ver all of your other online
accounts by triggering password reset emails. They'll still be able to trigger
the reset emails, and receive them, but they wont be able to read.
--
Mike Cardwell https://grepular.com https://emailprivacytester.com
OpenPGP Key35BC AF1D 3AA2 1F84 3DC3 B0CF 7
lk.com>
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Message-ID: <20150615111200.b8e087e66...@mymodeltalk.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3
X-Mailer: vBulletin Mail via PHP
Subject: "Model Castings & Actin
Who is your host? IF its amazon they have to unblock port 25 for sending if
you have more than one IP address. You might want to make sure they don't
have any restrictions on you. And...if they do they should have procedures
for getting them lifted.
--
Mike McKoy
*404.590.7176*
running cpanel you should be fairly secure.
I recommend visiting a security site and having them scan your server for
vunerabilities. Then do backups on the reg.
--
Mike McKoy
*404.590.7176*
http://MyForeverHair.com
http://www.MyModelTalk.com
http://InCrowdUSA.net
http://www.google.com/profiles/mi
Hi victor, so i changed the hostname to mail1.mymodeltalk.com and then
speciefied the internet hostname as mymodeltalk.com. Now when i restart
postfix it fails. What have I done wrong? I'm ultimately trying to
configure more than one sending IP.
--
Mike McKoy
*404.590.7176*
I changed the hostname to mail1.mymodeltalk.com in CENTOS and I changed
myhostname=mymodeltalk.com in main.cf. Now postfix won't start.
--
Mike McKoy
*404.590.7176*
http://MyForeverHair.com
http://www.MyModelTalk.com
http://InCrowdUSA.net
http://www.google.com/profiles/mikemckoy
On Mon, J
OK i have two instances... the first instance starts and then the second
instance tries too. I do appreciate the kind help thus far.
*The error is*: postfix-immt/postfix-script[20418]: fatal: the Postfix mai
l system is already running
--
Mike McKoy
*404.590.7176*
http
yup that did it.
you are awesome. tell me your birthday so i can send you endearing ecards
on your birthdays for the rest of your life :)
seriously thanks a bunch.
--
Mike McKoy
*404.590.7176*
http://MyForeverHair.com
http://www.MyModelTalk.com
http://InCrowdUSA.net
http://www.google.com
/jk2Lg7kSrO8VIU2eU5eABphe4EYV7O7bMOk7EhyC4hlic
4RveckMb7bMO1As6Ix4rG2nPa6AEjtBkgGn7sr/j2iBSzi0ThwChY73IW2+jzvxqOV
96Dp8clECIwn98JtyeSQiaMhk9Kpr3zZTi+DzALg=
--
Mike McKoy
*404.590.7176*
http://MyForeverHair.com
http://www.MyModelTalk.com
http://InCrowdUSA.net
http://www.google.com
ha. Thanks man. You shall be honored and remembered timelessly in song
--
Mike McKoy
*404.590.7176*
http://MyForeverHair.com
http://www.MyModelTalk.com
http://InCrowdUSA.net
http://www.google.com/profiles/mikemckoy
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 5:46 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2
ld be via port 25.
Checking an inbox via pop3 or IMAP would use different ports but to send
authenticated mail from a machine port 25 or 587 needs to allow traffic.
i'm i'm wrong someone correct me.
--
Mike McKoy
*404.590.7176*
http://MyForeverHair.com
http://www.MyModelTalk.com
http:/
undary="b1_1be90f23e5ec5cb3112d6555f65b47d3"
--b1_1be90f23e5ec5cb3112d6555f65b47d3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset = "utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
--
Mike McKoy
*404.590.7176*
http://MyForeverHair.com
http://www.MyModelTalk.com
http://InCrowdUSA.net
http://www.google.com/profiles/mikemckoy
On
tions between members to go to spam. So i'm trying to get this
right :)
--
Mike McKoy
*404.590.7176*
http://MyForeverHair.com
http://www.MyModelTalk.com
http://InCrowdUSA.net
http://www.google.com/profiles/mikemckoy
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 8:05 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Mike McKoy
OUTPUT -p tcp -d 105.106.107.108 --dport 25 -j DNAT \
--to-destination 192.168.0.1
Where 192.168.0.1 is replaced by whatever the new IP should be. Assuming
you don't have any legit mail going to the old IP anymore.
