others send to me.
How do I make LOCAL mails work?
Attached is output from postconf -n
Alexander
postconf-n.rtf
Description: MS-Word document
09 5:42 PM
Subject: Re: Local Mails not working
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 02:48:35PM +0100, Alexander wrote:
>> How do I make LOCAL mails work?
>>
>> Attached is output from postconf -n
>
> Here I would ask that you spend some time on learning basic computer
> and em
with respect and not by making abusive
comments.
Anyway, thank you all, I have solved the problem. I blame myself for not
taking more time to check before sending that Mail.
Alexander
- Original Message -
From: "Stan Hoeppner"
To:
Sent: Friday, December 11, 2009 12:08
Hello,
My goal is to conditionally select the relayhost based on the total size
of the outgoing message. The rationale is that I'm using Amazon AWS SES
for the most part. Alas, SES only accepts messages up to 10 MB in size
(this includes images and attachments that are part of the message), an
Patrick wrote:
/etc/postfix/main.cf:
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
permit_mynetworks
reject_authenticated_sender_login_mismatch
permit_sasl_authenticated
reject_unauth_destination
(etc)
smtpd_sender_login_maps = mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql_sender_login_maps
Darren Pilgrim wrote:
Alexander Hoogerhuis wrote:
Sorry for digging up an old thread, but unless I'm mistaken this will
deal with the case where the user sends email outbound with the MAIL
FROM equal to the SASL login username, but if someone sets their MAIL
FROM to be one of the v
Is there any way to configure out of office auto reply setting from the
Server End using Maildir?
Alexander
Thanks but this does not work
-Original Message-
From: eero.t.voloti...@gmail.com [mailto:eero.t.voloti...@gmail.com] On
Behalf Of Eero Volotinen
Sent: Saturday, May 01, 2010 7:54 AM
To: Alexander Erameh
Subject: Re: Out of Office auto reply setting
2010/5/1 Alexander Erameh :
> Is th
Is there any reason why Postfix doesn't read .forward files set up in users
Mail folders, even after modifying main.cf to include the forward_path
option.
Do I have to disable /etc/postfix/virtual which was hitherto handling
forwarding?
Alexander
* Alexander Erameh :
> Is there any reason why Postfix doesn't read .forward files set up in users
> Mail folders, even after modifying main.cf to include the forward_path
> option.
Yes. If postfix/local is not involved, the files will be ignored.
> Do I have to disable /et
On 05/05/2010 04:19 PM, Alexander Erameh wrote:
> * Alexander Erameh:
>
>> Is there any reason why Postfix doesn't read .forward files set up in users
>> Mail folders, even after modifying main.cf to include the forward_path
>> option.
>>
> Yes.
I have set the local delivery agent to local(8) and set the forward_path in
main.cf to /var/forward/$user/.forward, but my .forward files are still not
being processed. Is/are there any other thing I need to do?
Alexander
yandex servers
--
Alexander Moisseev
ts-dump.cap
Description: Binary data
ya-dump.cap
Description: Binary data
Did you try... oh, I dunno, *asking* yandex ?
They have logs that can tell you what happens; you don't.
Yes, I did.
ya-dump.cap was captured by yandex support. They told to me that have "conversation
with mx.tehstroi.ru[81.25.172.91] timed out while sending message body" errors. Also
they supp
mouss wrote:
if you are talking about your own mail (not customer mail), then
differentiate between outbound (submitted) mail and inbound mail. for
example, use port 587 for outbound mail (ideally enforce SASL/TLS here).
Then for such mail, simply remove all received headers:
/^Received:/IGNO
tions=
-o mynetworks=127.0.0.0/8
-o receive_override_options=no_unknown_recipient_checks
--
Thanks in advance,
Alexander Moisseev
Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 12/28/10 7:58 AM, Alexander Moisseev wrote:
m...@domain.tld has an alias al...@domain.tld and mail sent to alias.
X-Original-To: al...@domain.tld prepends to the message. It's OK.
If the before-queue content filter enabled as shown below then
X-Original-To:
I've just sent a long time looking at a problem a user alterted me to.
