What log message should I look for when a message has been deferred
and Postfix has decided it is undeliverable? (I'm parsing the log and
need to know how to distinguish this from an actual bounce.) Will the
log contain a 5xx message for that mail?
--
tdrop
smtpd_recipient_restrictions = permit_mynetworks,
reject_unauth_destination, reject_unverified_recipient
transport_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/transport
unknown_local_recipient_reject_code = 550
The ldap-alias.cf and ldap-users.cf are lookups for Active Directory
distribution lists and real users.
--
Jeff
ap libs didn't
handle this transient situation gracefully. Anyway, this is beside the
point of my question. All I really want to know is if the message is
lost after a 451.
--
Jeff
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 3:23 PM, Noel Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jeff wrote:
>>
>> We have an email gateway appliance at the network edge for spam/virus
>> filtering. It relays mail to multiple postfix+imap servers behind the
>> firewall. The back-end serve
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 11:38 AM, Wietse Venema <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jeff:
>> It took me a while before I could test this. The recommended solution
>> succeeds at blocking the specified aliases when relayed through our
>> gateway, but it does not do so at t
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 1:43 PM, Wietse Venema <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jeff:
>> On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 11:38 AM, Wietse Venema <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Jeff:
>> >> It took me a while before I could test this. The recommended solution
>&g
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 2:16 PM, Wietse Venema <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jeff:
>> I want the back-end to tell the front-end gateway 550 for
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED], but I want it to tell my other internal MTAs OK,
>> whilst not breaking regular recipient verification.
wrong? It seems to be a rather common practice.
--
Jeff
I have recipient_bcc_maps set up and configured correctly on a per-user
basis:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How would I do this for an entire domain? Would it be:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or would it be
@domain.tld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks!
> Jeff wrote:
>> I have recipient_bcc_maps set up and configured correctly on a per-user
>> basis:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> How would I do this for an entire domain? Would it be:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>
.
What am I doing wrong? http://www.postfix.org/sendmail.1.html says
that Errors-To overrides command line options to sendmail, so why is
it not heeded when no return path command line options are used?
If possible, I would like the bounce address to be something that is
not normally displayed by common mail clients.
--
Jeff
Hi:
I am hoping I can ask for suggestions or pointers to help solve this
challenge.
I am trying to implement an autoreply capability. I am putting
together a script that will handle the messages.
Many of the autoreply examples I've found suggest implementing this by:
main.cf:
always_b
Hi:
I am having a problem with duplicate bcc's (from recipient_bcc_maps)
and I suspect I know why - but I hope someone can point me to a
solution.
I have a content filter set up for dspam (content_filter = dspam:dspam
in main.cf) set up as described in the "Advanced content filter
examp
Hi:
After reading http://www.irbs.net/internet/postfix/0703/1471.html and http://www.irbs.net/internet/postfix/0703/1519.html
to help with my autoreply capability (and making sure i get it as
close to "right" as possible!), I am trying to ensure that I can take
all reasonable measures to ge
On Dec 31, 2008, at 6:11 PM, mouss wrote:
Jeff Weinberger a écrit :
Hi:
After reading http://www.irbs.net/internet/postfix/0703/1471.html and
http://www.irbs.net/internet/postfix/0703/1519.html to help with my
autoreply capability (and making sure i get it as close to "right" as
pos
mouss wrote:
Jeff Weinberger a écrit :
>
> I've verified that the "R" flag is there and I use -f ${sender} on
the
> command line (the script does parse the arguments)
>
> I think the envelope-sender is missing before it enters the content
> filter. This from
On Jan 1, 2009, at 9:31 AM, mouss wrote:
jeff_homeip a écrit :
--- In post...@yahoogroups.com, mouss wrote:
Jeff Weinberger a écrit :
I've verified that the "R" flag is there and I use -f ${sender}
on the
command line (the script does parse the arguments)
I think the env
On Jan 1, 2009, at 9:49 AM, mouss wrote:
Jeff Weinberger a écrit :
Thank you! That helps clarify what I was missing in this - so clearly
dspam is not passing the envelope sender back to postfix.
