one tobi

[pfx] Re: Is it possible to add a dynamic value to a heder by header_checks?

the header via the milter app then :-) Cheers tobi On 23/03/2023 13:27, Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users wrote: Dnia 23.03.2023 o godz. 12:48:36 Tobi via Postfix-users pisze: I wonder if the following is possible: can postfix add a header with a dynamic value? My goal would be to add a

[pfx] Logging of SMTP smuggling mitigation

Hello we use the "new" feature for the mitigation of the SMTP smuggling via > smtpd_forbid_bare_newline = yes in main.cf and wanted to ask if it would be possible to log more information upon such a reject > bare received after DATA (0 bytes) from mail- m121165.qiye.163.com[115.236.121.165] W

[pfx] Enforce TLS in smtp client sender based?

Hi I wonder if it is possible in postfix client to enforce usage of TLS based on sender. Just like in smtp_tls_policy_maps but based on sender of the message and not on rcpt or nexthop. The only way I can see so far is to setup another postfix instance with smtp_tls_security_level = encrypt and us

[pfx] Re: Enforce TLS in smtp client sender based?

we want it :-) Have a nice weekend tobi On Fri, 2024-04-26 at 01:46 -0400, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote: > On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 07:21:24AM +0200, Tobi via Postfix-users > wrote: > > > Or would it be possible to use a sender_dependent_relayhost_maps > > an

[pfx] Looking for a neat way to determine the time a mail sits in active queue

Hi list maybe someone has a good idea :-) I'm looking for a way to reliably determine how long a message sits in active queue. Currently I use postqueue -j and pipe it to jq, get only hits from queue_id==active and then get arrival time, sort it by arrival time, take the oldest and calculate the

[pfx] Re: All over sudden cannot verify Microsoft TLS certificates?

Victor, On Mon, 2024-12-09 at 19:46 +1100, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote: > On Mon, Dec 09, 2024 at 08:28:55AM +0100, Tobi via Postfix-users > wrote: > > > since this weekend we have the issue that our postfix seems to be > > unable to verify TLS certs presented

[pfx] Re: All over sudden cannot verify Microsoft TLS certificates?

Hi Victor think you push my to the right path :-) On Mon, 2024-12-09 at 22:51 +1100, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote: > On Mon, Dec 09, 2024 at 12:03:02PM +0100, Tobi via Postfix-users > wrote: > > > > Is that preventing mail delivery, or just noise in the logs? >

[pfx] All over sudden cannot verify Microsoft TLS certificates?

Hello list since this weekend we have the issue that our postfix seems to be unable to verify TLS certs presented by Microsoft. We get > Server certificate not verified all over the postfix logs. Manually testing shows the same > openssl verify -verbose <(echo | openssl s_client -connect 52.101

[pfx] Re: All over sudden cannot verify Microsoft TLS certificates?

policy for Microsoft. Thanks @Victor for your support Cheers tobi On Mon, 2024-12-09 at 22:51 +1100, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote: > On Mon, Dec 09, 2024 at 12:03:02PM +0100, Tobi via Postfix-users > wrote: > > > > Is that preventing mail delivery, or just

[pfx] Re: All over sudden cannot verify Microsoft TLS certificates?

ed only check the TXT record's version "id" > against the cached value. Again a good argument for "mta-sts" is stupid and DANE should always be preferred :-) Cheers tobi On Tue, 2024-12-10 at 14:30 +1100, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote: > On Mon, Dec 09,

[pfx] DHL messed their DNS?

I know that this is not a postfix issue, but I have the hope that someone from DHL is on this list :-) It looks like that DHL (and possibly many other DHL related domains) messed with their DNSSec. With NSEC3 to be more precise If checking the csync the following is returned > dig dhl.com csync

[pfx] Change message subject and nexthop in smtp client if TLS could not be established?

Hi there I guess the answer will be "not possible" but maybe (hopefully) I'm wrong :-) I'm looking for a way to achieve the following: if postfix smtp client cannot establish a TLS connection to MX host then we want to change nexthop **and** add a suffix to the subject. The goal is to route back t

[pfx] Is that correct behaviour?

Hi list we have an issue with mail delivery. We use tlspol to tell postfix if mta-sts or DANE should be used for a recipient domain. Now we have the case that a rcpt domain has 3 MX records. The first one with prio 0 has **no** TLSA records but the other two (prio 10 and 20) have proper TLSA recor

[pfx] Re: Is that correct behaviour?

On Thu, 2025-01-16 at 08:33 -0500, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote: > Tobi via Postfix-users: > > Hi list > > > > we have an issue with mail delivery. We use tlspol to tell postfix > > if > > mta-sts or DANE should be used for a recipient domain. Now we