On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 08:19:07AM +0100, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
> * Jeff Huang :
> > OK,Thanks.
> >
> > I'll try cyrus imap.
> >
> > Now I use Courier-imap as my imap/pop3 server.
>
> Try dovecot IMAP. It indexes maildir and fixes the index automatically. Cyrus
> IMAP doesn't ...
Cyrus do
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 06:55:14AM -0600, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 11/18/2010 3:12 AM, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> >Hi All,
> >
> >I've been having issues where emails are being rejected by Cyrus because the
> >"From" address contains an underscore in the domain name.
> >
> ...
> >
> >PS. I have contacted
On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 02:00:49PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Michael Durket:
> > Thanks to all who replied. I'll be trying out the various ideas. But
> > they all
> > seem awkward. In my MVS days, when we wrote large scale systems
> > like this, we'd keep important statistics in the link pack
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 01:58:22PM +0200, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote:
> I think you should never write to Cyrus mailspool without using the
> Cyrus Tools??
Absolutely. You don't want to deliver it directly, you want to deliver
it to cyrus' lmtpd process, or piping it to the cyrus "deliver" tool.
On Sat, Oct 08, 2011 at 06:17:19AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Stan Hoeppner:
> > nicely. On the other hand, you won't see an EXTx filesystem capable of
> > anywhere close to 10GB/s or greater file IO. Here XFS doesn't break a
> > sweat.
>
> I recall that XFS was optimized for fast read/write
On Sun, Oct 09, 2011 at 03:56:39AM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> On 10/8/2011 3:33 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > That's a lot of text. How about some hard numbers?
>
> Maybe not the perfect example, but here's one such high concurrency
> synthetic mail server workload comparison showing XFS with a
On Sun, Oct 09, 2011 at 02:31:19PM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> On 10/9/2011 8:36 AM, Bron Gondwana wrote:
> > How many people are running their mail servers on 24-32 SAS spindles
> > verses those running them on two spindles in RAID1?
>
> These results are for a maildir ty
On Sun, Oct 09, 2011 at 03:24:44PM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> That said, there are plenty of mailbox
> servers in the wild that would benefit from the XFS + linear concat
> setup. It doesn't require an insane drive count, such as the 136 in the
> test system above, to demonstrate the gains, esp
On Sun, Oct 09, 2011 at 04:42:25PM -0400, vg_ us wrote:
> From: "Bron Gondwana"
> >I'm honestly more interested in maildir type workload too, spool doesn't
> >get enough traffic usually to care about IO.
>
> will postmark transaction test do? here -
On Sun, Oct 09, 2011 at 04:42:25PM -0400, vg_ us wrote:
> will postmark transaction test do? here -
> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=linux_2639_fs&num=1
Oh:
http://blog.goolamabbas.org/2007/06/17/postmark-is-not-a-mail-server-benchmark/
"Thus it pains me a lot that they ar
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 01:33:31AM +0300, karave...@mail.bg wrote:
> Nice setup. And thanks for your work on Cyrus. We are
> looking also to move the metadata on SSDs but we have not
> found yet cost effective devices - we need at least a pair of
> 250G disk for 20-30T spool on a server.
You ca
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 01:49:44AM +0300, karave...@mail.bg wrote:
> I do not trust Postmark - it models mbox appending and skips
> fsync-s. So it is too different from our setup. The best benchmark
> tool I have found is imaptest (from dovecot fame) - it is actually
> end to end benchmarking, in
On Sun, Oct 09, 2011 at 06:03:36PM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> On 10/9/2011 3:29 PM, Bron Gondwana wrote:
>
> > I'm honestly more interested in maildir type workload too, spool doesn't
> > get enough traffic usually to care about IO.
> >
> > (sorry, gett
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 07:05:16PM -0600, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> On 1/26/2012 2:54 PM, Matteo Cazzador wrote:
> > Hello, i'va a particular question about mail server.
> > Suppose a customer have more than one locations
> > in different geographic sites, each one with a mail server with the same
> >
of this work is worth the effort unless email is a major part
of your organisation's purpose, otherwise you should probably
concentrate on things that actually make you money )
--
Bron Gondwana
br...@fastmail.fm
On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 12:02:45PM +0530, Ram wrote:
> I was wondering if others on this list are also facing this , gmail
> breaking off some connections
>
> All my postfix mailq is increasing because gmail , sporadically ,
> times out some connections.
>
> Jun 1 07:40:37 mmail14 postfix/smtp[1
ges are slightly harder to change, but still not impossible if
they want to play that game.
Bron.
--
Bron Gondwana
br...@fastmail.fm
the next month or so.
Regards,
Bron.
(anyway, aren't more companies just outsourcing entirely these days?)
--
Bron Gondwana
br...@fastmail.fm
s problem?
Don't send directly from your amazon host, use a smarthost:
http://docs.aws.amazon.com/ses/latest/DeveloperGuide/send-email-smtp.html
Cheers,
Bron.
--
Bron Gondwana br...@fastmail.fm
19 matches
Mail list logo
