ram wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 09:57 -0500, Victor Duchovni wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 07:58:07PM +0530, ram wrote:
>>
>>> [r...@50.133 postfix]# postmap -q t...@netcore.co.in cdb:/etc/postfix/vmap
>>> r...@netcore.co.in
>>> [r...@50.133 postfix]# postmap -q t...@netcore.co.in cdb:/etc/p
Res wrote:
[]
> on our internal email servers (and on my personal one) I use
> milter-regex to stop all those pesky cable/dial/dsl users, its great
> because i can also use this rule in milter-regex.conf :
>
> reject "Access Denied ; Please use the English language when
> communicating with us"
>
Henk van Oers wrote:
Quote from header_checks (5):
""
DUNNO Pretend that the input line did not match any pat-
tern, and inspect the next input line. This action
can be used to shorten the table search.
For backwards compatibility reasons, P
Henk van Oers wrote:
On Sat, 14 Mar 2009, Michael Tokarev wrote:
Henk van Oers wrote:
[]
I was trying to use action OK to jump out of header checks.
That is: not only skip the next patterns, but also the next
input lines.
[]
Isn't it better to use the same semantics as in restric
Bill Cole wrote:
Michael Tokarev wrote, On 3/14/09 4:13 PM:
Henk van Oers wrote:
[...]
I the case of multiple recipients there can be rejects for some,
no tests for some others (OK), a few test for DUNNO recipients
and all the checks for the rest. Right?
Yes. For each recipient
Simon Wilson wrote:
I'm running Postfix 2.3.3 on CentOS 5.3 x64 (Postfix installed from
CentOS repository). Firstly thank you to the writers for a great piece
of software... :)
Postconf -n:
[]
Setup works a treat, has been running great for a few weeks. I sent an
email to about 10 people, 2
ram wrote:
I have a mailing list server where an application sends mails to list
members using /usr/sbin/sendmail ( on commandline)
When the mailing is going on I find that /usr/sbin/sendmail takes quiet
some time to return even for a trivial message
For eg.
sendmail -f r...@netcore.co.in r..
Jay G. Scott wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> the aliases files are limited to 1024 chars/record because of NIS.
Which part of the postfix documentation states this?
/mjt
A few years ago I implemented a new dict for
Postfix, dict_fnmatch. It is a shell-style
pattern matcher with patterns placed _inline_,
right in the config file, without any additional
files like pcre/regex (the simplest dictionaries
which does not use indexed files) and others.
The usage is quite
Harakiri wrote:
> I can use
>
> smtpd_end_of_data_restrictions=check_policy_service unix:private/policy
>
> just fine in the main.cf. However this has the drawback that i need to
> add
>
> -o smtpd_end_of_data_restrictions=
>
> to each filter in the master.cf which should not use the policy ser
30.05.2010 15:58, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 05/30/2010 01:29 PM, Jarrod Neven wrote:
[]
#postconf -n
config_directory = /etc/postfix
mail_owner = postfix
setgid_group = postdrop
smtpd_client_restrictions = check_sender_access
hash:/etc/postfix/restricted_senders
check_sender_access does not wor
30.05.2010 21:37, Michael Tokarev wrote:
30.05.2010 15:58, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
[]
smtpd_client_restrictions = check_sender_access
hash:/etc/postfix/restricted_senders
check_sender_access does not work here; remove it.
It does, with smtpd_delay_reject = yes
Typo: it does, with
06.06.2010 01:31, John Peach wrote:
On Sat, 05 Jun 2010 23:26:46 +0200
Jeroen Geilman wrote:
The "unknown_virtual_mailbox_reject_code" response defaults to 550.
If it is not 550 on your system, somebody altered it from the default.
(I don't see how an undeliverable address could be anything bu
15.06.2010 21:12, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Wietse Venema:
More thoroughly, when I search for all IP addresses that show up
in postscreen "DNSBL rank XXX" records:
% egrep "`awk '/DNSBL rank/ { print $NF }' /var/log/maillog | sort -u`"
/var/log/maillog | grep smtpd
If I try this, I'm gettin
06.07.2010 20:58, Phil Howard wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 10:27, Isaac Witmer wrote:
>> I'm doing a custom install, and one of the packages in the install is
>> postfix.
