virtual alias mapping does not match postmap query result

2009-05-21 Thread Ken
$ postmap -q f...@mydomain.com regexp:/etc/postfix/virtual b...@somewhere-else.tld Yet, if postfix actually receives a message destined for f...@mydomain.com, I see this log activity: May 21 18:37:02 bks-mail2 postfix/smtp[5803]: C728A1100053:\ to=, orig_to=,\ relay=mx1.myotherdomain.com[]:25, de

Re: virtual alias mapping does not match postmap query result

2009-05-21 Thread Ken
Well...I seem to have partially answered my own question. If I remove the catch-all regexp, the address is rewritten correctly. Still, why does postmap -q present a different result? And, how can I accomplish the catch-all rewrite if this is the expected behavior of regexp? I may have misunderstoo

Re: virtual alias mapping does not match postmap query result

2009-05-22 Thread Ken
...@myotherdomain.com. This seems like an inconsistent behavior by postfix. If the catch-all rule is given before the other, the other rule is never matched. If the catch-all rule is given last, then both rules match. Melvyn Sopacua wrote: > On Friday 22 May 2009 01:10:21 Ken wrote: > >>

check_sender_access

2009-05-22 Thread Ken
Magnus, I really appreciate your input. Here is what I have done. I moved reject_unauth_destination above check_sender_access, so mail is only relayed for virtual_alias_domains unless sender is connecting from $mynetworks. I wish for senders at example.net to be exempt from any further tests in smt

why this DMARC pass by google?

2021-08-19 Thread ken
Experts, I met a strange issue about DMARC validation at google groups. Since it requires some pics to make a more clear statement, I wrote the question on blog: https://blog.hoxblue.com/why-this-dmarc-pass-by-google/ Can you help to explain my question? Thank you very much. regards. Ken

Re: why this DMARC pass by google?

2021-08-19 Thread ken
gt; Experts, >> >> I met a strange issue about DMARC validation at google groups. >> Since it requires some pics to make a more clear statement, I wrote the >> question on blog: >> https://blog.hoxblue.com/why-this-dmarc-pass-by-google >> >> Can you hel

"Forging" headers?

2009-03-04 Thread Ken D'Ambrosio
ok as if mail had originated from the corporate server. Any way to do that? Thanks! -Ken -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.

How to reject mail on secondary MX?

2011-12-02 Thread Ken D'Ambrosio
tc/aliases and /etc/passwd -- we're talking perhaps 15 addresses, tops -- but how do I get the secondary to check against them before relaying to the primary? Thanks, -Ken

Re: OT: Large corporate email systems - Exchange vs open source *nix based

2013-12-10 Thread Ken D'Ambrosio
st Exhange. This is really disappointing. There was one project that was well priced and a drop-in replacement, Postpath, but it got acquired by Cisco some time ago, and hasn't been heard from since. $.02, -Ken P.S. Once you make a choice *which* direction you're going in, inv

Postfix log warning

2008-08-05 Thread Ken Hathaway
First off I don't think this is a postfix problem. I'm hoping someone here has seen something similar and can help me out. Google so far has turned up nothing for me. :( I get this same warning from gmail, yahoo & live. The email goes straight the the junk email folder on all of these systems. :(

Re: Postfix log warning

2008-08-05 Thread Ken Hathaway
tfix passing on the warning message to the far end smtp? That doesn't seem right. Anyway thanks for the help ken So if I'm reading this right the warning message is coming from postfix. On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 1:12 PM, Brian Evans - Postfix List < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > K

Re: Postfix log warning

2008-08-05 Thread Ken Hathaway
Doh! forgot to include this kenhat: postconf -d myhostname myhostname = swi.spellwellinc.com SWI.spellwellinc.com:~ On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 6:01 PM, Ken Hathaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > Thanks Brian! You got me going in the right direction. > > I probably should have ment

will this break DMARC?

2021-08-12 Thread Ken N
the forwarded email from pobox, will it break DMARC? since the message header showing sender is x...@mail.ru, but the SMTP talking IP is pobox's IP address. Thank you. -- Ken N https://lrblogs.com/

Re: will this break DMARC?