I suspect it doesn't know how via SMTP, but it can also use the
sendmail command to do th
Hello again:
One more issue on which I would appreciate any help anyone can offer:
Yesterday I upgraded my postfix installation from 2.5.2 to 2.5.5 and
my MySQL installation from 5.0.51b to 5.0.75. Immediately after
restarting everything (the whole computer), I started seeing these
message
On Jan 1, 2009, at 1:55 PM, mouss wrote:
Jeff Weinberger a écrit :
Hello again:
One more issue on which I would appreciate any help anyone can offer:
Yesterday I upgraded my postfix installation from 2.5.2 to 2.5.5
and my
MySQL installation from 5.0.51b to 5.0.75. Immediately after
On Jan 1, 2009, at 4:53 PM, mouss wrote:
Jeff Weinberger a écrit :
[snip]
- try with "hosts = 127.0.0.1" (without "localhost")
Tried this - no change. :(
ahem. if you do this, you should not hear about a socket. it should
use
a TCP connection. can you show the err
On Jan 1, 2009, at 12:58 PM, mouss wrote:
Jeff Weinberger a écrit :
I've been reading the dspam docs this morning and the project owner
states fairly strongly that sendmail is far preferable to SMTP
re-injection (in the postfix setup docs), but doesn't say why.
if he doesn'
On Jan 2, 2009, at 2:30 AM, mouss wrote:
Jeff Weinberger a écrit :
I used a pcre: table for smtpd_sender_restrictions and the PREPEND
action as follows:
main.cf:
smtpd_sender_restrictions = check_sender_access
pcre:/etc/postfix/smtpd_sender_restrictions.pcre
On Jan 2, 2009, at 9:20 AM, mouss wrote:
Jeff Weinberger a écrit :
It's definitely my set up. I don't use LMTP to pass the message to
dspam, I use a transport called "dspam" that uses pipe. That means
there's no S/LMTP dialog, just the message itself passed as S
Wietse Venema wrote:
Jeff Weinberger:
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
> On Jan 2, 2009, at 2:30 AM, mouss wrote:
>
> > Jeff Weinberger a ?crit :
> >>
> >> I used a pcre: table for smtpd_sender_restrictions and the
PREPEND
> >&g
On Jan 2, 2009, at 2:17 PM, mouss wrote:
Jeff Weinberger a écrit :
On Jan 2, 2009, at 9:20 AM, mouss wrote:
Jeff Weinberger a écrit :
It's definitely my set up. I don't use LMTP to pass the message to
dspam, I use a transport called "dspam" that uses pipe. That mea
On Jan 2, 2009, at 3:20 PM, mouss wrote:
Jeff Weinberger a écrit :
content_filter=lmtp:unix:/path/to/dspam args
No.
content_filter=lmtp:inet:127.0.0.1:10024
where the 10024 is the same port used in dspam.conf:
ServerPort10024
of course, dspam must be running in daemon mode
On Jan 1, 2009, at 4:53 PM, mouss wrote:
Jeff Weinberger a écrit :
[snip]
- try with "hosts = 127.0.0.1" (without "localhost")
Tried this - no change. :(
ahem. if you do this, you should not hear about a socket. it should
use
a TCP connection. can you show the er
On Jan 2, 2009, at 4:03 PM, mouss wrote:
Jeff Weinberger a écrit :
OK, thanks. I will set up dspam to listen on port 10024 - seems to
make
the most sense. I don't need a localhost:10024 entry in master.cf
then?
right?
no, 10024 will be used by dspam. your postfix should h
On Jan 2, 2009, at 5:32 PM, mouss wrote:
Jeff Weinberger a écrit :
I'm guessing I should leave my port 25 (smtp) entry to allow
submission
on that port with authentication (leaving
"smtpd_client_restrictions=permit_sasl_authenticated...") - is
there any
harm in that?
no.
-mail is jeff (at) jweinberger.homeip.net. I can send
as that e-mail, but I also want to allow sending from someothername
(at) jweinberger.homeip.net and from jeff (at) some-other-domain-I-
own.tld. so the table row looks like:
field username: jeff (at) jweinberger.homeip.net
field password
s when I build the live database. Right
now, I want to make sure I can get this to work, and it's not working
as I'd expect.
I'm reasonable sure I'm missing something, but I don't know what.
Please let me know if there is further information that would point to
a solution.
Thank you so much for taking the time to help!
