Re: I thought I had a send-only Postfix server, but I see someone connected to it!

On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 12:57 PM, Chris Babcock wrote: > > > > The relay access was rejected, but I don't want anyone to get even > > > this far. Newbie-oriented advice appreciated. > > > > > Postfix listens for all connections on inet_interfaces. > > ...by default. See: > > http://www.postfix.org

Re: I thought I had a send-only Postfix server, but I see someone connected to it!

On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 12:58 PM, Bjørn Ruberg wrote: > Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote: > >> MountainX wrote: >> >> >>> I only want my local machine to be able to send email out. I won't want >>> to >>> receive email. >>> >>> >> [...] > > >> Postfix listens for all connections on inet_interface

Re: Getting started with Postfix on Ubuntu

ail from any Linux user account on this box to be sent to m...@example.com using my smtp relay settings (which use smtp.gmail.com with my m...@example.com gmail account). Does that make sense now? I would appreciate some examples of exactly what I should change in main.cf, generic, tra

Re: I thought I had a send-only Postfix server, but I see someone connected to it!

On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 4:00 PM, mouss wrote: > Dave a écrit : > > On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 12:58 PM, Bjørn Ruberg > <mailto:bj...@ruberg.no>> wrote: > > > > [snip] > > > > An even easier alternative is to let Postfix listen to localhost > &g

Re: I thought I had a send-only Postfix server, but I see someoneconnected to it!

On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 11:14 PM, MacShane, Tracy < tracy.macsh...@airservicesaustralia.com> wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org > > [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of MountainX > > Sent: Tuesday, 27 January 2009 1:42 PM > > To: postfi

I am confused about my system's email addresses - need some help getting them to conform to my wishes

Hopefully I have improved my question-asking now. :) I'm using smtp.gmail.com with Postfix. It is working and all emails are delivered. All my config info is at the bottom of this message. The account I use to sign in to gmail is me-at-example.com (as shown in config below). I want to check my ema

Re: I thought I had a send-only Postfix server, but I see someone connected to it!

On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 1:37 PM, Chris Babcock wrote: > On Mon, 26 Jan 2009 18:41:32 -0800 (PST) > MountainX wrote: > > > The experts have already learned Postfix. As far as I am concerned, I > > can't add anything to the world by learning Postfix too. > > It isn't enough for email to just work.

Re: I am confused about my system's email addresses - need some help getting them to conform to my wishes

On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 11:10 PM, Sahil Tandon wrote: > On Tue, 27 Jan 2009, Dave wrote: > > > Hopefully I have improved my question-asking now. :) > > You are confusing the role of the SMTP server and the IMAP client/server. > Several of your "problems" have littl

Re: looking to pay for problem solving on minor Postfix issue

On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 1:30 PM, Evan Platt wrote: > While I'll probably get flamed for this... > There are probably tons of people who'd jump at the chance for this - easy > money. I'm one of them - I love easy money. If I knew enough postfix, I'd > jump on this. But as it is, I know just enoug

Re: Name service error for name=localhost type=AAAA: Host not found

On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 7:31 PM, Darren Pilgrim wrote: > Dave (DavesTechShop.net) wrote: > >> Jan 28 19:18:23 ubuntu postfix/smtp[27317]: 13n20: to=, >> relay=none, delay=8, delays=7.9/0.01/0/0, dsn=5.4.4, status=bounced (Host or >> domain name not found. Name service

Re: Name service error for name=localhost type=AAAA: Host not found

On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 7:55 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: > Dave: > > On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 7:31 PM, Darren Pilgrim >wrote: > > > > > Dave (DavesTechShop.net) wrote: > > > > > >> Jan 28 19:18:23 ubuntu postfix/smtp[27317]: 13n20: > to=, &

Aliases question - can I alias a user name to a name that is not a local user account?

With my setup, Postfix send an email from my local user account ("user") as u...@example.com. Example.com is a Google apps domain. I would like the email to go out as another name: anewn...@example.com. (where "anewname" matches my gmail user account name). My gmail user account and my linux user

Re: Aliases question - can I alias a user name to a name that is not a local user account?