2021-08-12 Thread Ken N
;t provide those details to be able to evaluate. -- Ken N https://lrblogs.com/

Re: will this break DMARC?

2021-08-12 Thread Ken N
thank you very much @raf. I have got your idea. On 2021/8/13 1:03 下午, raf wrote: On Fri, Aug 13, 2021 at 10:44:31AM +0800, Ken N wrote: I sent an email from mail.ru to pobox.com, pobox forwarded it to gmail. This is DMARC setting of mail.ru: _dmarc.mail.ru. 164 IN TXT &q

delivery rules question

2021-08-13 Thread Ken N
.example.com. Messages for use...@example.us will go to mx-2.example.com. Thank you. -- Ken N https://lrblogs.com/

Re: will this break DMARC?

2021-08-13 Thread Ken N
ly for DMARC purposes. So, if it's DKIM-signed by mail.ru, and pobox.com just forwards it, and does nothing else other than adding headers along the way, then it'll probably pass a DMARC check for mail.ru. Otherwise, it won't. Having said all that, what gmail does with it upon arrival is entirely up to gmail.:-) -- Ken N https://lrblogs.com/

Re: will this break DMARC?

2021-08-13 Thread Ken N
ell). That renders DKIM signatures invalid. Perhaps the dovecot list does that. It doesn't seem to, looking at the archives. -- Ken N https://blog.hoxblue.com/

Re: How to force remote deliver agent to send messages via SSL only

2021-08-15 Thread Ken N
does ubuntu linux have the keystone chain management? thanks. On 2021/8/16 2:03 上午, Ralph Seichter wrote: One can import self-signed certs and/or certificate authority data directly into TB's own keystore, but importing into the OS keystore (e.g. the system keychain for macOS) is usually more co

Question on DKIM signature

2021-08-16 Thread Ken N
I was reading this blog posting: https://www.alexblackie.com/articles/email-authenticity-dkim-spf-dmarc/ But I am confused that, what content should DKIM signature for? The message body or headers? what headers should be signed? Thank you.

Re: Question on DKIM signature

2021-08-16 Thread Ken N
Raf Thank you for providing the details. That make things clear. Regards. On 2021/8/16 6:26 下午, raf wrote: On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 05:21:15PM +0800, Ken N wrote: I was reading this blog posting: https://www.alexblackie.com/articles/email-authenticity-dkim-spf-dmarc/ But I am confused

Re: [OT] ANN: Postfix policy service geoid-policyd

2021-09-14 Thread Ken Peng
If my email provider has taken your policy, I will be denied by them since I always was using the VPN to access the internet. Almost every well known VPN (pureVPN, keepsolid etc) has a large range of IPs for their users, and these IPs are in different countries. regards. On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 3

Re: are mail isps dumb when seeing atest mail sent to your own server ?

2021-09-15 Thread Ken Peng
You can try this tool which will tell you how your email looks like spam. https://www.mail-tester.com/ Regards. On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 6:13 PM Jean-François Bachelet wrote: > Hello ^^) > > > Well, I've tried to test my server setup (postfix++Spamassassin++) with > an official Gtube test mail

any staff from the provider 5x2.de?

2021-10-09 Thread Ken Peng
I found their forwarding policy is somewhat strange. They changed the "to:" header address in the forwarded email to the destination address. For example, u...@foo.com writes to t...@5x2.de, this mail will be forwarded to d...@gmail.com When gmail receives this email, the "to:" header is d...@gmail

Mail system is down

2022-01-01 Thread Ken Wright
me? System details: Ubuntu Server 20.04.3, Postfix 3.4.13, Dovecot 2.3.7.2. Further details available on request. Ken

Re: Mail system is down

2022-01-01 Thread Ken Wright
On Sat, 2022-01-01 at 13:35 -0500, Wietse Venema wrote: > Ken Wright: > > - Does the socket /var/spool/postfix/public/showq exist? It >   should look like this: > >   srw-rw-rw- 1 postfix postfix 0 Dec 17 18:13 > /var/spool/postfix/public/showq Looks just like this,

Re: Mail system is down

2022-01-01 Thread Ken Wright
On Sat, 2022-01-01 at 16:22 -0500, Wietse Venema wrote: > Ken Wright: > > >   Is the postqueue command subject to AppArmor reduced > > > privileges? > > >   The postqueue command will log EACES (Permission denied) > > > errors, > > >   but when AppAr

Re: Mail system is down

2022-01-01 Thread Ken Wright
On Sat, 2022-01-01 at 18:50 -0500, Wietse Venema wrote: > Ken Wright: > > > > I did a quick Google search, and ran sudo apparmor_status.  There > > don't appear to be any postfix-related programs listed. > > Then that leaves the cron related profiles. None of those either.

