Hi list,
I have one specific host sending LOTS of newsletters. I am slowing down
the traffic with these parameters:
default_destination_rate_delay = 2s
slowsmtp_destination_rate_delay = 6s
I have some big destination domains in a transport map like this:
bigname.com slowsmtp:
verybigname.com
Hi,
On 05/29/2014 04:24 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 01:35:45PM +0200, ?? ??? wrote:
[snip]
Are there any good ways to configure my postfix to only slow down the
traffic originating from my newsletter host?
A separate Postfix instance for the newsletter delivery i
Hi
On 06/02/2014 05:11 PM, st...@thornet.co.uk wrote:
Hi
We use sqlgrey as a policy daemon for greylisting. It runs on both our
mail servers with a shared database on one of them. If the database is
unavailable for some reason on the main server the backup rejects mail
with "451 4.3.5 Server co
Hi,
On 06/03/2014 11:42 AM, D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote:
On Tue, 03 Jun 2014 11:17:07 +0200
Микаел Бак wrote:
Maybe you should consider having a master db on one of the mail
servers and a slave db on the other one and have the data be
replicated to the slave automatically.
Since both se
Hi,
On 10/22/2014 04:03 AM, li...@sbt.net.au wrote:
[snip]
is monitoring blacklists just 'a good idea'? a must ? or?
[snip]
I use this:
http://whmscripts.net/tips/2010/rbl-check-initial-release/
HTH,
Mikael
Hi there,
On 02/04/2015 11:06 PM, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
the truth is that a xx.xx.xx.xx-static-dsl.isp.tld is not a mailserver
just becaus eit contains the word "static" - in fact most of them are
ordinary office dsl lines with clients behind
True. Not nessassarily a mail server, but it co
Hi again,
On 02/05/2015 02:58 PM, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
frankly SPF is no rocket science and you don't need your ISP to
configure that simple DNS record for your own domain
Rocket science or not, most domain I have seen has NOT set up any SPF.
And many people argue that SPF creates more p
