Issue with pipe mail to script

tus=bounced (host 127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1] said: 550 5.1.1 <|/usr/local/autoresponder/autoresponder@mail-in1>: Recipient address rejected: User unknown in local recipient table (in reply to RCPT TO command)) Can someone please assist with this issue? Thanks Simon

Re: Issue with pipe mail to script

On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 7:57 AM, Simon wrote: > On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 11:35 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: >> You are expanding the virtual aliase BEFORE the Amavis filter, >> and another time after mail is filtered. >> >> See http://www.postfix.org/FILTER_README, an

Re: Issue with pipe mail to script

On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 10:39 AM, mouss wrote: > Simon a écrit : >> On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 7:57 AM, Simon wrote: >>> On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 11:35 PM, Wietse Venema >>> wrote: >>>> You are expanding the virtual aliase BEFORE the Amavis filter, >&

Re: Issue with pipe mail to script

n - - smtpd .. -o receive_override_options=no_address_mappings,no_header_body_checks,no_unknown_recipient_checks And it works a treat! Thank you. So it works, but did i use no_address_mappings correct in this case? Thanks Simon

Illegal mix of collations error

27; Jun 8 07:15:19 mail-in1 postfix/trivial-rewrite[23183]: fatal: mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql-transport.cf(0,lock|fold_fix): table lookup problem I have googled and have not really found a solution to this issue... can anyone assist please? THanks SImon

SASL with two seperate auth sources?

from _users where userid ='%u Which works well! I was wondering if there is a way we can add another source to the mix so that postfix would check 2 seperate servers/databases/tables with a different table structure on the second mysql server? Thanks! Simon

Re: SASL with two seperate auth sources?

On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 10:05 AM, Simon wrote: > Hi There, > > Currently we are using postfix (2.5.5-1.1) on debian lenny sasl support > thus: > > # cat smtpd.conf > auxprop_plugin: sql > mech_list: plain login cram-md5 digest-md5 > sql_engine: mysql > sql_hostnam

BCC to Undisclosed-Recipient

how to fix this would be greatly appeciated! Thanks Simon

Re: BCC to Undisclosed-Recipient

On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 8:45 AM, Noel Jones wrote: > On 3/30/2010 2:40 PM, Simon wrote: > >> Any idea on what i have incorrect or how to fix this would be greatly >> appeciated! >> >> > What do you think is should say? > > Have you looked at &

Re: BCC to Undisclosed-Recipient

it, I dont know why i didnt think of this before. DOH!. Simon

Postfix config for static:hold on all unauthenticated mail

the queue, but with static:hold Can someone please assist with the config to achieve this? Thanks MUCHLY!! Simon

Real-time monitoring of postfix queue

... Simon

Moving deferred mail to another server

Hi There, We have two postfix servers (postfix from debian lenny). Is there any way to move all deferred mail from one server to another? Thanks Simon

Round robin outgoing smtp?

who have confirmed email lists. Any thoughts? Regards, Simon

Re: Round robin outgoing smtp?

Hi There, i have answered my own question. Sorry for the email. On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 2:53 PM, Simon wrote: > Hi There, > > We have a postfix server running on debian lenny. We are wondering > what the best way would be to disperse outgoing mail via a ip range > rather than one

Spam Backscatter

011 08:28:43 +1100 Thanks Simon

Re: Spam Backscatter

On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 1:29 PM, Noel Jones wrote: > >> >> Return-Path: > *[ourdomain.actual.domain]**> >> >> Received: from 195-191-72-102.optolan.net.ua >> (unknown [195.191.72.102]) >> > > > The client 195.191.72.102 is listed

Re: Illegal mix of collations error

On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 10:09 AM, Darren Pilgrim wrote: > Simon wrote: > >> Jun 8 07:15:19 mail-in1 postfix/trivial-rewrite[23183]: warning: mysql >> query failed: Illegal mix of collations (latin1_swedish_ci,IMPLICIT) and >> (utf8_general_ci,COERCIBLE) for operation &#x

Re: Illegal mix of collations error

ease? >> >> Thanks!! >> >> Simon >> >> The issue is that you are comparing two strings, one that uses one > character set and another which uses a different character set. Mysql > retains (and includes) character set information during string comparisons - > if y

Getting abused by backscatter spam

t we are still getting hammered by backscatter spam (like the below) and are hoping to get the lists input with where to head in terms of getting this sorted... it seems like everything we look at just does not quite suit our setup. Many thanks in advance!!!! Simon Received: from psmtp

Re: Getting abused by backscatter spam

On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 11:56 AM, mouss wrote: > 1) nothing in your sample shows that you use postfix. > if using postfix, why is Return-Path in the middle of headers? > > 2) given the return-path you show, this is not backscatter. maybe you > meant envelope sender forgery? > > 3)  93.85.177.92 i

HOLD and reject_rbl_client?

ackscatterer.org Thanks Simon

Re: HOLD and reject_rbl_client?