Re: Mail system is down

2022-01-02 Thread Ken Wright
On Sun, 2022-01-02 at 11:16 -0500, Wietse Venema wrote: > Ken Wright: > > On Sat, 2022-01-01 at 18:50 -0500, Wietse Venema wrote: > > > Ken Wright: > > > > > > > > I did a quick Google search, and ran sudo apparmor_status. > > > > There

Re: Mail system is down

2022-01-02 Thread Ken Wright
tory) connect(4, {sa_family=AF_UNIX, sun_path="/var/run/nscd/socket"}, 110) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) connect(4, {sa_family=AF_UNIX, sun_path="public/showq"}, 110) = 0 What permissions and ownership should I set for the /var/run/nscd directory? Ken

Re: Mail system is down

2022-01-02 Thread Ken Wright
On Sun, 2022-01-02 at 17:30 -0500, Wietse Venema wrote: > Ken Wright: > > On Sun, 2022-01-02 at 16:01 -0500, Wietse Venema wrote: > > > Does it also fail when run as root? In that case, > > > > > > ??? # strace -e connect postqueue -p |&grep showq > &

Re: Mail system is down

2022-01-02 Thread Ken Wright
> # ls -l /usr/sbin/postdrop > -rwxr-sr-x 1 root postdrop 44472 Dec 23 18:08 /usr/sbin/postdrop -r-xr-sr-x 1 root postdrop 22808 Sep 7 02:58 /usr/sbin/postdrop I hope this makes sense to you. I can see permission differences, but I don't know if they're responsible. Ken

Re: Mail system is down

2022-01-02 Thread Ken Wright
r-sr-x 1 root postdrop 60072 Dec 23 18:08 /usr/sbin/postqueue -r-xr-sr-x 1 root postdrop 22760 Sep 7 02:58 /usr/sbin/postqueue Are those missing write permissions the cause of my problems? Ken

Re: Mail system is down

2022-01-02 Thread Ken Wright
lower case "denied" rather than > upper case "DENIED" like AppArmor does, so check for that > as well. But you'd probably know if selinux was active. I disabled AppArmor a few hours ago and I still can't get to my email. Ken

Re: Mail system is down

2022-01-02 Thread Ken Wright
Just checked my mail logs. Do any of these help anyone? kwright:~$ tail /var/log/mail.log Jan 2 21:23:31 grace postfix/postdrop[58322]: warning: mail_queue_enter: create file maildrop/914822.58322: Permission denied Jan 2 21:23:31 grace postfix/postdrop[55910]: warning: mail_queue_enter: create

Re: Mail system is down

2022-01-02 Thread Ken Wright
On Sun, 2022-01-02 at 21:59 -0500, Wietse Venema wrote: > Ken Wright: > > On Sun, 2022-01-02 at 19:40 -0500, Wietse Venema wrote: > > > Sorry, I mis-typed 'postqueue'. > > > > > > Try this instead. > > > > > > Here is what happens o

Re: Mail system is down

2022-01-02 Thread Ken Wright
On Mon, 2022-01-03 at 14:50 +1100, raf wrote: > On Sun, Jan 02, 2022 at 09:32:53PM -0500, Ken Wright > wrote: > > > Just checked my mail logs.  Do any of these help anyone? > > > > kwright:~$ tail /var/log/mail.log > > [...] > > kwright:~$ tail /var/log/ma

Re: Mail system is down

2022-01-03 Thread Ken Wright
e maildrop/896893.138176: Permission denied though. Ken

Re: Mail system is down

2022-01-03 Thread Ken Wright
On Mon, 2022-01-03 at 19:45 -0500, Wietse Venema wrote: > Ken Wright: > > On Tue, 2022-01-04 at 08:32 +1100, raf wrote: > > > Actually, if you are still getting > > > "/usr/lib/postfix/sbin/0: No such file or directory" > > > messages (with new tim

