Am 08.12.2010 07:52, schrieb Stan Hoeppner:
> I just added installation/usage instructions to the top of the file
> yesterday. As mouss stated, you'll see an entry in your mail log file
> with detailed optional text, usually identifying the ISP by name.
> Pflogsumm or logwatch can help you easily
Am 09.12.2010 00:53, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
> * is it really making greylisting useless? I use postgrey successfully
small correction: on my own servers I run policyd for greylisting, not
postgrey ... ;) just to be correct, and maybe there are specific issues
with policyd vs. postg
Am 09.12.2010 08:19, schrieb Stan Hoeppner:
> Stefan G. Weichinger put forth on 12/8/2010 5:55 PM:
>> Am 09.12.2010 00:53, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
>>
>>> * is it really making greylisting useless? I use postgrey successfully
>>
>> small correction:
Am 09.12.2010 08:12, schrieb Stan Hoeppner:
> The original design usage of greylisting was to stop spam bots as they
> don't retry as an RFC compliant MTA does. If that is your main goal for
> your greylisting daemon, then this set of pcres, along with spamhaus pbl
> and cbl checks (use zen) is
Am 2010-12-09 21:59, schrieb Steve:
> Hacking? Adding one additional BL to policyd-weight.conf is not
> hacking. Hacking policyd-weight would be if you add additional
> features like OS fingerprinting support, GeoIP support, etc...
ok ok, you're right ;-)
I just thought of the advice of the au
We are getting quite off topic here, I assume.
BLs aren't postfix, I know.
Maybe we should continue off-list, Steve?
Am 10.12.2010 20:08, schrieb Steve:
>>> zen.spamhaus.org should be the only spamhaus.org DNSBL in your
>>> IP blocklist configuration. You should not use ZEN together with
>>> oth
Am 2010-12-10 23:32, schrieb Steve:
>
> Original-Nachricht
>> Datum: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 22:46:35 +0100 Von: "Stefan G. Weichinger"
>> An: Steve CC:
>> postfix-users@postfix.org Betreff: Re: fqrdns.pcre
>
>>
>> We are getting q