There was an issue receiving emails from a sepcific sender, and it was
clear that is was somehow blocked by SBL:
NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from unknown[1.2.3.4]: 554 5.7.1 : Sender address
rejected: http://www.spamhaus.org/SBL
On 14.10.2009 19:20, Michael Tokarev wrote:
Alexander Hoogerhuis wrote:
I've just sent a long time looking at a problem a user alterted me to.
There was an issue receiving emails from a sepcific sender, and it was
clear that is was somehow blocked by SBL:
NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from un
best regards,
Alexander
> The right forum is a SuSE support forum.
Ok, I will go there.
Your server needs to
be patched if either:
- remote sites verify your certificate when sending email over TLS.
This is the case on my server.
Thanks for the answer anyway :-)
Best regards,
Alexander
ot;
Fine. Have a nice weekend.
Alexander
Hi,
just for info, it has been fixed on saturday.
postconf | grep mail_ver
mail_version = 2.5.6
rpm -qa | grep postfix
postfix-2.5.6-5.6.1
Nessus scan is fine.
Best regards,
Alexander
(1) 699
33 99-0 oder via Email an .
mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Alexander J. Trentini
ITdesign
Software Projects & Consulting GmbH
Anton Freunschlag-Gasse 49, A-1230 Wien
Tel.: +43 (1) 699 33 99-58, Fax: DW -33
Mobil +43 (664) 811 49 82
mailto:alexander.trent...@itdesign.at
http://www.itdesig
Hello, I'm using:
# cat /etc/*release
CentOS release 6.3 (Final)
# rpm -qa | grep post
postfix-2.6.6-2.2.el6_1.x86_64
on 2 servers: preferans.de and (yes, funny name)
static.103.78.9.176.clients.your-server.de
I own several domains and would like all
incoming mails addressing those domains
to b
Thanks for replying -
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 1:55 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Alexander Farber:
>> And have opened port 25 in the firewall:
>>
>> But now when I send a mail to s...@videoskat.de
>> there is nothing to see in postfix logs:
>
> Nothing happens
Hello -
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> so the domain "videoskat.de" is not listed in your postfix config
>
> mydestination
> local_recipient_maps
>
> did you read any documentation or are you starting blindly
> from the centos-defaults and try to figure all knowledge
> ou
Hello -
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 3:05 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> http://www.postfix.org/BASIC_CONFIGURATION_README.html
with CentOS 6 I've ended up adding
inet_interfaces = all
virtual_alias_domains = videoskat.de balkan-preferans.de
to /etc/postfix/main.cf and
@balkan-preferans.de
Hello Wietse -
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 2:43 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Alexander Farber:
> HOWEVER, there is one problem that you need to be aware of. If your
> machine forwards SPAM to gmail, then gmail will decide that your
> server is a spammer. Gmail may then file "goo
On 10.10.2013, at 14:55, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
> <***@gmail.com>: host gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com[2a00:1450:4001:c02::1a]
>said: 550-5.7.1 [2a01:4f8:d16:4114:feed:1bad:beef:dead 1] Our
> system
>has 550-5.7.1 detected an unusual rate of unsolicited mail
> originating from
>you
Hello,
I run a Drupal 7 website on a CentOS 6.4 server
with postfix-2.6.6-2.2.el6_1.x86_64.
In the last few months the amount of fake users trying to register at my
website has increased dramatically - I get 2 or 3 of such registrations per
minute.
Mostly they have fake mail adresses with many d
Should I use smtp_header_checks here?
I have also asked the question at
http://serverfault.com/questions/556723/silently-drop-outgoing-mails-to-us-er-n-a-megmail-com-more-than-3-dots-in-user
(And I apologize for my mail being not in plain text -
I use Gmail and they have changed their interface a
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 10:45 AM, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
>
> problems needs to be solved on the root cause not worked around somewhere
> else
>
No, at the moment I am looking for the Postfix workaround.
I'd like my postfix to drop OUTGOING mail silently if addressed to
us.er.n.a...@gmail.com
I think I'd like to use
smtp_header_checks with DISCARD action
- but http://postfix.org/header_checks.5.html says such a combination is
not supported?
Hello, I know regexes well - but can't figure out, where to applly them in
Postfix, since smtp_header_checks with DISCARD action seems not to be
supported with OUTGOING mail?