On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 8:44 PM, Aaron Wolfe wrote: > On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 8:36 PM, Dave (DavesTechShop.net) > wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 8:32 PM, Dave (DavesTechShop.net) > > wrote: > >> > >> > >> On Wed, Jan 28

Re: I am confused about my system's email addresses - need some help getting them to conform to my wishes

On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 8:46 PM, Stroller wrote: > > On 28 Jan 2009, at 20:32, mouss wrote: > >> ... >>> OK, so I have to make sure all messages are from me-at-example.com >>> in order for them to appear in the sent-mail >>> folder of that account. >>> >> >> No, they wil

Re: Aliases question - can I alias a user name to a name that is not a local user account?

On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 8:56 PM, Victor Duchovni < victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 08:47:28PM -0500, Dave wrote: > > > > When you post to this list, you are taking up the time of many experts > > > (and some amateurs like myself :

Re: Aliases question - can I alias a user name to a name that is not a local user account?

On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 9:18 PM, Victor Duchovni < victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 09:04:48PM -0500, Dave wrote: > > > > Google is full of noise. Try: > > > > > >http://www.postfix.org/documentati

Re: smtpd_tls_session_cache_database - correct config?

On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 4:01 PM, mouss wrote: > MountainX a écrit : > > > > > > MountainX wrote: > >> which of these lines is more correct? I'm guessing the 2nd line is > better. > >> > >> smtpd_tls_session_cache_database = > btree:/var/run/smtpd_tls_session_cache > >> or > >> smtpd_tls_session_c

Re: Aliases question - can I alias a user name to a name that is not a local user account?

On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 10:30 PM, Aaron Wolfe wrote: > On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 9:25 PM, Dave wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 9:18 PM, Victor Duchovni > > wrote: > >> > >> On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 09:04:48PM -0500, Dave wrot

strange aliasing problem

This problem only happens when I send email to r...@localhost. The email is re-addressed to d...@myolddomain.net, as so: to=, orig_to= There is no entry in aliases, generic, virtual nor anywhere else I can find that still has a reference to myolddomain.net. Furthermore, if I address the email t

Re: Aliases question - can I alias a user name to a name that is not a local user account?

On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 12:34 AM, Victor Duchovni < victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 10:39:53PM -0500, Dave wrote: > > > I would want the table entry would be: > > .* m...@example.com > > Ignoring regexp table syntax problems

Re: strange aliasing problem

On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 12:38 AM, Dave wrote: > This problem only happens when I send email to r...@localhost. > > The email is re-addressed to d...@myolddomain.net, as so: > > to=, orig_to= > > There is no entry in aliases, generic, virtual nor anywhere else I can fi

Re: strange aliasing problem

On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 1:21 AM, Aaron Wolfe wrote: > On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 1:04 AM, Dave wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 12:38 AM, Dave wrote: > >> > > > > Solved. I discovered that my installation had two aliases databases. One &g

Re: Aliases question - can I alias a user name to a name that is not a local user account?

On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 1:17 AM, Victor Duchovni < victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 12:48:14AM -0500, Dave wrote: > > > > Ignoring regexp table syntax problems for the moment, this is a very > > > degenerate regexp table, the inpu

Re: Aliases question - can I alias a user name to a name that is not a local user account?

On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 7:54 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: > Dave: > > What's with you guys on this list who have the answers yet are just > handing > > out clues one by one and making me guess about the answer over the course > of > > several email exchanges? For

Re: Aliases question - can I alias a user name to a name that is not a local user account?

