mail.log
LOGABSTRACT="all"
VERBOSE="on"
DEFAULT=~/Mail/inbox
#DEFAULT=/var/mail/fetchmail
PMDIR=$HOME=~/.procmail
#INCLUDERC=$PMDIR/spam.rc
I don't want to rewrite headers through formail or procmail. This is a home
setup, and fetchmail must just go get the mail and pass it to procmail.
Thank you in advance
Danny
superflous? No it is not, it is
the easiest way to send a first time poster on his way. It is obviuos that you
have better things to discuss on this mailing than answer simple questions. Why
don't
you make this list an exclusive club for the initiated and seasoned postfix user
only?
Thank You
ause POSTFIX, not exim, not sendmail but
POSTFIX is involved. POSTFIX calls fetchamail in the postfix main.cf
via the mailbox_command. SO DO NOT TELL ME THAT I AM ON THE WRONG FREAKIN
MAILING LIST.
Thank You
Danny
> You need to show logfile evidence that Postfix is actually part of
> your problem. I hope that is not too much to be asked.
>
> Wietse
And you do not inspire much confidence in the IT industry if you think your
answer was helpfull. My personal advice to you ... get away from your screen
every now and then ... there is a real life if you just open your front door.
>On Apr 23 10, /dev/rob0 :
>
> PS: Danny does not ins
tp://username@10.0.0.5:25"
set smtp_pass="password"
set ssl_starttls=no
#####
Any pointers?
Thank you
Danny
rd to bind9.
My local mail server is fever.havannah.local. How would I go about doing that
properly?
Bind9 is working properly as is all the other required stuff.
Thank You
Danny
> An MX record is needed ONLY if there are other mail servers on the
> local network.
>
> For a single server, simply listing the domain in main.cf:
> mydestination is sufficient.
>
> -- Noel Jones
Thank You
> google this keywords "dns split view bind9"
Phew ... a little too advanced for me ... ;) ... thank you for the link
Danny
t is not a train smash, just curious.
Thank You
Danny
Thanks guys, I used the php.ini suggestion but am in the process of integrating
phpmailer.
Thanks again for your time
Danny
New install on FreeBSD 7.2, from cd /usr/ports/mail/postfix && make install
clean. I have Google'd the error but haven't found anything. What else
should I provide?
checking whether -fkeep-inline-functions is supported... yes
updating cache ./config.cache
creating ./config.status
creating Makefile
On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 8:51 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Danny Edge:
> > Stop in /usr/ports/lang/gcc42.
> > *** Error code 1
>
> You have a problem bulding GCC. You are about 100 miles away
> from building Postfix.
>
>Wietse
>
I will try my best to
all
help is much appreciated, i have been searching all over for an answer.
Thanks Danny
Yup that fixed it, thanks alot. I am quite new with unix systems, and mail,
so i would never had thought of that, thanks man.
Danny
2008/7/29 Sahil Tandon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Danny Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hello.
> >
> > Im having some probl
2008/7/29 Sahil Tandon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Danny Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hello.
> >
> > Im having some problem sending mail, i can receive mails but not send.
> >
> > The system is FreeBSD 6.3, im trying to make a mail server
The tech contact for the domain is listed as gdm...@gmail.com
Might be worth dropping them an email
On 29/09/2015 9:43 pm, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> https://dmarcian.com/spf-survey/ietf.org
>
> fail is p6 should be ip6
>
> help me to solve it
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
My first thought is that is anything actually running on port 8893?