Re: Mail system is down

2022-01-03 Thread Ken Wright
On Mon, 2022-01-03 at 20:50 -0500, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: > On Mon, Jan 03, 2022 at 08:02:20PM -0500, Ken Wright wrote: > > > $ sudo chmod g+s /usr/sbin/postdrop > > $ ls -la /usr/sbin/postdrop > > -r-xr-sr-x 1 postfix postdrop 22808 Sep  7 02:58 /usr/sbin/postdrop > &g

Re: Mail system is down

2022-01-03 Thread Ken Wright
On Tue, 2022-01-04 at 15:32 +1100, raf wrote: > On Mon, Jan 03, 2022 at 07:22:24PM -0500, Ken Wright > wrote: > > > On Tue, 2022-01-04 at 08:32 +1100, raf wrote: > > > Actually, if you are still getting > > > "/usr/lib/postfix/sbin/0: No such file

Fatal: no SASL authentication mechanisms

2022-01-04 Thread Ken Wright
My Postfix woes continue. Now I'm getting this error message: Jan 4 19:08:47 grace postfix/smtps/smtpd[17286]: fatal: no SASL authentication mechanisms This is starting to get old. Ken

Re: Mail system is down

2022-01-04 Thread Ken Wright
On Tue, 2022-01-04 at 07:30 -0500, Wietse Venema wrote: > Ken Wright: > > Okay, I ran sudo postfix set-permissions.  It ran with no trouble > > whatsoever; no errors, warnings, nothing.  Still getting the exact > > same messages in mail.log. > > Then your file sys

Re: Fatal: no SASL authentication mechanisms

2022-01-04 Thread Ken Wright
On Tue, 2022-01-04 at 20:49 -0500, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: > On Tue, Jan 04, 2022 at 07:20:43PM -0500, Ken Wright wrote: > > > My Postfix woes continue.  Now I'm getting this error message: > > > > Jan  4 19:08:47 grace postfix/smtps/smtpd[17286]: fatal: no SASL

Re: Fatal: no SASL authentication mechanisms

2022-01-04 Thread Ken Wright
y passdb driver is sql. Could that be the problem? > There are many other possibilities.  Perhaps, instead of doing all > the integration work yourself, you may be better off with a "turnkey" > email server such as <https://mailinabox.email>? If I don't do the work, how will I learn? Ken

Re: Fatal: no SASL authentication mechanisms

2022-01-04 Thread Ken Wright
fix postfix 0 Jan  4 15:31 > /var/spool/postfix/private/auth Here's what I got: kwright@grace:/etc/dovecot/conf.d$ sudo ls -la /var/spool/postfix/private/auth srw-rw 1 postfix postfix 0 Jan 4 19:09 /var/spool/postfix/private/auth so the socket is there, with read and write permissions for the postfix user and group. Ken

Re: Fatal: no SASL authentication mechanisms

2022-01-04 Thread Ken Wright
ked, and those libsasl packages are installed. Thanks for trying, though. At this point I need all the help I can get! Ken

Re: Using Postfix as a Backup MX

2020-03-31 Thread Ken Wright
eriod where I should have put a comma and it kept my server from working properly. Ken On 3/31/20 1:03 PM, Linda Pagillo wrote: > Hi gang. I could have swore I sent this to the list days ago, but no > one responded and I can't find the email I sent in my sent folder > which

Re: AntiSpam & AntiVirus Integration with Postfix: lots of tools, but which one's AREN'T 'dead'?

2015-09-08 Thread Ken Peng
How about Spamassassin? we have been using it for a long time. On 2015/9/9 星期三 7:26, Andreas Meyer wrote: Hello! joh...@fastmail.com schrieb am 08.09.15 um 14:06:30 Uhr: My question is - if I want to Postfix-integrate A/V & A/S *AND* stick to projects that have active development and commun

Re: AntiSpam & AntiVirus Integration with Postfix: lots of tools, but which one's AREN'T 'dead'?

