SASL and auxprop errors

2010-07-20 Thread Gordan Bobic
I am seeing errors like this in syslog: postfix/smtpd[24494]: auxpropfunc error invalid parameter supplied postfix/smtpd[24494]: sql_select option missing postfix/smtpd[24494]: auxpropfunc error no mechanism available It would appear that they are coming from the otherwise unused (that is unuse

Re: SASL and auxprop errors

2010-07-20 Thread Gordan Bobic
On Tue, 2010-07-20 at 08:09 -0700, Walter Pinto wrote: > Have you tried adding: > > auxprop_plugin: ldap What, exactly, would that do? My LDAP relevant configuration entries are: mydestination = $myhostname, localhost.localdomain, localhost, ldap:/etc/postfix/ldap-domains.cf local_recipient_maps

Re: SASL and auxprop errors

2010-07-20 Thread Gordan Bobic
On Tue, 2010-07-20 at 08:33 -0700, Walter Pinto wrote: > Try adding this to your smtpd.conf > > sql_select: dummy > > Or you could recompile sasl without sql capabilities Awesome, that silenced the libsql warning. Is there a way to do something similar with the libldapdb warning? Gordan

Re: SASL and auxprop errors

2010-07-20 Thread Gordan Bobic
On Tue, 2010-07-20 at 08:45 -0700, Walter Pinto wrote: > What linux distro are you running? RHEL/CentOS 5. Gordan

RE: Is such an SSL attack possible against Postfix?

2010-07-21 Thread Gordan Bobic
On Wed, 2010-07-21 at 10:02 +0100, Jonathan Tripathy wrote: > Port 25 outgoing will be blocked by most ISPs > -- > > This may be the case in your country, but from where I'm from, I've > never had a problem sending out on port 25, ev

Re: Is such an SSL attack possible against Postfix?

2010-07-21 Thread Gordan Bobic
On Wed, 2010-07-21 at 11:11 -0400, Charles Marcus wrote: > Jonathan Tripathy wrote: > > I beg to disagree. Blocking port 25 is a violation of Net Neutrality. > > Ridiculous, net neutrality has nothing to do with service level > agreements. Residential service does not in any way, shape or form > e

Re: OT: ISP Blocking of port 25

2010-07-21 Thread Gordan Bobic
Daniel V. Reinhardt wrote: ISP's should be made responsible and accountable for what their users do. They hold the rights to the IP Space in use at the time, and such any traffic that goes over it should be logged for later analysis by authorities if a user is found to be doing something ille

Re: OT: ISP Blocking of port 25

2010-07-21 Thread Gordan Bobic
Charles Marcus wrote: As I mentioned before, if they really feel that blocking port 25 blocks spam, You aren't serious? It isn't a matter of 'feeling'. Blocking port 25 for residential users blocks TONS of SPAMBOTNETS. This isn't theory or guesswork, it is a simple fact. It also relievs a huge