>> Each time, it prompts me to select "no configuration" "Local use" etc.
>> just after the package has been downloaded and
18.10.2010 16:43, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
[]
> if ! grep @ < /dev/null
> $1
> STOP
> then
Now that's interesting construct ;)
case "$1" in
?...@?*) ;;
*) echo "No @ in Mail-address" >&2; exit 1;;
esac
/mjt
12.11.2010 12:33, Lists wrote:
[]
>> smtpd_helo_restrictions =
>> warn_if_reject reject_invalid_hostname
>> check_helo_access regexp:/etc/postfix/helo.regexp
>
> Thanks Ralph, that makes sense. I copied the original line from this
> list many years ago - just noticed in postconf (5) that
15.11.2010 14:59, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Catalin Iacob:
>> Hello everybody,
>>
>> I use pipe to start my own script when an email to a certain address
>> is received. The script will do it's own logging and I want to be able
>> to correlate that logging with the Postifx logs. The queue id that is
>
15.11.2010 14:08, Ignacio García wrote:
> Hi there...
>
> I'm having a problem with one of our servers. We have been blocked by
> CBL because one of our customers have been sending many emails recently
> from his php-based bulletin system. This system does not send lots of
> emails (it's programme
I never actually used LDAP, and someone asked if it's possible
to alias one domain to another, and I wonder if its doable in
LDAP the Right Way.
Let's assume we've example.com domain with all the addresses
stored in LDAP somehow. Now let's assume also that example.net
should be an alias for examp
07.12.2010 11:21, Trigve Siver wrote:
[]
> yes I know but I'm not in charge of realyhost and they (who are in charge)
> told
> me that they don't accept empty From. Could I somehow change From to some
> kind
> of "black hole" which will discard all the mails?
Postfix tries hard to conform to e
On 03.03.2011 18:11, Pascal Volk wrote:
> On 03/03/2011 03:47 PM Reindl Harald wrote:
>> Here a example on my homeserver with set quota down to 10 MB
>> while 50 MB are in the inbox for this test-case. You see
>> the same message-id so i sent one message to two rcpt while
>> one of them was over qu
Rudy Gevaert wrote:
Dear list,
This morning I stumbled upon a strange problem. Mail delivery to an
exchange backend did not work:
refused to talk to me: 501 5.5.4 Invalid Address)
After some troubleshooting an googling I found
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/291828.
When using the conte
Jaroslaw Grzabel wrote:
Hi.
As I'm new on that group I would like to welcome everyone.
I've noticed that in my SMTP filtering server a lot of spam try to get
through. I want to block it but the problem is all these emails starts
from | (pipe). How to block it then ?
Please provide an examp
Jaroslaw Grzabel wrote:
Hi Terry,
Thank you for your reply.
It's not full log just only grepped by pattern and it's just only one
example:
[]
ost1-v-4-63.static.adsl.vol.cz[62.177.85.63];
from=<|arl.b...@domain_name.com> to=<|arl.b...@domain_name.com>
proto=ESMTP helo=
Stop accepting ma
Jaroslaw, if you want help, please reply to the list,
not to me personally.
Jaroslaw Grzabel wrote:
Michael Tokarev wrote:
Stop accepting mail for unknown recipients in your domains.
I will change my question then. How can I reject messages for unknown
recipients when all recipients are on
konstantin-m...@gmx.de wrote:
Hallo!
My postfix receives mails but I can not send mails via SMTP. This is a part of
my log file:
[]
Jun 24 20:49:48 serverxyz postfix/smtpd[30748]: NOQUEUE: reject: \
RCPT from -123456.pool.mediaWays.net[xx.xx.xx.xx]: \
550 5.1.1 : Recipient address rej
Søren Schrøder wrote:
Greetings.