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 11:22 AM, Robert Schetterer wrote:
>
>
> Am 22.11.2013 10:48, schrieb Al
Thanks, I agree with all general advices...
But for now I just want to stop the flood
(and also Drupal is difficult to modify for me +
I don't want to add CAPTCHA to my
already overloaded reg. form, etc., etc.).
So the following seems to work for me for now -
/etc/postfix/header_checks:
/^To: \S
I admin this website for 3 years already and
despite it being just a small obscure card game -
there haven't been a month without a challenge,
where I had to go and change something manually.
This postfix workaround is pretty perfect for now,
I enjoy looking at maillog right now and see the
Nov 2
Yes, Reindl, thanks again for all these _obvious_ advices,
while I was just asking a specific Postfix-related one.
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 1:03 PM, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
> my last post in this thread because we are going off-topic
>
> discard messages on a MTA is the *last resort* if nothing
I've spent last 2 hours with Drupal CAPTCHA module -
the default image and math captchas didn't stop
any spam user at all - I could see fake users
still registering - every few seconds (scary!).
I have uploaded a russian font then and configured
the CAPTCHA to use russian letters only
(since my si
Yes, ok - it's my fault.
Next time I will ask a Postfix question here,
I shouldn't forget to add a disclaimer
"and please no CMS or web admin advice needed" ;-)
Hello Peter and others,
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 1:38 AM, Peter wrote:
> On 11/23/2013 12:38 AM, Alexander Farber wrote:
> > /etc/postfix/header_checks:
> > /^To: \S+\.\S+\.\S+\.\s...@gmail.com <mailto:s...@gmail.com>$/i DISCARD
> >
> > /etc/postfix/main.cf &l
Does this doc really apply to my situation?
(I'd like to discard some of the mails sent out by my CMS)
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 11:42 AM, tejas sarade wrote:
>
> http://www.postfix.org/SMTPD_ACCESS_README.html
>
Regards
Alex
/virtual
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 3:16 PM, tejas sarade wrote:
> I would like to know current recipient restrictions. What is the output of
> following command.
>
> grep smtpd_recipient_restrictions /etc/postfix/main.cf
>
>
>
> On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 4:43 PM, Alexander
postconf |grep smtpd_recipient_restrictions
smtpd_recipient_restrictions = permit_mynetworks, reject_unauth_destination
I see, thanks to you both!
The #danger doc not probably doesn't apply here, but still good to know.
scores it does.
So basically, untill the site can relfect the real world, it seem to be
of limited use.
mvh,
A
--
Alexander Hoogerhuis | http://no.linkedin.com/in/alexh
Boxed Solutions AS | +47 908 21 485 - al...@boxed.no
"Given enough eyeballs, all bugs are shallow." -Eric S. Raymond
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 1:44 AM, Bill Cole <
postfixlists-070...@billmail.scconsult.com> wrote:
> On 11 Aug 2014, at 10:22, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
>
>> http://serverfault.com/questions/619537/use-postfix-
>> and-spamassassin-packages-on-centos-6-to-reject-spam-without-custo
>>
>
> Also worth noti
Hello again,
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 9:34 AM, Alexander Farber <
alexander.far...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 11 Aug 2014, at 10:22, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
>>
>>> http://serverfault.com/questions/619537/use-postfix-
>>> and-spamassassin-packages-on-centos-6-to-rej
On Wed, 1 Oct 2008, Ujjval K wrote:
Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 14:51:49 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ujjval K <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Wietse Venema <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: postfix users list
Subject: Re: New Postfix install
Thx I was able to change MTAs to point to postfix...
However , here is teh next error
://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html or
somewhere else.
Regards,
Alexander
have not found an answer, yet.
Regards,
Alexander
bviously, there may be dependencies you need to meet. There are also
SRC rpms available.
Tracy,
thanks for this hint. Are these only for openSuSE 11.1 ? I will need
SuSE Linux Enterprise 10 SP2.
Regards,
Alexander
Munich, Germany
erver:/mail/SLE_10/x86_64/
This one has a postfix24-2.4.5-1.1.x86_64.rpm from 2007 which seems to
be quite old and unsecure.