On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 1:43 AM, Evan Platt wrote: > At 10:37 PM 1/28/2009, you wrote: > > What's with you guys on this list who have the answers yet are just >> handing out clues one by one and making me guess about the answer over the >> course of several email exchanges? Fortunately, there a

server configuration

pose to support only virtual mailbox domains, uses antispam and antivirus measures, smtp auth server and client through dovecot not sure about this, tls, and hooks in to mailman for list management. Thanks. Dave. address_verify_map = btree:/var/spool/postfix/verified_senders alias_database

New Antispam settings

cipient_restrictions after the rbl checks, and dkim-milter last in the file. I'd appreciate any feedback on these settings and suggested improvements if any. Thanks. Dave. address_verify_map = btree:/var/spool/postfix/verified_senders alias_database = hash:/etc/postfix/aliases alias_maps =

RE: New Antispam settings

Hello, Thank you for your suggestions. I will make the changes. Any other suggestions welcome. Thanks. Dave. -Original Message- From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Magnus Bäck Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2009 9:39 AM

Am I an open relay?

= hash:/etc/postfix/vmaps virtual_minimum_uid = 1000 virtual_uid_maps = static:5000 Thanks. Dave.

RE: Am I an open relay?

Hi, Thanks for your reply. For reject_unverified_sender what would be a better way of dealing with it? Thanks. Dave. -Original Message- From: Noel Jones [mailto:njo...@megan.vbhcs.org] Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2009 1:02 PM To: dave.meh...@gmail.com; postfix-users@postfix.org

RE: Am I an open relay?

Hello, Thanks for your reply. I have not added any services to master.cf. Thanks a lot. Dave. -Original Message- From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Ralf Hildebrandt Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2009 12:59 PM To: postfix-users

postfix and amavisd-new on CentOS

_filter, restart postfix and all is well. Thanks. Dave.

RE: postfix and amavisd-new on CentOS

Hi, Thanks for your reply. I have solved the problem. I commented out receive_override_options in main.cf and that did it. Thanks. Dave. -Original Message- From: Noel Jones [mailto:njo...@megan.vbhcs.org] Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 9:36 PM To: dave.meh...@gmail.com

restrictions, postgrey, and spamassassin

ers, but am not sure which file to alter. These last two might be off topic responses private if it is felt necessary. Any suggestions appreciated. Here's a postconf -n. Thanks. Dave. address_verify_map = btree:/var/spool/postfix/verified_senders alias_database = hash:/etc/postfix/a

postfix not rejecting single nonexistent user

a postconf -n output, i've been over this for four days now and it's eluding me, it's probably simple but now frustrated and can't see it. Help appreciated. Thanks. Dave. address_verify_map = btree:/var/spool/postfix/verified_senders alias_database = hash:/etc/pos

RE: postfix not rejecting single nonexistent user

Hello, Thanks. The mail is rejected, but it's generating bounce messages, whereas mail to unknown users that smtpd rejects doesn't get queued at all, mail addressed to mailman seems to start through the queue rather than be initially rejected. Thanks. Dave. -Origin

rbl checks, best place

estions welcome. Thanks. Dave.

Checking external mail

mail server and have it put the message through it's various checks? Thanks. Dave. Delivered-To: dave.meh...@gmail.com Received: by 10.100.6.16 with SMTP id 16cs108866anf; Sat, 5 Sep 2009 07:42:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.224.42.83 with SMTP id r19mr8187638qae.35.1252161766037;

latest postfix vs. postfix 2.3 package?

ide if i should do an upgrade. Thanks. Dave.

chaining filters

has this combo working i'd like to hear about it. Thanks. Dave.

RE: Postfix DKIM

Hi, I'd recommend either dkimproxy if your using a proxy setup or amavisd-new if you've already got amavisd going that way might be easier. Hth Dave. -Original Message- From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Evan

postfix, amavisd-new, and dkim?

he options be: v="DKIM1"; h="sha256;sha1"; k=rsa; t=s; p=Base64Key; I'm hoping i'm getting these settings right. I generated the private key with openssl genrsa with a keysize of 1024 did i have to specify an algorithm? Thanks. Dave.