[]
Jun 30 07:55:42 mailgate postfix/smtpd[39222]: warning: \
87.53.72.254: address not listed for hostname mail.viauc.dk
Jun 30 07:55:42 mailgate postfix/smtpd[39222]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT
from unknown[87.53.72.254]: 550 5.7.1 Client host rejected: cannot
f
ram wrote:
Sorry for this OT post .. but I think this is a common problem for all
postfix admins
We run smtp services for our clients using smtp-auth. And nowadays we
also enforce a strong password (minimum alphanumeric)
But still people's passwords get compromised. Even a relatively strong
pass
Peter Micunek wrote:
Hi all,
I need to dump lookup table transport.cdb. I tried it via postmap:
postmap -s cdb:transport
postmap: fatal: cdb table transport.cdb: sequence operation is not supported
Hmm. I thought I fixed this? I'll see.
Is there any way to do it?
Meanwhile, you can use
Alexander Hoogerhuis wrote:
I've just sent a long time looking at a problem a user alterted me to.
There was an issue receiving emails from a sepcific sender, and it was
clear that is was somehow blocked by SBL:
NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from unknown[1.2.3.4]: 554 5.7.1
: Sender address rejected:
Daniel Caillibaud wrote:
I have a pb with some mails (with unknown domains) injected into postfix
locally by fetchmail.
postfix reject smtp transaction when sender domain name is not found, which is
wanted exepted when it's a fetched mail.
I don't want fetchmail send directly to delivery agen
Eugene V. Boontseff wrote:
Dear colleagues,
kindly looking for your assistence in the following matter.
To cut off the spamers, I intended to use pcre:table.
main.cf :
...
smtpd_client_restrictions =
check_client_access pcre:/usr/local/etc/postfix/exper,
...
eug...@mail [/usr/local/e
It started as an operator error, albiet an unexpected one.
I had 3 IP addresses for our mailserver, one "primary"
which receives mail "from outside", one "internal", and
I added another, to which I pointed secondary MX to, in
order to test postscreen.
So it worked quite well for some time, and I
26.04.2011 13:28, Peter L. Hansen wrote:
> Hi List,
>
> Iam having trouble trying to adding autoreply/autoresponder/outofoffice
> functionality to our setup.
>
> It seems that the best option is to use "yaa". Other suggestions are
> welcome.
>
> I have a postfix setup with virtual users in mysql
27.04.2011 15:44, Noel Jones wrote:
[]
> regexp and pcre compatible expression:
>
> /^Subject: +[^[:space:]]{60}/ REJECT no spaces
>
> matches Subject: followed by one or more spaces, followed by 60 or more
> non-space characters.
This will reject mime-encoded quoted-printable subjects.
/mjt
Hello.
I come across a situation when an almost-hitting-limit
message has been retried and retried multiple times
and was finally returned to the sender.
The receiving side uses a milter (antivirus application).
Here's how it looks like on the sending side:
postfix/qmgr: E7749E064: from=, size
28.04.2011 15:08, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Michael Tokarev:
>> postfix/cleanup: warning: milter8_message: vstream_fseek
>> incoming/4BE085028D: File too large
>
> Why is this reported as a "450 4.3.0" error? This should
> be a permanent error instead.
No it sho
28.04.2011 18:22, Wietse Venema пишет:
> Michael Tokarev:
>> 28.04.2011 15:08, Wietse Venema wrote:
>>> Michael Tokarev:
>>>> postfix/cleanup: warning: milter8_message: vstream_fseek
>>>> incoming/4BE085028D: File too large
>>>
>>> Why
08.05.2011 22:33, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> /etc/postfix/dynamicmaps.cf as provided by Ubuntu/Debian is:
>
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 318 2011-04-22 15:04 /etc/postfix/dynamicmaps.cf
>
> by default. Which programs are using it and when? Before dropping
> privileges? After? Does /usr/sbin/sendmail u
On 20.01.2012 04:39, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
[]
>>> But that
>>> alone isn't going to fix a 10x performance deficit. You've probably got
>>> multiple factors degrading performance.
>>
>> Yes, you have right. But I found recently, that disk mounted on my
>> server are slow 5.9K. My tests on in shows t
On 20.01.2012 16:01, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> On 1/20/2012 1:50 AM, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>
>> Please excuse me for the somewhat harsh words, but except of the
>> alignment issues which should be solved for once when partitioning
>> and creating filesystem, the res
On 21.01.2012 15:42, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> On 20.01.2012 16:01, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
[]
>> As it turns out the OP has Seagate LP drives which are not Advanced
>> Format 512/4096 drives. No alignment issue there.
