stfix.org/postconf.5.html#sender_bcc_maps
http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html
--
Sahil Tandon
=
..
check_recipient_access hash:/etc/postfix/filters
..
/etc/postfix/filters
recipi...@example.org FILTER foo:bar
There are some caveats and limitations; for more information see:
http://www.postfix.org/access.5.html
http://www.postfix.org/FILTER_README.html
--
Sahil Tandon
M?rcio Luciano Donada wrote:
> Sahil Tandon escreveu:
> > M?rcio Luciano Donada wrote:
> >
> >> I am using the sender_bcc_maps, but would like to know if there is the
> >> possibility of doing the audit in e-mail sent from the field for only
> >>
Xs? You should see
something like:
% telnet 209.85.133.27 25
Trying 209.85.133.27...
Connected to an-in-f27.google.com.
Escape character is '^]'.
220 mx.google.com ESMTP d38si5830405and.43
Also see:
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#relayhost
--
Sahil Tandon
elay Host would probably be my only option. However using postfix relay with
> gmail seems to be a *lot* of work
It is not a lot of work at all; what gave you the assumption that it is?
--
Sahil Tandon
On Dec 19, 2008, at 10:59 AM, "Asif Iqbal" wrote:
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 6:05 AM, Sahil Tandon
wrote:
Asif Iqbal wrote:
You are right I cannot talk to any domain's MX. My ISP is cox and
I cannot
even talk to their two MXs on port 25. I guess I could do a nmap
to find
> Wietse Venema meant in his reply. Sorry if I misunderstood
Yes, see the example in SASL_README for guidance:
http://www.postfix.org/SASL_README.html#client_sasl
--
Sahil Tandon
In general, no
> > special configuration is required to send mail to any domain.
>
> Correct, as long as there are no spam filters around.
False.
--
Sahil Tandon
tp. You need the latter.
> I followed this
>
> http://www.postfix.org/SASL_README.html#client_sasl
Also follow this: http://www.postfix.org/TLS_README.html
--
Sahil Tandon
ease help me!!
Why not simply reject such messages? What is the reason you want to
accept but silently discard messages to that non-existent user? It is
your choice to do so, but please offer some rationale for the archives.
--
Sahil Tandon
(given suitable CAfile or CApath):
>>
>> smtp_tls_security_level = secure
>>
>
> So where would you get the certificate to authenticate to google or
> 1and1.
The smtp (client), as opposed to the smtpd (server), does not need a
certificate to authenticate to google.
--
Sahil Tandon
Victor Duchovni wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 08:25:12AM -0500, Sahil Tandon wrote:
>
> > sean darcy wrote:
> >
> > > Victor Duchovni wrote:
> > >> On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 12:08:20PM -0500, Asif Iqbal wrote:
> > >>
> > >>&
thin that particular smtpd_mumble_restrictions and
moves onto the next one, where the message may still be rejected by
another check. AFAIK, DUNNO stops processing of a particular access
table but continues checks within the same mumble restrictions.
--
Sahil Tandon
I created an /etc/postfix/aliases file containing:
>jim123: JIM123
>
> Then I ran "newaliases", but it did not seem to work.
Is /etc/postfix/aliases appropriately defined in your main.cf? Please
show the output of 'postconf -n' and read:
http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#mail
--
Sahil Tandon
or the Postfix mailing list.
Postfix is an MTA, not a POP3/IMAP server or client.
--
Sahil Tandon
as you currently do, or route to an address that resolves (via
transport_maps) to a pipe transport.
--
Sahil Tandon
ist, read:
http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#mail
--
Sahil Tandon
Michael JOLY wrote:
> Can we change or personalize the message sent automatically by postfix such
> as the "mail delivery system" message
http://www.postfix.org/bounce.5.html
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#bounce_template_file
--
Sahil Tandon
ers known
relay recipients? Or are you trying to devise some sort of 'catch-all'
that forwards *all* mail to unknown users (local or otherwise) to this
other mail server? The latter is a bad idea.
[...]
--
Sahil Tandon
ostconf -n'. Also see:
http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#mail
--
Sahil Tandon
n.cf. Mouss
already gave you this clue.