"spontaneous" re-appearance of .db (and source text!) files

ybody ever seen this before? I have googled it, but to no avail. Thanks, Dave This shows the files re-appearing, a log watch while attempting to deliver mail, and the build info for postmap. 1) * The db file AND text file exist and are removed $ ls -l sender_access2* -rw-r--r--1 root root

Re: "spontaneous" re-appearance of .db (and source text!) files

e not gotten to "tuning" yet. I am going for a very lean yet VERY secure implementation which can nevertheless handle gmail, etc. (Note: I am a C programmer, not an admin. This is all kind of foreign to me.) Thanks again! Dave > d...@powerstandards.com: >> Feb 14 08:47:1

Re: "spontaneous" re-appearance of .db (and source text!) files

Hi Wietse, This is a syslog snapshot of the situation a few seconds earlier: * postmap processes dying because of a missing file (remember, there is no mention of the db file in the current configuration) * other postmap processes creating/populating the db file "N" times, ergo the duplicate ent

"Configuring header/body checks... from outside users only" && main.cf

, or behaviour of, (postfix's) sendmail? Thanks, Dave Network settings: $ uname -a Linux P1234567 2.6.37_PQube_Bob+ #152 PREEMPT Thu Jan 16 14:47:05 PST 2014 armv5tejl GNU/Linux $ ip addr 1: lo: mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00

Address verification ONLY on startup (i.e., "pinging" external addresses)

TION_README and can't quite figure out what is even relevant to my problem, and know that that may not even be the best route for "pinging". What would be the most common way to do this? It's perfectly possible I'm missing something painfully obvious here. Note: a relay_host is usually involved. Thanks, Dave

Re: Address verification ONLY on startup (i.e., "pinging" external addresses)

Pfft! Of course! Thanks! D. > On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 02:00:36PM -0500, d...@powerstandards.com wrote: > >> What I'd like to do is check on a postfix start or reload that these few >> addresses are reachable *before* I do things like set up firewalls, >> etc., >> then stop sending out probes at

Re: Address verification ONLY on startup (i.e., "pinging" external addresses)

ble which is no different than for a good email address. I have tried setting: address_verify_relayhost= in the main.cf, but when I monitor the log after running the sendmail -bv command, I still see the mail being relayed through the relay server. Thanks again. Dave > Pfft! > > Of

mynetworks equivalent for sender address

sort of stuff?) A simple equivalent of mynetworks, but for a from address rather than an IP/network would be ideal. Thanks in advance for any suggestions. regards Dave

Re: mynetworks equivalent for sender address

Great, thanks. Do I need the "enabling DSASL authion postfix client section, or configure sender dependent SASL. And do I need to use relayhosts? thanks Dave On 30/08/2020 18:24, Nick wrote: On 2020-08-30 18:08 BST, dave wrote: So what I'm looking for is the easiest way of acce

Re: mynetworks equivalent for sender address

That would be great if it works. It may be easy to forge, but it can be harder to guess depending on what name I choose? But you both mention relay - is that in the loose sense of the word? I don't need to relay it do I? Just permit? thanks Dave On 30/08/2020 23:31, Jaroslaw Rafa

Re: mynetworks equivalent for sender address

(the one I'm using on this list) and it fails the sender address domain not found and FQDN tests. There is no relaying needed. thanks Dave On 31/08/2020 00:05, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: On Sun, Aug 30, 2020 at 11:54:19PM +0100, dave wrote: That would be great if it works. You mean that wou

Re: mynetworks equivalent for sender address

Thanks, SASL looks the best way. Still not sure why we're talking relaying... ;-) regards Dave On 31/08/2020 17:55, Bill Cole wrote: On 31 Aug 2020, at 4:51, dave wrote: Mail to my own domains is not permitted by default. This email from raspberry is sent to my own domain (the on

Re: mynetworks equivalent for sender address

Thanks Viktor, that looks good. regards Dave On 01/09/2020 08:38, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 09:51:42AM +0100, dave wrote: Maybe I need to clarify a few things. My email server is not in my home network. My raspberry is, and it gets random IPs as sometimes it has to go

postscreen_whitelist_interfaces behind proxy

sting disabled. Something like: postscreen_whitelist_interfaces = !:2525 static:all I realize it doesn't have much use without proxy and it is not usual setup.. But in my case, it would save me from configuring several IPs on several machines. So, just a suggestion. Thanks, Dave -- View this message in