On 04/12/2015 10:19 am, Robert Chalmers wrote:
> I have opendmarc configured in postfix main.cf
>
> ###
> # dkim & dmarc
> smtpd_milters = inet:127.0.0.1:8891, inet:127.0.0.1:8893
> non_smtpd_milters =
Nothing at all, as long as you take the time to learn how to configure
it properly, all your stats seem to show is that many admins are too
lazy (or not capable) of doing this. That being the case, I suggest you
use a third party mail provider or learn how to configure Postfix
On 29/12/2015 12:01
Hi all,
I am getting the following error on just one email address from
policyd-spf, called from Postfix. No other email address has caused me
problems (as far as I'm aware) and I had to completely disable
policyd-spf in Postfix to allow the email through. Can anyone decipher
what the problem wa
help
On 04/02/2016 9:34 pm, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Thursday, February 04, 2016 04:19:54 PM Bill Cole wrote:
>> On 4 Feb 2016, at 15:52, Danny Horne wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I am getting the following error on just one email address from
>>> polic
I've decided to stop using SPF checking until I've got the later version
of python-ipaddr (or whatever it was called)
On 05/02/2016 2:49 pm, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Friday, February 05, 2016 11:09:03 AM L.P.H. van Belle wrote:
>> Switch to the perl version of this and your problem is fixed.
>>
What are you trying to achieve? There's plenty of experts here (not me
I hasten to add!!)
On 15/02/2016 8:52 pm, Roman Doe wrote:
> I'm struggling finding a postfix expert, any contact to suggest?
>
> Thank you very much.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 22/02/2016 7:57 pm, Curtis Maurand wrote:
>
> The problem was in the /etc/nsswitch.conf.
>
> I changed the line
>
> hosts: files dns
>
> to
>
> hosts:dns files
>
> and that solved the trouble.
Interesting, I got the IP result Viktor got, but have the same
nsswitch.conf setting as
Because you installed for source rather than through Yum, you haven't
got the System V init scripts. If you try to install these via Yum
it'll want to install Postfix as well, to avoid that run -
|rpm -Uvh --nodeps $(repoquery --location postfix-sysvinit)|
Then you'll be able to run -
systemctl
This command should just read
rpm -Uvh --nodeps $(repoquery --location postfix-sysvinit)
On 24/02/2016 5:48 pm, Danny Horne wrote:
> rpm -Uvh --nodeps $(repoquery --location postfix-sysvinit)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Can anyone follow up on this? In other words, are any of you using
Let's Encrypt certificates with any of the TLSA options written about?
I'm considering moving to LE but would like some feedback (last post on
this thread was four months ago so early adopters should have
experienced a renewal by
On 19/04/2016 3:51 pm, Philip McGaw wrote:
> See my attempt.
>
> https://skippy.org.uk/lets-encrypt-postfix-and-dovecot/
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>
Are you using TLSA records though? That was what I really wanted
feedback on
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 19/04/2016 4:19 pm, Dirk Stöcker wrote:
> In case you do not know:
>
> There are two other options for free domain verified certificates:
>
> https://www.startssl.com/ - per cert: 1 domain, 1 year
> https://buy.wosign.com/free/?lan=en - per cert: up to 5 domains, 1-3
> years
>
> Ciao
Thanks f
On 26/04/2016 7:10 am, Julian Kippels wrote:
> Hi, we are using OTRS for this. Julian
+1 for OTRS
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi all,
Can someone point me to an easy to understand tutorial on reconfiguring
Postfix from serving a single domain to serving virtual domains? Here's
my setup -
Postfix 3.1.1
Uses Unix system accounts
Dovecot IMAP server
TLS / DKIM / DMARC used
Probably other stuff I've forgotten, if you need
On 01/08/2016 3:01 pm, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 01, 2016 at 12:31:33PM +0100, Danny Horne wrote:
>> Can someone point me to an easy to understand tutorial on
>> reconfiguring Postfix from serving a single domain to serving
>> virtual domains? Here's my setup
Hi all,
It's just been made aware to me that my Postfix (version 3.1.2) is
having problems with IPv6. Here's the sort of thing I see in the logs,
note it gives no indication it's an IPv6 problem
Sep 7 16:12:59 turing postfix/smtpd[12487]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
mail-lf0-x22c.google.com[2a00
Thanks for the reply, I found the following site which showed me I was
seriously lacking in my IPv6 config. I think I've got it fixed now
(email from GMail came through on an IPv6 address)
http://www.postfix.org/IPV6_README.html
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 08/09/2016 9:45 pm, Allen Coates wrote:
> I would be interested to know the measures other people use.