For more information:
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#mydestination
http://www.postfix.org/STANDARD_CONFIGURATION_README.html
http://www.postfix.org/ADDRESS_CLASS_README.html
--
Sahil Tandon
Adam wrote:
> Is there a way I can have mail sent through different "smtpd's"
> depending on the outgoing domain? If so I could throw a different
> disclaimer depending.
http://www.postfix.org/transport.5.html
--
Sahil Tandon
On Jan 5, 2009, at 11:07 AM, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
Hi list again,
Wietse, I take advantage of this new email to thank you for your reply
to my earlier email.
This time I just wonder why relay_domains defaults to mydestination?
I looked in the documentation and they appear to be very distinct
tic.musicreports.com not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
^^^^^^
Fix that.
--
Sahil Tandon
t; relaying to destinations you don't accept by hosts outside of
>> mynetworks.
>
> Does smtpd_sasl_auth_enable = no completely disable submission and
> prevent relaying for hosts I don't accept? or is there more I have to
> make sure I do?
This disables submission via SASL authenticated clients on port 25.
--
Sahil Tandon
m your domain; it was the From: header that purports to be from your
domain. The check_sender_access table operates on the envelope, not the
header.
> This arrives in the inbox of no...@thisisreallymydomain.com with no
> indication of the
> actual source being a different domain, as "From"
> n...@thisisreallymydomain.com.
Actually, there is an indication in the headers, as explained above.
> How do I filter on the actual domain that it is coming from instead of
> the forged
> "From:" sent in the message headers?
You need to filter based on the headers
--
Sahil Tandon
Sahil Tandon wrote:
> > > Received: by www.thisisireallymydomain.com (Postfix)
> > > id 3C916254775; Tue, 30 Dec 2008 03:50:01 -0800 (PST)
> > > Delivered-To: n...@thisisireallymydomain.com
> > > Received: from alkhorayef.com (unknown [91.189.132.54])
Some a
sport map and
populates it with the appropriate hostnames and transport nexthops.
--
Sahil Tandon
the most out of this mailing
list, read http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#mail before posting
again.
--
Sahil Tandon
> and it will comply.
Change the code or $myhostname. :-)
--
Sahil Tandon
On Mon, 12 Jan 2009, David Cottle wrote:
> So I should be using smtpd_helo_name to set the server helo name?
All supported main.cf parameters are documented in the postconf(5) manual;
smtpd_helo_name is not one of them.
For the umpteenth time, please stop top-posting.
--
Sahil Tandon
connects to your smtpd. It is common practice
for servers that support ESMTP to indicate this in their banner; no harm in
leaving it there. Although Postfix by default sends EHLO even if ESMTP does
not appear in the banner, some other MTAs might need to see ESMTP to know
your server supports it
? What do the logs say? Show the output of
'postconf -n' and relevant excerpts from your log. Also see the
DEBUG_README, to which you were referred upon joining this list; it
contains useful troubleshooting tips and advice on how to get help
from this list.
--
Sahil Tandon
On Jan 12, 2009, at 11:51 AM, "Eduardo Júnior"
wrote:
Hi, all
I pretend release to a account in specific the quantity of
recipients in a message be bigger than the default.
For example:
userf...@mydomain.com
number of recipicients allowed: 100
other
number of recipicients allowed: 1
l to recipient; sender==$$recipient
--
Sahil Tandon
ocal users (local, virtual etc)
are sent only by valid legitimate emails addresses.
Read about reject_unlisted_sender and smtpd_reject_unlisted_sender in
the postconf(5) manual.
--
Sahil Tandon
software
mailing list.
--
Sahil Tandon
one pop/imap server so long as it was decent
>>> hardware.
>>
>> Same here. This is mainly due to the caches dovecot uses.
>
> Not to mention Dovecots LDA fits in nicely with postfix :)
+1 for Postfix w/ Dovecot LDA.
--
Sahil Tandon
this message,
> but
> you receive it anyway.
>
> You can use HOLD with a check_recipient_access map reliably, that's another
> good way to temporarily pause delivery.
I think this affects all recipients of the message, so the OP probably wants to
use transport_maps to limit holding/queuing only for a particular sent of
recipients.
--
Sahil Tandon
On Wed, 14 Jan 2009, Sahil Tandon wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Jan 2009, Noel Jones wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 04:41:59PM -0800, Jeff Weinberger wrote:
> > >
> > > On Jan 14, 2009, at 3:53 PM, Roderick A. Anderson wrote:
> > >
> > > >Jeff
rify for the archives, djbdns (with dnscache) works
perfectly well; one should just not add his or her ISP's nameserver(s)
to the list of roots. Though it's not the default, a lot of tutorials
seem to recommend it.