>
> I never had/usd these so don't know. Apparentl
On 10.02.2012 18:21, Simone Sanna wrote:
> Hi list,
> I am struggling to find a solution for a problem I have when relaying
> mails from Postfix to Exchange server 2010.
> The problem is that although messages are correctly sent, they do not
> show up in the Sent Items folder of Exchange, I have tr
On 02.03.2012 16:25, Nerijus Kislauskas wrote:
> On 03/02/2012 01:56 PM, Jerry wrote:
>> There is <...> no custom "Postfix schema"
>
> Hi,
>
> maybe it is worth to make one to stop question cycle "where I can get
> postfix.schema for LDAP?".
It is the other way around: Postfix can use whatever s
On 02.03.2012 16:47, Nerijus Kislauskas wrote:
> On 03/02/2012 02:31 PM, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>> It is the other way around: Postfix can use whatever scheme is
>> best for your needs, it does not dictate which schema to use.
>> Different usage scenarious will require diffe
On 04.03.2012 13:30, Stanisław Findeisen wrote:
> On 2012-03-04 09:20, Stanisław Findeisen wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> I am running a small Postfix server, and for a couple of hours I've been
>> getting: "host ... refused to talk to me: 421 service not available
>> (connection refused, too many connections
On 04.03.2012 19:24, Stanisław Findeisen wrote:
> On 2012-03-04 11:26, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>> On 04.03.2012 13:30, Stanisław Findeisen wrote:
>>> On 2012-03-04 09:20, Stanisław Findeisen wrote:
>>>> Hi!
>>>>
>>>> I am running a sma
On 29.03.2012 22:23, Wietse Venema wrote:
[]
> Perhaps you can suggest a way for makedefs to parse out the CPU
> type from "uname -whatever" and use that in the library search?
This isn't about uname. Uname may return one thing, yet postfix
may be building for entirely another -- that's the main
On 29.03.2012 23:10, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> --On Thursday, March 29, 2012 10:56 PM +0400 Michael Tokarev
> wrote:
>
>> Besides, gcc --print-search-dirs (as already used in makedefs)
>> includes all necessary multiarch directories already. So
>> I'm not
On 29.03.2012 23:23, John Peach wrote:
> My Ubuntu Precise box has the following in in /etc/ld.so.conf which
> will pick up those directories:
You can install libraries for other architectures - sparc, mipsel,
etc - and the corresponding dirs will be added to the list. Yes
even if you're on x86,
On 29.03.2012 23:32, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Michael Tokarev:
>> SEARCHDIRS=$(${CC-gcc} -print-search-dirs 2>/dev/null |
>> sed -n '/^libraries: =/s/libraries: =//p' |
>> sed -e
On 29.03.2012 23:29, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Michael Tokarev:
>> On 29.03.2012 22:23, Wietse Venema wrote:
>> []
>>> Perhaps you can suggest a way for makedefs to parse out the CPU
>>> type from "uname -whatever" and use that in the library search?
>
These warnings started showing up after an upgrade
of our servers to version 2.9+.
We've several smtpd instances in master.cf, each
with its own set of restrictions. In order to
simplify managing of these, we split the them into
a set of separate restrictions, using this technique:
master.cf:
On 26.04.2012 14:59, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Michael Tokarev:
>> master.cf:
>>
>> extaddr:smtp ... smtpd -o smtpd_role=ext
>>
>> master.cf:
>>
>> smtpd_recipient_restrictions = smtpd_${smtpd_role}_recipient_restrictions
>> smtpd_ext_recipien
Hello.
I already mentioned this topic several years ago, and
described a technique I used to compensate the problem
at this time (and it is still usable and in use today).