Maybe I've just been lucky with spam, but I just use greylisting, my
thought being that most spam will be sent from scripts rather than a
well configured mail server, and these scripts won't c
> Apr 16 17:18:46 dante opendkim[17056]: (unknown-jobid): not authenticated
>
> Apr 16 17:18:46 dante opendkim[17056]: 9AB782118043: no signature data
>
> Apr 16 17:18:46 dante postfix/qmgr[17770]: 9AB782118043:
> from=, size=19094, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
>
> Apr 16 17:18:46 dante postfix/smtpd[
On 17/04/2015 1:02 pm, Krzs wrote:
> :~$ telnet smtp.myFQDN 25
> Trying 1.2.3.4 ...
> Connected to myFQDN.
> Escape character is '^]'.
> 220 smtp.myFQDN ESMTP Postfix
> ehlo smtp.myFQDN
> 250-smtp.myFQDN
> 250-PIPELINING
> 250-SIZE 1024
> 250-ETRN
> 250-STARTTLS
> 250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES
> 25
On 18/04/2015 2:08 pm, Krzs wrote:
> SMTPD does starttls
>
>> 220 2.0.0 Ready to start TLS
'Ready to start TLS' isn't the same as a running TLS connection, you've
shown no evidence of the key negotiation (if that's what it's called)
required to create the encrypted connection, and I don't belie
I think this is what I used...a fair bit of scrolling to get to relevant
information but I hope it helps
https://ripe68.ripe.net/presentations/253-DANEs_don%27t_lie-20140512.pdf
On 02/06/2015 9:35 am, Per Thorsheim wrote:
> Cannot find a simple process guide for configuring DANE TLSA support &
>
Hi all,
Can anyone decipher this? If by 'recipient address' they mean mine, I
receive email from many different sources on that address all the time,
so don't know what this entry is telling me.
Jan 25 19:06:59 turing postfix/smtpd[7772]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
mx-out-04c.sjc1.discourse.org[
On 25/01/2017 7:31 pm, Dominic Raferd wrote:
> The key text must be 'Server configuration problem'. I think you
> should look at earlier lines in your log which might tell you what
> your configuration problem is. See
> http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html. I note that the incoming
> mail was v
Hi all,
Apologies if this has been discussed before, but currently I use
self-signed certificates on my Postfix servers for TLS negotiation, I'm
doing this mainly to keep the costs down. As far as I'm aware I don't
have any problems sending / receiving email to / from the major
providers, but cou
On 21/01/2018 8:47 pm, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>> I see wildcard SSL certificates are coming down in price, I use
>> SSL on one or two websites and am starting to consider one of these
>> to cover everything I do. Am I right in assuming a standard wildcard
>> SSL certificate will be usable on both
On 21/01/2018 9:35 pm, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>
> Indeed stick with what you've got. You could (if not intimidated by the
> logistics, but we may have more tools for you in this space soonish) also
> implement a private CA that signs your no-longer self-signed server cert.
> This makes it possible
On 22/01/2018 3:52 pm, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>
>> On Jan 22, 2018, at 10:06 AM, Danny Horne wrote:
>>
>> Private CA sounds interesting, will have to read up about it
> You can get away with a lot less complexity than the usual OpenSSL CA.
> See, f
Hi all,
I've read what Postfix documentation I can find on the subject, and I
don't understand why I'm seeing untrusted connections rather than
trusted. I'm using an account at mailbox.org for testing purposes, they
use DNSSEC / DANE for there server (as do I), and I see a verified
connection whe
Thanks for the reply,
I didn't think achieving an inbound trusted TLS connection required
DANE, merely a trusted certificate (which was verifiable through my
trusted CA file.
