RE: Migrating to postfix

B25231BD: client=it5.aaq.hfecorp.local[10.252.0.137] -Original Message- From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Wietse Venema Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2014 1:56 PM To: Postfix users Subject: Re: Migrating to postfix Jason Staudenmayer: &g

RE: Migrating to postfix

ecorp.local[10.252.0.137] Looks like it still doing the same thing -Original Message- From: Wietse Venema [mailto:wie...@porcupine.org] Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2014 2:46 PM To: Jason Staudenmayer Cc: Postfix users Subject: Re: Migrating to postfix Jason Staudenmayer: > transport: &

RE: Migrating to postfix

Ok I found why it's dumping fax@ email to root, /etc/aliases had a default entry for fax: Still not taking addresses in the format fax-(phonenumber)@ -Original Message- From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Jason Staudenmayer

RE: Migrating to postfix

SO it should have just the localhost or should it be empty? -Original Message- From: Wietse Venema [mailto:wie...@porcupine.org] Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2014 3:28 PM To: Jason Staudenmayer Cc: Wietse Venema; postfix-users@postfix.org Subject: Re: Migrating to postfix Jason

RE: Migrating to postfix

Wait I think I got working now -Original Message- From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Jason Staudenmayer Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2014 3:34 PM To: Wietse Venema Cc: postfix-users@postfix.org Subject: RE: Migrating to postfix SO

SASL On Postfix/Dovecot running on Freebsd 8.1

I was getting some relay issues when my local IP changed so I realized or thought that perhaps my SASL wasn’t working I did a bunch of tweaking which is never good but when i switched my mail to port 587 i was able to once again send with no problem BUT when i did the telnet test froth postfi

Fwd: SASL On Postfix/Dovecot running on Freebsd 8.1

smtpd_reject_unlisted_sender=yes -o smtpd_recipient_restrictions=permit_mynetworks,permit_sasl_authenticated,reject slow unix - - n - - smtp -o smtp_connection_cache_on_demand=no > Begin forwarded message: > > From: jason hirsh > Subject: SAS

Anonymous TLS Connection

in my Mail log i am getting messages like 27 08:56:51 tuna postfix/smtpd[35786]: Anonymous TLS connection established from telbo-xxx.x.xx.x.cust.telbo.net[xxx.x.xx.x]: TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits) This is from my clients so obviously I have no configured the mail cli

Re: DNS Resolver

I looked at the discussion on patching and it is target at Net::DNS version .76 I am running version .78 i still tried patching and I naturally got a Hunk #1 error > On Feb 27, 2015, at 1:04 PM, Mike Hodson wrote: > > Hello Jason, > > I'm not certain where you are

Fwd: DNS Resolver

> Begin forwarded message: > > From: jason hirsh > Subject: Fwd: DNS Resolver > Date: March 1, 2015 at 10:04:24 AM AST > To: Mike Hodson > Cc: posfix-us...@postfis.org > > Watching the log, although I have this error the system is using the RBL for > check

Fwd: DNS Resolver

I am not sure what has gotten through on the mailing list 1) I was unable to patch the Net::DNS version .76 I am running version .78 2( The mail system is happily using about 4 RBLs Ater updating all involved ports I am still getting 75371-06) _WARN: rules: failed to run NO_DNS_FOR_

Re: RegExp help

I have bene using https://regex101.com for test and evaluationIt has also helped on my composition > On May 14, 2015, at 6:48 AM, Barbara M. wrote: > > > I am trying to use regexp to block mails from specific domains to specific > users (and let other users r

Re: RegExp help

> On May 14, 2015, at 7:41 AM, Barbara M. wrote: > > On Thu, 14 May 2015, jason hirsh wrote: > >> I have bene using >> https://regex101.com >> for test and evaluationIt has also helped on my composition > > Cool. > But I can't still find a so

Re: Is it possible to stop a localhost system account being used in relay attempts?

user sent it? Thus permit_mynetworks would allow it. Could a service under the _www user have been manipulated into sending the email? Just a thought. Jason

postfix and multiple mandrill keys, based on sending server?