On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 3:10 PM, Sahil Tandon wrote: > On Thu, 2011-03-24 at 03:07:05 +0100, Amedeo Rinaldo wrote: > >> Il 24/03/2011 02:46, Sahil Tandon ha scritto: >> >On Thu, 2011-03-24 at 14:35:06 +1300, Simon wrote: >> > >> >>.. [CUT] .. >> &

Re: HOLD and reject_rbl_client?

On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 4:04 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote: > As to how to implement this in postfwd, this is not the right forum > for such a question. http://postfwd.org/ has instructions on how to > join the postfwd-users mailing list. What a fantastic piece of software!! Thanks :)

Postfix sasl with mysql and multiple servers with different tables

uot;mysql1" and "dbpostfix_other" on mysql2? Thanks Simon

Restrict authenticated senders with domain/email SQL lookup table

me process as gmail).. Can someone please give me some pointers here on where to start? I have searched quite bit for this, but can't think of the correct terms to find what i want... Thanks! Simon

Re: Restrict authenticated senders with domain/email SQL lookup table

On 15/12/2011, at 2:02 PM, Noel Jones wrote: > On 12/14/2011 3:18 PM, Simon wrote: >> >> >> What we would like todo is update our config so that postfix will only send >> "from" {anything}@clientdomain.com (where the domain is listed in our &

Re: Restrict authenticated senders with domain/email SQL lookup table

oved sending email addresses and/or domains? e.g. NOT associate it with a SASL login but has an approved sender list. e.g. all SASL login's would be able to send "from" all of the domains/addresses on the list? (I'm thinking of a specific situation where i would need this). Simon

Re: Restrict authenticated senders with domain/email SQL lookup table

ll SASL login's would be >> able to send "from" all of the domains/addresses on the list? (I'm thinking >> of a specific situation where i would need this). >> >> Simon >> > > That's easy enough to do with a check_sender_access map. Assumin

Starting today - lost connection after DATA (0 bytes) from xxx and END OF DATA - 554 5.7.1

has helped me. Can anyone please shed some light on what could be causing this issue? Thank you Simon Postfix is running on VMWare VM on debian alias_database = hash:/etc/aliases alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases append_dot_mydomain = no biff = no body_checks = pcre:/etc/postfix/body_checks

Blocking emails from domain for a single user

blockt...@domain.com sent an email to cli...@theirdomain.com would it get blocked, otherwise all other emails from blockt...@domain.com would be sent to any other to address? Thanks Simon

Re: Blocking emails from domain for a single user

On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 3:51 PM, Noel Jones wrote: On 4/19/2015 7:03 PM, Simon wrote: > > Hi There, > > > > We are using postfix 2.7.1 on debian. Is there a simple way to block > > emails from a domain or From address only to a certain to address? > > So this would

Re: Blocking emails from domain for a single user

On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Simon wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 3:51 PM, Noel Jones > wrote: > > On 4/19/2015 7:03 PM, Simon wrote: >> > Hi There, >> > >> > We are using postfix 2.7.1 on debian. Is there a simple way to block >&g

Re: Blocking emails from domain for a single user

On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 3:38 PM, Noel Jones wrote: > On 4/20/2015 6:39 PM, Simon wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Simon > <mailto:grem...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 3:51 PM,

RE: Postfix + Maildrop

> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 09:50:49 + > Subject: Re: Postfix + Maildrop > From: wyldf...@gmail.com > To: postfix-users@postfix.org > > 2009/2/17 mouss : > > $ maildrop -v > > maildrop 2.0.4 Copyright 1998-2005 Double Precision, Inc. > > GDBM extensions enabled. > > Courier Authentication Libr

RE: Postfix + Maildrop

Sorry for taking long ... tried to do some research on the hints I got from over here but failed miserably... below are my comments ... > Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 00:13:32 +0100 > From: mo...@ml.netoyen.net > To: postfix-users@postfix.org > Subject: Re: Postfix + Maildrop > > sim085 a écrit : > >