Maybe I misunderstood the documentation
On 31/01/2018 9:12 pm, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 03:31:08PM -0500, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>> Is "SwissSign Silver CA - G2" included in your "ca bundle"?
> Also, is this server known to provide a client cert?
>
> Bastian
>
Not sure about 'provide', but the following shows it doe
On 31/01/2018 8:31 pm, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> You report settings of:
> smtpd_tls_CApath = /etc/pki/ca-trust/extracted/openssl/ca-bundle.trust.crt
> smtpd_tls_ask_ccert = yes
> smtpd_tls_ccert_verifydepth = 2
>
> Surely "ca-bundle.trust.crt" is a file not a directory. This would work as
>
Ok, didn't fully understand some of what you've said, so I'll just post
what I see (no hexadecimal symlinks found). I've changed
smtpd_tls_CApath to /etc/pki/ca-trust/extracted/pem but that hasn't made
any difference
[root@indium tls]# openssl version -d
OPENSSLDIR: "/etc/pki/tls"
[root@indium tl
On 01/02/2018 4:56 pm, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> A simpler way to achieve the same goal would have been:
> http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#tls_append_default_CA
>
> tls_append_default_CA = yes
>
> bearing in mind the caution in the documentation, when enabling the
> panoply of Web
On 01/02/2018 5:10 pm, Danny Horne wrote:
> Ok, adding tls_append_default_CA = yes has finally given me trusted TLS
> connections, but I do wonder if it was worth it in the end!!
>
> I am not using permit_tls_all_clientcerts
>
I forgot to add, thank you all for your help, though it
On 01/02/2018 5:59 pm, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> This both loads the default CAfile and sets up the default CApath, so
> we don't yet know whether your CApath directory is fully prepared or
> not... So now you could try reverting to:
>
> tls_append_default_CA = no
> smtpd_tls_CApath = /
On 01/02/2018 6:40 pm, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>
>> On Feb 1, 2018, at 1:26 PM, Danny Horne wrote:
>>
>> I might have a go at that later (can't find
>> c_rehash anywhere but do have csplit available)
> https://www.openssl.org/docs/man1.1.0/apps/openssl-reha
On 15/05/18 19:34, for...@mehl-family.fr wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> When I send a mail with roundcube from my computer I find this message
> on my maillog :
>
> /*May 15 20:16:51 MYSERVER postfix/smtpd[29843]: connect from
> unknown[192.168.1.1]*/
>
>
I think all that means is Postfix can't resolve the IP
On 24/01/18 16:37, Dirk Stöcker wrote:
> It's not sooo complicated:
>
> Short guide for UNIXoid systems:
>
After a long gap (and a recent server rebuild), I've revisited this and
after a few false starts think I've created the CA and server
certificates correctly using Dirk's instructions. On impl
Hi,
After using local filters (on Thunderbird) for a long time I'm trying to
get Dovecot / Sieve filtering working. I think I'm almost there but
can't get Postfix to allow Dovecot to do the final delivery, which is (I
believe) the only thing stopping things working.
Here's my postconf -n output,
On 26/07/18 10:56, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Danny Horne:
>> Hi,
>>
>> After using local filters (on Thunderbird) for a long time I'm trying to
>> get Dovecot / Sieve filtering working.? I think I'm almost there but
>> can't get Postfix to all
On 26/07/18 10:56, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Danny Horne:
>> Hi,
>>
>> After using local filters (on Thunderbird) for a long time I'm trying to
>> get Dovecot / Sieve filtering working.? I think I'm almost there but
>> can't get Postfix to all
Hi all,
I'm trying out Postscreen after having used Postgrey for some time. The
reason for the switch is that Postgrey can cause emails from Google etc.
to take a long time to come through due to the large number of IP
addresses they use (and I don't want to whitelist the GMail addresses).
Here'
On 14/08/18 10:36, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>
> so, what is the problem?
>
None as far as I'm aware, but this is my first time using Postscreen, so
wanted to check that I hadn't messed anything up
60 matches
Mail list logo
