Rich Shepard wrote:
>
> Ah, so! That explains it. I run Dan Bernstein's dnscache here, but
> use my
> ISP's DNS servers otherwise.
>
> So, now I need to consider whether to remove the spamhaus line from
> main.cf or set up and maintain my own dns server.
>
I find that having a local unix-based
Rich Shepard wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Jan 2009, J Sloan wrote:
>
>> I find that having a local unix-based dns server is often orders of
>> magnitude faster than relying on an upstream isp for dns resolution.
>
> Joe,
>
> I don't know that the effort to set up and m
Sounds like fedora's missing a ca-bundle.crt...
Joe
sean darcy wrote:
> I followed the instructions on
> http://www.wormly.com/blog/2008/11/05/relay-gmail-google-smtp-postfix/
> to create your own certificate to use with google.
>
> main.cf:
> ..
> ## this to use certificate I created:
>
We're seeing an odd problem with postfix TLS only when talking to an
ironport device. We configured smtp_tls_security_level = none and used
smtp_tls_policy_maps to set per site tls policy, rather than doing tls
by default.
This had worked perfectly for over months and many thousands of smtp
sessio
Victor Duchovni wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 04:50:49PM -0800, J Sloan wrote:
>
>
>> We have just started doing business with a firm that uses an ironport
>> device, and discovered that postfix will not issue a STARTTLS to that
>> host, whether it's lis
Victor Duchovni wrote:
>
>>> The policy table lookup key does not match the destination nexthop, or
>>>
>
>
>
> That's exactly the problem.
>
>
> I think you should be able to figure this out, even without reading the
> below, but if you are in a hurry try the documentation:
>
> ht
For what it's worth, we've found ext3 to be far too slow for our needs.
The best setup we've found is reiserfs, mounted with "noatime" and
"notail" options -
Joe
Brandon Hilkert wrote:
> - Original Message - From: "Ralf Hildebrandt"
>
> To:
> Sent: Friday, March 20, 2009 6:52 AM
> Subje
Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 3/26/2009, Jim Wright (j...@wrightthisway.com) wrote:
>
>> Two options. 1, Eliminate windows users from your network.
>>
>
> Please... such comments are worse than useless...
>
>
It may not be what you want to hear, especially if you're heavily
invested in mi
Tashfeen Ekram wrote:
> I have installed Postfix on Ubuntu to use to only send emails for my
> rails application. My rails application is not able to connect to it.
> Could this be because sendmail is listeneing at port 20?
> also, what configuration would suit me best if I only want to send
> emai
Adrian Overbury wrote:
> Has anyone ever written a proxy server for policy services? I have a
> policy server (grossd, one of the best greylisting engines I've ever
> used) that, if it goes down, causes my Postfix servers to temp fail
> everything with 'Server configuration problem'. This is a re
Wietse Venema wrote:
> J Sloan:
>
>> Adrian Overbury wrote:
>>
>>> Has anyone ever written a proxy server for policy services? I have a
>>> policy server (grossd, one of the best greylisting engines I've ever
>>> used) that, if it
Sahil Tandon wrote:
>
> Google 'hapolicy synopsis' -- the author of postfwd wrote a perl
> script which acts as a load balancing policy service that can return
> dunno if the underlying services are unreachable. Obviously, if
> hapolicy itself malfunctions, you're back at square one.
Looks intere
Geert Hendrickx wrote:
>
> What drawbacks did you experience? We run a local policyd instance on each
> postfix server too, all connecting to a central (not replicated) MySQL.
> Policyd's behaviour when MySQL becomes unavailable is configurable, it can
> either tempfail (4xx) all incoming e-mail o
Roderick A. Anderson wrote:
>
> Sorry to hear that but in the mean time you can grab .src.rpm for a
> prior release, the tarball for the current release and modify the
> .spec file to reflect this.
I've been doing this for our smtp servers for some time. The suse
factory postfix srpm compiles nicel
Geert Hendrickx wrote:
> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 10:15:07AM -0700, J Sloan wrote:
>
>> Yes, that is the benefit of doing it that way. But we experienced problems
>> with recurring corruption of the isam tables when the network connections
>> to the db server were interr
Jan P. Kessler wrote:
>
> hapolicy (http://postfwd.org/DEVEL/tools/hapolicy-0.99.1) was developed
> to be small (~200 lines perl), simple and reliable. therefore it uses
> only basic perl modules and relies on postfix spawn. we run it since
> more than 6 months without problems to have a shared gre
Michael Wang wrote:
> Wietse Venema wrote:
>> Michael Wang:
> [...snip...]
>>> Is 2.3 end-of-life coming any time soon?
>>
>> Updates for Postfix 2.2 stopped last year.
>
> So that sounds like 2.3 patches may end this year. Assuming that, I
> have (very) roughly 6 months + some unknown amount of t
Blake Carver wrote:
> So a few other details I've grabbed didn't provide yesterday-
> These numbers don't seem to add up.
> My big question is how do I get this system upgraded without breaking it?
>
> postconf -d | grep mail_version
> mail_version = 2.4.5
>
> and also
>
> rpm -qa | grep postfix
>
Perhaps you want mailx -
Joe
Ujjval K wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thx for the reply..I have the "mail" Program, but it tries to
> use/usr/sbin/sendmail to send the email...
> Can that be configured to use postfix?
>
> thx
>
> --- On Thu, 10/2/08, Noel Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>> From: Noel
mouss wrote:
> Joey a écrit :
>
>> One thing I didn't think of on this, is that the list from spamhaus will be
>> the same I am already rejecting via RBL and while it is local, it would
>> still not include all the IP's I am using from these other heavy spam
>> countries.
>>
>
>
> you can b
Daniel V. Reinhardt wrote:
>
>
> Just to make sure I'm not crazy here, you can't get access to
> http://www.okean.com ?
>
> Links to screenshots of what I see ( right now )
> http://web56.net/images/download/screenshot1.jpg
> http://web56.net/images/download/screenshot2.jpg
>
That's interesting. I
Wietse Venema wrote:
> Wietse Venema:
>
>> I don't know if this is a problem with Windows TCP/IP, or if this
>> is a problem with a firewall on the client side. Reportedly, some
>> firewalls randomize TCP sequence numbers but don't update the
>> sequence numbers in SACK fields. That would be a
Alexander Grüner wrote:
> > Open SUSE includes more recent posfix rpms (but in the "factory" not
> the repos):
> http://download.opensuse.org/factory/repo/oss/suse/x86_64/postfix-2.5.5-6.6.x86_64.rpm
>
> >
> http://download.opensuse.org/factory/repo/oss/suse/i586/postfix-2.5.5-6.5.i586.rpm
>
> >
>
Chris Turan wrote:
>
> Ouch, but you're right. I am creating my own misery. It wasn't a
> problem before when I was unknown to the spammers. Its only been a
> problem for a few weeks and I haven't yet been put on any blacklists.
Keep sending out backscatter spam, and you will most certainly end
Ville Walveranta wrote:
> Somewhat unrelated, but perhaps worth mentioning:
>
> For couple of years I've used RegexBuddy (http://www.regexbuddy.com)
Weird, no linux version? oh well, useless to me.
Joe
Sturgis, Grant wrote:
> I know, way OT, but has to be said:
>
> You think a linux bigot would use such a thing?
>
No need for name calling on this list. That sort of nonsense, if you've
simply got to say it, should have been said via pm.
Joe
26 matches
Mail list logo