Re: looking to pay for problem solving on minor Postfix issue

Thanks everyone. I found my expert. I appreciate the kind offers of assistance. Consider the opportunity filled now. On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 1:19 PM, MountainX wrote: > > If you are a Postfix expert, I am willing to pay for your help (via email, > chat, etc.) to resolve several minor problems

Name service error for name=localhost type=AAAA: Host not found

I've been searching on Google again. For example: http://www.google.com/search?num=100&q=%22Name+service+error+for+name%3Dlocalhost+type%3D%3A+Host+not+found%22&btnG=Search I am not finding any solution. Here is my error: Jan 28 19:18:23 ubuntu postfix/smtp[27317]: 13n20: to=, relay=none

Re: Aliases question - can I alias a user name to a name that is not a local user account?

On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 8:22 PM, Dave wrote: > With my setup, Postfix send an email from my local user account ("user") as > u...@example.com. Example.com is a Google apps domain. > I would like the email to go out as another name: anewn...@example.com. > (where "anew

Re: Aliases question - can I alias a user name to a name that is not a local user account?

On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 8:32 PM, Dave (DavesTechShop.net) < d...@davestechshop.net> wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 8:22 PM, Dave wrote: > >> With my setup, Postfix send an email from my local user account ("user") >> as u...@example.com. Example.com

Spam attacks

Hi all Is there anyway of stopping the from "j...@foo.com" to "j...@foo.com" spam attacks? Regards

FW: Spam attacks

Hi all Just to clarify some points They are running an IMAP server with SASL login for remote users Regards _ From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Pawel Lesniak Sent: 04 March 2009 10:32 AM To: postfix users list Sub

etc/postfix/sender_access_map and /etc/aliases

mail# cat /usr/local/etc/postfix/main.cf # ## Basic parameters # myhostname = mail.xx.xx.xx mydomain = xx.xx.xx mynetworks = 127.0.0.1 192.168.68.0/24 192.168.69.0/24 # ## Lookup # # we put our maps under a single directory map_directory = /etc/postfix/maps # handy variables

Re: etc/postfix/sender_access_map and /etc/aliases

-Original Message- From: Noel Jones Reply-To: postfix users list To: Dave Johnson , postfix users list Subject: Re: etc/postfix/sender_access_map and /etc/aliases Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 17:30:11 -0500 Dave Johnson wrote: > The problem I am having is as follows > > Alias >

Cleanup is slow for mail received by SMTP

ay via STMP and it's absence via pickup. postconf -n, master.cf, a log of cleanup -v for mail received by SMTP and the test attachment used are available from http://sigmasys.co.uk/postfix/ Kind regards, Dave Green /var/log/maillog Mar 21 20:06:52 imp postfix/smtpd[29129]: connect from

Re: Cleanup is slow for mail received by SMTP

e NAGLE delays > of a tenth of a second or so, and that adds up with large messages. Interesting, I was not aware of this. -- Dave Green

Re: Cleanup is slow for mail received by SMTP

s via pickup. As far as I can tell cleanup goes through the same process each time independent of how mail is presented to it. -- Dave Green

Re: Cleanup is slow for mail received by SMTP

submitted with large attachments and throughput for such mail is similar to the results I obtained using smtp-source. My sincerest of thanks for providing both a solution and information about OpenBSD semantics of which I was not aware. Kind regards, Dave Green

Re: Cleanup is slow for mail received by SMTP

> Is the MTU<->buffer-size mismatch in the SMTP client or the milter? An upgrade to clamav-milter is being carried out tonight during scheduled downtime so I will investigate at this time and post to the list accordingly. Dave Green

Postfix ignoring "", won't do fingerprint checking

stems running the same version of Postfix, so obviously I'm doing something wrong. Anyone know of a reason Postfix would ignore "smtpd_client_restrictions"? As this is the first time I've ever tried to post a Postfix question, please don't hesitate to let me know if there's a better way to pPost such a newb question ... Dave