--
Sahil Tandon
I
> have tried sending the exact same messages via other servers with luck.
> If I compair the headers inside GMAIL
Did the rest of this sentence get cut off? Are there any spam-related
headers on the GMail side that might give you some clues?
--
Sahil Tandon
never knows I tried to get in touch. This is bad.
> Just some thoughts ...
Think again. :)
--
Sahil Tandon
ve you some clues?
>>
> Hmm, yes parts of the sentence is missing. I was about to write the only
> difference, in the header, is the host specifik once.
> The headers does not contain spam specifik headers.
Try contacting GMail support in your capacity as a client (you do have a
gmail.com email account) and ask why email X was placed in your spam folder.
--
Sahil Tandon
ix.org/postconf.5.html#smtpd_sender_login_maps
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#reject_sender_login_mismatch
--
Sahil Tandon
:
id=RULE_01; recipient_count=21; sender=m...@mailer.com; action=REJECT
You could also write your own policy service; read:
http://www.postfix.org/SMTPD_POLICY_README.html
--
Sahil Tandon
and not third-party software like DKIM
or DomainKeys), read: http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#mail.
--
Sahil Tandon
don't get the good banner.
>
> However, doing a telnet 25 from the server itself gives the good banner
Are you kidding? Didn't you *just* send this email and receive an answer
that it's your firewall? When you telnet from -> to localhost, you are not
subject to the firewall's smtp fixup feature.
--
Sahil Tandon
On Jan 21, 2009, at 9:31 AM, Guy wrote:
Hi guys,
I seem to recall from previous messages that some folks on here are
using dovecot deliver with postfix. I'm using maildrop + courier-auth
at the moment with dovecot as IMAP/POP3. I'm considering the merits of
changing to dovecot deliver instead
mething like the .mailfilter files used by maildrop.
That is how I interpreted your original question as well; the name and
location of the sieve configuration file are configurable. Per-user script
locations can be defined in your MySQL DB.
--
Sahil Tandon
s and the main.cf entries.
> Is there a simple way, being a lazy sod preferably automated, way of
> cleaning up main.cf.
The postconf(1) manual contains information to help you with that.
--
Sahil Tandon
l#delay_warning_time
--
Sahil Tandon
it is only in the FROM HEADER where the yahoo
domain appears?
--
Sahil Tandon
locking it coming in from the outside. But I want to block mail
> internal going out to a specific address.
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#check_recipient_access
--
Sahil Tandon
On Jan 27, 2009, at 9:52 AM, Linux Addict
wrote:
Wietse Venema wrote:
Linux Addict:
What I would like to do is, if a destination host does not have
an MX record, then I would like to drop the message, don't want
to bounce it.
The Internet email RFCs do not require MX records. They speci
I
> want it to).
Because you are not 'nobody', the message will not appear in your sent
folder. In any case, the functionality of saving a copy of sent messages in
some folder is not a Postfix issue. Also see the SMTP_FROM parameter in
denyhosts to modify the sender address.
--
Sahil Tandon
)
> Is it not permitted to use recipient verification through a relay server?
So cuda2.cascadenetworks.com does not believe e...@mytestdomain.com is a
valid recipient.
--
Sahil Tandon
And as I searched
> this mailling list, some users suggest policyd, but a database is needed,
> may I know any Postfix itself can do it or not? or just third party software
> does?
policyd is third-party software. You need a policy server.
--
Sahil Tandon
t. If you don't like the code of conduct
here, please unsubscribe. Have a lovely day!
--
Sahil Tandon
o one of my favorite Postfix options:
> reject_unknown_hostname
Which, in Postfix 2.3+, is reject_unknown_helo_hostname, and quite prone to
false positives. Use with caution on a production server.
--
Sahil Tandon
^^^
>>
>> Wietse
>>
> Hello Wietse,
>
> I've read and applied
> https://help.ubuntu.com/8.04/serverguide/C/postfix.html. How could this
> happen? Shouldn't the information be consistent?
Postfix is not affiliated with Ubuntu, so whatever you read on the
above-linked web site is the responsibility of the Ubuntu person who authored
that document.
--
Sahil Tandon
d by exchange) via cron, so they can see
> subjects and senders, so I will probably create a 'backup' service in
> master.cf that does all the stuff. It would be equivalent to an alias like
> this:
>
> @example.com localmailbox, |logthis, relay:[mx2.example.com]
Hm, and where is this access map syntax documented?