2015-09-08 Thread Ken Peng
Google and just found one, https://www.digitalocean.com/community/tutorials/how-to-install-and-setup-spamassassin-on-ubuntu-12-04 HTH, :) On 2015/9/9 星期三 9:01, joh...@fastmail.com wrote: Ken On Tue, Sep 8, 2015, at 05:49 PM, Ken Peng wrote: How about Spamassassin? we have been using it for a

Re: AntiSpam & AntiVirus Integration with Postfix: lots of tools, but which one's AREN'T 'dead'?

2015-09-08 Thread Ken Peng
...@fastmail.com wrote: On Tue, Sep 8, 2015, at 06:05 PM, Ken Peng wrote: Google and just found one, https://www.digitalocean.com/community/tutorials/how-to-install-and-setup-spamassassin-on-ubuntu-12-04 I'm not asking "How?". I can Google. I'm asking for recommendation

Re: AntiSpam & AntiVirus Integration with Postfix: lots of tools, but which one's AREN'T 'dead'?

2015-09-08 Thread Ken Peng
If email data traffic is not that big, I think pobox.com, dyn.com etc is a good gateway for email antispam/antivirus. Thx. On 2015/9/9 星期三 11:20, Wolfe, Robert wrote: The best one I've found and what I use to host other people's spam filtering ishttp://www.virtualtothecore.com/en/efa-nice-fre

force to use SSL port for delivery

2015-09-13 Thread Ken Peng
Hi, For security transfer, can I have the setup in Postfix to force peer MTA using SMTP/SSL port (465) for email delivery only? Thx. -- B. Regards, Ken Peng - k...@cloud-china.org

Re: force to use SSL port for delivery

2015-09-13 Thread Ken Peng
On 2015/9/14 星期一 9:23, Alice Wonder wrote: On 09/13/2015 06:07 PM, Ken Peng wrote: Hi, For security transfer, can I have the setup in Postfix to force peer MTA using SMTP/SSL port (465) for email delivery only? Thx. Port 465 is deprecated. It should not be used. 25 is what your server

Re: force to use SSL port for delivery

2015-09-13 Thread Ken Peng
s you have to accept mail that isn't encrypted. -- B. Regards, Ken Peng - k...@cloud-china.org

Re: force to use SSL port for delivery

2015-09-13 Thread Ken Peng
9:50, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: What is the Postfix version of your server? What software do the clients use? -- B. Regards, Ken Peng - k...@cloud-china.org

Re: force to use SSL port for delivery

2015-09-13 Thread Ken Peng
encrypted-email service easily. But if we can't assure the secure transfer, what destination these systems should exist for? Thanks. On 2015/9/14 星期一 10:00, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 09:56:27AM +0800, Ken Peng wrote: On 2015/9/14 星期一 9:50, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: Wh

Re: force to use SSL port for delivery

2015-09-13 Thread Ken Peng
g SSL. This is what I actually want to ask for, about the transfer secure. Thx. On 2015/9/14 星期一 10:15, Benny Pedersen wrote: On September 14, 2015 4:04:51 AM Ken Peng wrote: From production viewpoints, we can develop that a encrypted-email service easily. But if we can't assure the secur

Re: force to use SSL port for delivery

2015-09-13 Thread Ken Peng
Viktor, On 2015/9/14 星期一 11:16, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 10:32:46AM +0800, Ken Peng wrote: All our MX servers can be setup with tls secure. So the servers in question are inbound MX hosts accepting mail from other domains on port 25? And you were asking a question

Re: force to use SSL port for delivery

2015-09-13 Thread Ken Peng
e is a provider which has supported DANE well? Yes we have contact with Germany providers like web.de/GMX/Freenet/Arcor and smaller ones posteo.de/mailbox.org. -- B. Regards, Ken Peng - k...@cloud-china.org

Re: Forward rejected by yahoo

2015-09-17 Thread Ken Peng
age is marked as spam, since is considered a spoofed. Can I fixed this adding some header? Thank you -- B. Regards, Ken Peng - k...@cloud-china.org

Re: Newbie in postfix

2015-09-21 Thread Ken Peng
, Ken Peng - k...@cloud-china.org

Re: ENVID command information passed to piped script

2015-09-22 Thread Ken Peng
ss of this information via a piped script? -- B. Regards, Ken Peng - k...@cloud-china.org