We have a medium sized cloud with 90% of servers sending via mandrill and each app/server having its own key. We have a few legacy apps, for example a .net 1.1 app, that won't send via TLS over 587, and mandrill doesn't support plan smtp over 25, so we set up a postfix server to do relay to mand

[no subject]

We have a medium sized cloud with 90% of servers sending via mandrill and each app/server having its own key. We have a few legacy apps, for example a .net 1.1 app, that won't send via TLS over 587, and mandrill doesn't support plan smtp over 25, so we set up a postfix server to do relay to mand

[no subject]

We have a private cloud with all of the servers sending mail via mandrill, and each app/server has its own key. We have a few legacy apps, for example a .net 1.1 app, that can't send via TLS over 587 (and mandrill doesn't support plan smtp over 25), so we set up a postfix server to do relay to mand

using postfix as a smart relay for many servers

Hi, I'm using Postfix to relay from my internal network, through postfix, to mandrill, on to the destination. The issue is that I have multiple internal servers, but once it gets to mandrill they all look like one because the instructions I found only allowed for one mandrill relay. I found instruc

Virtual Aliases with not working

I am getting what appears to me to be contradictory messages I am getting a bounce message as follows mailto:ab...@kasdivi.com>>: host triggerfish.theoceanwindow.com [private/dovecot-lmtp] said: 550 5.1.1 mailto:ab...@kasdivi.com>> User doesn't ex

OpenDKIM , Postfix , SpamAssassin, Amavisd-New, SPF and FreeBSD

I am trying to revive my OpenDKIM installation. I had it working but managed to break it when I updated my ports. It is running but not signing outgoing messages My main.cf configuration relative to OpenDkim is smtpd_milters = inet:localhost:8891 non_smtpd_milters = $smtpd_milters milter_d

Re: OpenDKIM , Postfix , SpamAssassin, Amavisd-New, SPF and FreeBSD

erfish postfix/submission/smtpd[52375]: abort all milters Oct 25 12:45:15 triggerfish postfix/submission/smtpd[52375]: milter8_abort: abort milter inet:localhost:8891 The thing that concerns me is the appearance of “dummy” Any thoughts any one/? > On Oct 24, 2019, at 11:29 AM, Jason Hirsh wrote: &

Re: OpenDKIM , Postfix , SpamAssassin, Amavisd-New, SPF and FreeBSD

Ahh .. Interesting I had not understood that But I am still not signing …. > On Oct 25, 2019, at 2:00 PM, Fazzina, Angelo > wrote: > > From your original email > > Modesv > > > You are verifying and signing so yes that seems to be the

Re: OpenDKIM , Postfix , SpamAssassin, Amavisd-New, SPF and FreeBSD

I corrected.. so I am 80% sure about the associated tables. I was kind of hoping it was something simple and obvious. So much for that idea Thanks to all for the their time and efforts > On Oct 25, 2019, at 2:55 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: > > Jason Hirsh: >> I have gone over m

Re: OpenDKIM , Postfix , SpamAssassin, Amavisd-New, SPF and FreeBSD

I am getting entries in my maiillog, but only in regards to OpenDKIM working to verify INCOMING These are clearly entries from OpenDKIM. There is nothing corresponding for actions relative to outgoing mail Jason > On Oct 25, 2019, at 3:52 PM, Christian Kivalo > wrote: > > O

Re: OpenDKIM , Postfix , SpamAssassin, Amavisd-New, SPF and FreeBSD

The thing is … that isn an INCOMING not an outgoing email.. Maybe its is failing a DKIM test for incoming I can’t seem to get OpenDKIM to sign my OUTGOING > On Oct 25, 2019, at 1:17 PM, Fazzina, Angelo > wrote: > > > From what I can tell the DNS record was

Re: OpenDKIM , Postfix , SpamAssassin, Amavisd-New, SPF and FreeBSD

There is a mystery how opendkim started with out its conf file but ai issue it used defaults and thus the fault Thanks to all and sorry for polluting the mailing list Jason > On Oct 25, 2019, at 4:12 PM, Fazzina, Angelo wrote: > > Hi again, > Maybe this will help you trouble sho

postfix's sendmail equivalent to mailertable problem

Hi All, I am much of a newbie to postfix and need some help please. I know that what I am about to ask has been covered already on this list but I just can not get a head start. I am looking to have my postfix acting as a gateway for my exchange. On sendmail I know I would use mailertable, please