RE: Postfix + Maildrop

I am on the verge of giving up on maildrop ... but ... before that I have some more comments below ... > Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 21:17:19 +0100 > From: mo...@ml.netoyen.net > To: postfix-users@postfix.org > Subject: Re: Postfix + Maildrop > > Simon Aquilina

RE: Postfix + Maildrop

Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 04:34:14 -0500 Subject: Re: Postfix + Maildrop From: gejop...@gmail.com To: mouss+nob...@netoyen.net CC: postfix-users@postfix.org [quote] On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 3:17 PM, mouss wrote: Simon Aquilina a écrit : >[snip] >> >> > >> > Entert

RE: Postfix + Maildrop

> > 1- reinstall the "maildrop" package (not "courier-maildrop") > 2- once this is done, run the following commands: > > maildrop -v GDBM extensions enabled. Courier Authentication Library extension enabled. Maildir quota extension enabled. > ls -l /usr/bin/maildrop -rwxr-sr-x 1 r

RE: Postfix + Maildrop

> if you got this as root, then you have a problem. any selinux, apparmor, > ... ? authtest works fine now :) I tested it with postmaster and here are the results :) Authentication succeeded Authenticated: postmaster(uid: 6000, gid: 6000) Home Directory: /var/spool/mail/virtual/ Maildir:

RE: Postfix + Maildrop

tion and move to the courier-maildrop mailing list should I have problems fixing them. Thanks again to everyone for all the help given :) it was really appreciated! Regards, Simon J. _ More than messages–check out the rest of the

Queued non-deliverable message

alktalk.net one) saying "Status: Host or domain name not found. Name service error for name=talktalk.com type=MX: Host not found, try again" So my question is why did I get a message that one was wring and not the other? Do I need to change config somehow? Th

Re: Queued non-deliverable message

Quoting Sahil Tandon : On Mon, 27 Apr 2009, Simon Wilson wrote: So my question is why did I get a message that one was wring and not the other? Do I need to change config somehow? You use reject_unknown_recipient_domain, which results in a deferral and re-retry of mail delivery in the

SPF

F record -0.2 BAYES_40 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 20 to 40% [score: 0.2655] 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 2.2 TVD_SPACE_RATIOBODY: TVD_SPACE_RATIO Is my TXT record OK? Do I need the IP4 entry? Thanks. -- Simon Wilson www.simonandkate.net

Re: SPF

Quoting Mathias Meinelt : Simon Wilson wrote: TXT v=spf1 a mx ip4:59.167.212.191 ~all Your setup of the SPF record is ok, however you should leave out the "a" and "mx" directive as they have no use here unless you want to send mail over "mail.bluetie.com" as

My local user aren't working!

After many years I noticed in my current config that the local users aren't working properly. Specifically I have a hostname in "mydestination" (h7.zynet2.co.uk) and I want to accept email for "r...@h7.zynet2.co.uk" This email is currently delivered correctly if submitted from a trusted user o

Re: Sent Mail Shows FQDN in Email Address

http://www.postfix.org/ADDRESS_REWRITING_README.html#masquerade -- Simon Wilson www.simonandkate.net

Disable content_filter

rt also is filtered by spamassassin. Can anyone point me into the right direction on how to fix this? Thanks in advance, Simon

Re: Disable content_filter

=" option doesn't work, it works fine for the port, spamassassin reinjects the filtered mail. localhost:10025 inetn - n - - smtpd -o content_filter= Thanks, Simon

Re: Disable content_filter

nd not for the one on 192.168.xxx.xxx? BTW: in main.cf there is also set content_filter=. Regards, Simon

Re: Disable content_filter (Solved!)

on the two main.cf revealed the cause. On the server with the problem the address of the 192.168.xxx.xxx listener was listed in the inet_interfaces. It seems that in this case the definition of the "smtp" listener has a higher priority. After removing the address from inet_interfaces everything works now as expected. BR, Simon

Simple mail submission tool was Re: "nobody is going to write a new MTA"

On Thursday 28 May 2009 14:41:30 Marcio Merlone wrote: > > That would be great, I have some servers wich sends nothing but > administrative mails to me, logcheck, crontab, such annoying things. > They need nothing more than a bare bones MTA wich is able to send mails > to a relay host. Debian has