The problem is that on typical workstation or any other
non-mail-heavy-load machine, postfix in its default
configuration con
On 01.05.2012 17:09, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Michael Tokarev:
>> The "trick" I use with postfix for a long time locally
>> to address this issue is to mount a tmpfs on linux on
>> /var/spool/postfix/run, create subdirs (pid, public,
>> private) there [...]
&
02.05.2012 00:14, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Michael Tokarev:
> [using "unix" instead of "fifo"]
>> And yes, I verified the socket code (instead of pipe code) on linux
>> a few days ago and it appears to work fine there too. So indeed, this
>> is a very
On 03.05.2012 17:16, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
[]
> To who at Debian? Lamont Jones? Has he replied to your idiotic idea yet?
Please refrain from using such words in public forum.
Such usage makes you to be of that kind.
>> Thank you for making my worst nightmares come true. I will do
>> my best to p
On 06.07.2012 17:14, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 08:56:34PM +0200, Markus Petri wrote:
>> I wrote a small milter to archive incoming emails.
>
> Use recipient_bcc_maps to archive emails.
Or always_bcc parameter.
/mjt
On 16.08.2012 16:57, Wietse Venema wrote:
[]
> * With KVM and QEMU, one would set "cache=none" to bypass the write
> cache in the physical host and make fsync() work as expected in
> a virtual machine.
FWIW, with QEMU (kvm is just an "accelerator" for qemu, the
device model/emulation is exactl
03.08.2013 21:00, LuKreme wrote:
In case this is useful to anyone else:
=== What I was going to post ===
After updating postfix to 2.10, mailman (which has datestamps on the binaries
of Apr 2010) is failing. The log message in maillog is:
Aug 3 10:38:33 mail Mailman mail-wrapper: Group mismat
03.02.2014 17:37, m...@tls.msk.ru wrote:
[]
Please excuse me for this - sent 3 times.
It was my first attempt to use my android client for sending mail,
it had an issue submitting it to our (postfix) serveer and queued
mail, but i weren't able to find where the queue is..
/mjt
21 марта 2014 г. 5:22:24 GMT+04:00, bperrotta wrote
>I found the answer to my problem.
>Postfix wont mount if you have a bad fstab entry
>in Suse Linux 12.3. Figured it out from a post
Wow. Postfix does not mount anything at all, and does not read fstab. However,
if some filesystem on your syste
30.04.2014 15:23, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Nerijus Kislauskas:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Does this From: header of default bounce message in postfix conforms to
>> RFC2822, RFC5322 or RFC6854?:
>>
>> From: mailer-dae...@mx-1.ktu.lt (Mail Delivery System)
>>
>>
>> I'm using postfix 2.7.1. As I can see 2.11 is not
10.06.2014 05:02, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> On 6/9/2014 7:12 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
>> I really should have figured this out ages ago, but...
>>
>> Quite simply, there exits a small number of organizations that
>> run afoul of my various smtpd_recipient_restrictions and/or my
>> smtpd_helo_res
10.06.2014 22:43, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> On 6/10/2014 1:24 AM, Michael Tokarev wrote:
[]
>> it all to one stage it becomes clumsier. Also, moving stuff which should
>> be run at connect or hello time to recipient time is kinda wrong.
>
> Postfix performs delayed evaluati
rihad wrote:
[]
allowed. I will replace $myhostname in MySQL with its expanded value
once I get the query to happen at all...
How about adding the following single line to your postfix
startup script, before executing postfix's master:
postconf -e myhostname=`mysql-query-for-postfix-hostname
Hello Postfix-users!
And hello everyone who may still remember me.
Wietse, Victor, maybe Ralf is still here too..
With very warm regards and memory I'm here again.
LTNS, Very Long!.. :)
It's been long time since I touched email as well, besides
maintaining small postfix instances on servers to a
Hello Victor!
Just by a chance I noticed this email and wanted to add a comment.
04.10.2022 02:52, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
..
Perhaps you previously had a "backports" package that uses a non-default
release label, and it persisted across the upgrade... You may need to
also look at the configs (I
08.02.2023 12:14, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
..
/etc/postfix/sender-access:
top REJECT I employ crude anti-spam measures
.topREJECT I employ crude anti-spam measures
I wonder how effective to block just the TLDs. I guess it is zero, no?