Alexander
On 29-12-2021 11:13, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
- With smtpd_delay_reject=no, Postfix will log a DNSBL 'reject' in
smtpd_client_restrictions without any sender or recipient information.
That makes it difficult to answer questions about "missing" email.
And when SASL is used with delays
Hey folks,
for inexplicable reasons i don't get any results from zen.spamhaus.org anymore:
Apr 08 16:20:29 [postfix/dnsblog] warning: dnsblog_query: lookup error
for DNS query x.x.x.x.zen.spamhaus.org: Host or domain name not found.
Name service error for name=x.x.x.x.zen.spamhaus.org type=A: Hos
> A possible cause is that you are not using your own DNS resolver but
> instead relying on a third party (such as your ISP), and their
> resolver has been blocked by Spamhaus for over-usage. In which case
> you need to set up your own DNS resolver (e.g. bind) and use this
> instead, ensuring it do
nd expected but most fail due to
this error and I haven't been able to identify a pattern.
A survey of the mailing list suggests the problem as experienced by
another user may have been related to tlsproxy but I have
smtp_tls_connection_reuse set to no.
Thanks and regards,
Alexander Vasarab
SSL to 1.1.1g, but it would go outside of the stable
"channel" of my distribution, so it's not a preferred approach. I
recognize that this is a symptom of an underlying problem, just trying
to figure out what that underlying problem might be. Thanks.
Alexander
packet from the
foreign mailserver.
I'm not certain on the norms of this mailing list but I can put the
entire pcap somewhere if it would be helpful, it's 35 frames long.
Alexander
I've also seen at least one sender (notably, GMAIL) connect, elicit the
SSL_Shutdown error, and yet their message gets queued and delivered
without another try being needed.
Alexander
postfix-SSL_Shutdown.pcap
Description: application/vnd.tcpdump.pcap
May 11 19:29:04 vasaconsulting post
or first frame: 0.907756000 seconds]
Transmission Control Protocol, Src Port: 587, Dst Port: 37049, Seq: 7302, Len: 0
Flags: 0x004 (RST)
Alexander
interpretation, but I'm ignorant to the arcana
that's on full display in this log.
Alexander
May 12 19:04:06 vasaconsulting postfix/smtpd[3301]: reply: SMFIR_CONTINUE data
0 bytes
May 12 19:04:06 vasaconsulting postfix/smtpd[3301]: before
input_transp_cleanup: cleanup flags =
On 12/05/20 23:27 -0400, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
Once again out of the blue, a lost connection. The SMTP server is
trying to read the next command after sending "RCPT TO" and encounters
an EOF condition, for no apparent reason. At this point, I'd guess
your SSL library is broken...
I was able
On 13/05/20 13:56 -0400, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
If you're willing to rebuild Postfix from source, then I can provide
a patch that would log more details.
Yes, absolutely willing. Thank you.
Alexander
nt every 5 seconds through the mail server to keep the "TLS
warning" state warm, allowing real emails to get through via TLS on
their first attempt. As not every mail server immediately retries not
over TLS upon a TLS failure, this issue is impacting delivery to a
non-insignificant extent.
Alexander
On 13/05/20 16:20 -0400, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
Try the below. Note, if build as below, it will not replace your system
The output is attached.
Alexander
May 13 16:31:24 vasaconsulting postfix/smtpd[14216]: connect from []
May 13 16:31:24 vasaconsulting postfix/smtpd[14216]: tls_bio
OpenSSL 1.1.1d 10 Sep 2019
What OS are you running?
Debian GNU/Linux 10 (buster aka stable).
Yesterday, I bumped libssl1.1 to the version available in the testing
distribution, which is 1.1.1g, and noticed no change in the faulty
behavior. Now I'm back to stable's 1.1.1d.
Alexander
On 13/05/20 21:58 -0400, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
Please rebuild, and post another similar set of logs.
Thanks. Attached.
Alexander
May 13 21:56:38 vasaconsulting postfix/smtpd[25599]: connect from []
May 13 21:56:38 vasaconsulting postfix/smtpd[25599]: tls_bio:
hsfunc=0x7f310ef3a780, rfunc
ections to pgsql,
so I'm going to try juggling versions of buster's postfix-pgsql to see
if the issue lay there.