Re-queueing a message based on SMTP response regex

2015-10-28 Thread Ken Simpson
complex reasons, it's not enough in our application to just retry the message on the same general queue. Thanks, Ken

Re: Throttling locally generated email

2015-11-10 Thread Ken Simpson
eding. But you may need to also invest time/resources tracking down and solving the cause of the excessive volume, such as compromised WordPress scripts or user accounts. Ken On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 3:37 PM, Donald Bindner wrote: > Yes, the point of my email is that I researched and tried

Re: Puting the Postfix's queue into RAM disk

2015-11-13 Thread Ken Simpson
We deliver tens of millions per server per day using SSD spools... On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 11:18 AM Istvan Prosinger wrote: > I got two options that I know of. Signifficantly shortening the queue > lifetime, or (not) losing the queue from the RAM disk. > Just trying to measure which is worse (or

Cyrus LMTP delivery and DSN's

2023-02-24 Thread Ken Smith
ngs should be the same default as smtp_delivery_status_filter. Could someone more enlightened shine some light of what I may be missing. Many thanks Ken -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.

Re: Cyrus LMTP delivery and DSN's

2023-02-27 Thread Ken Smith
Wietse Venema wrote: Ken Smith: Hi, first post to this list but long term Linux user here. I have Postfix configured for virtual domains and delivery to cyrus-imap via LMTP over IP. All is working well besides one detail. It seems that when senders request a DSN they do not get any response

Re: Cyrus LMTP delivery and DSN's

2023-02-27 Thread Ken Smith
-line option? Wietse Incoming message included :- Disposition-Notification-To: {smtp-address} Shouldn't that trigger a DSN response? :-) Ken -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.

Re: Cyrus LMTP delivery and DSN's

2023-02-28 Thread Ken Smith
Wietse Venema wrote: Ken Smith: Wietse Venema wrote: {snip} But senders are not getting DSN's Why should Postfix send those? - What delivery status notifications did a remote SMTP client request in the RCPT TO command? - What delivery status notifications did a local user request

Re: email deliverability score

2023-03-01 Thread Ken Young
>From my experience, outlook always marks the domains they don't know as spam. anyway you should have mail-tester to mark your sender scores as high as possible (10 is the best). On Wed, Mar 1, 2023 at 7:11 PM Fourhundred Thecat <400the...@gmx.ch> wrote: > Hello, > > (not strictly postfix specifi

Re: Problem to receive mail from gmail

2023-03-06 Thread Ken Young
Your ISP may have netfilters which just block google IP. Sincerely, Ken Young On Mon, Mar 6, 2023 at 7:11 PM Di Battista Francesco wrote: > Hi all, > I have configured a new postfix server. > It works fine, but I can't receive mail only from gmail. > > When I send email

[pfx] Re: invalid and non-fqdn hostname

2023-04-05 Thread Ken Peng via Postfix-users
On 2023-04-06 09:32, Sean Gallagher via Postfix-users wrote: From reading the code, these two restrictions seem equivalent except when SMTPUTF8 extension is used. when the SMTPUTF8 is in play, reject_non_fqdn_helo_hostname will convert a hostname containing UTF to an internationalized domain nam

[pfx] Re: invalid and non-fqdn hostname

2023-04-06 Thread Ken Peng via Postfix-users
On 2023-04-06 19:07, Jaroslaw Rafa via Postfix-users wrote: I just now learned about the UTF8 thing, I would never think of using non-ASCII characters in host/domain names :) You can dig the UTF8 hostname, they are valid for query. $ dig 腾讯.公司 ns +short ns1.brandcloudns.com. ns2.brandcloudns

[pfx] Re: invalid and non-fqdn hostname

2023-04-06 Thread Ken Peng via Postfix-users
got your points which I totally agree with. -- Ken Peng https://kenpeng.pages.dev/ ___ Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org

[pfx] Re: invalid and non-fqdn hostname

2023-04-06 Thread Ken Peng via Postfix-users
er IP as well? Thanks -- Ken Peng https://kenpeng.pages.dev/ ___ Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org