--
Mike Cardwell https://grepular.com/ https://www.parsemail.org/
OpenPG
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 03:13:45PM -0600, Wolfe, Robert wrote:
> Download the source to the current release and then build it yourself
> from there.
>
> On 2017-01-23 13:46, Vernon Fort wrote:
>
> > What's the best way to get the latest version of postfix on centos 7?
> >
> > Vernon
I also wo
o anything
--
Mike.
Quoting Dirk Stöcker :
On Sat, 18 Mar 2017, Richard Damon wrote:
- On your side, don't reject RCPT TO for the no-reply address.
- On your side, add a telepathic policy service that can distinguish
between RCPT TO to verify an address, and RCPT
Surely that's going to need to be:
/^Subject:(.*)\[MASSMAIL\](.*)/ REPLACE Subject: $1$2
Quoting Ralf Hildebrandt :
* Zalezny Niezalezny :
As I see here header_checks can do it. There is only one problem. This rule
searching for a subject with string [MASSMAIL] and replacing complete
subject l
Assuming the header check works, I'd run that on a different instance
of postfix and route the specific outside servers to that instance via
the firewall...
Quoting John Stoffel :
Well, I've confirmed that EOP (protection.outloko.com, our external
Spam filter provider) is adding in the "Del
Our alternative was always to just set relays for "poorly behaved" domains to go through the ISP email servers. It was slower but more reliable since the ISP had an artificially inflated reputation and more time to complain when it's email was.blocked.
postconf -nWould be more useful...
The m3u contains a link to: http://audio.icann.org/meetings/sju61/sju61-OPEN-2018-03-14-T1732-208bc-zYhNI147Nrs4gtkXUVItrT4uukdYi3nR-en-02.mp3Which does work...On 19 Mar. 2018 19:50, Dominic Raferd wrote:On 17 March 2018 at 19:42, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
[ Also posted t
Sounds like GFS2 operating normally.
Do you have any metrics on for the performance of the SAN during these events?
Quoting Durga Prasad Malyala :
Hello all,
I am seeing consistent delays in writing to disk (my System redhat 7.2
using GFS2 file system cluster)
May 4 10:03:34 mail1 postfix/l
postmap is a lookup management tool; doing a query on an IP in a
subnet isn't going to succeed.
You probably just forgot to enable client_access or reload postfix
What does this return?
# postconf smtpd_client_restrictions
Default is:
smtpd_client_restrictions =
enabled would be:
smtpd_clien
off. You can contact our customer
service team via
in-product support to have them deactivate the features on your
behalf, but we do not recommend it.
--
Mike.
Quoting Daniele Nicolodi :
On 5/17/18 3:59 PM, Mike Guelfi wrote:
Quoting Noel Jones :
It seems counterproductive to rewrite a plain-text link... I don't
know it there's a setting in the O365 controls to avoid mangling
plain text, so you may have to live with it.
-- Noel J
Upstream RHEL, and therefore CentOS, don't update version numbers when
they roll security patches.
Latest release though:
2016-10-31 - Jaroslav Škarvada - 2:2.6.6-8
- Backported support for TLS 1.1, TLS 1.2
Not insanely old...
Quoting "@lbutlr" :
On 03 Jun 2018, at 16:08, Proxy wrote:
I'm
unknown in virtual alias table)
We need _both_ content filters to run on original, unfiltered messages.
There is no dependency one filter to the other.
What am I missing?
Please, advise. thank you.
~ Mike
autoresponder message on off
hours - in addition to delivering to Exchange users.
~ Mike
On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 1:47 PM Wietse Venema wrote:
> Mike Schleif:
> > CentOS Linux release 7.5.1804 (Core)
> > mail_version = 2.10.1
> >
> > Several years funning one content filter
m-8am weekdays, and all day weekends. Apparently, Exchange
cannot do this ...