I *guess* foo@top shouldn't re
30.04.2015 14:21, Koko Wijatmoko wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Apr 2015 12:12:33 +0300
> Алексей Доморадов wrote:
>
>> But it's very uncomfortable to create maildir for each
>> user manually. Are there any workaround?
Postfix do create missing Maildirs by default,
there's no need to do extra work in this
30.11.2024 19:32, Scott Kitterman via Postfix-users wrote:
For those of you who care about Debian (and to some extent its derivatives),
I'm passing maintainership of the Debian Postfix package to Michael Tokarev.
He's been a long term participant in both Debian and the Postfix communi
Hi!
For a long time I thought this problem is due to limitation of mailx email
submission program - when our users submit email message using mailx, their
From: header (which is filled using getpwnam(), with proper First.M.Last)
is not encoded properly but is left as plain 8-bit.
But today I fou
02.12.2024 02:04, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users :
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users:
The cleanup_out_header() function autodetects that a header needs
SMTPUTF8, including headers added with a header_checks PREPEND
action, but that function is not called for headers that are generated
by Postfix
01.12.2024 19:40, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote:
On Sun, Dec 01, 2024 at 07:21:13PM +0300, Michael Tokarev via Postfix-users
wrote:
On the other hand, it shouldn't be a very difficult task to implement this
for local submission given postfix has all the infrastructure available
01.12.2024 19:07, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
Michael Tokarev via Postfix-users:
Dec 01 18:42:57 isrv postfix/smtp[3009]: < mailly.debian.org[82.195.75.114]:25:
250-SMTPUTF8
Dec 01 18:42:57 isrv postfix/smtp[3009]: > mailly.debian.org[82.195.75.114]:25: MAIL
FROM: SIZE=58
01.12.2024 17:26, Matthias Andree via Postfix-users wrote:
Am 01.12.24 um 14:34 schrieb Michael Tokarev via Postfix-users:
From: Михаил Токарев
Shouldn't postfix at least try to generate valid email message in
such case?
How exactly does that mail that you claim Postfix trans
01.12.2024 18:19, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
Michael Tokarev via Postfix-users:
And while it's definitely true there's no encoding specified for the
GECOS field in /etc/passwd, the common practice over last couple decades
is to use utf8 in there. Also we've $LAN
08.12.2024 19:59, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote:
https://bugs.debian.org/882141 -- this is what we have in debian, and
the current solution:
ln -s "$SERVICEFILE" "$WANTDIR/postfix@-.service"
for DIR in $(postconf -h multi_instance_directories); do
ln -s "$SERVICEFILE" "$WANTDIR/p
09.12.2024 00:56, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users пишет:
Michael Tokarev via Postfix-users:
Just to demonstrate what's in debian about the matter, which I basically
just removed a few days ago:
https://salsa.debian.org/postfix-team/postfix-dev/-/commit/60a176aeee7dc0397037bc7980d5f3f265b
Hi!
Yesterday I mentioned a way how multiple postfix instances are managed
in Debian. And I'm trying to find out what's the right way to do this,
if at all.
As far as I can see, the only thing needed to manage a custom instance
is to have a custom config with main.cf and master.cf in there, whi
Hi!
It's been a very long story with debian installing postfix chrooted by default.
For about 25 years there were multiple, endless bug reports here on postfix-
users, in debian bug tracker, in ubuntu bug tracker and elsewhere, all kinds
of issues and workarounds has been faced. #151692 is one of
Hi!
I'm revisiting debian packaging of postfix, and noticed that a lot of stuff is
done
in quite sophisticated, twisty, or outright wrong way due to a simple issue:
many
postfix utilities require certain parameters to be set.