--
Sahil Tandon
n important part of this mailing list's welcome message:
TO REPORT A PROBLEM see http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#mail
--
Sahil Tandon
emails using the same yahoo/gmail account
> in the office that has a public static ip address, the mail is
> received.
Show some logs of the rejection(s) to help diagnose the problem.
--
Sahil Tandon
nd but I'm not sure if a
> pipe service would be more viable. Ideas/suggestions?
The dovecot LDA provides quota functionality and integrates into Postfix via
the pipe(8) transport.
--
Sahil Tandon
y [127.0.0.1]
> ...
>
> NOTE: The firewall is stopped and Selinux disabled.
NOTE: mail(1) is using sendmail(8) instead of sendmail(1); the latter is
Postfix, the former is Sendmail. Consult the CentOS documentation for
instructions on properly purging Sendmail from your system.
--
Sahil Tandon
On Fri, 06 Feb 2009, Glen B wrote:
> I'm not asking for an LDA to deploy.
I know.
> Are you suggesting that I review Dovecot's LDA as an example of how to
> use a pipe transport?
Yes.
--
Sahil Tandon
[19921]: (19921-07) Passed CLEAN,
> [194.152.14.14] -> , Message-ID:
> <000501c9895e.5a5d9b000e0e9...@localhost>, mail_id: F83J1kFOLclA, Hits:
> -2.599, size: 1365, queued_as: 247422121E, 5034 ms
Postfix believes exam...@example.com is a valid user and thus accepts the
message for *that* user.
--
Sahil Tandon
configuration is NAT Firewall > Untangle in bridge mode >
> postfix, but since telnet to postfix's smtp port produces an odd
> result when it's behind the Untangle box so I took Untangle out.
Thanks but all of this is missing the point. Re-read Viktor's email and stop
using OpenDNS with Postfix.
--
Sahil Tandon
is coming from an authenticated sasl session?
See pipe(8) for information on ${sasl_username} and ${sasl_sender}.
--
Sahil Tandon
cks.submit, which is referenced by the cleanup clone:
/^Message-/ IGNORE
This works as I'd expect, but will it break anything else?
--
Sahil Tandon
On Sun, 08 Feb 2009, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 08, 2009 at 03:38:22AM -0500, Sahil Tandon wrote:
> > This works as I'd expect, but will it break anything else?
>
> Yes. It will break the complete mail handling of the client. _Never_
> ever touch a message id.
On Feb 8, 2009, at 12:01 PM, Bastian Blank > wrote:
On Sun, Feb 08, 2009 at 11:13:53AM -0500, Sahil Tandon wrote:
On Sun, 08 Feb 2009, Bastian Blank wrote:
Yes. It will break the complete mail handling of the client. _Never_
ever touch a message id.
Do explain how adding/replacing a va
On Feb 8, 2009, at 1:02 PM, mouss wrote:
Victor Duchovni a écrit :
On Sun, Feb 08, 2009 at 06:22:17PM +0100, mouss wrote:
I mean replacing or deleting already set Message-Id headers. And
it will
break MUA driven thread handling
- very few people put their Sent mail in the same folders as
t understand why its not working.. If I remove all the rbl checks
> the emails arrive..
>
> Any ideas?
>
> Here is the configs that apply:
Show 'postconf -n' instead of snippets from main.cf. Also provide some logs
related to the problem.
--
Sahil Tandon
d some relevant excerpts from your log.
--
Sahil Tandon
On Mon, 09 Feb 2009, webmas...@aus-city.com wrote:
> Quoting Sahil Tandon :
>
>> On Mon, 09 Feb 2009, David Cottle wrote:
>>
>>> Yes all the files (whitelist, check_backscatterer and
>>> check_spamcannibal) have been postmap.
>>>
>>> I assume
hen this happens?
Try monit, or some log monitoring service that notifies you when service X
fails. But if service X is required for root to send you email, you'll have
to figure out a way around that.
--
Sahil Tandon
vealed via procmail's log for future messsages.
>
> Done.
>
> As I wrote earlier, procmail's not delivered mail to me before this.
Figure out why Postfix is passing the message on to procmail. Is it a
.forward file? A transport setting in main.cf?
--
Sahil Tandon
> ab...@anotherdomain.tld.
Can you show 'postconf -n' and confirm that you postmap'd (if necessary,
depending on your map type) the virtual_alias_maps file after adding the
above alias to it?
--
Sahil Tandon
y
default.