--Jeff
On Jan 6, 2009, at 5:59 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Jeff Weinberger:
I then added the line:
smtpd_sender_login_maps=hash:/path/to/map
to my main.cf and send a few messages. Postfix correctly allowed and
rejected all of the test messaages, and the logs showed the correct
reason for the rejection
$my_test_sender_restrictions,reject_sender_login_mismatch,.
or am I missing something?
Thank you!
--Jeff
truct that
would do
that without interfering with incoming mail from anywhere?
2) even if it's possible, it is advisable (I know no one is shy about
offering opinions here, and I hope if you have one, you'll voice
it :) )?
Thank you for any help and/or advice!
--Jeff
On Jan 8, 2009, at 5:49 AM, Jorey Bump wrote:
Jeff Weinberger wrote, at 01/08/2009 12:10 AM:
Hi:
Based on good practice and the help and urging of some of the gurus
on this
list, I am moving my users to using the submission service (port 587)
instead of port 25 to send mail from their mail
On Thu, 08 Jan 2009 09:53:45 -0500, Jorey Bump wrote:
> Jeff Weinberger wrote, at 01/08/2009 09:27 AM:
>
>> Setting smtpd_sasl_auth_enable = no would mean that no authentication is
>> required on port 25, but if I understand it correctly, it wouldn't
>> actually st
On Jan 8, 2009, at 6:53 AM, Jorey Bump wrote:
Jeff Weinberger wrote, at 01/08/2009 09:27 AM:
Setting smtpd_sasl_auth_enable = no would mean that no
authentication is
required on port 25, but if I understand it correctly, it wouldn't
actually stop an authenticated user from sending
check the MAIL FROM
address against?
Or does it just check the smtpd_sender_login_maps for a valid MAIL FROM
address (regardless of ownership)?
(yes, I'm trying to figure out if using this in my
smtpd_sender_restrictions would help and how it might do so)
Thank you!!
--Jeff
Viktor Duchovni wrote:
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 01:25:38PM -0800, Jeff Weinberger wrote:
reject_sender_login_mismatch checks the from address against
smtpd_sender_login_maps to be sure that the MAIL FROM address is
owned
by
the SASL-authenticated sender.
But with
This may seem like an odd question, but I need to find a way to
suspend delivery of mail to one account or one domain for a short
period of time to allow me to do a bit of maintenance.
As it stands now, I use maildrop as my delivery transport for virtual
mailboxes.
Is there a way to tell
On Jan 14, 2009, at 3:53 PM, Roderick A. Anderson wrote:
Jeff Weinberger wrote:
This may seem like an odd question, but I need to find a way to
suspend delivery of mail to one account or one domain for a short
period of time to allow me to do a bit of maintenance.
As it stands now, I use
On Jan 15, 2009, at 11:25 AM, Gilles Albusac wrote:
Is it possible to set up Postfix to choose an SMTP relayhost when
routing
outbound mail based on the domain name of the sender ?
try using transport map
http://www.postfix.org/ADDRESS_REWRITING_README.html#transport
# TRANSPORT MAP
#
# S
esting so far.
The recipient_restrictions are solely meant to avoid the many checks
( e.g. RBL, unauth_pipelining, etc.) in my main.cf for my smtp service.
This appears to work. I am of course, open to any and all suggestions
on how this can be improved.
Again, sorry for dragging you down an dead-end path, but thank you for
your help - I've learned a lot along the way.
--Jeff
On Jan 16, 2009, at 10:10 AM, Rob Horton wrote:
Hi,
I'm having some problems with setting a regexp transport map. What I
want is:
1) Mail for u...@domain.com is delivered locally via the Zimbra
system.
2) Mail for u...@machine.domain.com should be delivered directly to
that
machine.
3
information. The architecture documentation indicates only that it is
subject to pretty much anything that local submission is subject to,
but it's not clear what that is).
Any help or pointers are very much appreciated!
Thanks,
--Jeff
Viktor Wrote:
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 22:26:23 -0500
From: Victor Duchovni
Subject: Re: Question on sendmail submission and master.cf -o
overrides
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 07:11:16PM -0800, Jeff Weinberger wrote:
I am hoping someone can offer help in determining this information
about
Greetings,
not sure if what my problem is.
delivery times are way up and the queue is pretty high.
message come in, and take forever to deliver.
command_directory = /usr/sbin
config_directory = /etc/postfix
content_filter =
daemon_directory = /usr/libexec/postfix
debug_peer_level = 2
enable_serv
On Jan 21, 2009, at 12:13 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 10:41:00AM -0500, jeff donovan wrote:
I read the performance tuning http://www.postfix.org/TUNING_README.html
osx doesn't have qshape.