Re: postfix's sendmail equivalent to mailertable problem

see where that gets me. On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 6:17 PM, Sahil Tandon wrote: > On Nov 20, 2009, at 11:12 AM, "Jason X, Maney" wrote: > > Hi All, >> >> I am much of a newbie to postfix and need some help please. I know >> that what I am about to ask has b

rejections after limiting access to smtp auth

reject_non_fqdn_recipient Where /etc/postfix/access/sasl-users-list is populated like: username1 OK username2 OK We've also tried PERMIT rather than OK, without effect. It's worth noting that in making this change we moved from Postfix 2.9.6 to 3.1.12. Any thoughts? Thanks

Sending Error

/postfix/virtual_domains I just dont see the problem, can anyone provide some advice? Thanks, -Jason

Allow Relaying, but not be an open-relay

HI All, How can I allow e-mails to be sent from my website to external users (like GMail) but not be an open-relay to spammers? -Jason

Re: Allow Relaying, but not be an open-relay

what they submitted they dont get it. My main.cf says: mynetworks = 172.16.254.0/28 That address is my apartment. I am hosting this at mosso so I have one static from them of 67.23.34.37. Mail and CF run on this same IP. -Jason

Re: Allow Relaying, but not be an open-relay

er1 postfix/virtual[4833]: 125D5130298: to=>, relay=virtual, delay=0.29, delays=0.14/0.06/0/0.09, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (delivered to m$ May 21 22:25:31 Server1 postfix/qmgr[4459]: 125D5130298: removed -Jason

Re: header checks not working

Sahil Tandon wrote: On Tue, 30 Jun 2009, Rob Brandt wrote: I'm trying to set up a basic header check to get rid of emails sa marks as spam. I've added the following link to main.cf: header_checks = regexp:/etc/postfix/filter I prefer pcre:, but the following patterns should work w

Re: MTA Deferring e-mail

Hi Wietse, >> Oct 1 14:31:37 www postfix/qmgr[15204]: warning: connect to transport >> private/lsmtp: No such file or directory > > Fix that. I am not sure where it expects `private/lsmtp` to be located though. -Jason

Re: MTA Deferring e-mail

I noticed that, a typo from earlier. But now it seems I cannot send, nor receive e-mail: Oct 1 16:12:05 www zmmailboxdmgr[25272]: status OK Oct 1 16:12:20 www postfix/smtpd[25394]: connect from mail[192.168.1.27] Oct 1 16:12:20 www postfix/smtpd[25394]: A6EDD1A8043C: client=mail[192.168.1.27]

Re: MTA Deferring e-mail

So it looks like incoming e-mail might be working now, outgoing not so much. Oct 1 16:33:32 www clamd[20590]: SelfCheck: Database status OK. Oct 1 16:33:33 www postfix/smtpd[32650]: connect from localhost.localdomain[127.0.0.1] Oct 1 16:33:33 www postfix/smtpd[32650]: 64D131A8045E: client=local

Re: MTA Deferring e-mail

e. The question > then would be: how was it working before? $ postconf -n disable_dns_lookups = yes I now changed it to 'no' and things seem to be working again. I dont understand why, though, this would be creating the problem. Could you explain? If it creates this problem, why do people set it? -Jason

Postfix, and MX record questions

cannot decide if it is something Zimbra needs or something I would need in any setup... Jason

Exception to sender address restrictions

Hello all, I have postfix working pretty well... efficiently blocking a very large amount of spam (very happy with Postfix). But I have a problem... Postfix isn't receiving mail from a specific mail system, and it's critical that it does. The problem really isn't Postfix. Postfix is doing exactly

Outbound mail, relaying, Hotmail

rds virtual_mailbox_domains = mydomain.com anotherdomain.com mail.mydomain.com virtual_mailbox_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/users virtual_transport = lmtp:unix:/data/mail/lib/imap/socket/lmtp If any other information would be helpful in diagnosing this problem, I'm happy to provide it. Thank you very muc

Re: Outbound mail, relaying, Hotmail

On 06/22/2010 10:56 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote: Jason Bailey, Sun Advocate Webmaster put forth on 6/22/2010 10:32 PM: (Note: I do have to disclose one piece of information. Recently our server was automatically blacklisted by our ISP for spam that was being relayed through our system from a

