SMTP scanning server pool

2014-12-17 Thread Daniel Hopkirk
Hi All, I'm in need of a little help... I've got the basic idea of what I'm trying to achieve but am stuck with a few things not knowing the right wording to be asking uncle google to find examples etc, so I'm hoping that someone can help with some pointers in the right direction. I don't expec

Re: SMTP scanning server pool

2015-02-17 Thread Daniel Hopkirk - RandomInsanity
Hi Guys, Thanks Wietse for your comments, you confirmed what I assumed but couldn't afford to assume! And thanks for your thoughts Bennett. I'm happy to say that the key points you mentioned are ones we have already given thought as part of our general planning. I've been progressing following y

Re: SMTP scanning server pool

2015-02-17 Thread Daniel Hopkirk - RandomInsanity
ect_code. Are you able to explain a little more what the tempfail in that probe is so I can better interpret the logs as my reading of it would be a successful probe returning a reject result? Cheers, Daniel On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 3:07 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: > Daniel Hopkirk - RandomInsan

Re: SMTP scanning server pool

2015-02-17 Thread Daniel Hopkirk - RandomInsanity
n accepted at some point in my configuration tweaks, and based on the docs referencing its optimistic caching it may have been operating on that previous accept? Does this sound like a valid interpretation? Cheers, Daniel On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 11:28 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: > D

Re: SMTP scanning server pool

2015-02-17 Thread Daniel Hopkirk - RandomInsanity
Then I'm at a loss... Perhaps I missed a reload at a strange point or something. I shall keep an eye on it and follow up if there are any changes. Thank you very much for your assistance!! Cheers, Daniel On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 2:35 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: > Daniel Hopkirk - Random