On 14/05/20 08:06 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
Debian automatically builds debug symbol packages for ~all packages. They are
located in a separate package repository. For
to have
been resolved.
Thank you for your time and effort.
Alexander
Some of my users want to migrate to a cloud mail provider (with the same mail
domain name), while others want to stay on my on-premise postfix server. Thus I
seek to set up a "split server config", essentially using the cloud server as a
smarthost to be both an outbound and inbound gateway. A co
Hello, I seek advice. For mail received on port 25 for my domain, the usual
local transport
should be used (as accomplished with mydestination=mydomain), but for mail
submitted by
authorized users on port 587, I want all such mail (even for
recipients@mydomain) to get
sent via SMTP to a separate
Wietse asked:
> What should happen with local submissions via /usr/sbin/sendmail?
Thanks, I forgot about those, they too should go to the separate smarthost.
Your follow-up
message passing options to pickup(8) would seem to take care of that.
> /etc/postfix/master.cf
> submission .. .. .. .. ..
On Fri, 09 Aug 2019, Benny Pedersen wrote:
Hi,
> > Thanks, postscript is not part of the Debian package. I'll try to put:
> > service postfix restart
>
> this is not working, postfix send logs to syslogd, so restarting postfix is
> not what to do, restart the syslogd will work
>
> please create
Hi!
Since yesterday I am experiencing big problems when delivering mail to
an alias-list. (Yes, I have set up an owner-listname alias. :-))
When delivering mail to a list which is implemented as an
ldap-alias-list (currently 289 recipients), the local daemon delivers
most of the mails to local ma
On 09/21/2010 10:57 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Alexander 'Leo' Bergolth:
>> Since yesterday I am experiencing big problems when delivering mail to
>> an alias-list. (Yes, I have set up an owner-listname alias. :-))
>
> Do you have the RIGHT owner-listname alias.
T
On 09/22/2010 01:22 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Alexander 'Leo' Bergolth:
>> On 09/21/2010 10:57 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>>> Alexander 'Leo' Bergolth:
>>>> Since yesterday I am experiencing big problems when delivering mail to
>>>&
On 09/22/2010 05:20 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Alexander 'Leo' Bergolth:
>> The file contains:
>> 8<
>> x...@gmail.com
>> \lhock
>
> Your loop does not reproduce.
I know. :(
I don't think that the .forw
On 09/22/2010 01:22 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Alexander 'Leo' Bergolth:
>> On 09/21/2010 10:57 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>>> Alexander 'Leo' Bergolth:
>>>> Since yesterday I am experiencing big problems when delivering mail to
>>>&
On 09/22/2010 04:53 PM, Alexander 'Leo' Bergolth wrote:
> On 09/22/2010 01:22 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>> Alexander 'Leo' Bergolth:
>>> On 09/21/2010 10:57 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>>>> Alexander 'Leo' Bergolth:
>>>>> Sinc
On 09/23/2010 01:01 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Alexander 'Leo' Bergolth:
>> Ah! The problem seems to be the duplicate_filter_limit!
>>
>> I set it to 1 and now everything works fine!
>
> For the last time, you really should use the proper owner- alias
&
On 09/23/2010 01:11 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Alexander 'Leo' Bergolth:
>> However, I didn't notice any change such as separate processing of
>> destination addresses.
>>
>> And I also cannot confirm that it uses a new queue id for each
>> r
On 09/23/2010 03:48 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 03:36:27PM +0200, Alexander 'Leo' Bergolth wrote:
>> When the owner- alias IS configured correctly, HOW is delivery
>> distributed to multiple processes?
>
> See the deliver_indirect() code. A
On 09/23/2010 11:03 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Alexander 'Leo' Bergolth:
>> OK, now I know why my messages are not requeued.
>>
>> First of all: The owner- alias IS REALLY set up correctly. :-)
>>
>> But if members of the list are aliases themselves, r
On 09/24/2010 01:26 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Alexander 'Leo' Bergolth:
>> The other misfeature that I'd like to point out again is the behavior of
>> been_here() when the hash table is full.
