[pfx] Re: Suggestion: Allow prefixing the Queue-ID with a custom string

2024-11-05 Thread Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
On Tue, Nov 05, 2024 at 12:46:42PM +0100, Thomas Landauer via Postfix-users wrote: > A detail first: > At http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtpd_delay_open_until_valid_rcpt > please change "mail transaction ID" to "queue ID" for consistency here: > > The downside is that rejected recipients

[pfx] Re: mail records on CNAME

2024-11-05 Thread Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
On Mon, Nov 04, 2024 at 08:23:37PM +0800, Adriel via Postfix-users wrote: > say i have a subdomain sub.xyz.com. > > if I make a CNAME as, > > sub.xyz.com CNAME to xyz.net A CNAME redirects *all* RRsets for a given owner name other than (DNSSEC) RRSIG and NSEC. So MX and TXT records, ... will b

[pfx] Re: smtpd reports no queueid in lost connection log

2024-11-05 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users
Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users: When processing logs I have noticed that some queue IDs get reported by smtpd when DATA phase starts, but when connection is lost, those IDs aren't reported as lost. Example: Sep 2 16:51:11 mail postfix/smtps/smtpd[3697]: connect from a.b.t-com.sk[178

[pfx] Re: smtpd reports no queueid in lost connection log

2024-11-05 Thread Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
On Tue, Nov 05, 2024 at 12:19:20PM +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users wrote: > > > Sep 2 16:51:11 mail postfix/smtps/smtpd[3697]: connect from > > > a.b.t-com.sk[178.41.x.y] > > > Sep 2 16:51:11 mail postfix/smtps/smtpd[3697]: 4WyBXH6Dp7z6C7g: > > > client=a.b.t-com.sk[178.41.x.y

[pfx] Re: Suggestion: Allow prefixing the Queue-ID with a custom string

2024-11-05 Thread Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
Thomas Landauer via Postfix-users: > Since you're creating the queue ID only after `RCPT TO`, we have the > sender's and the main recipient's address at hand - that would be enough > to set up something like a `queue_id_prefix_map` :-) First, the queue ID is not the place for this information. T

[pfx] implementing some kind of dovecot/imap user@domain based sending restriction to @domain recipients only

2024-11-05 Thread Florian Piekert via Postfix-users
Hello Postfix Users! I have a postfix 3.10 installation up & running. Postfix and dovecot handle mail reception from the inet, dovecot/587 users sending to the local domains or into the internet. Is there a possibility of having some kind of "local" restriction for a specific (or a set of) lo

[pfx] Re: mail records on CNAME

2024-11-05 Thread Bill Cole via Postfix-users
On 2024-11-04 at 07:23:37 UTC-0500 (Mon, 04 Nov 2024 20:23:37 +0800) Adriel via Postfix-users is rumored to have said: Hello say i have a subdomain sub.xyz.com. if I make a CNAME as, sub.xyz.com CNAME to xyz.net and, xyz.net has its own MX and SPF records. my question is, for this DNS setu

[pfx] Re: smtpd reports no queueid in lost connection log

2024-11-05 Thread Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users: > >Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users: > >> When processing logs I have noticed that some queue IDs get reported by > >> smtpd when DATA phase starts, but when connection is lost, those IDs aren't > >> reported as lost. > >> > >> Example: > >> > >> Se

[pfx] Re: Suggestion: Allow prefixing the Queue-ID with a custom string

2024-11-05 Thread Thomas Landauer via Postfix-users
Hi, thanks! A detail first: At http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtpd_delay_open_until_valid_rcpt please change "mail transaction ID" to "queue ID" for consistency here: The downside is that rejected recipients are logged with NOQUEUE instead of a mail transaction ID. Viktor's logfil

[pfx] Re: implementing some kind of dovecot/imap user@domain based sending restriction to @domain recipients only

2024-11-05 Thread Florian Piekert via Postfix-users
Hello, And IF dovecot is the best angle of attack, I do not know. Neither do I. People who actually use Dovecot for submission might know. See below. Apparently I was imprecise in the formulation who does submission listening/receiving. Its pf. Maybe some kind of policy driven solu

[pfx] Re: implementing some kind of dovecot/imap user@domain based sending restriction to @domain recipients only

2024-11-05 Thread Bill Cole via Postfix-users
On 2024-11-05 at 10:58:27 UTC-0500 (Tue, 5 Nov 2024 16:58:27 +0100) Florian Piekert via Postfix-users is rumored to have said: Hello Postfix Users! I have a postfix 3.10 installation up & running. Postfix and dovecot handle mail reception from the inet, dovecot/587 users sending to the local

[pfx] Re: implementing some kind of dovecot/imap user@domain based sending restriction to @domain recipients only

2024-11-05 Thread Florian Piekert via Postfix-users
I have a postfix 3.10 installation up & running. Postfix and dovecot handle mail reception from the inet, dovecot/587 users sending to the local domains or into the internet. Is there a possibility of having some kind of "local" restriction for a specific (or a set of) local users (com

[pfx] Re: implementing some kind of dovecot/imap user@domain based sending restriction to @domain recipients only

2024-11-05 Thread Bill Cole via Postfix-users
On 2024-11-05 at 13:17:11 UTC-0500 (Tue, 5 Nov 2024 19:17:11 +0100) Florian Piekert via Postfix-users is rumored to have said: I have a postfix 3.10 installation up & running. Postfix and dovecot handle mail reception from the inet, dovecot/587 users sending to the local domains or into th

[pfx] Re: How to identify which emails are in hold queue because of failing milter

2024-11-05 Thread Yvan Masson via Postfix-users
Le 04/11/2024 à 17:05, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users a écrit : Yvan Masson via Postfix-users: Hi list, I have a Postfix 3.7.11 server configured with the following lines: smtpd_milters = inet:xx.xx.xx.xx:9900 milter_default_action = quarantine When the milter server is unavailable, incomin

[pfx] Re: implementing some kind of dovecot/imap user@domain based sending restriction to @domain recipients only

2024-11-05 Thread postfix--- via Postfix-users
People who actually use Dovecot for submission might know. I'm not even sure whether Dovecot's submission facility ever talks to Postfix. Dovecot doesn't "perform" submission services. It is only a proxy to postfix submission (or other). https://doc.dovecot.org/2.3/admin_manual/submissi