Re: received date differs

Sometimes it is simply because the date is set wrong on the computer sending the email. SpamAssassin uses dates in future and distant past as an indication of likelihood that an email is spam. It is spam - hit delete and move on - unless you need a better spam filter. Simon

message_size_limit

= -o message_size_limit=2048 When I now connect to the server it correctly notifies me about the maximum message size. vs100:/home/simon # telnet 192.168.xxx.xxx 25 Trying 192.168.xxx.xxx... Connected to 192.168.xxx.xxx. Escape character is '^]'. 220 mail2.e

anvil

Hi folks, I have postfix 2.3.3 installed and have just found some info on Anvil(8) which looks like it should be good as part of my anti-spam implementation. I can see anvil in /usr/libexec/postfix/ but when i enable the config within main.cf smtpd_error_sleep_time = 1s and grep on maillog there'

Re: anvil

2009/6/10 Ralf Hildebrandt : > * Simon Jones : >> Hi folks, >> >> I have postfix 2.3.3 installed and have just found some info on >> Anvil(8) which looks like it should be good as part of my anti-spam >> implementation.  I can see anvil in /usr/libexec/postfix

Re: anvil

2009/6/10 Ralf Hildebrandt : > * Simon Jones : > >> > That does not enable anvil. > >> can you point me to some docs on how to do it perhaps?  would be much >> appreciated, this is something i cam across today so apologies for >> coming across as a complet

Re: anvil

2009/6/10 Ralf Hildebrandt : > * Simon Jones : > >> > http://www.postfix.org/TUNING_README.html#conn_limit > >> ok thanks - I added those to main.cf > > What EXACTLY did you add? > >> but it still doesn't do anything, > > Of course it doesn&#

Re: anvil

2009/6/10 Ralf Hildebrandt : > * Simon Jones : > >> This is the part I'm missing, how do I enable the shit flinger? > > You COULD use smtp_source > > OR > > your could set ridiculous low limits (1/60s) and then test it manually using

Re: anvil

2009/6/11 Simon Jones : > 2009/6/10 Ralf Hildebrandt : >> * Simon Jones : >> >>> This is the part I'm missing, how do I enable the shit flinger? >> >> You COULD use smtp_source >> >> OR >> >> your could set ridiculous low limits

Re: message_size_limit

s Wietse for pointing out, that there may be some other problems with it. So I decided to go with the "save" configuration and increased the general message size in main.cf. Simon

Re: 250 Backend Replied

mes back on the Return-Path adresse. -- Simon.

Re: quota with mysql

better way? Thanks, Andre Maybe you should give a try to dovecot-deliver. It'll take care of the quota stuff directly. -- Simon

Re: quota with mysql

On 03/03/2010 10:18, Andre Hübner wrote: > Hallo, > >> Maybe you should give a try to dovecot-deliver. It'll take care of >> the quota stuff directly. > > this is working already but is not rejecting a mail on smtp-dialog. it > deletes the mail after postfix was accepting it and this is a legal > d

OT: 0.0.0.0

One domain is advertising an MX record of "0.0.0.0" which postfix correctly reports as "numeric domain name in resource data of MX record for ..." Then (on Linux at least), Postfix connects to "0.0.0.0" and then logs a couple of messages complaining it is trying to talk to itself. I'm not sure

Re: Relaying to SPF protected server

On Thursday 01 April 2010 12:38:29 J.R.Ewing wrote: > > Is there any solution? > I have idea to move senders address to "reply to" field and write new > sender. Is it possible with postfix? As Ralph says SRS will do this. However I looked at this recently for a project, where I thought I'd need

Re: Patch: support BURL

On Monday 12 April 2010 16:53:10 Victor Duchovni wrote: > On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 11:50:02AM -0400, Charles Marcus wrote: > > There is no IMAP client that I'm aware of that can 'save' a message to > > to the Sent folder. > > They all do it, that's how messages end up in the Sent folder, you > are c

Re: Mail to wildcard MX records doesn't work from Yahoo Mail, but fine from other addresses

o be a case "CNAME and other" which is a violation of RFC1034. So fix your DNS and see if things work correctly. Simon

Re: Mail to wildcard MX records doesn't work from Yahoo Mail, but fine from other addresses

On Tuesday 13 April 2010 10:16:49 Bob Eastbrook wrote: > On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 1:01 AM, Simon Waters wrote: > > Your post appears mangled beyond hope of direct assistance. > > Are you saying that the message was improperly formatted? No I'm saying I don't think