One example is `newaliases' run at the end of the startup procedure
08.12.2024 18:12, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
Michael Tokarev via Postfix-users:
One example is `newaliases' run at the end of the startup procedure in debian,
- it
has numerous rather complex workarounds, and yet there are open bug reports
still,
for many years. The s
08.12.2024 19:10, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users пишет:
On Sun, Dec 08, 2024 at 05:43:38PM +0300, Michael Tokarev via Postfix-users
wrote:
But a package might be installed from another system for example
(bootstrapping) where host name is not required to be set, or during
regular system
08.12.2024 19:10, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote:
DO NOT attempt to build database tables, except just-in-time, shortly
before Postfix is ready to be started. Otherwise, you cannot know the
desired value of various supporting parameters, that may depend on the
system environment:
Noticed a small error in postfix-script. The change is
in sed expression - 's/,/ /' vs 'y/,/ /'. This isn't
really important (it only suppresses extra check of
a few dirs which are normally done for default instance
only), but it's better to fix it.
Signed-off-by:
09.12.2024 21:52, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
Michael Tokarev via Postfix-users:
Noticed a small error in postfix-script. The change is
in sed expression - 's/,/ /' vs 'y/,/ /'. This isn't
really important (it only suppresses extra check of
a few dirs wh
10.12.2024 00:22, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
On my FreeBSSD system, Postfix has only one startup dependency,
and that is "LOGIN". If the system isn't ready for users then
it should not be running Postfix.
Would that be possible with systemd? Or is that too simple.
We're comparing ap
09.12.2024 17:17, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
Turning on chroot is possible for most master.cf entries except
those that use proxymap, postlogd, pipe, local, spawn (I may be
missing one). You can use "postconf -F "*/*/command" to find these,
and "postconf -F xxx/yyy/chroot=y" to turn
10.12.2024 00:46, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
The prob here is that it isn't trivial at all to set up the
chroot environment, despite all the efforts to solve this so
far. Many things can be simplified greatly by using proxy
maps for example, and that probably will be the way I'll
re
Hi!
After some experiments with postconf -F yesterday I noticed an
interesting outcome of it. I'm editing diff a bit, to omit the
unimportant details.
# cp -p master.cf master.cf.sav
# postconf -F '*/*/chroot=n'
# diff -u master.cf master.cf.sav
--- master.c
+++ master.cf.sav
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
28.12.2024 13:40, Tommy Berglund via Postfix-users wrote:
I am using Postfix 3.7.11 on Debian 12
How can I disable chroot in Postfix?
postconf -F '*/*/chroot=n'
Is it just changing the 5th column in master.cf from y to n or is there
more to do, before restarting postfix?
No.
/mjt
28.12.2024 18:19, Tommy Berglund via Postfix-users wrote:
Postfix works flawlessly without any errors.
Is it now safe to delete /var/spool
You most likely can remove /var/spool/postfix/etc /var/spool/postfix/lib
/var/spool/postfix/var /var/spool/postfix/usr - PROVIDED you don't have
actual co
10.12.2024 02:02, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users пишет:
Michael Tokarev via Postfix-users:
10.12.2024 00:46, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
The prob here is that it isn't trivial at all to set up the
chroot environment, despite all the efforts to solve this so
far. Many thing
10.12.2024 02:16, Jaroslaw Rafa via Postfix-users wrote:
Dnia 10.12.2024 o godz. 01:58:58 Michael Tokarev via Postfix-users pisze:
Hm... read-only /etc? How do you reconfigure anything then?
Remount-rw, configure, remount-ro. There's no need to configure
anything during regular s
10.12.2024 01:16, Kenneth Porter via Postfix-users wrote:
I have a systemd unit on another distro that submits mail with /bin/mail (part of mailx) at boot and shutdown. What dependencies are needed to make
that work here? (This notifies me when a remote system comes up that it was gracefully shu
10.12.2024 01:31, Jaroslaw Rafa via Postfix-users wrote:
Dnia 10.12.2024 o godz. 01:21:51 Michael Tokarev via Postfix-users pisze:
It redirected a few (maybe just one) runtime-info file from
/etc to /run - this way, /etc can be read-only (I used RO
/etc for years before systemd).
Hm... read
16.12.2024 06:05, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
Tomasz Pala via Postfix-users:
Again, what about the logging from NON-DAEMON Postfix processes
such as sendmail, postdrop, postqueue, and so on?
They belong to their calling service. Therefore if I run sendmail from
the shell, it belongs
1 - 100 of 149 matches
Mail list logo