[pfx] DKIM questions

2023-04-25 Thread Ken Peng via Postfix-users
Hello Can the domain certificates sign its sub domain? For example, mail.a.com was signed by certs of a.com. If so, does this make sense to DMRC of mail.a.com? Thanks. -- https://kenpeng.pages.dev/ ___ Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfi

[pfx] Re: postscreen question

2023-04-26 Thread Ken Peng via Postfix-users
Using rspamd instead of postscreen? > > Dear All, > > I am building a new server where I would like to build the best spam filter > possible :) > I am checking postscreen these days. I am planning to turn on the "deep > tests" as well, but it seems to be really scary to me :) > > In the doc th

[pfx] Domain scoring

2023-04-27 Thread Ken Peng via Postfix-users
Do you know any plugins for scoring a domain? For example, new registered domain, free domain get the low scores. Thanks. -- https://kenpeng.pages.dev/ ___ Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-u

[pfx] Re: Deny any sender address with subdomain

2023-04-28 Thread Ken Peng via Postfix-users
April 29, 2023 at 12:38 AM, "Jaroslaw Rafa via Postfix-users" wrote: > > Dnia 28.04.2023 o godz. 15:59:53 Gerd Hoerst via Postfix-users pisze: > > > > > question 1st : is it a good idea to reject any email which is not > > sent from a domain  (means sen...@domain.tld) any other like > > se

[pfx] Re: postscreen question

2023-04-28 Thread Ken Peng via Postfix-users
April 28, 2023 at 1:02 AM, "Phil Stracchino via Postfix-users" wrote: > > On 4/27/23 04:47, Ralph Seichter via Postfix-users wrote: > > > > > * Ken Peng via Postfix-users: > > Using rspamd instead of postscreen? > > I'm not quite sure what

[pfx] Re: postscreen question

2023-04-29 Thread Ken Peng via Postfix-users
force Thank you Ken ___ Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org

[pfx] Re: postscreen question

2023-04-29 Thread Ken Peng via Postfix-users
_action = enforce Thanks. > > On Sat, 29 Apr 2023, Ken Peng via Postfix-users wrote: > > > > > Hello > > > > When I enabled postscreen, why even gmail's sender IP was greylisted? > > > > Did you expect or configure to deal with gmail dif

[pfx] Re: Painful Postfix

2023-04-29 Thread Ken Peng via Postfix-users
April 29, 2023 at 6:40 PM, "Kolusion K via Postfix-users" wrote: > > Hello > >   > >   > > I am having a painful experience with Postfix and I hope that someone can > help me. > >   > > I am trying to send an e-mail, but the receving e-mail server is timing out, > as per Postfix's mail

[pfx] Re: Painful Postfix

2023-04-29 Thread Ken Peng via Postfix-users
> > > > When I create a raw socket to the receiving e-mail server, I can send and > > receive commands to it just fine. > > > >   Are you sure there is no net filters or ISP blocking issues? they block external port 25, other ports like 587/465 may have no problem. regards.

[pfx] Re: postscreen question

2023-04-29 Thread Ken Peng via Postfix-users
: 1. postscreen_dnsbl_sites where sites should also specify a negative value for matching the threshold, right? 2. I am using postfix 3.6.4. if I continue with the old parameter postscreen_dnsbl_whitelist_threshold, what will happen? Thanks. Ken Peng

[pfx] Re: E-mail problem

2023-04-30 Thread Ken Peng via Postfix-users
This is typical networking issues. Nothing about postfix. Regards > > So I have a bizarre problem. I can't send e-mail to some servers but I can to > others. The e-mail that doesn't get sent is due to the connection timing out > to the remote server. > > Another strange problem is that some

[pfx] Re: Njal.la

2023-05-02 Thread Ken Peng via Postfix-users
May 2, 2023 at 4:42 PM, "pripercat--- via Postfix-users" wrote: > > Hi, my hosting Njal.la don't permit send email from my postfix server port > number 25 to prevent spam. > > But they say that i can use this setup > https://njal.la/docs/postfix-smarthost/ > > with; > relayhost = [emailserve

[pfx] icloud mx ip

2023-05-02 Thread Ken Peng via Postfix-users
17.57.155.34 mx02.mail.icloud.com. 300 IN A 17.57.156.30 What's the advantage for this settings? Thanks. regards Ken Peng ___ Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-use