Re: backscatter spam

On Tuesday 13 April 2010 16:32:03 motty.cruz wrote: > Hello, I seemed to be losing the fight against backscatter email, one of > our users is getting tons of backscatter spam a day. I'm using postfix > Mail_version 2.7.0 + amavisd (Spamassassin) on FreeBSD machine. Please > help! Did you try this

Re: Mail server responded 5.7.1

On Monday 19 April 2010 09:51:52 mohamad rahimi wrote: > In our group we are using suse and > Postfix SMTP server. Every thing was fine until last month when we > restart our mail server and also firewall. > The first problem is that when we use > Thunderbird with security and Authentication it is

Re: Rejecting Spam Based on Spamassassin Score

On Monday 19 April 2010 18:34:59 Aaron Clausen wrote: > This has probably been asked a hundred times before, but a client of > mine has requested the ability to reject emails if their spam score is > above a certain score, rather than marking it as spam. Is this a > possibility with Postfix? As n

Re: postfix smtp_loop() breaks SMTP

On Tuesday 27 April 2010 17:24:35 Victor Duchovni wrote: > > $ < /tmp/data pcregrep -c Postfix > 134368 If we are hijacking the thread for how to convince suits to use Postfix... Picking an MTA based only on popularity would have got you sendmail until fairly recently, and I don't think

PostFix Mail Delivery to Different Hosts

achieve this in postfix using the transport file, but could any one give me an example how to get this working ? Thanks in advance, Simon.

Re: PostFix Mail Delivery to Different Hosts

On 05/05/2010 17:42, Victor Duchovni wrote: On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 04:21:37PM +0100, Simon Croome wrote: We are replacing sendmail as our MTA to Postfix and our internal mail relay receives mail from our edge MTA server<#> in the DMZ, once mail is received then any email addres

Re: PostFix Mail Delivery to Different Hosts

On 07/05/2010 10:30, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote: * Simon Croome: On 05/05/2010 17:42, Victor Duchovni wrote: On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 04:21:37PM +0100, Simon Croome wrote: We are replacing sendmail as our MTA to Postfix and our internal mail relay receives mail from our edge

Re: PostFix Mail Delivery to Different Hosts

On 07/05/2010 12:19, Wietse Venema wrote: Patrick Ben Koetter: * Simon Croome: On 05/05/2010 17:42, Victor Duchovni wrote: Here's the easier version... Take a look at the "TABLE SEARCH ORDER" in man 5 transport. Here's an example: # main.cf transp

Re: PostFix Mail Delivery to Different Hosts

On 07/05/2010 14:32, Wietse Venema wrote: Simon Croome: # main.cf transport_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/transports # /etc/postfix/transports firstname.lastn...@example.com relay:lotus.notes.server:25 firstname1.lastna...@example.comrelay:lotus.notes.server:25 firstname2

Delivery to external domains

Hi, I have setup a internal postfix server that relays mail from our external DMZ server to internal mail hosts, it should accept mail the example.com but allow relaying from selected lan hosts to external domains for instance o2.co.uk etc, whenever I attempt to relay through the postfix serv

Receipent Access

Hi, I'm trying to configure our postfix servers to only accept email for valid recipents from a hash table, I have in a file following an example online that it should be in the format of zhu...@example.com OK Can anyone confirm if this is correct ? Thanks

Re: Setting mime-header checking

docs. http://www.postfix.org/header_checks.5.html Isn't immediately apparent why your regexp fails to me, but I'd suggest not reinventing regexp here. Be careful to distinguish if it is regexp: or pcre: Simon

Re: dealing with Yahoo slowness

On Thursday 10 June 2010 19:51:51 Florin Andrei wrote: > > One of the tricks some people seem to use is creating a dedicated > transport for the slow destination. I'm reading the tuning and qshape > README documents, and there are a lot of good suggestions there, but I > was wondering what are the

Re: Too aggressive

On Friday 11 June 2010 13:30:44 Curtis Maurand wrote: > currently I have in my smtpd_client_restrictions: ... > reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org, reject_rbl_client bl.spamcop.net, > permit > > Is flat out rejecting clients on the RBL's considered too agressive? > should I just let spamassassin

Re: Should I be removing first received header for client IP

ooking at such things, so simply ask for the evidence including headers for anything to do with spam. Simon

Re: where to put domain name that's only it virtual map

On Monday 12 July 2010 20:53:46 Phil Howard wrote: > I've added a domain name which has email addresses that are only in > the virtual map. There are no real mailboxes over on Dovecot (via > transport) for this one. Attempts to send mail to > postmas...@newdomain.example.com gets "Relay access deni