The "qshape" program is a small Perl script. Just download
On Jan 21, 2009, at 1:44 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 01:04:07PM -0500, jeff donovan wrote:
On Jan 21, 2009, at 12:13 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 10:41:00AM -0500, jeff donovan wrote:
I read the performance tuning http://www.postfix.org
On Jan 22, 2009, at 10:28 AM, bharathan kailath wrote:
hi
how can i take some measures to stop this so called Nigerian 419
spam ;i've got two postfix relays with amavisd; but still i get some
emails like Nigerian 419 spam
help appreciated
smtpd_client_restrictions = permit_mynetworks, c
andle on where it's
coming from.
thanks for help
-jeff
On Feb 4, 2009, at 9:47 AM, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
jeff donovan wrote:
here is a sample of the bounce: I have modified the real users name.
Article rejected, un-authorized poster of realusern...@beth.k12.pa.us
Received: from XDYHONJUP [189.22.134.132] by john23.com with ESMTP
On Feb 4, 2009, at 8:59 AM, Matthias Andree wrote:
Am 04.02.2009, 14:42 Uhr, schrieb jeff donovan
:
Greetings
i have a user who is getting a ton of postmaster bounces. who or
what ever is spamming is using her address as the return reply, so
all the bounces and postmaster warnings are
o: or Cc: address (such as list mail).
Really, I am just checking with experts more knowledgeable than I
whether I have chosen a good (or the best) way to achieve this, or if
there is a better way.
Any advice and help are much appreciated!
Thanks,
--Jeff
--
Jeff Weinberger
ns (it doesn't work if
example.net is an alis for example.org which is in turn an alias of
example.com). but this should be enough in most cases.
This is helpful, but I still need the query to take all the other
alias domains into account. So, I need the IF condition, or a second
map.
Tha
Mouss wrote:
Jeff Weinberger a �crit :
> [snip]
>
> This is helpful, but I still need the query to take all the other
> alias domains into account. So, I need the IF condition, or a
second map.
>
I don't think so. I used this. I don't remember the details, but the
i
. ( i
know not the best but it may stem the tide ).
any assistance is welcome
-jeff
On Feb 19, 2009, at 10:39 AM, Noel Jones wrote:
jeff donovan wrote:
Greetings
I have a user whos name is being spoofed by the spammers of the
world. and her mailbox is getting flooded by legitimate Mailer
Delivery notices.
Is there anything i can do for her besides change her account
On Feb 19, 2009, at 10:39 AM, Noel Jones wrote:
jeff donovan wrote:
Greetings
I have a user whos name is being spoofed by the spammers of the
world. and her mailbox is getting flooded by legitimate Mailer
Delivery notices.
Is there anything i can do for her besides change her account
On Feb 20, 2009, at 9:56 AM, J.P. Trosclair wrote:
jeff donovan wrote:
# reject_ndn
<> REJECT please don't send notices to forged sender
-- Noel Jones
Greetings,
I have added the data restrictions, the restrictions class, and
the sender restrictions. is there an erro
On Feb 20, 2009, at 9:56 AM, J.P. Trosclair wrote:
jeff donovan wrote:
# reject_ndn
<> REJECT please don't send notices to forged sender
-- Noel Jones
Greetings,
I have added the data restrictions, the restrictions class, and
the sender restrictions. is there an e
On Feb 20, 2009, at 9:56 AM, J.P. Trosclair wrote:
You should see the REJECT please... from Noel's example in the logs.
J.P.
got it working.
Feb 20 11:07:51 mail2 postfix/smtpd[28710]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
mailrelay1.msp.eschelon.com[209.150.200.11]: 557 <>: Sender address
reje
On Feb 20, 2009, at 11:51 AM, Noel Jones wrote:
jeff donovan wrote:
okay,..
no errors in logs
I beg to differ... Just not the errors you've looked for.
I am now the proud recipient of a million of these. all from
different domains.
Transcript of session follows.