[pfx] Re: icloud mx ip

2023-05-02 Thread Ken Peng via Postfix-users
Since mx1 and mx2 have the same IPs included, it's a waste to postfix's chosen space for IP addresses. For example, the 5 MX IPs could have 2 duplicates. So I am not sure why apple has this wasted setup. Thank you. > > Ken Peng via Postfix-users: > > > > > H

[pfx] Re: body_checks not catching all backscatter

2023-05-02 Thread Ken Peng via Postfix-users
May 3, 2023 at 1:43 PM, "Peter via Postfix-users" wrote: > > On 28/04/23 03:59, Sebastian Wiesinger via Postfix-users wrote: > > > > > Hi everyone, > > I'm not sure if I'm missing something but I can't find out why my > > body_checks doesn't catch all the backscatter I'm getting right now.

[pfx] Re: body_checks not catching all backscatter

2023-05-03 Thread Ken Peng via Postfix-users
lock backscatter is by using the > > > backscatter DNSRBL. Make sure you follow the instructions for setting it > > > up properly: > > > > > > https://www.backscatterer.org/?target=usage > > > > > > If used correctly it will only bl

[pfx] Re: Hello Baknu of DANE-for-SMTP?

2023-05-03 Thread Ken Peng via Postfix-users
Please contact Dennis: dennis baaten.com regards > > Hello, > > is Baknu, the author of https://github.com/baknu/DANE-for-SMTP around here? > Or does someone know her/his personal email address and can forward this > message as I´d like to get in contact? > Thanks, > > Joachim > -- https:

[pfx] Question on the CNAME

2023-05-03 Thread Ken Peng via Postfix-users
spacemail.com txt +nocmd +noall +answer spacemail.com. 47 IN CNAME spacemail.com.cdn.cloudflare.net. How does it get mail then? incoming mail was handled by spacemail.com.cdn.cloudflare.net? Thanks Ken Peng ___ Postfix-users

[pfx] Re: TLS Library Problem? (SSL_accept error from ...)

2023-05-05 Thread Ken Peng via Postfix-users
> > > > Because TLS/SSL things are very complex, you have to show us real > settings all. Like me: (yw-0919: inbound, yw-1204: outbound) > [1] https://gitlab.com/soyeomul/Gnus/-/raw/master/DKIM/smtp-conf.yw-0919 > [2] https://gitlab.com/soyeomul/Gnus/-/raw/master/DKIM/smtp-conf.yw-1204 > And P

[pfx] Re: stop bulk messages

2023-05-06 Thread Ken Peng via Postfix-users
May 6, 2023 at 8:14 PM, "Ralph Seichter via Postfix-users" wrote: > > * Corey Hickman via Postfix-users: > > > > > Some clients abuse the outgoing smtp server for sending bulk messages. > > [...] Do you know how to stop this behavior? > > > > There is 'default_destination_recipient_limit'

[pfx] Mx has ip6 only

2023-05-24 Thread Ken Peng via Postfix-users
If the MX hostname has only IPv6 resolved, does it have problems in mail functions? Thanks. ___ Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org

[pfx] which main.cf and postconf

2023-07-10 Thread Ken Gillett via Postfix-users
specific to my network. It is almost as if the configuration being used is an amalgam of main.cf in the above directory and also from /etc/postfix, but I don't believe postfix does that sort of thing. As I said, many years since I last played with postfix and could do

[pfx] Re: which main.cf and postconf

2023-07-10 Thread Ken Gillett via Postfix-users
tual problem I am trying to resolve and keep this just about configuration source. Ken G i l l e t t _/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/ > On Mon 10 Jul 2023, at 14:25, Bill Cole via Postfix-users > wrote: > > On 2023-07-10 at 05:34:44 UTC-0400 (Mon, 10 Jul 2023 10:34:44 +0100) > Ken Gille

[pfx] Re: which main.cf and postconf

2023-07-10 Thread Ken Gillett via Postfix-users
files account for that? Surely, they would both talk to the same running process to get the required info? Ken G i l l e t t _/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/ > On Mon 10 Jul 2023, at 14:02, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users > wrote: > > "postconf -d config_directory" shows where the p

  1   2   >