Re: Postfix with PostgreSQL backend - number of connections to the database issue

On Friday 27 August 2010 10:52:46 Adam PAPAI wrote: > > It seems postfix keeps-up 8-10-15 connections always, but i guess 2 or 3 > would be enough. The queries are very quick, so it's not necessary to > keep the SQL connection open. > > The documentation does not mention any part of this issue. Re

Re: Invalid IP address (ipv6)

s), and mail client name version so we know what to look out for when the time comes. Simon

Re: Postfix forwarding may result in backscatter

On Tuesday 31 August 2010 16:57:16 Stefan Seidel wrote: > > Really, I don't care about NDNs > for _forwarded_ mail, esp. since most of the mail traffic on this address > is from mailing lists. Most mailing lists can automatically detect dead accounts using NDN - but your choice to do it manually

Re: Customized transport with multiple recipients

On Thursday 02 September 2010 14:26:33 Zhou, Yan wrote: > > I observed that the transport only get one single message with multiple > TO: address in it. So, this means my transport should do the work of > sending to multiple destinations? If it is an SMTP transport yes the remote end should do tha

Re: Unable to put recepient access

On Tuesday 07 September 2010 10:11:02 Sharma, Ashish wrote: > > Sep 7 04:53:55 ip-10-194-99-63 postfix/smtpd[942]: fatal: open database > /etc/postfix/blockList.db: No such file or directory Sep 7 04:53:56 > ip-10-194-99-63 postfix/master[938]: warning: process > /usr/libexec/postfix/smtpd pid 94

Re: MX question

On Tuesday 14 September 2010 13:51:12 CT wrote: > > Does Postfix do an MX lookup on "inbound mail" as part of > "spam" prevention or some other check.. ? Mind has "check_sender_mx_access" so and logs appropriate messages if the MX results are unacceptable. What are you trying to achieve, as it

Re: SPF Softfail question

On Monday 20 September 2010 14:18:16 Kammen van, Marco, Springer SBM NL wrote: > > Not really Postfix related, but maybe you can share your thoughts... Definitely not Postfix related. > As far as I understand from the whole SPF perspective, shouldn't a Soft > Fail be a 4** error and re-try, So

Re: mail to hotmail bounce back

On Thursday 02 July 2009 10:21:35 Umar wrote: > > : host mx2.hotmail.com[65.55.92.152] said: 550 OU-002 Mail > rejected by Windows Live Hotmail for policy reasons. Reasons for > rejection > may be related to content with spam-like characteristics or IP/domain > reputation problems. If

Re: Recommended way to (quickly) get total mail queue size?

On Tuesday 07 July 2009 16:15:06 Michael Durket wrote: > > So what's the best way to quickly (i.e. less than a few seconds) get the > current queue count out of Postfix? man qshape

Re: Message Size Limit Exceed

On Tuesday 14 July 2009 10:20:09 Jacky Chan wrote: > > I would like to ask if the size of message exceeds the one defined in > main.cf, how can I configure Postfix to generate a bounce or error notice > to user/admins? User? On our boxes it returns an appropriate error code to the sender (who is

Re: Enabling cisco pix workarounds affect on performance

On Thursday 16 July 2009 14:41:59 ram wrote: > > If I enable cisco pix workarounds on a high traffic outgoing server , > what are the performance impacts on that Judging from today's log files on my postfix box the default configuration enables these as needed. Jul 16 11:36:10 servername postfix

Re: Enabling cisco pix workarounds affect on performance

On Thursday 16 July 2009 15:26:01 ram wrote: > > For all outgoing mails, the mails are going through a PIX. > Will my outgoing performance be hit then The advice is usually to disable the PIX SMTP fix-up because it is buggy, aside from issues of load. This may have security implications.

Re: Multiple PTR entries

On Thursday 16 July 2009 17:19:23 Victor Duchovni wrote: > > People publishing multiple PTR records are IMHO misguided. I fear the folks who wrote RFC1033 used the term "official name" for where a reverse PTR record should point. I'm sure they meant "canonical", which I'm assured is an outdated

Re: postscreen test

Winnow from winnowing.

Re: Transport Maps

On Tuesday 21 July 2009 16:53:52 Linux Addict wrote: > > I tried using transport maps, "example.com :[smtp1.example.com]" > and " example.com smtp:[smtp1.example.com], but of them didn't use > smtp.example.com. Not clear what you mean here. Documentation of "transport" (man transport)

  1   2   3   4   5   >