--
Sahil Tandon
EADME for hints on asking for help on this list.
As a guess, the machine giving you the 450 cannot find your hostname, so
perhaps it's a DNS problem on either side.
--
Sahil Tandon
ail.rpg.in? Check the logs there.
--
Sahil Tandon
: starting the Postfix
> mail system
> Feb 14 11:12:14 nova postfix/master[27805]: fatal: /etc/postfix/master.cf:
> line 115: missing "transport type" field
What is line 115 of master.cf?
--
Sahil Tandon
On Sat, 14 Feb 2009, Nate Carlson wrote:
> Sorry if this is a FAQ, I can't find anything about it online.
Somewhat of a FAQ:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.mail.postfix.user/150117/
--
Sahil Tandon
On Mon, 16 Feb 2009, David Cottle wrote:
> I see a lot of unknown on RDNS lookups, yet SPF works, so DNS is
> looking up, its just RDNS comes up unknown
Not a Postfix issue.
--
Sahil Tandon
ard_error_limit are applied. See TARPIT
CONTROLS in smtpd(8).
--
Sahil Tandon
On Feb 17, 2009, at 3:09 PM, bharathan kailath
wrote:
i understood
but why two folders 'defer' and 'deferred'! using OpenSuse 10.3
thanks
Stop top-posting and read qmgr(8).
On Feb 17, 2009, at 3:19 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
bharathan kailath wrote:
i understood
but why two folders 'defer' and 'deferred'! using OpenSuse 10.3
thanks
"deferred" stores the reason why the message is in "defer".
Is that inverted? :-)
the documentation is it stated that the destination domain needs to
be specified?
> What would be the best way to delay ALL outbound email?
What is the problem you're trying to solve? Maybe defer_transports would
help in this situation.
--
Sahil Tandon
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Travis wrote:
> I recently started bouncing email because (it appears) I had a mixture
> of space-indentation and tab-indentation on the multi-line $mydestinations
> line.
Show logs and output of the following command:
% postconf mydestination
--
Sahil Tandon
nd see the tag or code, it can then decide if it
> should delay or deliver immediately the message.
>
> I hope I'm making myself clear and please ask if you need clarification.
Why not configure your application to inspect the mail and, depending on
your criteria, submit to Postfix immediately or after a two hour delay?
--
Sahil Tandon
fer_transports and that looks promising. Would I simple
> put defer_transports = smtp in the main.cf or do I have to fiddle with
> other settings someplace too? I'd prefer something a little more
> elegant than defer_transports unless I can, again, specify somehow which
> mails are to be delayed.
You needn't fiddle with other settings. To deliver deferred mail, issue the
"sendmail -q" command.
--
Sahil Tandon
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Melvyn Sopacua wrote:
> On Wednesday 18 February 2009 16:56:05 jeffs wrote:
> > Sahil Tandon wrote:
> > > On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, jeffs wrote:
> > >> Thank you for your prompt reply.
> > >
> > > No problem, but please
delays for only
that transport in main.cf.
--
Sahil Tandon
retrieval,
consult the documentation of your IMAP/POP software.
--
Sahil Tandon
ch seem to means that the
> email is coming back someway.
>
> What I don't understand, is that why this doesn't happenned with all the
> mails, just the one that are sent using a client software, or a client
> webmail...
>
> Any help is appreciated!!!
Read the DEBUG_README; it is a document to which you were linked upon joining
this list.
--
Sahil Tandon
ail manually using q id, mail are reaching.
Guess: lisletech.com.s5b2.psmtp.com is the MX for 'mydomain.com' and when the
original email was sent, lisletech.com.s5b2.psmtp.com was, for whatever
reason, unreachable. When you tried re-delivering the message, the host was
back up.
--
Sahil Tandon
On Fri, 20 Feb 2009, post...@yeah.net wrote:
> I have installed postfix and I can send emails fine with my email client,
> but cannot receive, only us...@mydomain.com send to us...@mydomain.com is ok.
Show related logs.
--
Sahil Tandon
On Feb 20, 2009, at 8:25 AM,"itsramesh_s"
wrote:
--- In post...@yahoogroups.com, Sahil Tandon wrote:
On Fri, 20 Feb 2009, itsramesh_s wrote:
I have configured postfix-2.4.5-2.fc8, the problem with alias.
alias file entry.
athena: la...@..., itsrames...@...
build notificatio
1 - 100 of 851 matches
Mail list logo
