Just I wanted to know if there is currently a good way to tie messages with
log files? I mean, to see that ID (like 8BA216E7D7) into some mail header or
similar... Perhaps add it with maildrop -A?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Friday 08 January 2010 20:27:09 Noel Jones wrote:
> Well, you can always look up the Message-ID: header, which is
> logged by qmgr, and find the QUEUEID that way.
Thanks! Was quite the same thing I waned. That uniqueness is not crucial right
now...
signature.asc
Description: This is a digita
Hi,
maildrop seems to reject any efforts on my part, take a look at this:
Tried using maildrop with postfix as described in the second part of [1], but
it failed. strace showed me:
"connect(3, {sa_family=AF_FILE, path="/var/lib/courier/authdaemon/socket"...},
110) = -1 ENOENT (No such file
or dir
On Sunday 10 January 2010 14:59:11 mouss wrote:
> Your maildrop needs to contact the courier authdaemon server. Make sure,
> authdaemon is running and correctly configured. if you don't need it,
> you'll need to rebuild maildrop without authlib support.
>
> anyway, this is not postfix related. mai
Is that possible for mail headers field to continue multiple /^From: .*/
speaking in terms of maildrop and PCRE?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Thursday 14 January 2010 11:59:16 Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Is that possible for mail headers field to continue multiple /^From: .*/
> > speaking in terms of maildrop and PCRE?
>
> According to RFC 5322:
>
>from= "From:" mailbox-list CRLF
>mailbox-list= (mailbox *(",
On Thursday 14 January 2010 19:14:48 Victor Duchovni wrote:
> It may be prudent to also treat:
>
> From:
> From:
>
> as synonymous with:
>
> From: ,
>
> the implied meaning is that the people with those email addresses,
> co-authored the email.
But have you seriously
On Friday 15 January 2010 09:29:37 Mark Martinec wrote:
> On Friday January 15 2010 09:11:27 Kārlis Repsons wrote:
> > But have you seriously seen a mail client, which would allow sending such
> > mail? I would think, this is an extreme rarity, but is it?
>
> It
Hi there,
hopefully this can be easy: as I have $myhostname other than virtual domain
name, when server relays my v.d. mails, it uses $myhostname and so sometimes I
receive a refusal like this: "550 Reverse DNS lookup failed for host"; how
should I make server use my virtual domain's name when r
On Tuesday 20 April 2010 18:46:51 Noel Jones wrote:
> For your server (from list mail headers)
> Received: from pasts.trikata.com (unknown [85.15.210.5])
Well and if I have a domain 11.lv, for which this is given:
host 11.lv
11.lv has address 85.15.210.5
11.lv mail is handled by 10 mail.11.lv.
11.l
On Tuesday 20 April 2010 20:50:08 Noel Jones wrote:
> Here's the problem, your IP has no hostname:
> # host 85.15.210.5
> Host 5.210.15.85.in-addr.arpa not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
..
> Your HELO name and rDNS name should match, there should be an
> A record for the rDNS name that points back to the same
Hi to all the list members!
I've been thinkering around postfix for some not very long time, but still
haven't found an answer to this problem:
1) let there be host "server" and host "client";
2) server must be able to receive any incoming mail (as usually for its own
domain);
3) server only s
On Tuesday 24 November 2009 18:39:34 Victor Duchovni wrote:
> > 3) server only sends relayed mail to not-on-server address if its from
> > authenticated client (with the expected certificate);
>
> mynetworks = 127.0.0.1
> relay_domains =
> smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
>
On Tuesday 24 November 2009 20:00:38 you wrote:
> > > 6) before accepting message, server checks clients authenticity in
> > > similar way, if user U is the source.
> >
> > You are trying to impose an end-to-end security model (end-user
> > entitlements to send email, ...) onto a hop-by-hop infra
Hi all,
I've found, it can be done by setting always_bcc, but it would also make
copies of normally received mail and locally sent one, right? If so, how can
only relayed mail be saved as a local copy on relay host?
Thanks...
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Monday 07 December 2009 17:38:48 Kārlis Repsons wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've found, it can be done by setting always_bcc, but it would also make
> copies of normally received mail and locally sent one, right? If so,
Just to know: did I ask some nonsense or this was consider
Could anyone help me sorting this out: its very convenient to store mails on
mailserver and relay sent mail through it, so it gets sent immediately, but
there is a problem: how can relayed sent mail be also saved on mailserver,
using the same LDA program as for incoming mail (to place it into th
On Saturday 12 December 2009 16:57:40 /dev/rob0 wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 03:37:17PM +0000, Kārlis Repsons wrote:
> > Could anyone help me sorting this out: its very convenient to store
> > mails on mailserver and relay sent mail through it, so it gets sent
> > immedi
After seeing these:
postfix/smtpd[14497]: warning: 118.71.107.14: hostname
adsl-dynamic-pool-xxx.fpt.vn verification failed: Name or service not known
postfix/smtpd[14497]: connect from unknown[118.71.107.14]
postfix/smtpd[14497]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from unknown[118.71.107.14]: 550
5.1.1 : Re
On Saturday 12 December 2009 17:59:49 Wietse Venema wrote:
> =?utf-8?q?K=C4=81rlis_Repsons?=:
> > After seeing these:
> >
> > postfix/smtpd[14497]: warning: 118.71.107.14: hostname
> > adsl-dynamic-pool-x -xx.fpt.vn verification failed: Name or service not
> > known
> > postfix/smtpd[14497]: connec
20 matches
Mail list logo