>
> The alternatives to a limited-size hash are a) run out
On 09/24/2010 12:42 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Alexander 'Leo' Bergolth:
>> On 09/24/2010 01:26 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>>> Alexander 'Leo' Bergolth:
>>>> The other misfeature that I'd like to point out again is the behavior of
&g
On 09/24/2010 02:31 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Alexander 'Leo' Bergolth:
>>> Have you already tried the "no RESET_OWNER_ATTR()" solution?
>>
>> I did a test run with the following aliases:
>>
>> testlist: member1, member2, leo2
>&g
On 09/24/2010 03:07 PM, Alexander 'Leo' Bergolth wrote:
> On 09/24/2010 02:31 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>> Alexander 'Leo' Bergolth:
>>>> Have you already tried the "no RESET_OWNER_ATTR()" solution?
>>>
>>> I did a test run wit
On 09/24/2010 02:31 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Alexander 'Leo' Bergolth:
>>> Have you already tried the "no RESET_OWNER_ATTR()" solution?
>>
>> I did a test run with the following aliases:
>>
>> testlist: member1, member2, leo2
>&g
On 09/24/2010 03:44 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Alexander 'Leo' Bergolth:
>> On 09/24/2010 02:31 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>>> Alexander 'Leo' Bergolth:
>>>>> Have you already tried the "no RESET_OWNER_ATTR()" solution?
>>>&g
On 09/24/2010 04:56 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Alexander 'Leo' Bergolth:
>>> Even then, a 1000 recipient list should be spread across two local(8)
>>> processes, each delivering transactions of 50 recipients side by side.
>>> I don't see that happen,
Hi!
I'd like to implement SRS (or another solution that rewrites the
envelope sender on forwarding) using a milter plugin or an SMTP based
content filter.
What are your experiences? Does anyone already use such a solution?
Which plugins are you using?
Thanks in advance,
--leo
--
e-mail ::: Le
Hi!
I am trying to understand how duplicate mail elimination works in postfix.
According to previous postings, mails that are duplicated by resolving
multiple recipient aliases that refer to the same final address cannot
be suppressed because local(8) doesn't currently handle that case.
http://t
Hello,
I'm looking for a solution to send every mail, also from one internal
mailbox to another internal mailbox, to an external server which check
the mails. The external server will send every mail back to postfix.
Also every external mail will only come from this external server.
Mails from the
by foreign host.
I'm sorry, but I haven't fixed the problem. What do I need to
do so that the postfix does not accept messages with an incomplete
sender address (without the domain part)?
Regards, Alexander
_
18.11.2023 17:32, Matus UHLAR -
fantomas via Postfix-users пишет:
On
18.11.23 07:30, Alexander Kolesnikov via Postfix-users wrote:
192.168.250.35:27 inet n - n
- - smtpd -o syslog_name=postfix/$service_name -o
ttls-finger is able to do that with
the same cert store?
Bye,
Alexander.
--
http://www.Leidinger.net alexan...@leidinger.net: PGP 0x8F31830F9F2772BF
http://www.FreeBSD.orgnetch...@freebsd.org : PGP 0x8F31830F9F2772BF
signature.asc
Des
Am 2023-11-30 15:03, schrieb Bill Cole via Postfix-users:
On 2023-11-30 at 08:03:09 UTC-0500 (Thu, 30 Nov 2023 14:03:09 +0100)
Alexander Leidinger via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
My main.cf contains the same certs-path for smtp and smtpd TLS
connections:
---snip---
# grep CApath
Am 2023-11-30 16:53, schrieb Wietse Venema via Postfix-users:
Alexander Leidinger via Postfix-users:
What is wrong here that [tlsproxy] doesn't establish a trusted
connection
to the github mailservers when posttls-finger is able to do that with
the same cert store?
Because ther
Am 2023-11-30 18:36, schrieb Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users:
On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 03:37:02PM +0100, Alexander Leidinger via
Postfix-users wrote:
> > Nov 30 11:18:40 mailgate postfix/tlsproxy[98300]: server certificate
> > verification failed for in-9.smtp.github.com[140.8
1 - 100 of 124 matches
Mail list logo