Out: 220 mail2.bet
On Feb 20, 2009, at 12:18 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
jeff donovan wrote:
On Feb 20, 2009, at 9:56 AM, J.P. Trosclair wrote:
You should see the REJECT please... from Noel's example in the logs.
J.P.
got it working.
You can also
# grep 'reject: .*backscatterer' /var/log/maillog
,
Jeff
"It does not require many words to speak the truth." - Chief Joseph, Great Nez
Perce Indian Chief
Thank you Viktor for your reply.
We already have an anti-spam/anti-virus system sitting in front of our mail
system. Would this then work if Postfix were positioned similarly?
>>> Victor Duchovni 3/11/2009 1:48 PM >>>
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 01:35:26PM -0400, Jeff Berni
I'm looking for a good one-stop guide for Postfix. I'm a newbie.
Any suggested reading?
Hi,my mailserver is postfix and the mailbox is set to /Maildir.
But I found if there are too many email in maildir,the imap is very slow.
Can we set the Maildir indexing?So we can accelerate to read/find the email
from Maildir.
Thank you.
Jeff Huang
2009-03-22
OK,Thanks.
I'll try cyrus imap.
Now I use Courier-imap as my imap/pop3 server.
Jeff Huang
2009-03-22
发件人： vg...@hotmail.com
发送时间： 2009-03-22 10:33:00
收件人： jbhu...@scut.edu.cn; postfix-users
抄送：
主题： Re: How to index maildir
--
From:
transport as it appears in master.cf: either dovecot or procmail.
Am I on the right track? How then do I get postfix to use this?
Jeff
there a way for me to not have Postfix change the case? My folder
names all start with a capital letter. Deliver cannot find the mailbox
because "folder" does not equal "Folder".
Thanks,
Jeff
On 4/16/2009 10:44 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 08:24:54PM -0700, Jeff Grossman wrote:
I have set up "recipient_delimiter = +" so I could put a folder name in an
e-mail address and have it automatically filtered for me. I am using
"mailbox_comma
On 4/17/2009 6:54 AM, Jeff Grossman wrote:
On 4/16/2009 10:44 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 08:24:54PM -0700, Jeff Grossman wrote:
I have set up "recipient_delimiter = +" so I could put a folder name
in an
e-mail address and have it automatically filtered for
On 4/17/2009 7:11 AM, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
Jeff Grossman wrote:
On 4/16/2009 10:44 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 08:24:54PM -0700, Jeff Grossman wrote:
I have set up "recipient_delimiter = +" so I could put a folder name
in
On 4/17/2009 9:08 AM, Mark Martinec wrote:
Jeff,
One more thing I noticed today also. All messages which have the "+" in
the e-mail are sent to Dovecot's Deliver twice. So, I receive the
message twice in the folder. All other messages are only sent to
Deliver once. Any i
On 4/22/2009 12:17 PM, Mark Martinec wrote:
Jeff,
One more thing I noticed today also. All messages which have the "+" in
the e-mail are sent to Dovecot's Deliver twice. So, I receive the
message twice in the folder. All other messages are only sent to
Deliver once.
the files?
Jeff Huang
Hello,
I am a newbie...
I wish to use my Postfix system (v2.1.5) to accept mail for, and relay mail to
another MTA. How do I go about doing this?
Thank you for any help offered.
Jeff
"It does not require many words to speak the truth." - Chief Joseph, Great Nez
Perce Indian Chief
I don't want to sound ungrateful for pointing me at the docs, but I was hoping
for a little clarification on the process. I had looked at the docs, but was
still unclear on how to go about it.
Jeff
victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com 5/5/2009 11:00 AM >>>
On Tue, May 05, 2009
lease?
>>> Victor Duchovni 5/5/2009 11:47 AM >>>
On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 11:32:36AM -0400, Jeff Bernier wrote:
> I don't want to sound ungrateful for pointing me at the docs, but I
> was hoping for a little clarification on the process. I had looked at
> the doc
and how to ?
Thanks.
Jeff Huang
?
Jeff
Sender: Corey Chandler
Date: 2009-05-06 15:11:15
Subject: Re: backup email
Jeff Huang wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I want the email server backup the sending out email.
>
> For example.The user send a email out to other user,the smtp server
> copy it and send it
Hi.
I have a smtp server and it need to authorized by the id and psw before send
mail.