Re: Postfix ignoring "", won't do fingerprint checking

11:01 AM, Noel Jones wrote: > On 5/10/2010 10:30 AM, Dave O'Larte wrote: > >> I'm trying to enable TLS client fingerprint checking on Postfix - that >> is, I want Postfix, acting as a server, to check the fingerprint of >> clients trying to connect against a table

Re: Postfix ignoring "", won't do fingerprint checking

On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 2:28 PM, Larry Stone wrote: > > Please don't top post in this group. Interleaving it is then. > > On Mon, 10 May 2010, Dave O'Larte wrote: > >> --main.cf non-default parameters-- >> smtpd_client_restrictions = permit_tls_clien

Re: Postfix ignoring "", won't do fingerprint checking

On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 3:31 PM, Noel Jones wrote: > On 5/10/2010 12:52 PM, Dave O'Larte wrote: >> >> Regarding using the right main.cf <http://main.cf>: >> I've only installed a single Postfix instance, and changes I make to >> main.cf <http://main.c

Load issues with Postfix on FreeBSD

n - - pipe # flags=FR user=list argv=/usr/lib/mailman/bin/postfix-to-mailman.py # ${nexthop} ${user} -- Dave Brodin Network Operations Manager Smithville Digital This message may contain information that is confidential. If you are not an intended recipient, use and

Re: Load issues with Postfix on FreeBSD

On 12/9/2010 3:21 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: Dave Brodin: We are an ISP and have Postfix running on FreeBSD. Currently, we are using postfix 2.4.10 on FreeBSD 4.7. Both are older versions because several years ago we tried to upgrade FreeBSD to 6.0 and had some bizarre results. We just tried

Re: Load issues with Postfix on FreeBSD

On 12/9/2010 4:55 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote: Wietse Venema put forth on 12/9/2010 2:52 PM: Dave Brodin: Thank you very much for the info. I'm really filling in because our main system administrator's last day is tomorrow, unfortunately. I guess it's 8.2-PRERELEASE (not sure ho

Re: Load issues with Postfix on FreeBSD

, so I am filling in. Unfortunately, I am not proficient with commands to analyze disk and memory performance. I ran iostat, but I'm not sure how to interpret the results. On 12/9/2010 3:39 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote: On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 02:59:56PM -0500, Dave Brodin wrote: Old s

Re: Load issues with Postfix on FreeBSD

make sure nothing in my current config is messing it up. I can see what my numbers look like then. Dave Brodin On 12/15/2010 5:43 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: Victor Duchovni: On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 01:37:48PM -0500, Dave Brodin wrote: I ran the following command: time /usr/local/bin/smtp-sourc

Re: Load issues with Postfix on FreeBSD

...@bluemarble.net -t dbro...@bluemarble.net localhost:25 500 real0m0.358s user0m0.063s sys 0m0.135s Can't wait to see how it handles under a real mail load once I can schedule the migration from the current server. Thanks again for all the help. Dave Brodin On 12/16/2010 10:46 AM, W

Re: Load issues with Postfix on FreeBSD

On 12/16/2010 3:00 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: Dave Brodin: [ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ] Many thanks to Scott Lambert for what I believe to be the solution to my load problem. It was nsswitch.conf which still had all its default settings when I began this troubleshooting. I

Updating SSL cert

direct me as to troubleshootong and then repairing this problem. TIA Dave

Re: Updating SSL cert

these are likely the files that are being read because the email address in these files are the email address of the person who was administering the server, Again, please bear with me as I am just working my way through the learning curve. Dave On 23/12/10 12:20 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote

Re: Updating SSL cert

Yes, that was my problem. I was confusing postfix with dovecot. It is now updated and functioning normally. Thanks for your help. Regards, Dave On 23/12/10 12:49 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote: > On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 12:43:44PM -0500, Dave Filchak wrote: > >> Well ... OK then: sor

Postfix relay to local MTA on different port or IP

age. Thanks for the help. Dave

IPv6 and smarter relaying

host which has both ipv4 and ipv6 addresses because I have relayhost set ? -- Dave Taht http://the-edge.blogspot.com

Re: IPv6 and smarter relaying

d...@teklibre.org (Dave Täht) writes: Half solved! > I have setup my laptop (as a test) to send out and respond to ipv6 mail, > and not listen on the ipv4 ports at all. I tunnel my laptop out to > have a static ipv6 address, and have mx records (for the teklibre.org > domain)

Re: rbl checks, best place + ipv6?

mouss writes: > Dave a écrit : >> Hello, >> I'm running postfix, amavisd-new and spamassassin. Currently in my >> postfix smtpd_recipient_restrictions right at the end last thing i have some >> rbl checks. I'm wondering if that's the best plac

Re: rbl checks, best place + ipv6?