Re: header checks not working

der is X-Spam-Status, not X-Spam-Flag. The "/i" at the end implies case insensitivity when matching. I'm not sure if Postfix honors such pattern modifiers, but generally speaking, when dealing with Perl-compatible regex, that's what the "i" does. If Postfix doesn't like it, just take the "i" out. Jason

[pfx] private/dovecot-lmtp]: Connection refused)

:/home/jason # posconf -n posconf: Command not found. root@triggerfish:/home/jason # postconf -n broken_sasl_auth_clients = yes command_directory = /usr/local/sbin compatibility_level = 3.6 daemon_directory = /usr/local/libexec/postfix data_directory = /var/db/postfix debug_peer_level = 2

[pfx] Re: private/dovecot-lmtp]: Connection refused)

My nonrandom action for tho morning OK I bandaided my going back to an older main.cf but updating the ssl/tls infoThat brought mail back on line Sort of Dovecot still not happy with me but this error seems more warning and best suited to be addressed else where status=sent (delivered via d

[pfx] TLS Library Problem

Still chasing ssl/tls issue I have they error message postfix/smtps/smtpd[39559]: warning: TLS library problem: error:14094416:SSL routines:ssl3_read_bytes:sslv3 alert certificate unknown:/usr/src/crypto/openssl/ssl/record/rec_layer_s3.c:1621:SSL alert number 46: I am assuming the ie eher I

[pfx] Re: TLS Library Problem

Thanks. Was just confirming , Yes self signed. I broke certbot > On May 12, 2024, at 4:55 AM, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users > wrote: > > On Sat, May 11, 2024 at 11:55:14PM -0400, Jason Hirsh via Postfix-users > wrote: > >> I have they error message >>

[pfx] Re: postfix/sendmail[25965]: fatal: usage: sendmail [options]

I assume that this error wont interfere with with postfix other operations? > On Nov 26, 2024, at 6:01 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: > > Jason Hirsh via Postfix-users: >> This is an arror I am getting since I manage to damage by configuration in >> my upgrade to Postfix 3.9. an

[pfx] postfix/sendmail[25965]: fatal: usage: sendmail [options]

This is an arror I am getting since I manage to damage by configuration in my upgrade to Postfix 3.9. and FreeBSD 14.1. When I first installed Postfix I added the following to rc.conf sendmail_enable="NO" sendmail_submit_enable="NO" sendmail_outbound_enable="NO" sendmail_msp_queue_enable="NO"

[pfx] Clearing or Update Postfix Verify Cache

I am still dealing with self inflicted issued when I updated to FreeBSD 14,1 and the associated update to Postfix 3.9 I sort of became aware of the end of support for btree and changed these lines in master.cf from smtpd_tls_session_cache_database = btree:${data_directory}/smtpd_scache smtp_tls_

[pfx] Postfix TLS Library Problem No such file

I am running Dovecot Version 2.3.21.1 and Postfix version 3.10-20241027. on FreeBAS 14.1 I have two domains on one server each two sub domains, mail and www Tha appropriarte portion of main.cf is: # SASL CONFIG broken_sasl_auth_clients = yes smtpd_delay_reject = yes smtpd_helo_required = ye

[pfx] Fwd: Postfix TLS Library Problem No such file

> Begin forwarded message: > > From: Jason Hirsh > Subject: Re: [pfx] Postfix TLS Library Problem No such file > Date: May 6, 2025 at 2:27:43 PM EDT > To: postfix-u...@postfix.org > Cc: Bill Cole > > >> On May 6, 2025, at 12:43 PM, Bill Cole via Postfix-us

[pfx] Re: postfix/cleanup warning: unsupported dictionary type: PATH=/bin.

never find the earlier header_checks it refers to Thanks! You said my butt again Jason > On May 26, 2025, at 1:46 AM, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users > wrote: > > On Sun, May 25, 2025 at 04:43:58PM -0400, Jason Hirsh wrote: > >> I am getting this error >> &g

[pfx] Re: Killed postfix

> On May 27, 2025, at 10:21 PM, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users > wrote: > > On Tue, May 27, 2025 at 12:22:17PM -0400, Jason Hirsh wrote: >>> From: Jason Hirsh >>> Subject: Killed postfix >>> Date: May 27, 2025 at 12:11:13 PM EDT >>> To: po

<    1   2   3