On Nov 9, 2024, at 10:08 AM, Randy Bush via Postfix-users
wrote:
> pcre is not in the debian postfix package :(
It's available, but in a separate package named "postfix-pcre" that you can
install:
https://packages.debian.org/bookworm/postfix-pcre
--
Robert L Mathews
__
> I don't know aboud rspamd, but SpamAssassin may produce headers like:
> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=3.5 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
> which would positively match the OP's regexp:
> /^X-Spam.*YES/
i do not believe rspamd produces such. as always, i could be wrong.
>># I generall
> If you also emply header checks
i don't. i checked because of the repeated "This feature is not
supported with smtp header/body checks."
> header_checks = regexp:{ {/^X-Spam(-Flag)?:[[:blank:]]*YES/ REJECT} }
> mime_header_checks =
> nested_header_checks =
will try. thanks.
rand
Robert L Mathews via Postfix-users wrote:
>> pcre is not in the debian postfix package :(
> It's available, but in a separate package named "postfix-pcre" that
> you can install:
> https://packages.debian.org/bookworm/postfix-pcre
w00t! thank you.
randy
On 09-11-2024 19:08, Randy Bush via Postfix-users wrote:
I don't know aboud rspamd, but SpamAssassin may produce headers like:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=3.5 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
which would positively match the OP's regexp:
/^X-Spam.*YES/
i do not believe rspamd produces suc
On Fri, Nov 08, 2024 at 10:25:27PM -0800, Randy Bush via Postfix-users wrote:
well, i have seen two `^X-Spam` markings
X-Spam: Yes
X-Spam-Flag: YES
which is why my regexp was `/^X-Spam.*YES/`. i believe, but do not
know, that the first is the mark of rspamd. no idea about the other.