But I found I can send a fake mail.
For example,I use id1 to authorize and send a email which is mail from
i...@domain.com.
Is there some methord to check it and prevent from it?
Jeff
EMail:jbhu
at
> queue id?
I am by no means an expert at e-mail. But, my first guess would be that
the server at polluce.unimo.it did a test of the recipient of the e-mail.
It connected, tested the recipient e-mail address, and then disconnected.
Jeff
use new version directly, other than patch the original
source manually.
jeff geng
2010-1-5
postfix-2.5-patch03
Description: Binary data
Wietse:
Please see my reply marked as blue.
:)
jeff geng
2010/1/5 Wietse Venema
> jeff geng:
> > Wietse:
> >
> > Happy new year :)
> >
> > We use niginx's smtp function to redirect mail to postfix server. But in
> > postfix, XCLIENT command can
the got_login will be used.But this is not the key issues.
If nginx will support SASL_USER and SASL_METH parameters, it would be best.
If you can put something into Postfix for current nginx We will be very
grateful to you.
Thank you.
jeff geng
2010/1/6 Wietse Venema
> Wietse Ven
ilman/postfix-to-mailman.py
${nexthop} ${user}
and my `postconf -n` output is below.
I'm running Postfix 2.6.5 on Mac OS/X (client) 10.5.8
Any help is appreciated and I will do my best to answer any questions.
Thank you!
--Jeff
-`postconf -n` output
alias_database = mysql:/
--- In postfix-us...@yahoogroups.com, mouss wrote:
>
> Jeff Weinberger a �crit :
> > I am hoping that this is something fairly simple that I am missing
> >
> > I have a few lists on a mailman server that I run. Until recently, only
> > authenticated users (those
--- In postfix-us...@yahoogroups.com, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> Jeff Weinberger:
> [ Charset UTF-8 unsupported, converting... ]
> > --- In postfix-us...@yahoogroups.com, mouss wrote:
> > >
> > > Jeff Weinberger a ?crit :
> > > > I am hoping that this
--- In postfix-us...@yahoogroups.com, Wietse Venema wrote: > >
Jeff Weinberger: > > > > > > Jeff Weinberger: > > > [ Charset UTF-8
unsupported, converting... ] > > > > --- In postfix-us...@yahoogroups.com,
mouss wrote: > > > > > >
--- In postfix-us...@yahoogroups.com, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> Jeff Weinberger:
> > I changed main.cf so the only "relay_domains" entry is:
> >
> > relay_domains=lists.mylistserver.com
>
> You need to verify this with the command
>
> postconf -n
>
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 1:36 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Jeff Weinberger:
>> > Jeff Weinberger:
>> > > I changed main.cf so the only "relay_domains" entry is:
>> > >
>> > > relay_domains=lists.mylistserver.com
>> >
>> > Y
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 2:38 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Jeff Weinberger put forth on 1/28/2010 4:18 PM:
>
>> You've made it clear I'm posting the wrong thing - but I don't know
>> what the "right" thing is
>
> Sorry to but in Wietse.
>
>
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 3:16 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 1/28/2010 4:46 PM, Jeff Weinberger wrote:
>>
>> virtual_alias_domains = mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql_virtual_alias_domains.cf
>
> does lists.mylistserver.com match the above lookup?
> postmap -q lists.mylistserver.com m
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 1/28/2010 5:36 PM, Jeff Weinberger wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 3:16 PM, Noel Jones
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 1/28/2010 4:46 PM, Jeff Weinberger wrote:
>>>>
&
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 4:02 PM, Jeff Weinberger
wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
>> On 1/28/2010 5:36 PM, Jeff Weinberger wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 3:16 PM, Noel Jones
>>> wrote:
>>>>
I am using mysql (quite successfully in most cases) to do lookups for
a variety of reasons in postfix.
Recently, I had some issues with a domain lookup and in the testing
tried varying my MySQL query between using %d and %s as the lookup
key.
The documentation is clear on this when the query is f
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 4:41 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Jeff Weinberger:
>> I am using mysql (quite successfully in most cases) to do lookups for
>> a variety of reasons in postfix.
>>
>> Recently, I had some issues with a domain lookup and in the testing
>> tri
1 - 100 of 262 matches
Mail list logo