~ Mike
On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 2:46 PM Wietse Venema wrote:
> Mike Schleif:
> > content_filter=filter:dummy
> > This filter has been running for years, massaging all messages as we
> > require, and m
No parallel content_filter processing?
http://www.postfix.org/FILTER_README.html
Advanced content filter: sending unfiltered mail to the content filter
RE: "scan"
This runs up to 10 content filters in parallel.
What am I missing?
~ Mike
On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 1:47 PM Wietse Ven
On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 3:09 PM Wietse Venema wrote:
> Mike Schleif:
> > All addresses INCLUDING the special address? - yes
> >
> > The special address is subject to ONLY this filter or BOTH filters? -
> BOTH
> > filters
> >
> > Perhaps, there is ano
to fix current configuration.
Suspect that I might be able to figure it out after looking through
3.4.0 changes though, and altering configuration to use new features.
Thanks!
--
Mike Kazantsev // fraggod.net
s to make symlink to the cert file and use that as
> the keyfile.
Thanks for testing this one-file case, such a quick patch and releases.
It's rare that such things are bugs and not my misconfiguration, so
apologies for maybe being too long-winded in describing the wrong problem.
--
Mike Kazantsev // fraggod.net
I want to relay messages coming through a server with a dynamic IP
(Exchange) through my postfix.
My postfix
my smtpd_recipient_restrictions already has a
"hash:/etc/postfix/allowed_relays" option on it, and I've tried adding
the Dynamic DNS name that resolves to that IP address and put it in the
On 05/05/10 13:31, Nataraj wrote:
> Mike A. Leonetti wrote:
>> I want to relay messages coming through a server with a dynamic IP
>> (Exchange) through my postfix.
>>
>> My postfix
>> my smtpd_recipient_restrictions already has a
>> "hash:/etc/postfix/
We are going to have an off-site e-mail archiving solution that needs to
receive e-mail for certain domains only. How can I have postfix copy
e-mail bound for only certain domains to another server (as well as
deliver it locally)?
--
Mike A. Leonetti
As warm as green tea
Matt,
My only qualm with that is the other server isn't concerned with ALL
domains, just a few. So BCCing every domain would cause a much larger load.
Mike A. Leonetti
As warm as green tea
On 05/19/10 13:37, Matt Hayes wrote:
> On 5/19/2010 1:28 PM, Mike A. Leonetti wrote:
>
>
Awesome. Thanks guys.
Mike A. Leonetti
As warm as green tea
On 05/19/10 14:04, Matt Hayes wrote:
> On 5/19/2010 2:00 PM, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
>
>> On 5/19/2010 1:56 PM, Mike A. Leonetti wrote:
>>
>>> Matt,
>>>
>>> My only qualm
ient dnsbl.sorbs.net
message_size_limit = 52428800
--
Mike A. Leonetti
As warm as green tea
So if I put "virtual_mailbox_domains = domain.com" mail will be
delivered using the virtual_transport I guess. But when it's doing the
alias it always adds "domain.com" at the end. How does it know to do that?
Mike A. Leonetti
As warm as green tea
On 05/19/10 23:51, No
On 05/20/10 12:40, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 5/20/2010 8:32 AM, Mike A. Leonetti wrote:
>
>> So if I put "virtual_mailbox_domains = domain.com" mail will be
>> delivered using the virtual_transport I guess. But when it's doing the
>> alias it always adds &q
dnsbl.sorbs.net
message_size_limit = 52428800
Once again I will be the first to admit that I am wordy and confusing
with the way I write. If I am doing something very wrong or backwards
please don't hesitate to let me know.
Thanks.
--
Mike A. Leonetti
As warm as green tea
How can I have postfix stil accept e-mail for certain domains but only
allow e-mails from a specific IP and the range of allowed internal IPs?
--
Mike A. Leonetti
As warm as green tea
server and then flush the queue.