Mark Martinec writes: > On Sunday August 23 2009 04:10:06 Dave Täht wrote: >> What I found after fighting with an exchange server that what seems to >> work best is assigning my first mx host to be ipv6 only, and my fallback >> to be a mx ipv6 and ipv4 host. > > My cho

ipv6 and smart(er) relaying

n the background, rather than via a cron job, is a good idea, and 2) I have to run my own mail servers anyway, so why not skip that step? And 3) It's kind of fun.) If anyone would like to dink with this little arm box, email me privately, I'll set you up an account. -- Dave Taht http://

Re: ipv6 and smart(er) relaying

wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema) writes: > Dave Taht: >> So what I think I want to do is setup fallback relaying as follows: >> >> MX 5 mylaptop.example.org # if my laptop's up send mail there >> MX 10 mytinyarmbox.example.org # if not, try my arm box

Re: ipv6 and smart(er) relaying

wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema) writes: > Dave T?ht: >> wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema) writes: >> >> > Dave Taht: >> >> So what I think I want to do is setup fallback relaying as follows: >> >> >> >> MX 5 mylaptop

Re: ipv6 and smart(er) relaying

wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema) writes: > Dave T?ht: >> wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema) writes: >> >> > Dave Taht: >> >> So what I think I want to do is setup fallback relaying as follows: >> >> >> >> MX 5 mylaptop

Re: ipv6 and smart(er) relaying

d...@teklibre.org (Dave Täht) writes: One unanswered question from this series of emails: >> Dave Taht: > > Would you take a patch that would let a crazed administrator disable > *sending* mail on different protocols? > > The simplest version would imp

Re: ipv6 and smart(er) relaying

Stan Hoeppner writes: > Dave Täht put forth on 10/6/2009 10:02 AM: >> d...@teklibre.org (Dave Täht) writes: >> >> One unanswered question from this series of emails: >> >>>> Dave Taht: >>> Would you take a patch that would let a crazed admin

Re: ipv6 and smart(er) relaying

wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema) writes: > Dave T?ht: >> d...@teklibre.org (Dave T?ht) writes: >> >> One unanswered question from this series of emails: >> >> >> Dave Taht: >> > >> > Would you take a patch that would let a craz

Re: ipv6 and smart(er) relaying

Stan Hoeppner writes: > Dave Täht put forth on 10/7/2009 2:40 PM: > >> I imagine you all were big fans of NETBUI and IPX/SPX too. > > That's a bit like comparing a German Shepherd and a Poodle to a Pig and > a Giraffe. IPv4/IPv6 share the same architecture (same sp

Re: ipv6 and smart(er) relaying

wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema) writes: > Stan Hoeppner: >> Dave T?ht put forth on 10/7/2009 2:40 PM: >> >> > I imagine you all were big fans of NETBUI and IPX/SPX too. >> >> That's a bit like comparing a German Shepherd and a Poodle to a Pig an

Cant send mail

Hi all I have set up a new box, but are having problems sending mail. Any help would be appreciated I have posted all the code to: http://pastebin.com/m9d7f56d Regards

Transport to multiple destinations

erver when the primary is down. I need this same functionality in postfix so I can provide a backupmx or mailbag if the primary link or mailserver goes down. Thanks, Dave

Re: Transport to multiple destinations

On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 6:29 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: > Dave Jones: >> I am converting some sendmail boxes to postfix and can't find any >> information about multiple destinations (preferably primary / >> secondary). > > If it is not documented, then it is not imp

  1   2   >