My first thought.
Mike A. Leonetti
As warm as green tea
am aware that there can be security risks, but they exist
anyway if postfix fails back to plaintext.
Thanks.
--
Mike A. Leonetti
As warm as green tea
(2011年01月09日 10:28), lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote:
> Zitat von "Mike A. Leonetti" :
>
>> I set up postfix with:
>>
>>> smtp_tls_policy_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/tls_policy
>> And a list of domains with "may" as the policy for each of them. The
&
sources.
Thanks.
--
Mike A. Leonetti
As warm as green tea
ould be asking if it's possible
to only allow connexions from allowed IPs to receive e-mail.
Mike A. Leonetti
As warm as green tea
even after the message leaves the postfix queue?
--
Mike A. Leonetti
As warm as green tea
(2011年04月15日 21:04), Wietse Venema wrote:
> Mike A. Leonetti:
>> My main goal is to "archive" messages with the extra information
>> (like what SASL user was used to authenticate to send the message
>> etc) that postcat would give. Is it possible to pass that inform
and deliver to an external contact. The actual local e-mail address
>> of the user is found in the "mail" attribute, but the external contact to
>> deliver to is located in another DN that is linked back to the main user
>> using the user's DN.
>>
>&g
tently
across platforms, the problems it creates outweigh the benefits.
Thanks.
Mike
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
This accomplishment must feel awesome to those of you that started
this thing and as well to those of you that have participated along
the way.
Thanks for your dedication. I hope you found joy along the way.
Mike
Quoting Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users :
On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 08
On 12/30/2023 12:08 PM, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
> "Hakon Alstadheim wrote:
>> Just FYI, I got postfix 3.7.9-0+deb12u1 from bookworm-updates (i.e.
>> Debian) today.
>
> Scott Kitterman:
>> For those still using Debian Bullseye (oldstable), postfix
>> 3.5.23-0+deb11u1 is also availabl
Hello,
My setup like below:
I have Postfix setup and use dovecot as SASL. Now, all email accounts
can use the smtp server to send emails. I want to allow only one email
account to send out emails and rest of others can only use POP3 or IMAP.
How can I make that?
Thanks
leanup[28182]: 2FB4FDE1A1F:
message-id=<20230918202736.2fb4fde1...@foveal.com>
Sep 18 16:27:36 foveal-12 postfix/qmgr[28154]: B63D9DE1838: removed
--
--
Mike Bianchi
mbian...@foveal.com
www.FovealMounts.com
___
Postfix-users mailing lis
:00 postfix/qmgr[2381502]: 675C218000D0:
from=, size=7269, nrcpt=3 (queue active)
For 1st recipient check do before queue, and then message go to queue and
then checks do for other recipients.
--
Best regards,
Mike Teplynin
___
Postfix-users mailing
h headers is likely a mistake.
That's an interesting point, I hadn't thought of that case. Is there a
way to avoid that but also keeping the "normal" recipients in custom
header?
--
Best regards,
Mike Teplynin
___
Postfix-use
upted during the message transfer,
I can save info about helo, the sender and recipient addresses, but
not the part of the message that the client managed to send (because
the milter did not receive it?)
--
Best regards,
Mike
___
Postfix-users mailing
ove
some headers on other internal servers before messages reach users
mailboxes.
--
Best regards,
Mike Teplynin
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
ion for us, but Postfix does not have such functionality.
--
Best regards,
Mike Teplynin
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 11:27 AM Jaroslaw Rafa via Postfix-users
wrote:
> As usual in such cases, I think you can write a milter that would do the job
> exactly as you want.
I'm not sure that I have enough skills to write a milter, but this is
my plan B :)
--
Best regards,
Mi
On Wed, May 7, 2025 at 10:15 AM Tom Hendrikx via Postfix-users
wrote:
> In the past, I've used the test tools (milter-test-server,
> milter-test-client) from https://github.com/milter-manager/milter-manager
Very nice link, thank you!
--
Best re
201 - 263 of 263 matches
Mail list logo